Flag by holydarkness? Red Trust by Stalker22 and Nutildah

[Rating Place]

holydarkness says that he wants to start a flag for a $1.5m bet that I never agreed too.

Stalker22 put up negative trust accusing me of posting fake quotes which I never did.

Nutildah also added negative trust claiming I made a quote that I didn’t make.

It seems like collusion.

threw this up in case anyone wants to discuss. holy's thread is self moderated. Thanks

This is the quote that I made

holydarkness has repeatedly taken the opposite position, saying the book is within its rights to void the winnings and only return the deposit. His exact words in the XYes thread (June 27, 2025):
“LOL. The casino is within its rights. They did not scam anyone. ... They voided the winnings and returned the deposit. It could be considered a scam if they had confiscated the deposit as well. ... If they do not pay, no one can do anything because they are within their rights.”

edit- I apologize for the mixup. I did misquote the wrong person. But I'll get the quotes from holydarkness saying the same.

[Stalker22]

~
edit- I apologize for the mixup. I did misquote the wrong person. But I'll get the quotes from holydarkness saying the same.

Finally! It took a full month and a couple of people calling you out for you to finally admit your "mix-up."  Now, instead of a real apology to the members you slandered as liars, you are doubling down by claiming you will find other quotes to prove you were right all along?

Hopefully you now understand why the "distrust" tag.  I will reconsider it in a month.

I am reposting this here as I discovered this thread after my initial comment.

[Rating Place]

~
edit- I apologize for the mixup. I did misquote the wrong person. But I'll get the quotes from holydarkness saying the same.

Finally! It took a full month and a couple of people calling you out for you to finally admit your "mix-up."  Now, instead of a real apology to the members you slandered as liars, you are doubling down by claiming you will find other quotes to prove you were right all along?

Hopefully you now understand why the "distrust" tag.  I will reconsider it in a month.

I am reposting this here as I discovered this thread after my initial comment.

I said that I apologize for the post and will do personally. I made one misquote in 12 years. Here's the quote saying the same. There are others saying the same.

Regarding OP's arbitrage betting activity, I can't say much [as I am bound by for-my-eyes-only basis] other than that I've given a glimpse of what led them to struck the gavel and draw a verdict of arbing. Regarding arbing is a smart strategy or prohibited, I won't dive deep into that discussion right now, because specifically for this case, smart or not, they're irrelevant because they're simply prohibited, as per their ToS that I've captured and sitting in my gallery since few days ago:With above, unfortunately, like it or not, we have to consider OP as breaching the terms he agreed upon sign up. Thus, the casino is within their right to confiscate the rest of the fund.