Ree: Vote KAZKAZ27 for DT1 and Moderator. The defender on the forum!

[Rating Place]

There was a ST:TNG episode on this.  An admiral was investigating the Enterprise for something.   As the investigator called on more senior officers. she started becoming more bold and drunk with power, accusing everyone of everything and throwing away what little support she had.  Finally she lost the respect she needed to do her job.

That's what dummy has done here.   He may have had a legitimate complaint at one time, but showing too much sympathy without investigation proved he was no different than other trolls in the past.  :/

It seems your saying KazKaz has a legitimate complaint but people don’t like the way he acted subsequent to the fake trust. Because of this, the fake trust is fine.

[DireWolfM14]

~

You're grasping at straws and turning out to be just as big of a nuisance as your new found ally.  Just because he's the enemy of your enemy shouldn't cause you assume he's your friend.  

"~Kazkaz27" in your Trust list.

Easy as pie.

Done!  Yes, that was indeed easy.

[Rating Place]

~

You're grasping at straws and turning out to be just as big of a nuisance as your new found ally.  Just because he's the enemy of your enemy shouldn't cause you assume he's your friend.  

"~Kazkaz27" in your Trust list.

Easy as pie.

Done!  Yes, that was indeed easy.

with good reason.

Out of curiosity, why did you pile on Kaz with duplicate trust. Is there a chance to take it down?

[DireWolfM14]

Is there a chance to take it down?

Of course.  I can be very reasonable and forgiving. 

However, if he continues to insist that he's the victim when he himself has been the aggressor, striking first with red tags (all frivolous and without merit,) and continues with the narrative that his private keys are safe to use...  Well, that just makes him a retarded wannabe scammer, hypocrite, and trust abuser.  In that case, no, the red tag stays.  Because the community is more important that Kaz's feelings.  And the community deserves to be warned before dealing with a retarded wannabe scammer.

His misplaced arrogance won't let him admit his own faults.  Instead, we're already seeing him attempt to use his meaningless red-tags as leverage to have his own removed.  He left red tags for many for voicing their opinions, and bullied people with those red-tags, all while calling others bullies.  The chickens do come home to roost, after all.

[Rating Place]

Is there a chance to take it down?

Of course.  I can be very reasonable and forgiving.  

However, if he continues to insist that he's the victim when he himself has been the aggressor, striking first with red tags (all frivolous and without merit,) and continues with the narrative that his private keys are safe to use...  Well, that just makes him a retarded wannabe scammer, hypocrite, and trust abuser.  In that case, no, the red tag stays.  Because the community is more important that Kaz's feelings.  And the community deserves to be warned before dealing with a retarded wannabe scammer.

His misplaced arrogance won't let him admit his own faults.  Instead, we're already seeing him attempt to use his meaningless red-tags as leverage to have his own removed.  He left red tags for many for voicing their opinions, and bullied people with those red-tags, all while calling others bullies.  The chickens do come home to roost, after all.

Thanks for that since I don’t know the history. I didn’t even know what happens here in reputation.  

Maybe everyone takes a month off from fighting here in reputation and then all the unnecessary red tags can come down on both sides. Leave the first one up for private keys as a warning. Just a thought.

[DaveF]

"~Kazkaz27" in your Trust list.

Easy as pie.

Done!  Yes, that was indeed easy.

I hope that was actually done a long time ago.
Could just be me getting older and grumpier but I just don't put up with people like Kaz anymore.

There are a few people that I spend the time to point out their flaws, or actively argue with, but for the most part it's ~ and if I have the time and motivation a negative feedback and then I move on.

Would rather spend time outdoors^* riding / hiking then arguing with people on the internet.

-Dave

^*Except for days like today when instead of pollen in the air there might be some air in the pollen out there.
https://youtu.be/BN-oLuNeNxE?t=32

[nutildah]

Would rather spend time outdoors^* riding / hiking then arguing with people on the internet.

I've managed to limit the places where I argue with strangers on the internet to here, and I try to get it all out at the same time. If I was sitting in a cubicle it might make more sense to pass the time in such a fashion, but now that I'm not - and a little older & wiser - I'm not as quick to get angry. Its just wasted energy, and its not good for you.

[Vod]

Out of curiosity, why did you pile on Kaz with duplicate trust. Is there a chance to take it down?

I recently added negative trust for his theft of keys from many organizations.  He admitted it.   His response was to say it was proof I am a pedophile. 

Kaz is an idiot and you may want to separate yourself from that pervert.

[Rating Place]

Out of curiosity, why did you pile on Kaz with duplicate trust. Is there a chance to take it down?

I recently added negative trust for his theft of keys from many organizations.  He admitted it.   His response was to say it was proof I am a pedophile. 

Kaz is an idiot and you may want to separate yourself from that pervert.

I didn’t see that about the theft. First time that I’m aware of it.

Kaz?

[Vod]

I didn’t see that about the theft. First time that I’m aware of it.

Why don't you read that thread and tell us if you still support your perverted buddy.  :/

[Rating Place]

I didn’t see that about the theft. First time that I’m aware of it.

