Feature enable to avoid self ban completely

[livingfree]

I don't think that they're going to do this.

They're a provider and they paid for them and so if a user requests for that, there probably won't be other offers to you if most of the games come from the same provider you don't like.

But this is a good feature for those gamblers who feel that there's sort of energy that comes from the providers that they've lost money.

It might be a good attempt to suggest it to them though.

For sure they wont because this is where they do make money too. They might be having that self exclusion but it totally talks about on stopping on playing literally but blocking or not to see a specific provider then there's no such feature and they wont really be doing it. So the best approach? Just manually avoid them and if you do hate pragmatic then skip all the types of slots they do have and focus into other provider. Actually you would really be able to think up on this way. Imagine having that 3000 rolls and having no bonus? that would surely pissed you off and thinking about being non fair and thats something a normal reaction for us gamblers who do love slots. This is why i do keep on transferring on other slots whenever my first 30-50 rolls didnt give out something good win or my bankroll is that fastly declining then i do tend to make some switch up.

Yes, that's the choice that we can do.

To manually avoid them if we don't like these games.

We can ban ourselves for not playing those games that we don't like because if we demand to them like that, we won't even be heard by them.

We're not even enough to cover the volume or demand that they're having base on their stats.

[DrBeer]

As always I thought maybe somethings have changed now that I passed a lot of time without gambling and played Pragmatic Gates of Olympus Super Scatter, which of course got to near 3000 spins without giving the bonus through normal game play, now if this is not something to be sued this f*cking provider then I don't know what it is.

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

And what is the problem with just not using games of such providers? No, I understand that filtering and hiding them is quite convenient, but you can also protect yourself from such providers ? I'm not sure that the platform itself can block the provider of the service, for which the platform receives income - it's their business.

Exactly, I don't think it would easy for any casino to ban or block a provider because you laid a compliant. Maybe what op needs to do is either gamble on a reputable casino or avoid the casino game he is having issues with. There are thousands of casino games and I bet you will also find the one that interests you just like this Gate of Olympus Game. Even though your request makes sense it would be a difficult choice for casinos to make because providers and casinos work hand in hand and we definitely may not have any information about their agreement.

The point is that we need to exercise self-control, and it’s important to understand how these platforms work so that we don’t make unreasonable demands that undermine their business model. A casino can provide a global mechanism to block our activity (self-exclusion), but not a service provider that generates additional revenue for them.

[Bitinity]

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

Even if there is such a feature in a casino, means that you need to enable it and at the same time you can disable it as you wish. The key is on ourselves, if we dont like with a specific game, we can simply ignore it without such a feature. Do not rely on casino's feature because even if there is a casino with this feature but if you cant control yourself, you will move to the other casinos to play the game because you are curious/challenged to break the bad record.

[Yeesha]

The point is that we need to exercise self-control, and it’s important to understand how these platforms work so that we don’t make unreasonable demands that undermine their business model. A casino can provide a global mechanism to block our activity (self-exclusion), but not a service provider that generates additional revenue for them.

Self-control is actually very important when it comes to gambling, because if a gambler doesn't develop self-control he is at risk of losing a lots of things and not just money, including other productive or beneficial resources, like houses, cars and most importantly your reputation. Gambling can easily tarnish one's image and makes you look irresponsible and unreliable in the eyes of others, and that is why it is actually very important to develop self awareness, and self-control. Even when some gamblers are not in their right position, right state of mind or right senses, they often find it actually difficult to believe or realise that self-exclusion can help them overcome their gambling issues, because they will never hold themselves accountable or believe that they are addicted to gambling despite loosing so much in gambling.

[Franklyn-wood]

The point is that we need to exercise self-control, and it’s important to understand how these platforms work so that we don’t make unreasonable demands that undermine their business model. A casino can provide a global mechanism to block our activity (self-exclusion), but not a service provider that generates additional revenue for them.

Self-control is actually very important when it comes to gambling, because if a gambler doesn't develop self-control he is at risk of losing a lots of things and not just money, including other productive or beneficial resources, like houses, cars and most importantly your reputation. Gambling can easily tarnish one's image and makes you look irresponsible and unreliable in the eyes of others, and that is why it is actually very important to develop self awareness, and self-control. Even when some gamblers are not in their right position, right state of mind or right senses, they often find it actually difficult to believe or realise that self-exclusion can help them overcome their gambling issues, because they will never hold themselves accountable or believe that they are addicted to gambling despite loosing so much in gambling.

Self control sounds like insult to an addicted person, because they will never admit that they are addicted and there reply will always be am I a child or do you think I don't know what I am doing when ever you try to advice them even when it is obvious that they have lost control of self will. I met a guy some years ago being beaten buy group of boys. When I asked them what he did, they said he stole his father's house rent money. To play bet. So with this kind of experience it very heard for him accept it

[r_victory]

If a particular provider bothers you, simply don't play the games they offer. Why would casinos go to the trouble of adding yet another feature when you can filter them out or choose not to play? Ultimately, it is something that wouldn't add value to the gamblers experience.

