World politics of seeing less developed countries as terrorist country

[kingstep]

Because when personal agendas are into the leaders, you'd see how they're acting upon towards other nations that either messes with them or helping them with the basic things they need to up their industries and they're getting supplies from the less developed countries.

when the less developed countries sees that they are being exploited and refused to stand up to defend themselves, who do you then blame? if the developing countries are in the position of the developed countries, would they not do worse? in matters of a country taking advantage of another and appearing as the good one while the others are looked at as the bad ones, you don't have the right to blame them because they has the advantage and were smart enough to take full control of it.

every nation wants to dominates either directly or indirectly. if you are sitting back playing pity and waiting for someone to have pity on you, then you are not ready to grow as a nation. as it stands, when you call a nation like, Iran, we all know what comes to our mind. when we call a nation like Nigeria, we still know what comes to our mind and when we talk about the united state, we still knows what comes to out mind. it is in the place of a nation to project herself the way she wants to be address and fortunately, most of the western nation knows how best to go about this.

[Nmjut]

Today, developed countries like the US, England, Germany etc see less developed countries as a threat to their well been but they forget that most of the renowned terrorist actually lived in there countries. The way they screen those from Arab less developed countries is different from the way they screen those from the less developed European countries. These countries especially US pride themselves as the alpha and Omega of this world. They always boast of how peaceful and law abiding her citizens are but the reality check is the USA to a large extent breed terrorist who go about shooting school students and shooting people in beer parlor
 Of recent, the man who almost killed Donald Trump during his campaign and the one who breached the protocol to attack DJ is US citizen. What is your take on this lets discuss

There is no country in the world that is totally free from terrorism. So, it is a foolish act to blame one country or a specific region on the basis of their economic status, for terrorist pactivities. However, sometimes the economic vulnerabilities lead the prevalance of illegal activities or crimes across the world.  But mostly in such cases, the economically vulnerable beings are heired by the well class. So, here they work for them in return they got an amount through which they fulfil their ecomomic needs. To conclude , terorism is a chronic disease that has nothing to do with any specific place, country, and religion. It has its seeds in an individaul's mindset. This reprehensible act should be eliminated by changing the mentality of people.

[Marykeller]

No country in the world that doesn't have dirty linens on them. Is the country that made theirs to be open, for other world to see, will other nation crucify and judge.

Some of the Arab nations and Africa has allow terrorists group to dwell among them to an extents they make live unbearable for the citizens of those Arab and African nations. You don't expect Americans whose government fight very hard to flush out terrorists in their country to give an open hand to countries that terrorists disturbs a lot. They have to do all they can in their power to watch and inspect the citizens of those nation that terrorists disturbs before they enter their country.

[BADecker]

^^^ Yet the populations keep rising.     

[Accardo]

There is no country in the world that is totally free from terrorism. So, it is a foolish act to blame one country or a specific region on the basis of their economic status, for terrorist pactivities. However, sometimes the economic vulnerabilities lead the prevalance of illegal activities or crimes across the world.  But mostly in such cases, the economically vulnerable beings are heired by the well class. So, here they work for them in return they got an amount through which they fulfil their ecomomic needs. To conclude , terorism is a chronic disease that has nothing to do with any specific place, country, and religion. It has its seeds in an individaul's mindset. This reprehensible act should be eliminated by changing the mentality of people.

You expect things like this to happen as a result of total dependence of underdeveloped nations on developed countries, thereby giving them the audacity to say or treat their dependents in any way possible, and calling them all sorts of names. Nobody is to be blamed but the lack of the third world nations, most of the times, to develop a world of their own, a world they'll be capable of controlling, and contented with, instead of copying or adapting to every thing the first tier nations do. Culture is there for a purpose, the mentality of the West and East has grown widely in places like Africa. Naturally, when a group of people can't do something for themselves it'll be hard to escape ill treatments from those they depend fully on for help and assistance.

[Callido]

This is not the first time this is happening on the developed countries are seeing less developed as a problem to their enrichment.
These developed countries will not want to see the underdeveloped to get to the level where they can boast of their own development to make live better for their own people. Self politics has made the world a place where evil people can dominate.

I don't blame developed countries for thinking that way, the reason is that most underdeveloped countries have the best resources to raise the economy of their country but why are the majority still in poverty, all because of corruption and that stigma follows every citizen of that country whenever they try to enter into developed countrie.

The difference between corruption in developed countries and corruption in underdeveloped nations is that, developed countries are corrupt to where it will benefit their country at large while underdeveloped do act only just for their selfish interests, take a look at what is happening around you.

