Is real-world asset tokenization (like real estate) the next big thing in crypto

[Anni_Crypto]

Hi everyone,

I’ve been observing that many crypto projects are still heavily driven by hype and short-term narratives. At the same time, there seems to be a growing interest in real-world use cases and sustainable value.

One area that caught my attention is real estate tokenization combined with integrated payment solutions. The idea of connecting blockchain technology with tangible assets could potentially bring more trust and long-term adoption into the space.

I’m curious how you see this:
Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate?

Would be great to hear your thoughts and experiences.

[sergiorus]

Hi everyone,

I’ve been observing that many crypto projects are still heavily driven by hype and short-term narratives. At the same time, there seems to be a growing interest in real-world use cases and sustainable value.

One area that caught my attention is real estate tokenization combined with integrated payment solutions. The idea of connecting blockchain technology with tangible assets could potentially bring more trust and long-term adoption into the space.

I’m curious how you see this:
Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate?

Would be great to hear your thoughts and experiences.

tokenisation is definitely gonna be a big thing but only the well established and battle tested projects will really play a serious role in it and as you can imagine they already have high marketcaps.
the retail will always be attracted by hype and huge returns and that will come from smaller projects who will jump the mainstream train and create hype.
many people will get rich, many people will lose everything. just as usual.

[o48o]

Hi everyone,

I’ve been observing that many crypto projects are still heavily driven by hype and short-term narratives. At the same time, there seems to be a growing interest in real-world use cases and sustainable value.

One area that caught my attention is real estate tokenization combined with integrated payment solutions. The idea of connecting blockchain technology with tangible assets could potentially bring more trust and long-term adoption into the space.

I’m curious how you see this:
Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate?

Would be great to hear your thoughts and experiences.

Idea of it has existed since altcoins came along, but those ideas lack regulatory compliance, or if they try to be designed around regulatory compliance, tokens themselves become pointless, centralized and not cost effective. They are basically just glued on working centralized system, that works better without those tokens in the first place.

This is unless they figure out the way to build kyc in chain, that preserve privacy, is cheap, instant and have same features as current systems have that most i don't even know about.

Good luck with that. Such system have been tried to build for nearly 10 years now. And even if it would eventually work, it would need adoption and actual need for it from the issuers.

[dansus021]

Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate? The real answer based on the whitepaper the research and how big real world asset is, I do believe that RWA project is really gonna hit the market hard, if crypto can unlock the tradfi and bridge that gap into crypto universe this gonna unlock more liqudity into the market.

But the problem right now is people didnt believe enough with any kind of RWA project the last promising project that I know called Plume is good but now has slower adoption and the token is plumetting, if we can bring the people trust this one gonna big IMO

[jossiel]

I’m curious how you see this:
Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate?

Maybe or it won't be.

There's no actual hype from it on the last bull run and so, it can be capitalized by the projects by the next cycle and that's around 3 years from now.

I think many of these projects have been driven by hype and so to no contest, if it will be driven by hype it won't be this time.

[MAAManda]

I’m curious how you see this:
Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate?

RWA & other token categories are still something other than meme tokens, regardless of whether RWA will play a major role or not in the next cycle. If you're someone who wants to profit from the next cycle, I think it would be better if you buy L-1 tokens rather than category tokens such as Ethereum (ETH), BNB (BNB), Solana (SOL) or Tron (TRX).

[rbynxx]

Hi everyone,

I’ve been observing that many crypto projects are still heavily driven by hype and short-term narratives. At the same time, there seems to be a growing interest in real-world use cases and sustainable value.

One area that caught my attention is real estate tokenization combined with integrated payment solutions. The idea of connecting blockchain technology with tangible assets could potentially bring more trust and long-term adoption into the space.

I’m curious how you see this:
Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate?

Would be great to hear your thoughts and experiences.

Been hearing that for years now and I've been with those projects before I guess and that they want to tokenized real estate and even some of those virtual lands that was hyped in the metaverse trend and that most of us think that it will be the next big thing are probably now gone. A lot has emerge even pre-pandemic with that kind of vision but most of them are gone for good and if you look at Real Estate tokens here: https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/real-estate, I think only PARCL rings a bell and probably it's with those spams around the airdrops that takes on it.

Well, I think there will be a time that this will be a thing since tokenization is the future and real estate wouldn't be an exception to that but I'm talking it will probably decade/s from now, the real estate of today isn't that broken afaik and it will work as per usual.

[hugeblack]

No, if real estate contracts that include delivery in 12 or 24 months are considered high risk unless there is a highly transparent regulatory environment, then what about digital contracts that do not meet the minimum legal requirements?

[asriloni]

Do you think real-world asset tokenization will play a major role in the next cycle, or will hype-driven projects continue to dominate?

Would be great to hear your thoughts and experiences.

RWA is not a big thing anymore especially for real estate. The fact that real estate tokenization is lacking of demand. It has been exist since before 2020. There were some RWA real estate related project such as propy, but it's more like a zombie project.

There's no need tokenization for the real estate because it has certification. So i don't think tokenization will play important role here.

If you're not believing with what i said, then take a look at the Propy token on CMC. So you can see how it has never got hyped ever since it was being introduced. RWA is only important for some things such as US trasury or etc.

Canton network is the best example in what sector RWA is playing an important role.

[Taskford]

No, if real estate contracts that include delivery in 12 or 24 months are considered high risk unless there is a highly transparent regulatory environment, then what about digital contracts that do not meet the minimum legal requirements?

That's correct since even if we say that they really have those fix timelines on when they deliver those assets it could still be seen as high risk for investor, especially if those digital contracts they brought does not meet those minimum legal standard and that one adds more the risk.

So what I've seen towards those matter is another promises and I don't see any protection given to investors, since everything is questionable. They always say that its the next big thing but this is another crazy stories so they can sold those digital products they are selling and stole the money of people.

[ZaryBee]

No, if real estate contracts that include delivery in 12 or 24 months are considered high risk unless there is a highly transparent regulatory environment, then what about digital contracts that do not meet the minimum legal requirements?

That's correct since even if we say that they really have those fix timelines on when they deliver those assets it could still be seen as high risk for investor, especially if those digital contracts they brought does not meet those minimum legal standard and that one adds more the risk.

So what I've seen towards those matter is another promises and I don't see any protection given to investors, since everything is questionable. They always say that its the next big thing but this is another crazy stories so they can sold those digital products they are selling and stole the money of people.

Tokenizing real-world assets sound good on paper, but without strong legal backing and transparency, many investors will still see it as risky. The technology itself is not the problem. The bigger issue is trust, regulation, and whether investors are actualy protected if something goes wrong. A lot of projects also overhype the next big thing narrative, so people should be careful and not blindly trust every platform or promise.