Real estate are good investment only if location choosed good and smart

[Waldorf77]

Earthquakes are problem tetonic plates will move places where nobody woul't expecting it happens.
Instead of direct real estate safer way is to own RWA tokens the ownership of physical assets and land by tokens not your physical labour or risks you just own the tokens.
Anyways few places on earth will be good to hold property but a lot places will experince earth quakes in 30 years.
Its not smart to have property where earthquakes are

Places like france a lot of europe asia canada and usa will experince a lot earthquakes spouth part of finland and eastern europe will be okay also the russia and australia good those are good places to own land or property.

[_act_]

Not just earthquake, volcanic eruption is also part of it. I have watched videos of where volcano erupted and many house were covered by the volcano and turned into a stone.

There are still other natural disasters that can destroy properties.

Another one is war. We have seen how the war in Gaza and Ukraine destroyed properties and also caused many people to be displayed.

I prefer to hold bitcoin and diversity into other online assets.

[sergiorus]

Earthquakes are problem tetonic plates will move places where nobody woul't expecting it happens.
Instead of direct real estate safer way is to own RWA tokens the ownership of physical assets and land by tokens not your physical labour or risks you just own the tokens.
Anyways few places on earth will be good to hold property but a lot places will experince earth quakes in 30 years.
Its not smart to have property where earthquakes are

Places like france a lot of europe asia canada and usa will experince a lot earthquakes spouth part of finland and eastern europe will be okay also the russia and australia good those are good places to own land or property.

New Zealand is one of the most earthquake-prone places on earth (not to mention the lingering fears after the horrible earthquake in Christchurch in 2011) yet its real estate market is among the best performers worldwide in the last 10 years.

Recent development makes sure the buildings are earthquake-resistant, mostly low-story. Every house and building is insured too.

What is more important, is that there will never be a war there, it has good climate, it's almost self-sufficient and it is Anglo sphere. Apparently investors value that much higher than low chance of earthquakes.

[Fortify]

Earthquakes are problem tetonic plates will move places where nobody woul't expecting it happens.
Instead of direct real estate safer way is to own RWA tokens the ownership of physical assets and land by tokens not your physical labour or risks you just own the tokens.
Anyways few places on earth will be good to hold property but a lot places will experince earth quakes in 30 years.
Its not smart to have property where earthquakes are

Places like france a lot of europe asia canada and usa will experince a lot earthquakes spouth part of finland and eastern europe will be okay also the russia and australia good those are good places to own land or property.

Earthquakes are not a problem in most of the countries that you stated, or they are so infrequent or low level that's it's not even worth a mention. There is a wider problem of natural diasters but they can be much more varied - tornadoes, floods, wild fires, etc. However there are insurance products out there which will cover the majority of these cases for the right price. The property market is fairly good at self regulating these things, if there is too much risk then you won't get any cover or it'll be too expensive so you have to go without. People need a place to actually live though, so it's not the same as holding a token asset which will always come secondary to that necessity. Many people live in countries where home ownership makes more sense because renters don't get the same protection.

[Zigabel]

Places where you see that Natural disasters does hit tooo frequently, they generally will not be a good place to own properties for long term, you have projected the next 30 years, and so if we are to go by that projection, we can say it is safe to buy now and after about 20 years time you may want to let go of such place if you want because I'm supposing that by then you should have made profit enough to make up for the investment capital and time. but then even with all of this natural disasters, these places are recoverable after the hit so you may want to put that into consideration.

We will not say because a place has a potential for such occurrences in the future, we are going to let to place lay fallow, it can be use with measures that will mitigate such hits if they happen, or the investments on such places would have an alternate plan in place to take care of such events, insurances can be of help in such a case. But it is best individuals keep off such, maybe institutions who has capacity will be able to go into such considering the risk to reward and what they hope to put in place to give then the edge for profit they will be looking to get.

[pawanjain]

Earthquakes are problem tetonic plates will move places where nobody woul't expecting it happens.
Instead of direct real estate safer way is to own RWA tokens the ownership of physical assets and land by tokens not your physical labour or risks you just own the tokens.
Anyways few places on earth will be good to hold property but a lot places will experince earth quakes in 30 years.
Its not smart to have property where earthquakes are

Places like france a lot of europe asia canada and usa will experince a lot earthquakes spouth part of finland and eastern europe will be okay also the russia and australia good those are good places to own land or property.

Real estate is something which is once in a lifetime thing for many people and for some it's just an investment.
Those who buy a property to live and build a home need not necessarily look at it from a returns on it point of view.
Those who are into it for the returns can consider digital tokens linked to the real estate as it is a fair option and can be considered.