[Pi-network314159]

Today, developed countries like the US, England, Germany etc see less developed countries as a threat to their well been but they forget that most of the renowned terrorist actually lived in there countries. The way they screen those from Arab less developed countries is different from the way they screen those from the less developed European countries. These countries especially US pride themselves as the alpha and Omega of this world. They always boast of how peaceful and law abiding her citizens are but the reality check is the USA to a large extent breed terrorist who go about shooting school students and shooting people in beer parlor
 Of recent, the man who almost killed Donald Trump during his campaign and the one who breached the protocol to attack DJ is US citizen. What is your take on this lets discuss

Of course what do you expect? A country that is still undeveloped and many bad things are happening, corruption is taking place day by day, and no solution is given , they will definitely lose trust from other countries and they will see them as threat, because if they can't handle their country very well, it means they can not handle a developed country. Before a country is called developed, it mean it has gone through a thorough training and screening. So someone can not just come and fit in to where he does not belong, some identification and screening needs to be done to see their compitency. I don't see anything wrong with that except it is done for other porpose of which I don't care to know.

[Y3shot]

Now let's take a likkle drive back into history. Who invaded who, stole, killed and experimented on others?! Who did?! How are those who did this not branded terrorist in the first place?! How are those who help plant a proxy government oppressing citizens 9f that country not terrorist?!

The above-mentioned are not any good, most especially the British who have invaded and colonised almost every nation on earth about 171 of the country's in the world have been invaded by the British. Germans are not any good, or have we forgotten what they did back in the day to the African country Namibia?! We're all owed reparations, ( Africans ).

Killed? Laughable!! That was obviously staged. We should learn to identify such propagandised stuffs.

There is no need to point to who to blame, but one thing I know is that the way you want people to see you or treat you is in your hands. If you check countries that were invaded, leaders of these countries think only of themselves and do not consider their citizens.

 A country whose leader's primary concern is to serve and to fight corruption will find it difficult for any country to invade. Powerful countries use irregularities and bad leadership against them. If developing countries focus on good leadership, no country can easily joke with them, but with their style of leadership, they seem to be a joke.

[Oluwa-btc]

There is no need to point to who to blame, but one thing I know is that the way you want people to see you or treat you is in your hands. If you check countries that were invaded, leaders of these countries think only of themselves and do not consider their citizens.

 A country whose leader's primary concern is to serve and to fight corruption will find it difficult for any country to invade. Powerful countries use irregularities and bad leadership against them. If developing countries focus on good leadership, no country can easily joke with them, but with their style of leadership, they seem to be a joke.

I'm do not consider it interesting in anyway whenever I see indirect defenders of the west. At least, we've had our own faur share of good leaders who put our people first but what did the west do to this leaders?! They ended up killing our favorite leaders over the years and we join hands with them to blame it on the current puppeteers and corrupt leaders. It's just unfair.

We've had our own fair share of good and decent leaders, but they was killed by the west!

[Juicyhome]

OP, the USA has a bragging right, they have done well for the world, many aid and loan are collected from USA by the underdeveloping countries to be use for capital projects to develop themselves, at the end the bad leadership will use it to enrich themselves instead to develop themselves,  if the developed countries says underdeveloping countries are terrorists state,then they're right, the don't just talk per say, they have prove form to support their claims.
Look at Nigeria where terrorists are killing daily and the government are silent about it, how will Nigeria develop with such insecurity will not allow investors into your country.

[uneng]

You can't generalize every attacks mentioned as terrorist ones, as there are different motivations involved. In the case of school attacks, they are mainly executed by bullied students who seek for revenge or who might be facing psycho outbreaks. They aren't motivated by ideology like the terrorists who hate the western world and USA in special.

And regards american citizens who are terrorists, they are heavily influenced by wicked ideologies which are also shared by the classical terrorists from less developed countries. In other words: the perfect enemy's weapon to destroy the nation from inside.

[Doll2233]

No country is totally free from violent crime or terrorism, therefore parading a country as safe is not is wrong. Even in countries that have less crime, they sometimes have some security problems. The US cannot claim to be innocent of the terrorist activities in many countries. History has shown that they are one of the major financiers of terrorist groups. During the recent unrest in Iran, the US shipped arms to the Kurdish intermediaries in Iraq. These men were supposed to transfer the arms to protesters in Iran. Reports show that these guns never got to the protesters. Guess what those arms will be used for: terrorism. They also sponsored the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, Syrian rebel groups, right-wing Contra rebels and so on.

