|
TheAndy500
|
 |
July 28, 2026, 09:12:12 AM |
|
 ⚽️ Pre-season is here ⚡️ & we got you covered 🔥
✅ Chelsea FC 1.20 | Draw 7.0 | W Sydney 12.00
✅ Fulham FC 1.60 | Draw 4.10 | Al Ahli FC 5.00
👉 Who you backing today? 🧐 🌐 Official Website: Kikabet.com👾 Discord Channel: @Kikabet 𝕏 Twitter Profile: @Kikabetcom📱 Instagram Profile: @Kikabetcom📢 Telegram Channel: @Kikabetcom |
|
|
|
fritvalg
Jr. Member
Activity: 33
Merit: 4
|
|
July 28, 2026, 10:02:25 AM |
|
It's not about that you can pay withdrawals to a losing player.. that's kinda expected. Yes you did reward as everybody do.. i dont attack that. Its this campaign and the super sketchy behaveior with made up terms after your mood. Im very convinced the whole operation on support and hosting is a one man show. It's just the overall experience that gives me the impression about changing terms, communication problems and the way you use your fantasy to calculate how far I was. Even this thread looks weird as there are so many red flags about that World Cup final - void bets but those paid users who discuss sports rather than experience on this site are doing a good job to make sure negative posts are history quite fast. Just the fact you admit you didn't state in the terms that originals were excluded should make you include all wagers.. and btw.. you still didn't change that landing page on the front. It still says $100,000 wagered and that's it.. no restrictions are mentioned. A Detailed Warning About kikabet.com - My Full Experience
After spending considerable time on kikabet.com, I feel compelled to share my complete experience to help others make an informed decision. This is not an emotional rant but a factual account of numerous concerning issues I encountered during my time on their platform.
Initial Red Flags
From the moment I.....
Official Response from Kikabet
We take feedback seriously, so we'll respond point by point. Some of this player's complaints have merit and we'll own them. Others are factually incorrect — and since he has chosen to publish his deposit and wager figures publicly, we'll respond with the actual account record. We're happy to verify every number below with forum moderators. The claim that he "lost his deposit" and got nothing. Here is the account record. Total deposits: $38,326.61. Total withdrawals: $14,444.05 — every single one processed smoothly, without delay, without a single question asked. He doesn't dispute this anywhere in his post, because there's nothing to dispute. On top of that, we paid him $6,482.87 in cash rewards in roughly six weeks (June 9 – July 24): 34 separate payouts, including $5,294 in daily cashback, weekly cashback, and $1,154 in new-user cashback. These weren't bonus balances with strings attached — this was withdrawable cash, credited automatically, every single day he had a losing day. On his worst days, the daily cashback alone paid him back over $1,400 in a single day, and nearly $3,500 across one 48-hour stretch. Put simply: this player received back more than a quarter of his total net losses in cash rewards — roughly 4% of his entire wager returned to him. He described these terms himself as better than anything he'd seen in 20 years of gambling. He was right. We honored every cent of them. The day-one technical issue. True, and we apologized at the time. A loss-limit misconfiguration blocked third-party providers for part of his first day. It was escalated and fixed within 24 hours, as he confirms himself. Not the start we want for any VIP, and we've since changed how limits are applied to transferred accounts. The $5,000 promotion. This promotion was designed for new VIP transfers: wager $100k in 30 days, receive $5,000. The player had already completed his VIP transfer months earlier and was already receiving matched benefits — including the cashback detailed above — so he wasn't eligible under the promo terms, the same way a signup bonus can't be claimed by an existing account. When he pushed back, we made an exception anyway: complete the qualifying wager on his existing account and receive the $5,000. He accepted. That offer still stands today. Originals excluded from wager count. The exclusion exists to prevent abuse — spamming 1.01x bets on dice or limbo would let anyone "complete" $100k in wager with near-zero risk, defeating the purpose of the requirement. This is standard industry practice for wagering requirements. However, the player is right that this should have been stated explicitly on the promotion page, and we've now updated the terms. That's on us. The 35% vs 40% "mood" discrepancy. This isn't mood — it's the difference between total wager and qualifying wager. His lifetime wager across all products is $159,174 (from day 1, not after joining the VIP promo) including originals and sportsbook; his qualifying wager toward the promotion is lower because originals don't count, as above. The leaderboard he referenced counts everything; the promotion doesn't. We accept this wasn't communicated clearly enough, and we're adding a visible qualifying-wager tracker