RE: AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[howardsentell]

Why are you resisting technology that can improve our world? I have said that artificial intelligence is involved in many of the activities you participate in. Throughout history new inventions have faced resistance. It is better to accept these changes now than risk being left behind. Artificial intelligence and supercomputers will soon have a greater impact than the internet. Also when you see people using AI you rely on AI services to make that identification which is contradictory. Bitcoin is decentralized and supporting its adoption is a good idea.

 "CZ" Zhao (Founder of Binance)
"Satoshi Nakamoto was an AI from the future."

Larry Page (Co-founder of Google)
"You guys know what that means? That’s artificial intelligence." (Referencing how the entire web and predictive search engine mechanics rely on AI-like processing).

Ray Kurzweil (Futurist and Computer Scientist)
"We have the potential to use AI-powered biology to cure and prevent all disease, effectively reversing aging and extending the human lifespan."

[Kazkaz27]

The cronies like utilizing AI in order to “track” AI. They like to complain about others people’s use of AI but justify their own use of it. They want people to create disclaimers for their AI utilization yet don’t provide disclaimers with their own use of it. It’s a narrative driven approach. Do as I say, not as I do type of thing. They are butt hurt about my AI disclaimer now even though they are the ones who demanded it. It’s redundantly ironic and moronic. You can’t reason with these people or feed them any logic. It’s like leading a horse to water. You can’t make them drink. I’ve decided just to drown them.

The whole AI Spam Report Thread is literally a trash bin inside of a trash bin.

Edit: Here is a good disclaimer to add to your signature if anyone wants it:

Disclaimer: 🤖 AI Occasionally Utilized!

(Disclaimer: Cronies cry if use it)

[Charles-Tim]

This forum did not against the use of AI, but some people are using it wrongly. Some people will use it to generate a whole article or post, and post it on this forum without referencing it as AI written.

Some people only use it to promote another sites. They will use AI to write article, post it without referencing it. You will see them keep posting new inorganic topics and posts often to promote a site like exchanges. This is very wrong.

You can use AI, but make sure you reference it that you used AI and not hide it. I have have posts which I included AI in quotes or in a way that people will know that I am using AI, but the posts are not deleted.

You can read this about AI guidelines on this forum: AI guidelines

[Kazkaz27]

This forum did not against the use of AI, but some people are using it wrongly. Some people will use it to generate a whole article or post, and post it on this forum without referencing it as AI written.

Some people only use it to promote another sites. They will use AI to write article, post it without referencing it. You will see them keep posting new inorganic topics and posts often to promote a site like exchanges. This is very wrong.

You can use AI, but make sure you reference it that you used AI and not hide it. I have have posts which I included AI in quotes or in a way that people will know that I am using AI, but the posts are not deleted.

You can read this about AI guidelines on this forum: AI guidelines

Yeah, it’s true. Some people use it wrongly. The opposite is also true. Some people attack or report it wrongly. But that’s really based on perspective. Someone’s view of the “right way” may not align with another’s view of the “right way”. The divide seems evenly split 50/50. The guidelines are vague or open to interpretation just like many rules or guidelines here. They are speculative, abused, not followed, and not easily enforced. In other words, basically pointless. Reminds me of the trust system. — Pointless.