There is absolutely no country in the world that is free from any sort of crime or terrorism and governments are being criticized when there foreign policies contribute to the instability of their country but just saying that United state is the major financier of terrorist group is an over simplification of the whole thing. US has supported the groups because of the Geo political reasons during the time of the conflict like cold war and the mujahideens were backed by the US in 1980s because they were fighting the Soviet Union but later some individuals from those movement became the part of some extremist organisation that doesn't mean that originally they were supporting the terrorist groups and similarly same applies to the Syrian and Contra rebel groups these programs were controversial and they had some unintended consequences and it is very important to see that there are many countries like US Russia China Iran they have been always accused of backing these proxy groups because of  their own interest rather than blaming them we need to recognise the global conflict.

[Royal Cap]

I think that when we look at it as a country versus country the discussion often goes in the wrong direction.  No country is perfect and it is not right to say that people from a particular region or nationality are inherently more dangerous, there is no denying that violence and serious crimes occur even in developed countries. At the same time it is not right to judge an entire country or population by the actions of a few criminals, therefore before considering other countries as a threat, they should address this extremist mentality and gun culture within their own country.

[Ndabagi01]

What you should know is that every country has terrorists in them, wishing and from outside of the nation. Other countries seeing less developed countries as a threat to them without having any proof to show for it are just looking for whom to hold responsible for their own internal crisis or discrepancies. Every country can as well get to tell perfectly well what they think or assume of another country, it doesn’t still justify their claim about the country.

[Franklyn-wood]

What you should know is that every country has terrorists in them, wishing and from outside of the nation. Other countries seeing less developed countries as a threat to them without having any proof to show for it are just looking for whom to hold responsible for their own internal crisis or discrepancies. Every country can as well get to tell perfectly well what they think or assume of another country, it doesn’t still justify their claim about the country.

Seeing other under deloped countries and terrorists won't solve anything because we can hardly pick out a country where there is no terrorist. It good talk about factors that cause terrorism and why it keeps increasing on daily bases.
Hardship which is as a result of high cost of living, reduced supply of social amenity like roads, food, shelter, hospital and water by government, creating political thug's for selfish interest. This are reason why every country no matter how develop they are there will be terrorist, except with local and international help of the government to eradicate them from the society, by granting the amnesty, providing jobs and other needs,

[BADecker]

It's about the God of the Bible protecting His own. He is the only God. Allah simply means 'God'. Muslims don't say God because they are trying to promote Islam/Muslamism.

[Berry2d]

There are some very important factors to consider when any country is either enjoying development or not. As for those experiencing unexpected development, it will be clearly seen
that  they are free from terrorism because any nation with the existence of terrorists never by chance experience development.
Therefore it is straightly open that those nations faced with terrorism are underdeveloped countries because failed structural systems is one of the characteristics of terrorism. Without been told i will say we can see for ourselves on countries like Nigeria, since the existence of terrorism they have been experiencing great underdevelopment when they are supposed to be moving forward because of the existence of great mineral resources.

[Wakate]

Now let's take a likkle drive back into history. Who invaded who, stole, killed and experimented on others?! Who did?! How are those who did this not branded terrorist in the first place?! How are those who help plant a proxy government oppressing citizens 9f that country not terrorist?!

The above-mentioned are not any good, most especially the British who have invaded and colonised almost every nation on earth about 171 of the country's in the world have been invaded by the British. Germans are not any good, or have we forgotten what they did back in the day to the African country Namibia?! We're all owed reparations, ( Africans ).

Killed? Laughable!! That was obviously staged. We should learn to identify such propagandised stuffs.

There is no need to point to who to blame, but one thing I know is that the way you want people to see you or treat you is in your hands. If you check countries that were invaded, leaders of these countries think only of themselves and do not consider their citizens.

This is bullshit and I can see that you know nothing about politics and western invasions that is why you think you can become a sheep and not get attacked or controlled by the different propaganda? France is a typical example and they know that once the access and the benefits they are getting from Africa are cut off, that will be the beginning of their misfortunes.
Do you know why France is looking for ways to get access to the burkinafaso raw materials agian? These people are funding conflicts in the African and Arab regions to make the region looks bad so people can call for their supports and aid.

[Lida93]

 Unfortunately we're living in a world where the words of some are taking to be truly well established and given attention than those of some others. No country is clean of internal security challenges and for some there are those that are peculiar to them while its rarely heard of about others.
On the terrorism aspect it's crazy how some of these terrorists groups and organisations where initially created by those who claims to be helping the countries where these terror groups are spreading like wildfire destroying everything it comes in contact with. Take the book haram terrorist groups in Nigeria today, you wouldn't believe where the recent file findings about the government of one so-called power country having a hand in it's creation through it agents. These beasts are created so they can in turn have a market for their weapons.