Sport betting lovers, is accumulating many games fun?

[Zigabel]

Yes parley is fun, but I do not accumulate games just for fun, I do it for the purpose of winning and making money but the fun I have in it is with the rush I get when I have had a few of the game  played in my favour and then I am anticipating and very expectant of the remaining games to be completed, that tension can sometimes be fun, mostly when it is later relaxed as the anticipated result is out and you know if you won or lost. But then it is more riskier and also reduce your chances of winning than with single picks, but on lucky days, you will get the most of it because by then, you would have accumulated so many odds and the amount to be won will turn out really huge.

[Orpichukwu]

I have fun with casinos and just few sport matches in a single bet. Is parlay fun to you if you bet on it every week?

It's not fun to me that it can't be fun betting on more than how many matches, which I can't follow up on; it can't be fun. Maybe because I'm now more of a slot lover than a sports lover, but even as that, I don't see how it could be fun to combine a high number of matches all together, staking with little money. After the first 2-5 games, the rest of the games added are obviously because of profit chasing, nothing more.

[o48o]

Some people will bet on 10 or more games weekly in a parlay at once. I have tested this before that I went for more than 10 to 15 matches accumulated but this is not fun at all. I had to check the clubs very well, their h2h, last 5  to 7 matches and other things before betting on the matches in an accumulated bet. When I finished betting on it, I still lose most of the time.

I can afford to lose the money because I use small amount of money that I can afford to lose to bet every time that I bet, but I do not think it is worth the time.

I have fun with casinos and just few sport matches in a single bet. Is parlay fun to you if you bet on it every week?

I am confused What do you mean "worth the time"? Are you using your time to follow each game or something? I thought that was the fun part for people interested in those sports.

To me parlay is buying the ticket and forgetting it until it's done and i am not putting everything on one parlay, so i can just use rest of the money for faster resolutions.

That's not however a guarantee that i would win more, as some of them still fail, but unlike in parlay, i don't lose bets for all games if one fails.

[sompitonov]

Yes parley is fun, but I do not accumulate games just for fun, I do it for the purpose of winning and making money but the fun I have in it is with the rush I get when I have had a few of the game  played in my favour and then I am anticipating and very expectant of the remaining games to be completed, that tension can sometimes be fun, mostly when it is later relaxed as the anticipated result is out and you know if you won or lost. But then it is more riskier and also reduce your chances of winning than with single picks, but on lucky days, you will get the most of it because by then, you would have accumulated so many odds and the amount to be won will turn out really huge.

Of course, it's exciting and only fuels the excitement, so after a few successful bets, you'll want to know what happens next. Of course, it's unpredictable, and some simply force themselves to think the next bet will be even better, especially when a player is on a winning streak. Even if we're lucky enough to win a big streak, we need to know when it's enough to avoid falling into the blind belief that luck will always be with us. Sometimes, you can even learn from the pros and watch what they do when they're on a winning streak.

[hedgeh0g]

Yes parley is fun, but I do not accumulate games just for fun, I do it for the purpose of winning and making money but the fun I have in it is with the rush I get when I have had a few of the game  played in my favour and then I am anticipating and very expectant of the remaining games to be completed, that tension can sometimes be fun, mostly when it is later relaxed as the anticipated result is out and you know if you won or lost. But then it is more riskier and also reduce your chances of winning than with single picks, but on lucky days, you will get the most of it because by then, you would have accumulated so many odds and the amount to be won will turn out really huge.

Of course, it's exciting and only fuels the excitement, so after a few successful bets, you'll want to know what happens next. Of course, it's unpredictable, and some simply force themselves to think the next bet will be even better, especially when a player is on a winning streak. Even if we're lucky enough to win a big streak, we need to know when it's enough to avoid falling into the blind belief that luck will always be with us. Sometimes, you can even learn from the pros and watch what they do when they're on a winning streak.

I think spying on what professionals do is a good strategy in general, and this applies not only to gambling. I often observe professionals because I can see what they do in different situations that might be unclear to me, such as when I'm alone with the game. I think they simply operate more smoothly and don't want to take too many risks, and if they do have a series of bets, they simply do whatever allows them to control the risk and the situation itself. This is what sets them apart from many gamblers.

