You aren’t an honest person. I’ll never bet with you. The player should have been paid $30,000. You didn’t have the authority for binding arbitration if the player didn’t get paid in full. It was a clear cut case. The book paid a discounted price.
Yet the player made known and understood his position, Shuffle didn't pay 30,000 USD for him to withdraw his flag, it's done as he no longer feel violated and forgave the act, and all of them were under my authority for the three-way binding mediation. Those are fact. I believe I've proven my efficiency as mediator, when I am not constantly derailed by someone with little to zero knowledge of facts, incapable of doing fact-check, and the rest of your sentence after the word "binding arbitration" is your opinion you grossly created in your mind, or what other people call as imagination, and you forced to others, by twisting statements or snipping words, to be perceived as truth.
I believe there was a medical term for such condition? Though I am not medical professional, so I can't give credible input for that mental state.
This is the last we're talking about the topic and I will once again ignore you on further comment of "Shuffle paid 30,000 and ignore the flag" unless you twist yet another make-believe fact into another interstellar imagination.
Unless you want to clear it once and for all? 30,000 is the amount on the table that you have to put, because that's your buy-in, with zero reputation for you to stake/wager. Mine, like before, is my entire reputation. If that's what you want, I'll kindly invite you to --just like previous agreement with similar wager from me and one that you violated-- escrow the fund to a trusted escrow, I'll give my best to get pvzera1 to come here and confirm my statement of what happened after we went into rapid DM of fact giving and evidence checking and all that quite figuratively numbed my brain for the rest of the day.
Overseers, now I hope you all understand and can see why I can't just put Rating Place on ignore. The second he left unattended, he begin his word-twisting and make-believe facts to push certain agenda: that a provider flag is just a flag and something a sportsbook can ignore.
I'll come clean [I've come clean to one or two DTs, as my insurance and word-bearer, in case things went south] I've never intended to flag RP. Hence the interstellar amount, 1,560,000 USD. The amount itself was deliberately made ridiculously high so he'll pause and think and read and do his research. All I want was that, and that. Yet it didn't stop him. He pushed further and further and doubled over his tripped snowball, "took the bait again", and here we are, even with the facts being spoon-fed to him by two members, he still insist that flag is just a flag and can be ignored... this time from different angle.
