OgNasty. Reliable and respected user

[Excimer]

This is my independent opinion about OgNasty

I doubt Excimer has looked that far back, he mostly a "current events" troll - I could be wrong though.  Besides the post where OgNasty threatened to kill me in court and take 30 days for the community, I have that well known PM where OgNasty prays for violence; then he went on to tell the court he feared for his life when I finally found out who he is.

Why do I care if someone threatened someone else in PM? I am only responsible for myself. Besides PM's are not a public activity for which one can bear any responsibility. Private messages are not moderated.

- I don't give a shit about your squabbles and who threatened whom in your PM
- I don't give a shit who called whom a "PDFian" and other names
- I don't give a shit about all your court procedures, lawsuits, and other "epsteinain" stories

I am expressing my subjective opinion and I have the right to do so.

Why should I support your harassment of OgNasty? Personally, OgNasty is one who hasn't done anything bad to me. Why should I dislike and distrust him?

When one good user (who didn't steal or scam anyone) was being harassed by crowd (by Vod, 1miau and the other activists), OgNasty didn't interfere. At the very least, this means OgNasty has brains. And the fool 1miau made enemies for himself and paid for his behavior (because of the cowardly little dog should not have barked at the elephant.)

I never noticed OG beating up the weak. Unlike some

I never liked this 1miau. He seemed fluffy and harmless. And when someone was blamed by a crowd, he would always come running and kick the victim even which he didn't know

One victim sent me a proof via tg (screenshot from flag, 1miau was there among flag supporters):



This victim said that never knew 1miau and had no disputes with him, but was surprised by this malicious act on the sly

Vod and 1miau attacked a user they didn't even know and had no dealings with (I am talking not about OgNasty). And after this you will talk here about justice and some kind of lawsuits?

From this, I conclude that Ognasty is independent of the crowd's opinion. That commands respect.

[Kazkaz27]

Only 1 time in my experience I’ve not agreed with OG. It was regarding a post he merited of DireWolfM14’s. I private messaged him about it and he clarified his reasoning which was reasonable. Solid in my book. Transaction and communication always smooth.

[Excimer]

It's generally considered not done to post PMs here, so I won't do that, but I can confirm I've received PMs with childish name calling and a threat to leave negative feedback from OgNasty in 2020 and 2021.

And this is is all this that you can present to OG as accusation?    
"Childish name calling and a threating to leave negative feedback" is not a forum violation
For such a forum mastodont like OG, your arguments sound extremely far-fetched, petty and childish, as if there is nothing else to present.
It's just shameful. Kindergarten. And this is a LoyceV, a greatest forum genius?

I haven't heard a single coherent argument yet. So far, I see that the master OG is acting within the rules.

[DireWolfM14]

I remember coming across NastyMining when I was new here and looking for ways to invest in bitcoin.  After a bit of research I decided that to anyone with any financial sense, NastyMining looks, walks, talks, and smells like a Ponzi scheme.  The fact that shares of NastyMining are delineated in dollars, but paid for in bitcoin is the only thing that's kept OgNasty from getting in trouble.  Whatever, semantics don't override ethics, and legal doesn't mean the same thing as moral.  I wrote it off, and gave Og the benefit of the doubt.  Just because I didn't want to join NasyFans didn't make me think he was untrustworthy.

But then this happened:

First: I've been wondering about this for a while now, and although I don't want to point fingers, I do like transparency so here it goes: What happened to the "dividend" from airdrops based on Bitcoin holdings?

http://transition.obyte.org/ shows that treasurer address 1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF joined the Byteball airdrop with 500.00051 BTC (0.0771% share):

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF
HMdUJW2FnsyZVJAoXhuLuYvt2Zqgdpt5o9xGCqIQqnMVOIyrzkY2ICiwGbAfeCXOiS6SDj/UvRRr+CvIo+zTQJQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Verified!

https://explorer.obyte.org/#OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX shows the GBYTE (now called OBYTE) received on address OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX: on 09.07.2017 13:58:44, approximately 36.174 GBYTE was received. Out of this, 0.0625*500 = 31.25 GBYTE was thanks to forum funds. At the time, this was worth approximately 7 BTC.

There were later airdrops too, and Stellar Lumens could have produced a similar amount based on Bitcoin holdings, but I don't think that data is publicly available.

Og used forum funds to register for an airdrop without informing forum administration, and pocketed 7 bitcoin without any thought that those funds didn't belong to him.  It's all there, documented in that thread, with clear and undeniable evidence.

There's also the issue with abusing the trust system to pat himself on the back.

Og is not ethical or moral.  And no, he's not reliable, either.  The only people who respect him are delusional and without ethics or morals themselves.  Wannabe scammers who are enamored by his ability to legally scam hundreds without consequence.  It's no surprise to me that you two are the only ones jumping to defend him.

[Kazkaz27]

I remember coming across NastyMining when I was new here and looking for ways to invest in bitcoin.  After a bit of research I decided that to anyone with any financial sense, NastyMining looks, walks, talks, and smells like a Ponzi scheme.  The fact that shares of NastyMining are delineated in dollars, but paid for in bitcoin is the only thing that's kept OgNasty from getting in trouble.  Whatever, semantics don't override ethics, and legal doesn't mean the same thing as moral.  I wrote it off, and gave Og the benefit of the doubt.  Just because I didn't want to join NasyFans didn't make me think he was untrustworthy.