[AmoreJaz]

I have fun with casinos and just few sport matches in a single bet. Is parlay fun to you if you bet on it every week?

It's not fun to me that it can't be fun betting on more than how many matches, which I can't follow up on; it can't be fun. Maybe because I'm now more of a slot lover than a sports lover, but even as that, I don't see how it could be fun to combine a high number of matches all together, staking with little money. After the first 2-5 games, the rest of the games added are obviously because of profit chasing, nothing more.

It won't be fun if you are not really a fan of that sports, and you are not very familiar with the teams involved. But if you happen to live and breath that sports, it would be a roller coaster ride of emotions while waiting match after match. But if you can't follow each game, I don't think it is advisable to bet on parlay or you have no idea what you are going into.

For me, betting good amount of money in parlay is like being brave in the battle that you are about to embark on. Because for me, this is quite risky as you need to wait for several matches before you can get over the emotions that you're holding onto. So I don't think it is fun for me, like waiting in vain.

[Sandra_hakeem]

Yes parley is fun, but I do not accumulate games just for fun, I do it for the purpose of winning and making money but the fun I have in it is with the rush I get when I have had a few of the game  played in my favour and then I am anticipating and very expectant of the remaining games to be completed, that tension can sometimes be fun, mostly when it is later relaxed as the anticipated result is out and you know if you won or lost. But then it is more riskier and also reduce your chances of winning than with single picks, but on lucky days, you will get the most of it because by then, you would have accumulated so many odds and the amount to be won will turn out really huge.

Of course, it's exciting and only fuels the excitement, so after a few successful bets, you'll want to know what happens next. Of course, it's unpredictable, and some simply force themselves to think the next bet will be even better, especially when a player is on a winning streak. Even if we're lucky enough to win a big streak, we need to know when it's enough to avoid falling into the blind belief that luck will always be with us. Sometimes, you can even learn from the pros and watch what they do when they're on a winning streak.

I think spying on what professionals do is a good strategy in general, and this applies not only to gambling. I often observe professionals because I can see what they do in different situations that might be unclear to me, such as when I'm alone with the game. I think they simply operate more smoothly and don't want to take too many risks, and if they do have a series of bets, they simply do whatever allows them to control the risk and the situation itself. This is what sets them apart from many gamblers.

Most gamblers think that these rich professionals pay less attention to very little details like because they have earned enough from the game and have gotten a level of mastery that the regular gamblers don't have. Well, that's not true.

They even tend to focus really deep into the game. That way, they see better opportunities quicker, make swifter decisions and take due profit in bits, based on their daily targets. That's the only way they're able to maintain a steady flow of the profit. Accumulating many games is never the way to it.

[rdbase]

Having done those many matches on a single betslip is more stressful than fun especially if you have alot on the line in terms of the bet amount placed for them all to be correct.
But having a betslip with ten games on the same parlay with just a dollar staked was a surprise when I did get them all right.
So when they do win, then sure they can be more exhilarating than fun in a sense.
This was more of an experiment for myself since I rarely do more than 5-6 legs on a single betslip if I expect to win.
It was for a competition so only had a target of 10x odds. So it would of been more difficult not having this target set so low for the ten games stretched over a single parlay.

[ejikeme24]

I have fun with casinos and just few sport matches in a single bet. Is parlay fun to you if you bet on it every week?

It's not fun to me that it can't be fun betting on more than how many matches, which I can't follow up on; it can't be fun. Maybe because I'm now more of a slot lover than a sports lover, but even as that, I don't see how it could be fun to combine a high number of matches all together, staking with little money. After the first 2-5 games, the rest of the games added are obviously because of profit chasing, nothing more.

You're right, a fun gambler is supposed to be betting on one game and that should be the one you find more interesting to watch or probably your favourite team. Betting more than one game shows that one is betting in other to make money because the major reason why gamblers bet more than one game is so that to enable them accumulate odds which a fun gambler have nothing to do with accumulation of odds but to chose the only game that is more interesting or their favorite team, because there's no way they can watch 3 to 4 matches at the same time.