[EluguHcman]

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

Even if there is such a feature in a casino, means that you need to enable it and at the same time you can disable it as you wish. The key is on ourselves, if we dont like with a specific game, we can simply ignore it without such a feature. Do not rely on casino's feature because even if there is a casino with this feature but if you cant control yourself, you will move to the other casinos to play the game because you are curious/challenged to break the bad record.

There is no way this self exclusion stuff in gambling can be 100% effective where addiction is there that the urge can not let us remain disciplined.

Casinos upgrading to features to expel voluntary users option and the casino keep to the terms uncompromising, that would not still solve the problems to totally stop these set of gamblers gamble in the future.

Even if casinos has to be fully regulated and the commission bans the gamblers after self excluded that they can not even have another account from other casinos due to their KYCs being red flagged, it is very possible that they can still use others KYC to open account.

This kind of matter does not at all seem to have solutions yet due to gambling impulses.

[Dr.Osh]

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

If that feature existed, it would certainly make it easier for us to limit ourselves from a game that always makes us curious about winning from the game. What's annoying is when slot machines offer wins that we never get. They say, jackpot, scatter. In reality, when we play there, all we get is losses without even a little win. I'm sure the feature you mean is impossible for casino sites to add. It would be detrimental to them.

[PX-Z]

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

You mean disabled a game provider, because there's no self ban option or term for such platform, disabling game providers or choosing your preferred game provider is better. If we request such feature, their response probably, "you can actually avoid them by not choosing them when playing." Which is reasonable too.

[Johnlomape]

The point is that we need to exercise self-control, and it’s important to understand how these platforms work so that we don’t make unreasonable demands that undermine their business model. A casino can provide a global mechanism to block our activity (self-exclusion), but not a service provider that generates additional revenue for them.

Self-control is actually very important when it comes to gambling, because if a gambler doesn't develop self-control he is at risk of losing a lots of things and not just money, including other productive or beneficial resources, like houses, cars and most importantly your reputation. Gambling can easily tarnish one's image and makes you look irresponsible and unreliable in the eyes of others, and that is why it is actually very important to develop self awareness, and self-control. Even when some gamblers are not in their right position, right state of mind or right senses, they often find it actually difficult to believe or realise that self-exclusion can help them overcome their gambling issues, because they will never hold themselves accountable or believe that they are addicted to gambling despite loosing so much in gambling.

Gambling can make a gambler to lose fortunes without realizing until it's too late. There are gamblers that will be gambling like they don't have any other thing to use their time and money to do. Mistakes can happen in gambling and it's important we find quick solutions to it before it's may be too late. To make money from gambling, we need to make sure that we don't gamble for too long since that is how so many victims have became addicted to gambling without their full knowledge.

[Crypto_Timothy]

As always I thought maybe somethings have changed now that I passed a lot of time without gambling and played Pragmatic Gates of Olympus Super Scatter, which of course got to near 3000 spins without giving the bonus through normal game play, now if this is not something to be sued this f*cking provider then I don't know what it is.

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

It's easy to think about new features when you're not the dev but the exclusion button works to exclude you from the general betting experience from you, so nothing can trigger you back, it's like trying to stop drinking but then you want it so only 1 particular beer gets expelled but you still watch other alcohol around you. That won't solve your case,  the game isn't really the problem but you need to take a break from betting as a whole, that would be the better experience than to just exclude one game. Just the way this game got a hold on you, that's how the new game you enter will have the effect, so what better way than to exclude yourself entirely from the betting experience

[Chibit01]

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

That option will be nice for those who are fully into slot games as it will help them remove providers which they consider their games to be rigged away from their suggested games. Currently, since games are not even arranged by providers by some casinos, when you manually set them through the filter side, even when you don't want to use some providers, you might have clicked on the game already before their usual welcome logo and name will appear.

[Hispo]

If a particular provider bothers you, simply don't play the games they offer. Why would casinos go to the trouble of adding yet another feature when you can filter them out or choose not to play? Ultimately, it is something that wouldn't add value to the gamblers experience.

Yes, you have got a point there, people can simply choose not to play games which are not enjoyable for them and completely ignore specific providers on casinos, but I think the point of OP is actually different...

If a feature like that was implemented by the casino and people started to ban providers from their dashboard, then the casino would realize which providers are the least popular on their website and it could even force the provider itself to improve over time in other to be as competitive as the most popular providers (those who are not banned by many people).

Ultimately, it is a feature which does not add any value to one's experience, so I assume this is a way OP wants to punish those providers who he feels are not worth it.