But then this happened:

First: I've been wondering about this for a while now, and although I don't want to point fingers, I do like transparency so here it goes: What happened to the "dividend" from airdrops based on Bitcoin holdings?

http://transition.obyte.org/ shows that treasurer address 1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF joined the Byteball airdrop with 500.00051 BTC (0.0771% share):

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF
HMdUJW2FnsyZVJAoXhuLuYvt2Zqgdpt5o9xGCqIQqnMVOIyrzkY2ICiwGbAfeCXOiS6SDj/UvRRr+CvIo+zTQJQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Verified!

https://explorer.obyte.org/#OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX shows the GBYTE (now called OBYTE) received on address OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX: on 09.07.2017 13:58:44, approximately 36.174 GBYTE was received. Out of this, 0.0625*500 = 31.25 GBYTE was thanks to forum funds. At the time, this was worth approximately 7 BTC.

There were later airdrops too, and Stellar Lumens could have produced a similar amount based on Bitcoin holdings, but I don't think that data is publicly available.

Og used forum funds to register for an airdrop without informing forum administration, and pocketed 7 bitcoin without any thought that those funds didn't belong to him.  It's all there, documented in that thread, with clear and undeniable evidence.

There's also the issue with abusing the trust system to pat himself on the back.

Og is not ethical or moral.  And no, he's not reliable, either.  The only people who respect him are delusional and without ethics or morals themselves.  Wannabe scammers who are enamored by his ability to legally scam hundreds without consequence.  It's no surprise to me that you two are the only ones jumping to defend him.

Did he lose forum funds despite “bad judgment” in using those funds without “administrative” approval?

In holding those funds for the forum, did he have authority over them?

Were any forum funds actually lost due to OG’s ethical or moral “integrity” — or lack thereof?

Are you claiming he profited from his actions and his position to move forum funds? If so, was any of that profit donated back to the forum, or was it solely pocketed by OG?

Side note: You are quite possibly the biggest narrative- and trust-system-twisting scumbags on the entire forum, so those questions are important.

[Excimer]

Wannabe scammers

Well, this is a typical reaction to an opinion independent from the crowd.

Where did it say I respect him? You are delusional yourself.

I asked why I should dislike him? How can I dislike or distrust a person who has never attacked me? As for me, all the scammers are in DT.

I remember coming across NastyMining when I was new here and looking for ways to invest in bitcoin.  After a bit of research I decided that to anyone with any financial sense, NastyMining looks, walks, talks, and smells like a Ponzi scheme.  The fact that shares of NastyMining are delineated in dollars, but paid for in bitcoin is the only thing that's kept OgNasty from getting in trouble.  Whatever, semantics don't override ethics, and legal doesn't mean the same thing as moral.  I wrote it off, and gave Og the benefit of the doubt.  Just because I didn't want to join NasyFans didn't make me think he was untrustworthy.

But then this happened:
...

blah blah
You're being vague and unsure. You're using the word "Ponzi" with uncertainty. Provide clear arguments that it was a Ponzi. The fact that there somehow SMELLED something to you there doesn't interest me much.

Og used forum funds to register for an airdrop without informing forum administration, and pocketed 7 bitcoin without any thought that those funds didn't belong to him.

Maybe this was his award for his "assets optimization" and "active capital management". Some of the managers here also have their own bonuses.

If he was truly guilty of something, Theimos would have punished him long ago. The rules were different before. After all, a m*xers were also allowed before.

ANd OG still remains a respected member of the forum. This is evident from the Grok, not from me. And you're storytelling me something about Ponzi? Well, if you don't believe Grok, ask Teimos. I think he will confirm that OG's contribution to the forum is significant.

Wannabe scammers who are enamored by his ability to legally scam hundreds without consequence.  It's no surprise to me that you two are the only ones jumping to defend him.

LOL  
You better tell me how you all worshiped the scammer Lauda.  
Who is wannabe scammers now? Who are was enamored by Lauda's ability to legally scam hundreds without consequence?  

[JustBeKause]

Og used forum funds to register for an airdrop without informing forum administration, and pocketed 7 bitcoin without any thought that those funds didn't belong to him.  It's all there, documented in that thread, with clear and undeniable evidence.

What people don't understand, is that somewhere out there, in some alternate universe, there is a reality where Steamtyme never made that thread, LoyceV never posted his findings, theymos never found out, and OgNasty still holds the fucking coins.

But hey, he didn't steal anything haha rite?

Fiduciary duty rite haha?

Returned more than anyone else rite? Ha.

>_>

[OgNasty]

1) theymos could have asked for any coins related to the treasury at any point. I didn’t steal anything or claim anything with the intent of keeping them for myself. In fact, they are still held on the bittrex exchange if he wants to KYC and claim them.

2) If I were still the treasurer, I also would’ve claimed the Hex airdrop for the forum which would have netted a couple million dollars in BTC. It was a massive loss for the forum that I was not still the treasurer when this occurred.

3) NastyFans isn’t a Ponzi Scheme. Distributions come from sales of coins and mining rewards. It is actually crazy that people still spread that lie. Maybe I’ll do something about that with whatever retainer is leftover after the Vod case is tossed out.

4) I’m not going to continue responding to the nonsense claims and will probably delete this soon as I don’t want to be a part of any of these threads so quote it if you want it.

I’m very flattered that so many people dedicate so much of their lives to me. Being infamous is fun.