so players don't have to ask support. "Support and the VIP host are the same person." They are not. VIP players are assigned a dedicated host precisely so they deal with someone who knows their account — that's the "same person answering" he noticed. Our support team covers multiple shifts and languages. Rakeback on originals. Rakeback applies to slots, as stated in the offer. Originals are covered instead by daily cashback, which applies to all products — which is exactly why he was paid cashback on days he played originals exclusively, including the day-one session he complains about. The World Cup boosted odds. Selected boosted markets on the final were voided at the direction of our sportsbook provider for compliance reasons, and all stakes were returned in full to every affected player. No player lost a cent on those markets. To summarize the record: $38,326 deposited, $14,444 withdrawn without issue, $6,483 paid in cash rewards, and a $5,000 offer that remains open if he completes the qualifying wager. We're sorry his experience ended in frustration, and the two gaps he identified — promo terms clarity and progress visibility — are already fixed. But "warning others" about a site that returned over a quarter of his losses in cash and never once delayed a withdrawal isn't a warning. It's the account record of one of the best-compensated players we've ever had. Every number above can be verified with moderators at his consent ; an offer we make openly, and one we suspect won't be taken up. |
|
|
|
|
|
Salahmu
|
|
July 28, 2026, 11:35:26 AM |
|
Casinos don’t really go into the business of boosting odds as a form of promotion. The much I’ve encountered that might appear to be a boost often comes with a tick-box where you can manually tick if you want a boost to apply on the odds.
It depends on what you call a promotion otherwise I don't think the boosted odds are really for promotion because is the same with every other options in the sportbook but the odds are the only different and besides with the popularity of sports is good when new things are mixed with the regular options so that you will have another experience, the reason why is not common among casinos is because they have not done it to see the impact. However the tick-box type you are talking about doesn't boost much and is also something you might not see all the time if you are betting so is a bit different from Kikabet. |
|
|
|
|
MusaMohamed
|
|
July 28, 2026, 01:30:31 PM |
|
Its common practices of some casino which operates a signature campaign, since many are got scared about those past delays happen. Maybe its time for them to show how serious they are in terms of protecting their reputation.
They can somehow make it by putting those campaign funds on escrow, if they do that they can eliminate any doubts if they are going to pay or not
It's common but not the only way and it's never mandatory to Escrow a campaign fund. Like BestChange that announced and managed a signature campaign by themselves, you can see first posts in BestChange signature campaign thread were about Escrow. Like they can not be trusted without Escrow but they run the campaign for some years, and made their reputation too. Some delays in processing can happen some times but it's not serious issue. |
|
|
|
|
Jatiluhung
|
|
July 28, 2026, 05:30:58 PM |
|
⚽️ Pre-season is here ⚡️ & we got you covered 🔥
✅ Chelsea FC 1.20 | Draw 7.0 | W Sydney 12.00
✅ Fulham FC 1.60 | Draw 4.10 | Al Ahli FC 5.00
👉 Who you backing today? 🧐
The Chelsea vs. Western Sydney preseason match has ended with Chelsea coming out on top. so congratulations to those who bet on Chelsea. And now, another match currently underway in the preseason is Fulham vs. Al-Ahli. The score is currently 0-1. For those who were late to place their bets at the start, it’s actually easier to pick a favorite once the match is underway. The odds still look good, too. Especially for those familiar with Al-Ahli. they certainly won’t underestimate this team from the start. After all, Al-Ahli is an elite club in the SPL, and their performance is always quite solid.  |
|
|
|
|
Obim34
|
|
July 28, 2026, 05:55:59 PM |
|
The Chelsea vs. Western Sydney preseason match has ended with Chelsea coming out on top. so congratulations to those who bet on Chelsea.
I knew it was a risk betting on Chelsea, though they won but conceding four goals makes them absolute trash, I do not celebrate their victory, just for the winning prize alone. Too many goals in the match, both team showed poor defending, which needs to be fixed before season begins. Fulham are currently tie with Al Ahli FC, the performance isn't encouraging enough, but with enough time left, I still believe in the Premier League side to win the game, those who included this option will be going through different swings at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
Jatiluhung
|
|
July 28, 2026, 06:12:27 PM |
|
The Chelsea vs. Western Sydney preseason match has ended with Chelsea coming out on top. so congratulations to those who bet on Chelsea.