Why don't you read that thread and tell us if you still support your perverted buddy.  :/

link?

[Vod]

I didn’t see that about the theft. First time that I’m aware of it.

Why don't you read that thread and tell us if you still support your perverted buddy.  :/

link?

You quoted it above, my friend.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5583521.0

[Kazkaz27]

I didn’t see that about the theft. First time that I’m aware of it.

Why don't you read that thread and tell us if you still support your perverted buddy.  :/

I didn’t say these things…

I like to put children's dicks in my mouth

I get blow jobs from young boys.

It’s crazy you call me the pervert.

[Vod]

It’s crazy you call me the pervert.

You are a pervert - you keep making up stories about minors in sexual positions and attaching my name.    You took a story I was telling, invented a new narrative, then plagiarized my words in your quote.

[Kazkaz27]

It’s crazy you call me the pervert.

You are a pervert - you keep making up stories about minors in sexual positions and attaching my name.    You took a story I was telling, invented a new narrative, then plagiarized my words in your quote.

Oh, is that kinda like what you did when you said I sold stolen keys or was a self admitted thief?

[Vod]

Oh, is that kinda like what you did when you said I sold stolen keys or was a self admitted thief?

No, you admitted in your subject line you sold stolen keys.   Then in the post you clarified that it was thousands and thousands. 

As I told OgNasty, I am not ashamed of anything I have written, so decide if everything you have written today is something you want your family to read.

[Kazkaz27]

Oh, is that kinda like what you did when you said I sold stolen keys or was a self admitted thief?

No, you admitted in your subject line you sold stolen keys.   Then in the post you clarified that it was thousands and thousands. 

As I told OgNasty, I am not ashamed of anything I have written, so decide if everything you have written today is something you want your family to read.

You said we were friends.   I didn’t do anything really but repeat what’s been discussed about in the past.

We were friends until I realized you were not honest - Exact same as OgNasty.    Then you turned on me - exactly like OgNasty.   I've asked you repeatedly for evidence of the grapevine.   All you've done is repeatedly post sexual quotes about children and putting my name on them, and that was today - not in the past.

I don't want to sue you - I will have enough money from my settlement and I am not greedy.  But I do want a court order barring you from posting online here after the things you wrote about me.   It is defending that application with lies that will cost your house - not me.    I have direct experience with this - I was frustrated about OgNasty's delay tactics but I received assurance my bills would be paid so the longer he delays, the more he will pay me.

I'd say $5k and a new "legal" career would be better than a lawsuit, but I have no idea how your mind works.  I just hope you are not swatting this person.

I didn’t turn on you. You turned on me. You lied about me and claimed I was a thief out of the blue with no evidence to justify your claim. I hit you where it hurt and brought up the past, followed up by using your own words against you. I don’t care what you do from this point forward. My thoughts of you aren’t gonna really change. So go ahead and call the cops. Sue me or don’t sue me. I don’t really care. You also won’t stop me from exposing you for being a liar and your past evils will be there to haunt you regardless.

To be clear: I never stated as a fact that you are a pedophile. What I said was that, based on the specific past statements you made (which you can see quoted in this thread), I believed that was the case. That was my honest reaction and opinion at the time.

I am not claiming to have proof of any illegal acts, nor am I asserting it as an objective fact. It was my subjective interpretation of your own words. If those quotes were taken out of context or do not reflect your actual views, then I accept that my belief was mistaken.

I am not interested in continuing any “name-calling game.” You accused me of theft/fraud first; I responded in kind. Both of us have now thrown serious accusations without full evidence. Let’s drop the personal attacks. I have no desire to damage your reputation beyond defending my own.

If you want to resolve this honorably, address the original trust/fraud issue with facts and on-chain evidence instead of police drama. I’ll do the same.

No hard feelings if we can move on. This is the last comment in which I’ll engage with you.

[Vod]

No hard feelings if we can move on.

I'm moving on and I hope I have an apology from you for involving me in your child porn fantasies before the police email back.   But no hard feelings?   You are a pervert and a thief and I want nothing to do with you other than help the community by removing a very active perverted scammer.

[Kazkaz27]

No hard feelings if we can move on.

I'm moving on and I hope I have an apology from you for involving me in your child porn fantasies before the police email back.   But no hard feelings?   You are a pervert and a thief and I want nothing to do with you other than help the community by removing a very active perverted scammer.

I’m sorry, might have misspoken. Gotta ask. Do you have evidence that I am in fact a thief ? Or are you just interpreting my words as some form of admission, even though I clearly denied your inference regarding my supposed admission? Just wondering if you regard your claim as fact or an opinion?

[Vod]

I’m sorry, might have misspoken. Gotta ask. Do you have evidence that I am in fact a thief ?

You should ask the police that and they can review your key thread and give you options.  I don't need any more from you to file an application, so you can have the last word.

@OP - sorry for consuming the thread like this - hopefully others will learn from his mistake better than he learned from Og.