Vote KAZKAZ27 for DT1 & Moderator AKA defender on the forum!

[howardsentell]

Vote KAZKAZ27 for DT1 and Moderator. The defender on the forum BTC

Let’s give a big shout-out to Kas. He’s one of the forum’s strongest supporters, helping other members and regularly sharing useful information. He also works to expose scams. I believe he should be considered for the DT1 and Moderator roles. Thanks, Kas BTC

Member:   Kazkaz27
November 17, 2019
Posts:   1103
Activity:   798
Merit:   968


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2716227

[Excimer]

He also works to expose scams.

That's good. I'am too


I'm actually considering it, but I can decide whether to vote or not.

Tell me what you think about the next users: 1miau, Vod, LoyceV, nutildah, suchmoon and Don Pedro Dinero.

Tell me about each one individually, what you think about about them?



Your answer will help me decide whether to vote or not. I need to know whose side you on.

[Kazkaz27]

LoyceV is the only one I have actually transacted with and will vouch for. I disagree with his stances rarely. The others I have never truly transacted with. Although, if I were to rate them in order from a standpoint:

I put them in order:

Vod - it’s hard for me to say, 50/50. I have related with him and disagreed but I’ve spoken with him enough to place him here.
1miau - agreed with his defense alliance idea and didn't like how he was attacked simply for his return but don’t know him well enough to have more to judge.
Suchmoon - I know nothing of him so he defaults here
Nutildah - semi neutral but weighted crony, have had a lot of interactions and mostly battles.
Don Pedro Dinero - Gay bootlicker

This isn’t my “side” persay. This is my experience so far. I really don’t have enough information on ever member to comfortably say anything bad about anyone on the list except for the bottom 2.

It’s far too much to unpack. You gave a loaded ask.

I could expand on them all and say good things about all of them I’m sure if I searched for it. Could also find the bad but try my damnest to give the benefit of the doubt.

[Kazkaz27]

~Snip

Honestly, I can relate with all that and understand your reasoning and point of view.

LoyceV is only at the top of my list, but as you can see, no one is on my official trust list. I vouch for him simply because he remains the most neutral and we have transacted many times seamlessly. So my qualms are not with him, although I’d love for him to speak up about the current events and corruption. I’ve reached out to him privately before, and he said that he doesn’t like to get involved with the drama, which I completely understand and don’t hold that against him. Despite that, I do believe that it somewhat acts as being an accomplice. I don’t view him as the crown. But he is up there.

There is only one thing I truly disapprove of that I’ve seen. — His support of Holydarnkess after blatantly abusing the trust system.

It is sort of shady he wishes to remain so anonymous but that’s many members here. So….

1miau was hasty

So what is it that we completely disagree on?

[Excimer]

to speak up about the current events and curruption.

It's a rational motive.

But our forum is caste-based, like in India. Nutildah is untouchable. Accusing a Brahmin of corruption won't work.
Blaming the Kshatriya won't work either. It will be difficult to blame the Vaishya but possible. But against Shudras you can bring as many cases as you like

LoyceV is Brahmin



nutildah is Kshatriya



Don Pedro Dinero is Vaishya



And all the rest of bitcointalk are Shudras

[Kazkaz27]

I get it. Although, I do see alittle more to it. Cronies are webbed out. In groups or small packs. Messing with one wakes up another. It becomes a domino effect. They are all connected but who you poke determines the next who wakes. It’s not like they are all in one big group although they work in packs.

Your depiction of the form is quite accurate.

I never had a bad transaction on this forum. So despite the red trusts I have it’s all from butthurt cronies.

I’m not mad or targeting LoyceV although I do think his actions to not speak up are in fact rational motive. That doesn’t give me enough confidence to say more than that.

He has been overall good. But there would need to be a DT1 uprising in order to purge the shitty ones.

I also disagree with you that “I’m not willing to go against the crowd” — pretty sure thats a big reason nut called me a super villain. Definitely against the status quo.

The cronies have made it so I have little to nothing to lose here. I gladly speak up against them but only when given the right reason.

[Excimer]

a DT1 uprising

this is not a serious

Cronies are webbed out. In groups or small packs. Messing with one wakes up another. It becomes a domino effect. They are all connected but who you poke determines the next who wakes.

They eat each other up every day. There's no need to overthrow the DT. The DT is already being renewed every day. And there are no friends there, only exploitation of each other.

[Kazkaz27]

Then what is your suggestion?

[Excimer]

Then what is your suggestion?

Don't do anything. Don't get involved in this corrupted DT. Just do useful things for the forum.

[Kazkaz27]

Then what is your suggestion?

Don't do anything. Don't get involved in this corrupted DT. Just do useful things for the forum.

I did, I have, I do, and it’s baseless and viciously unrewarding due to the DT curruption I’ve experienced. Despite that, good advice. Probably won’t follow your advice tho because fuck them. They make this place shitty for more than myself.

[Excimer]

Then what is your suggestion?

Don't do anything. Don't get involved in this corrupted DT. Just do useful things for the forum.

I did, I have, I do, and it’s baseless and viciously unrewarding due to the DT curruption I’ve experienced. Despite that, good advice. Probably won’t follow your advice tho because fuck them. They make this place shitty for more than myself.

If you find any compelling evidence of any of the above persons, I can open a case. I have extensive experience of prosecuting in guilty verdicts. But please without calls for riots at the DT system

[Rating Place]

Then what is your suggestion?

Don't do anything. Don't get involved in this corrupted DT. Just do useful things for the forum.

I did, I have, I do, and it’s baseless and viciously unrewarding due to the DT curruption I’ve experienced. Despite that, good advice. Probably won’t follow your advice tho because fuck them. They make this place shitty for more than myself.

Keep up the good fight. They create bad posters. Knee pads trolled me for a year, red tagged me, but now doesn’t like being trolled back.

This is how out of hand it’s become. Stalker gives me negative trust, I give him negative trust for trust abuse and he returns fire with neutral.

If he didn’t give fake red trust in the first place, none of this happens. Sure, I admit that I’m awful poster in reputation but it’s caused by trust abuse.

No one is going to lay down in most of these fights and more are being created by fake trust.

Kaz, it’s so out of hand that no one trading with you even cares about your negative trust. It’s only your detractors that will keep bringing it up as if it’s evidence of your character. It’s evidence of their character.

[Kazkaz27]

A well known maker of physical Bitcoin and a Hero Member in good standing for years. On the forum he is a stalwart defender one who can be counted on to put members right dispense some sound information or call out a scam when he sees one. He is an active and dependable sort of contributor in short he has earned the DT1 trust and the forum position. Put in your vote for him.

I appreciate the kind words. I've put part of my soul into my work.

Haha, by the way adequate username you have. Definitely fits here on the forum. Wish you the best.

Keep up the good fight. They create bad posters. Knee pads trolled me for a year, red tagged me, but now doesn’t like being trolled back.

This is how out of hand it’s become. Stalker gives me negative trust, I give him negative trust for trust abuse and he returns fire with neutral.

If he didn’t give fake red trust in the first place, none of this happens. Sure, I admit that I’m awful poster in reputation but it’s caused by trust abuse.

No one is going to lay down in most of these fights and more are being created by fake trust.

Kaz, it’s so out of hand that no one trading with you even cares about your negative trust. It’s only your detractors that will keep bringing it up as if it’s evidence of your character. It’s evidence of their character.

Seldom do I receive recognition or thanks for defending others. It's more than often the opposite. I find it sad that so many members compromise their integrity for the approval of others. I admire people who stay true to whom they are.

Thank you, both.