I knew it was a risk betting on Chelsea, though they won but conceding four goals makes them absolute trash, I do not celebrate their victory, just for the winning prize alone. Too many goals in the match, both team showed poor defending, which needs to be fixed before season begins. Fulham are currently tie with Al Ahli FC, the performance isn't encouraging enough, but with enough time left, I still believe in the Premier League side to win the game, those who included this option will be going through different swings at the moment. In the preseason, there’s never a guarantee that even the favorites will win a match. But that’s what makes it exciting the difficulty in predicting the outcome presents its own challenge. Sometimes, even strong teams play as if they aren’t prioritizing a win. But we can take advantage of matches like this by betting on both teams to score. And the fact is, most preseason matches tend to produce quite a few goals, and in most preseason or friendly matches, both teams usually score. |
|
|
|
|
Gozie51
|
|
July 28, 2026, 06:43:08 PM |
|
But we can take advantage of matches like this by betting on both teams to score. And the fact is, most preseason matches tend to produce quite a few goals, and in most preseason or friendly matches, both teams usually score.
But on a good day looking at the difference in odds, you won't expect the kind of goal harvest. I expected Chelsea to show superior play with the class of where they belong in EPL but they didn't. They allowed Western Sydney who finished 12th in A league of Australia to have equal match. Though it is preseason match, every coach want to take it easy and taste out what they have in stock to prepare for the season. This is why I won't bet on direct win in such friendly game not withstanding the odd. |
|
|
|
|
MuffinMaster
|
|
July 28, 2026, 08:08:53 PM |
|
In the preseason, there’s never a guarantee that even the favorites will win a match. But that’s what makes it exciting the difficulty in predicting the outcome presents its own challenge. Sometimes, even strong teams play as if they aren’t prioritizing a win.
But we can take advantage of matches like this by betting on both teams to score. And the fact is, most preseason matches tend to produce quite a few goals, and in most preseason or friendly matches, both teams usually score.
I have to say, I really like your strategy. In fact, during preseason, coaches check players condition and test different formations, so betting on even the strong favorite to win is quite risky, and the results are often completely unrealistic. But I really like betting on both teams to score. It could really work! I've never looked at it that way before. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
TheAndy500
|
|
July 29, 2026, 12:19:27 PM |
|
 ⚽️ 4 pre-season games, all live on Kikabet today 🔥✅ Real Betis 2.38 | Draw 3.60 | Olympique Lyon 2.76 ✅ Sydney FC 8.40 | Draw 6.20 | Tottenham 1.27 - draw 1:1 and Tottenham won 4-2 on penalties. ✅ Bayer Leverkusen 1.60 | Draw 4.30 | KRC Genk 4.80 ✅ Atletico Madrid 1.89 | Draw 3.65 | Getafe FC 3.85 ⚡️ Betis vs Lyon is the pick of the day, both sides evenly matched and wide open 👀🌐 Official Website: Kikabet.com👾 Discord Channel: @Kikabet 𝕏 Twitter Profile: @Kikabetcom📱 Instagram Profile: @Kikabetcom📢 Telegram Channel: @Kikabetcom |
|
|
|
Porfirii
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3850
The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>SPA
|
|
July 29, 2026, 05:36:02 PM |
|
⚽️ 4 pre-season games, all live on Kikabet today 🔥
✅ Real Betis 2.38 | Draw 3.60 | Olympique Lyon 2.76
✅ Sydney FC 8.40 | Draw 6.20 | Tottenham 1.27 - draw 1:1 and Tottenham won 4-2 on penalties.