Location is definitely an important aspect when buying a property. Those who want to live in it should consider a good location because a good locality creates more memories and a peace of mind.
Those who are into it for investments can try finding a good location to generate better returns on it in the long term.
If they find a property in a good location it will definitely outperform the returns when compared to the digital tokens.

[barbara44]

You can't say that real estate isn't good in certain countries or places only because of possible natural disasters, because natural disasters can't always be predicted, they happen all the time and they often happen suddenly. Can anyone ever tell that a country is going to experience an earthquake before it happens or before something is felt some time before it happens?

No, it is not possible, which is why there is no way to be safe from that, and this is normal everywhere, and one shouldn't buy a property only in places where they believe natural disasters won't happen, because they can.

And, those who buy land won't need to be worried about anything. Whether there is earthquake or anything, your land stays yours even after that, if there is a house and it gets wrecked because of the disaster, that will be a loss for sure, but your land still will be yours, and once things get back to normal, the surroundings are built again, your land will again become valuable, especially if it's in a place which is normally valuable. So, if you are an investor, you shouldn't worry about these things, and besides, why would you wait for 30 years or so before reselling your property? Your aim is to make some profits, so do it as quickly as possible.

[viljy]

That is why real estate is not always a reliable investment. The most obvious example right now is real estate in the United Arab Emirates. Instead of an investment paradise on the edge of the desert, this place is now a hotbed of tension. I'm sorry for the dumb pun, but the biggest drawback of real estate is that it's immovable. Moreover, it happens that it is difficult to sell such real estate even for a song.

As for another investment paradise, New Zealand, it is never safe to say that it will always be quiet there. That's what they said about Dubai. The risks of New Zealand are precisely that there is too high a concentration of bunkers of the superrich, in which they plan to hide when a nuclear war begins. To which, again, you can come up with another dumb pun: too reliable is unreliable.

[Stepstowealth]

Anyways few places on earth will be good to hold property but a lot places will experince earth quakes in 30 years.
Its not smart to have property where earthquakes are

It is not just earthquakes that you should fear as someone who wants to invest in Real Estate, there are some other things that can affect your investment and it can be peculiar depending on your location, that is why you must do a proper research before buying any property.
 Find out the peculiar environmental challenges that that environment faces. If it is an environment where there is political instability or natural disasters like flooding, landslides etc, you may want to reconsider.

[Coyster]

Instead of direct real estate safer way is to own RWA tokens the ownership of physical assets and land by tokens not your physical labour or risks you just own the tokens.

The market for tokenized Real Estate is still limited, demand has been projected to grow tremendously, but right now there are still challenges and gray areas that will only get clearer with time. I'm also not sure how Real Estate tokenization protects investors from some of the Real Estate "problems/risks" you have mentioned in this topic.

Having done a little research into it, Real Estate tokenization offers liquidity, to an asset (Real Estate) that is ordinarily illiquid, it also lowers the entry capital required to own a piece of Real Estate, through fractional ownership. But i don't think it protects you from damages to the property that your token represents.

[YOSHIE]

Places like france a lot of europe asia canada and usa will experince a lot earthquakes spouth part of finland and eastern europe will be okay also the russia and australia good those are good places to own land or property.

I think there is no place in this world that is safe, if you look at earthquakes, what about tornadoes, wars, other natural disasters.

That's not the way to think about investing in property, you can invest anywhere, but you have to look at the conditions and situation in that area, if you want to invest in property.

For example, residents often experience earthquakes, that's your intelligence and expertise, how to think about building earthquake-resistant property, you have to think about it, not only taking advantage of your property, you also have to consider the risks for the safety and comfort of the users, so tois there any architecture?

[Mahiyammahi]

Not just earthquake, volcanic eruption is also part of it. I have watched videos of where volcano erupted and many house were covered by the volcano and turned into a stone.

There are still other natural disasters that can destroy properties.

Another one is war. We have seen how the war in Gaza and Ukraine destroyed properties and also caused many people to be displayed.

I prefer to hold bitcoin and diversity into other online assets.

You reminded me the movie called "2012" I was maybe in High School. This movie was made based on a prediction that in 2012-12-13 the whole world will perish. This also stated in lot's of religious books.
I'm more afraid of war rather than these Earthquake's. The way worls is moving it's not far when the neuc war is going to happen.

In every business there is risk, you enter in these section by knowing all those risks. You gonna never know what disaster is waiting for you, but hence sitting is not an option

[Faisal2202]

Places like france a lot of europe asia canada and usa will experince a lot earthquakes spouth part of finland and eastern europe will be okay also the russia and australia good those are good places to own land or property.

This narrative is massive, and a lot of people make the same kind of mistake by not confirming the geographical history of the land they are buying. There are experts who provide their services for people like you who want to buy land but are unsure if they should, due to this fear.

