anonymousminer should be reviewed for removal from DT1 status

[Kazkaz27]

This DT1 has consistently been one of the most disruptive members in the Bitcoin Collectibles section.

I encourage all members to review anonymousminer’s posting history.

There are numerous documented examples of behavior that negatively affects the community. Here are a few key threads:
• Negatively impacting the Bitcoin Collectible Space
• References and examples of anonymousminer’s problematic behavior



The pattern includes repeated off-topic attacks in sales and auction threads, unsubstantiated accusations, and attempts to damage the reputations of other members. He frequently posts under anonymity while criticizing those who have publicly identify themselves.

This type of conduct undermines trust in the marketplace and discourages participation. Given the ongoing disruption, I believe anonymousminer should be reviewed for removal from DT1 status.

I have tried to address this privately and cordially publicly for nearly two years. Mitchell has also previously asked the community to stop this exact kind of behavior: Mitchell’s request.

It is in the community’s best interest to carefully evaluate anonymousminer when updating trust/distrust lists.

[examplens]

This type of conduct undermines trust in the marketplace and discourages participation. Given the ongoing disruption, I believe anonymousminer should be reviewed for removal from DT1 status.

It seems that you didn't fully understand how the DT system works here.
This just confirms my theory that most of you, members of collectible boards, are not using the trust system properly.

Regardless, as far as I can see, you have 7 strong red tags, while anonymousminer has 45 green feedback. Maybe it's better to deal with yourself and your actions, instead of trying to discredit someone.

[Kazkaz27]

This type of conduct undermines trust in the marketplace and discourages participation. Given the ongoing disruption, I believe anonymousminer should be reviewed for removal from DT1 status.

It seems that you didn't fully understand how the DT system works here.
This just confirms my theory that most of you, members of collectible boards, are not using the trust system properly.

Regardless, as far as I can see, you have 7 strong red tags, while anonymousminer has 45 green feedback. Maybe it's better to deal with yourself and your actions, instead of trying to discredit someone.

My Spidey sense is telling me you may be an Alt or Practice Cronyism.

Discredit? No — only facts were presented. It is anonymousminer who has been attempting to discredit other members.

I am simply delivering the facts. If you see that as something else, you should step back.

I encourage the community to carefully review anonymousminer and consider adding him to their trust or distrust lists based on the evidence presented.

You’re right that the trust system is abused beyond recognition. It’s Widely Acknowledged that it can’t really be fixed, and there are No Real Consequences for Abusing it. So what does that leave us with?

[Vod]

My Spidey sense is telling me you may be an Alt or Practice Cronyism.

I'm flattered how you use my exact words.  

You’re right that the trust system is abused beyond recognition. It’s  Widely Acknowledged that it can’t really be fixed, and there are No Real Consequences for Abusing it.  What does that leave us with?

If you can't beat them, and you don't want to join them, be a better example for them.   I certainly pressure consequence on novel types of trust abuse (like today) but I'm bored of the farmers.  They may be new to you, but they are old to me.

(No one should twist my words into any attack on anonymousminer - not my intention)

[Kazkaz27]

you don't want to join them, be a better example for them.  

Good advice.

I’m doing my best to stay above the fray and be the bigger person here, but it’s genuinely difficult. Watching anonymousminer repeatedly attack innocent members’ work and reputations with unsubstantiated claims — while still being treated as a credible voice — is exhausting. It’s a reminder of how much discipline it takes to protect the community’s standards instead of mirroring the negativity.

It’s tempting to fight fire with fire, but it can do more harm than good.

One of many reasons I enjoy AI is that it helps de-escalate situations and more clearly present a case without being overly emotional. I usually write something and ask it to identify biases or harsher sentences. I do this to be more formal, logical, and factual vs. the latter. (Some use my utilization of AI in Bad Faith as an excuse to distract from or discredit the actual situation or truth, which is a shame.)

[Vod]

I’m doing my best to stay above the fray and be the bigger person here, but it’s genuinely difficult. Watching anonymousminer repeatedly attack innocent members’ work and reputations with unsubstantiated claims — while still being treated as a credible voice — is exhausting. It’s a reminder of how much discipline it takes to protect the community’s standards instead of mirroring the negativity.

I can relate with you perfectly.  I had to sue and it still hasn't stopped.