[Peanutswar]

Never seen yet a feature that allowing players avoid having the specific game provider because one of the most commons are the casino offered a games came from the game provider only and they cant filter their system just because of you only. Instead you are the one who made the adjustment with their game filtering which is commonly with the provider filters, genre or even search a specific game.

Sometimes when we are tilted about the game we wanted to avoid them but sooner or later possible you will again this games once you have watch others winning this game.

[eisen33]

As always I thought maybe somethings have changed now that I passed a lot of time without gambling and played Pragmatic Gates of Olympus Super Scatter, which of course got to near 3000 spins without giving the bonus through normal game play, now if this is not something to be sued this f*cking provider then I don't know what it is.

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

I don't see the point of partial self exclusion because if you stop playing games from one provider, you can easily switch to games from other providers. In most cases, players request self exclusion because they have issues with gambling in general, not because of a specific provider or a particular game. For that reason, I don't think partial or selective self exclusion serves any real purpose. It doesn't effectively address the underlying problem and can be easily bypassed by simply playing other games.

[swogerino]

As always I thought maybe somethings have changed now that I passed a lot of time without gambling and played Pragmatic Gates of Olympus Super Scatter, which of course got to near 3000 spins without giving the bonus through normal game play, now if this is not something to be sued this f*cking provider then I don't know what it is.

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

I don't see the point of partial self exclusion because if you stop playing games from one provider, you can easily switch to games from other providers. In most cases, players request self exclusion because they have issues with gambling in general, not because of a specific provider or a particular game. For that reason, I don't think partial or selective self exclusion serves any real purpose. It doesn't effectively address the underlying problem and can be easily bypassed by simply playing other games.

I say that I never experience this thing with any other provider except Pragmatic Play and that is why I think it is a good idea to have this feature enabled because I know I will keep trying their stupid games despite hating them, it is in a gambler nature to go and play where they are hit the hardest. So in my case and many others would be a good idea to have this feature as now I have started playing with ARS which let me play a lot of bonus buys but unfortunately the same end result in Pragmatic Play slot machines.

[YellowSwap]

As always I thought maybe somethings have changed now that I passed a lot of time without gambling and played Pragmatic Gates of Olympus Super Scatter, which of course got to near 3000 spins without giving the bonus through normal game play, now if this is not something to be sued this f*cking provider then I don't know what it is.

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

There is no such feature available on any online casinos, but this is a pretty good idea and I wish we all have a way to select games provider that we want and ignore others.

Another possible way is to know every single games that your own favourite games provider provides, so you will choose online casino games knowing that the games are from your favourite providers.

And this is going to be a lot of work, still I wish we have something like this, I tried doing some research related to this and it doesn't even bring anything meaningful.

[maydna]

If many requests from members to never show one provider, the casino might considers it but if that is just from one or few people, casinos will not thinks of it. They will consider that is player responsibility to control themselves and not because they enable or disable the feature.

You really need to stay away from Pragmatic Play provider and don't even bother to try. If player can't handling the temptation to stops gambling, they must leaves casinos forever because if not, the damage will be big. They can't imagine what is the impact to them but losing much money would happens.

[Webetcoins]

I was wondering because of this maybe casinos could add a feature where you expel and ban only a provider or some providers instead of completely self ban option. For example an option to never show again Pragmatic ever again to me and this be non changeable after the user accepts it.

Even if there is such a feature in a casino, means that you need to enable it and at the same time you can disable it as you wish. The key is on ourselves, if we dont like with a specific game, we can simply ignore it without such a feature. Do not rely on casino's feature because even if there is a casino with this feature but if you cant control yourself, you will move to the other casinos to play the game because you are curious/challenged to break the bad record.

No, no, once you have excluded something, you can't just enable it like that. That's the whole point of self-exclusion lol. I remember excluding myself for a week from stake. Later, I felt like it was too long, so I asked the support if they could shorten it and they clearly denied. I even gave lame excuses like I meant a day, not a week but they were firm in denying.

Oh well, there is no such feature to ban specific games, though, so you have to exclude the entire casino. But it's a good thought that there should be an option to ban a certain game or provider so that you can't access the game for that period.

[darewaller]

If a particular provider bothers you, simply don't play the games they offer. Why would casinos go to the trouble of adding yet another feature when you can filter them out or choose not to play? Ultimately, it is something that wouldn't add value to the gamblers experience.

And in all honesty, casinos want you to play those games :/

They know the player is addicted to Crash, for example. So, they will always want you to come back and lose money over and over again. Allowing special bans for providers will hurt their business.

The only reason casinos even have self exclude is that they are strictly required to have these by the license provider or the government, or both. Don't forget that these casinos are there to earn money and that money comes from you so don't expect them to help you out.