✅ Bayer Leverkusen 1.60 | Draw 4.30 | KRC Genk 4.80
✅ Atletico Madrid 1.89 | Draw 3.65 | Getafe FC 3.85
⚡️ Betis vs Lyon is the pick of the day, both sides evenly matched and wide open 👀
It seems to me a more likely victory for Atlético de Madrid over Getafe. A little less than an hour before the match starts, in a moment we will see if it is the right choice   |
|
|
|
|
dzonikg28
|
|
July 29, 2026, 06:05:53 PM |
|
It seems to me a more likely victory for Atlético de Madrid over Getafe. A little less than an hour before the match starts, in a moment we will see if it is the right choice I am not sure about that and there is a very good reason that Getafe has a chance. If I recall correctly, Atletico Madrid had nine players playing the World Cup final alone. I don't know how many of their players played the World Cup in total, but if even only those nine players are still all on vacation, this Atletico Madrid team will be very different from what they usually are.  Whether a win is possible for Getafe, I don't know, but I don't think that Atletico Madrid really is the favorite. Very possible that they play without any of their well known players, while I am pretty sure that Getafe has most of their players available already and may have had a few sessions of training. |
|
|
|
|
MuffinMaster
|
|
July 29, 2026, 06:28:04 PM |
|
It seems to me a more likely victory for Atlético de Madrid over Getafe. A little less than an hour before the match starts, in a moment we will see if it is the right choice I am not sure about that and there is a very good reason that Getafe has a chance. If I recall correctly, Atletico Madrid had nine players playing the World Cup final alone. I don't know how many of their players played the World Cup in total, but if even only those nine players are still all on vacation, this Atletico Madrid team will be very different from what they usually are. Whether a win is possible for Getafe, I don't know, but I don't think that Atletico Madrid really is the favorite. Very possible that they play without any of their well known players, while I am pretty sure that Getafe has most of their players available already and may have had a few sessions of training. Come on, let's not exaggerate. Getafe has always just been trying to break into the top tier. Atletico might test some weird lineups, but they'll definitely treat this match as a matter of honor. Spanish football is all about playing with your heart, not your head. Their mentality is totally different from, say, the Germans, where that kind of approach would make perfect sense. I'm telling you, Atletico just has to win this |
|
|
|
|
IjawMan
|
|
July 29, 2026, 06:32:02 PM |
|
Casinos don’t really go into the business of boosting odds as a form of promotion. The much I’ve encountered that might appear to be a boost often comes with a tick-box where you can manually tick if you want a boost to apply on the odds.
It depends on what you call a promotion otherwise I don't think the boosted odds are really for promotion because is the same with every other options in the sportbook but the odds are the only different and besides with the popularity of sports is good when new things are mixed with the regular options so that you will have another experience, the reason why is not common among casinos is because they have not done it to see the impact. However the tick-box type you are talking about doesn't boost much and is also something you might not see all the time if you are betting so is a bit different from Kikabet. Odds boosting is part of promotion by casinos and there are gamblers that takes cognisance of the slightest difference between the multiple gambling sites they making their bets on. I knew of it from a dialogue with a gambling mate who has to compare various odds build of each gambling site he uses, and will develop strong preference with using the particular one with bigger odds for the specific games he has in mind to hammer his bets on. |
|
|
|
|
348Judah
|
|
July 29, 2026, 08:32:17 PM |
|
I've seen some gamblers who also decided to go for a particular gambling casino because of odds boosting. I don't always blame people for their decisions in gambling because everyone knows what he wanted and will only have to help with the situation by going for it as long as they will get satisfied and use a particular casino for gambling through what they offer them.
|
|
|
|
|
SOKO-DEKE
|
|
July 29, 2026, 10:24:45 PM |
|
I've seen some gamblers who also decided to go for a particular gambling casino because of odds boosting. I don't always blame people for their decisions in gambling because everyone knows what he wanted and will only have to help with the situation by going for it as long as they will get satisfied and use a particular casino for gambling through what they offer them.
Odds boosting should not be the only reason a gambler to chooses a casino. The first thing every gambler should consider is whether the casino is trustworthy, not whether it offers boosted odds or any offer.If a gambler finds that a casino has a good reputation and is trustworthy, then boosted odds can be considered as an additional benefit. However, if the only reason for choosing a casino is its boosted odds, the gambler may end up being scammed.Therefore, anyone choosing a casino should base their decision primarily on the casino reputation, reliability and trustworthiness rather than on odds boosting alone. |
|
|
|
|
laijsica
|
|
Today at 02:00:21 AM |
|
I've seen some gamblers who also decided to go for a particular gambling casino because of odds boosting. I don't always blame people for their decisions in gambling because everyone knows what he wanted and will only have to help with the situation by going for it as long as they will get satisfied and use a particular casino for gambling through what they offer them.
Odds boosting should not be the only reason a gambler to chooses a casino. The first thing every gambler should consider is whether the casino is trustworthy, not whether it offers boosted odds or any offer.If a gambler finds that a casino has a good reputation and is trustworthy, then boosted odds can be considered as an additional benefit. However, if the only reason for choosing a casino is its boosted odds, the gambler may end up being scammed.Therefore, anyone choosing a casino should base their decision primarily on the casino reputation, reliability and trustworthiness rather than on odds boosting alone. There can be differences of opinion among gamblers regarding the credibility of a casino. A casino that is considered good to you may not be considered good to others. Your own satisfaction is important in choosing a good casino. I have heard many gamblers say that some casinos have a high win rate. If there is any weakness in the service provided by those casinos, gamblers gamble on that platform regularly. Even though some reputable casinos have good customer service in every aspect, experienced gamblers do not gamble there much because they do not win the desired amount. If a gambler once doubts arise about the credibility of the casinos and creates negative discussions about them in the community, gamblers become cautious and do not trust them and gradually withdraw their funds and find alternative platforms. |
|
|
|
|
maydna
|
|
Today at 08:14:58 AM |
|
I've seen some gamblers who also decided to go for a particular gambling casino because of odds boosting. I don't always blame people for their decisions in gambling because everyone knows what he wanted and will only have to help with the situation by going for it as long as they will get satisfied and use a particular casino for gambling through what they offer them.
