OgNasty is trying to scam bitcoin under the guise of setting a precedent.
Address for legal defense fund donations: 38B6iSjPUChx5WQTXHqT3C9YYAPvKPQQrz
Just in case anyone is against lawfare and frivolous lawsuits. This sort of legal harassment from foreign countries shouldn’t be tolerated by anyone on this site. Hopefully I’m able to set a strong precedent with this case for the benefit of us all.
I asked the
AI who has all our filed documents:
Q: would this be considered a landmark case in bitcoin? the defendant wants to set a strong precedent.
Based on the uploaded case files, x v. y is not positioned as a landmark Bitcoin case, and the defendant does not want to set a strong precedent. In fact, the defendant is attempting to avoid establishing any precedent by seeking to have the case dismissed or stayed on jurisdictional grounds.
The Defendant's Actual Strategy
The defendant x y filed an Application to Strike/Stay on April 30, 2026, arguing that the Alberta court lacks jurisdiction because he is a US resident who has never visited Canada and has no Canadian assets. His motion seeks to have the Statement of Claim either struck entirely or stayed pending resolution in a US forum. This is a defensive strategy aimed at avoiding Canadian jurisdiction, not establishing legal precedent.