They will do the research and let us know about the place, or we can also do the research on our own, but the point is, we must do it and should not take this step lightly.

Speaking about RWA, I think you are wrong about one thing. If the property that is tokenized sits on a major fault line, the underlying collateral will also be at higher risk, and so will the RWA investors. So it does matter, because when a disaster hits, even a DAO-governed asset can go to zero.

[Zaguru12]

I think there is no place in this world that is safe, if you look at earthquakes, what about tornadoes, wars, other natural disasters.

That's not the way to think about investing in property, you can invest anywhere, but you have to look at the conditions and situation in that area, if you want to invest in property.

When people actually look at totally saved areas for Real estate or property investment and they regard areas without earthquake imminent threat as save I sometimes just don’t know how to put it, I think sometimes they neglect little things that are even dangerous than the is huge earthquake or tornadoes. For example there are areas that are even tropical areas with risk of heavy rain which can pull off buildings. One thing is you can limit the risk by actually building or investing in certain areas but can never ever eliminate the risk and this common to any form of investment

Even the tokenized asset are risky too because if the physical asset gets affected they also are affected not talking about the volatility with digital tokenized asset also

[Bluedrem]

People have different investment preferences for money and location. Some people prefer to save money, some people prefer to do real estate business, and some people prefer to invest in currencies like Bitcoin. However, when Bitcoin was not around before, people preferred to invest in valuable assets like gold and real estate, but now that Bitcoin was created, when it became decentralized and gradually gained popularity, and along with its popularity, its value increased thousands of times, people started investing in Bitcoin, and now the number of people investing in Bitcoin has increased several times.

[Nahl]

Indeed investing at the property land or real estate is not always be profitable because people should be know the right real estate which potentially profitable in the long term and my country can be counted as the country with safe from earthquakes although sometimes this natural disasters were happend but it's quite rare and if we talking about investing at real estate indeed before decided to invest at this instrument research is very important because if you were buying the real estate at the wrong places potentially your investment value will be decreases and in my places too for real estate floods disaster is the main problem if want to invest that because the developers only know how to build the houses and ignoring nature condition and the fatal mistakes if people buying house with prone to flooding the risk is they cannot staying at those places because too danger and risky

[Iamgoat]

People have different investment preferences for money and location. Some people prefer to save money, some people prefer to do real estate business, and some people prefer to invest in currencies like Bitcoin. However, when Bitcoin was not around before, people preferred to invest in valuable assets like gold and real estate, but now that Bitcoin was created, when it became decentralized and gradually gained popularity, and along with its popularity, its value increased thousands of times, people started investing in Bitcoin, and now the number of people investing in Bitcoin has increased several times.

You are right as everyone has the option to choose what they think is best for them. If you think Real Estate is what is best for you in terms of investment, you should also know it is important for you to learn the best ways in location and market value so they don’t end up invest their money in real estate which is capital intensive and not get any tangible results or outcomes from it, they should not even try it in the first place especially when they are very sure. There is no point to prove to anyone you are a real estate investor when it won’t help you.

[7juju]

Earthquakes are natural disaster, it has been happening since time immemorial and it will continue to happen, but we can’t take because of that and say we won’t own properties. These days it’s not only earthquakes that are destroying houses alone. Man made disasters like wars are even destroying peoples houses these days more than earthquakes. We are not totally safe anywhere, just own your properties if you are able to and leave what you can’t control as human to nature.

[mindrust]

Real estate is an amazing investment, especially the commercial ones. Residential real estate on the other hand is crap. The reason is quite obvious. Home tenants might be unemployed but store tenants are making money, they own a business. If they don't make money, they leave and find some place else with a better spot. Home tenants though, these people are always in survival mode and they are mostly a pain in the ass to their land lord. If you ever invest in real estate, buy commercial re. Avoid residential re.

[leonair]

Earthquakes are problem tetonic plates will move places where nobody woul't expecting it happens.
Instead of direct real estate safer way is to own RWA tokens the ownership of physical assets and land by tokens not your physical labour or risks you just own the tokens.
Anyways few places on earth will be good to hold property but a lot places will experince earth quakes in 30 years.
Its not smart to have property where earthquakes are

Places like france a lot of europe asia canada and usa will experince a lot earthquakes spouth part of finland and eastern europe will be okay also the russia and australia good those are good places to own land or property.

Earthquake is a big fear for us when we invest in real estate. It is a natural disaster so we cannot avoid it. But when you choose a good safe place and invest in a real estate project where the soil level is good then it can be somewhat safe. But you have to remember that investment means risk so no matter what type of project you invest in, you will be taking risks. You will not find any investment without risk. The way the price of gold is currently increasing, investing in gold can also be a smart investment plan.