[Anayochukwu]

There are time when accumulating so many games will no longer be fun again due to so many factors you need to look as before you see it as fun. Some people do think that when you accumulate so many games, at least few of the games may become profitable for you for the truth is different from that. You can accumulate up to 10 games with parley and all of the games end in loses. This has happened to me before and it was quite unbelievable which changed my perspective concerning game accumulation.

I don't think there is any time that accumulating many games will be fun for gamblers, because in the end you will still lose all. Although I think it depends on the amount that the gambler uses to bet, because it can only be fun when you gamble with a small amount that you can afford to lose. Sometimes I don't know how most gamblers normally feel when gambling because accumulating many games doesn't change anything in gambling. It is totally wrong to gamble with such a mindset because, at the end of the day luck still has the final say.

[Bitcoin.com97]

Such strategy is risky , me I don’t like it , the only thing is that if you are lucky enough to win the payout is higher than a single bet, because the odd is usually small for a single bet but adding it together gives a bigger odd and pay , but if one loses all are gone that is the risky part, so to me accumulate many games is not fun, gambling normally is risky accumulating the games makes it more risky , I would prefer the usual one I’m used to instead of trying out such activities.

[eisen33]

Most gamblers think that these rich professionals pay less attention to very little details like because they have earned enough from the game and have gotten a level of mastery that the regular gamblers don't have. Well, that's not true.

They even tend to focus really deep into the game. That way, they see better opportunities quicker, make swifter decisions and take due profit in bits, based on their daily targets. That's the only way they're able to maintain a steady flow of the profit. Accumulating many games is never the way to it.

I agree that the more time you spend in a particular field, the easier it becomes to spot patterns. In the case of betting, you start to recognize the types of bets that have worked for you more often, and you’ll try to find them in similar situations in other matches. However it’s important to always remember that every match is different, teams are different, and the outcomes can vary as well. That’s exactly what makes gambling so challenging.

[sompitonov]

Such strategy is risky , me I don’t like it , the only thing is that if you are lucky enough to win the payout is higher than a single bet, because the odd is usually small for a single bet but adding it together gives a bigger odd and pay , but if one loses all are gone that is the risky part, so to me accumulate many games is not fun, gambling normally is risky accumulating the games makes it more risky , I would prefer the usual one I’m used to instead of trying out such activities.

I'm also not used to making such bets, but I wouldn't be surprised if some experienced players have a strategy based on multiple bets. If it's even marginally profitable, then of course it's worth using. I place single bets to specifically consider each match, because if I bet on one match I'm confident in after my own analysis, I might be a little hesitant about the second one. Why would I bet on it? I'd rather wait for matches I'm confident in. Caution and unhurriedness are what I need when betting.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Some people will bet on 10 or more games weekly in a parlay at once...

Is parlay fun to you if you bet on it every week?

In fact, that’s exactly the kind of betting that makes bookmakers the most money. The more selections in a bet, the higher the juice—meaning more profit for the house.

No, personally, I only place the occasional sports bet, but it wouldn’t even occur to me to combine them “just for fun” knowing that I’m reducing my potential profit.

[nimogsm]

I have fun with casinos and just few sport matches in a single bet. Is parlay fun to you if you bet on it every week?

I don't bet on multiple games at once because it takes a lot of time to test myself and search for information. I might bet once or twice a week, but there are periods when I don't bet for months because there are no interesting games. Most often, I watch the match I'm betting on, combining the two processes. Betting and not watching the game isn't interesting to me; I feel like something is missing. But I understand how players can bet on 10-15 games.

[LUCKMCFLY]

In fact, that’s exactly the kind of betting that makes bookmakers the most money. The more selections in a bet, the higher the juice—meaning more profit for the house.

No, personally, I only place the occasional sports bet, but it wouldn’t even occur to me to combine them “just for fun” knowing that I’m reducing my potential profit.

What you say is true, besides, making so many bets means being involved in more than two sports, and it's very difficult to keep up with so many sports at the same time. In my case, I only bet on football, European football, but it's because I like it a lot and follow it closely. However, there are things I know I miss, and I don't have the exact details to say that my prediction will be the one that wins, or at least a 95% chance that I will win.

[Makus]

In fact, that’s exactly the kind of betting that makes bookmakers the most money. The more selections in a bet, the higher the juice—meaning more profit for the house.