Odds boosting should not be the only reason a gambler to chooses a casino. The first thing every gambler should consider is whether the casino is trustworthy, not whether it offers boosted odds or any offer.If a gambler finds that a casino has a good reputation and is trustworthy, then boosted odds can be considered as an additional benefit. However, if the only reason for choosing a casino is its boosted odds, the gambler may end up being scammed.Therefore, anyone choosing a casino should base their decision primarily on the casino reputation, reliability and trustworthiness rather than on odds boosting alone. There can be differences of opinion among gamblers regarding the credibility of a casino. A casino that is considered good to you may not be considered good to others. Your own satisfaction is important in choosing a good casino. I have heard many gamblers say that some casinos have a high win rate. If there is any weakness in the service provided by those casinos, gamblers gamble on that platform regularly. Even though some reputable casinos have good customer service in every aspect, experienced gamblers do not gamble there much because they do not win the desired amount. If a gambler once doubts arise about the credibility of the casinos and creates negative discussions about them in the community, gamblers become cautious and do not trust them and gradually withdraw their funds and find alternative platforms. I am not sure some casinos have a high win rate but that could be true but you can't win if you don't have luck. You can try by yourself to see how high the win rate for you and I guess that will not gives you much good results. If gamblers choosing the casinos because of odds boosting, they should think more to do that often. Odds boosting can gives you the win, win bigger even but that will not guarantee you will win unless you have good analysis and pick the right. But gamblers choosing the casino from their reputation and have good customer services so they will not get a trouble. The recommended casinos could only be found by yourself after you research and not just based on others reviews. |
|
|
|
|
348Judah
|
|
Today at 02:05:01 PM |
|
Casinos don’t really go into the business of boosting odds as a form of promotion. The much I’ve encountered that might appear to be a boost often comes with a tick-box where you can manually tick if you want a boost to apply on the odds.
It depends on what you call a promotion otherwise I don't think the boosted odds are really for promotion because is the same with every other options in the sportbook but the odds are the only different and besides with the popularity of sports is good when new things are mixed with the regular options so that you will have another experience, the reason why is not common among casinos is because they have not done it to see the impact. However the tick-box type you are talking about doesn't boost much and is also something you might not see all the time if you are betting so is a bit different from Kikabet. Both of you have spoken well. When you see a gambling platform like this offering a boosted odds shows their interest to ensure that every gambler is given an equal right to earn more even beyond what the expected to get after winning a bet, we all know that this is not common to all casinos and that is why some that operates with this have the consciousness of being considerate with their gamblers by making every conditions received work in their favor as gamblers. |
|
|
|
Porfirii
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3850
The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>SPA
|
|
Today at 03:13:25 PM |
|
It seems to me a more likely victory for Atlético de Madrid over Getafe. A little less than an hour before the match starts, in a moment we will see if it is the right choice I am not sure about that and there is a very good reason that Getafe has a chance. If I recall correctly, Atletico Madrid had nine players playing the World Cup final alone. I don't know how many of their players played the World Cup in total, but if even only those nine players are still all on vacation, this Atletico Madrid team will be very different from what they usually are. Whether a win is possible for Getafe, I don't know, but I don't think that Atletico Madrid really is the favorite. Very possible that they play without any of their well known players, while I am pretty sure that Getafe has most of their players available already and may have had a few sessions of training. Come on, let's not exaggerate. Getafe has always just been trying to break into the top tier. Atletico might test some weird lineups, but they'll definitely treat this match as a matter of honor. Spanish football is all about playing with your heart, not your head. Their mentality is totally different from, say, the Germans, where that kind of approach would make perfect sense. I'm telling you, Atletico just has to win this In the end, it seems that you were right MuffinMaster (for my own sake)  The way I see it, the difference between the two teams is remarkable, and even if there were missing stars on the field, Atlético de Madrid showed their dominance for almost the entire match. |
|
|
|
|