No, personally, I only place the occasional sports bet, but it wouldn’t even occur to me to combine them “just for fun” knowing that I’m reducing my potential profit.

What you say is true, besides, making so many bets means being involved in more than two sports, and it's very difficult to keep up with so many sports at the same time. In my case, I only bet on football, European football, but it's because I like it a lot and follow it closely. However, there are things I know I miss, and I don't have the exact details to say that my prediction will be the one that wins, or at least a 95% chance that I will win.

making a long list of Games to bet on doesn't really mean that the gambler or bettor has to be involved in more than one sports, if I want to play parlays all I'll do is to focus in soccer betting or whatever sports that I'm interested in. You can mix different sports in a  bet slip but this increases the chances of losing. Even though a lot of people say having knowledge on different sports games improves the chances of winning, personally I think combining different sports games on a bet slip could actually reduce the chances of winning.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I have fun with casinos and just few sport matches in a single bet. Is parlay fun to you if you bet on it every week?

I don't bet on multiple games at once because it takes a lot of time to test myself and search for information. I might bet once or twice a week, but there are periods when I don't bet for months because there are no interesting games. Most often, I watch the match I'm betting on, combining the two processes. Betting and not watching the game isn't interesting to me; I feel like something is missing. But I understand how players can bet on 10-15 games.

Indeed, betting on a match and making out time to watch that match always feels absolutely different, the fun and the adrenaline rush is always on the high side to be honest, I am a very busy person offline but the number of times I've made out time to sit and watch the match I placed some bets on, the experience was quit and noticeably different from those who bet and don't watch.

And speaking of parley, that is bringing multiple games/match together into one betting ticket and betting on such game ticket is a very common form or type of betting, and it is true that if you want to analyze every game and team that you want to bet on into the parley, this can be very much time consuming, so what I do most of the time is to copy other bettors parley tickets, especially the ones from high rollers, and then simply hope the ticket wins.

[Samlucky O]

Evey bettor has what's enjoyable to them, I think that the real way to enjoy sports betting is to accumulate a lot of games because you already know the chances of winning is low and the aim isn't to win but to just have fun with the game and when they end up winning that becomes a bonus. Although this might not really be how every bettor thanks, some might actually combine a long game with the expectation of winning. personally, I love playing parlays, it is just a way that I enjoy betting, it doesn't really take much from me when I end.up losing because I stake amounts I can afford to lose.

For me I see the fun when the game is on a multiple parlay compeard to a single stake. Just emagine when you have a 10 game on a parlay and 7 had played remaining 3, the excitement will Abe very intense and much when the bettor is expecting the remaining 3 games to play for him to win the potential amount. This is the fun I see in accumulating game. But the disappointment is equal to the task of the fun, because everything will turn upsidedown when you lose your ticket at 1/10 meaning when 1 game cit the ticket.

[LastKiss]

Such strategy is risky , me I don’t like it , the only thing is that if you are lucky enough to win the payout is higher than a single bet, because the odd is usually small for a single bet but adding it together gives a bigger odd and pay , but if one loses all are gone that is the risky part, so to me accumulate many games is not fun, gambling normally is risky accumulating the games makes it more risky , I would prefer the usual one I’m used to instead of trying out such activities.

I'm also not used to making such bets, but I wouldn't be surprised if some experienced players have a strategy based on multiple bets. If it's even marginally profitable, then of course it's worth using. I place single bets to specifically consider each match, because if I bet on one match I'm confident in after my own analysis, I might be a little hesitant about the second one. Why would I bet on it? I'd rather wait for matches I'm confident in. Caution and unhurriedness are what I need when betting.

Good patience there. When someone with experience and strong analysis skill will likely to try placing such bets because when you can risk a smaller amount for a potentially high return, someone with high confidence will definitely be tempted to try it. The problem starts when someone wins and becomes addicted thinking parlay look so easy then they keep doing it over and over without realizing they’re actually losing in the long run. I place parlay bets when I feel confident in my analysis, but in reality confidence alone isn’t enough and I still end up losing. Still, I’m not upset because I only bet a small amount, so it feels worth the risk.