they put $20 million a month into buybacks. it comes from revenue and it is almost 50% of what Hyperliquid allocates to buybacks. Yet the FDV is many times lower, than HL's.
This is the number most people in this thread are ignoring. The platform generates real revenue and allocates a significant portion to buybacks. That is not typical shitcoin behavior.
The problem is the regulatory overhang. Pump.fun has been under scrutiny for enabling scam tokens at scale and that risk is priced into the token whether people admit it or not. Strong fundamentals, but a platform that regulators are watching closely is a different kind of risk than pure speculation.
I still think it's just the market conditions that make everyone ignore any fundamental metrics.
Pancakeswap allocates $2m from revenue into buying and burning its CAKE token every month. Sure it's 10 times less than what Pump.fun does, but the FDV is also 4 times lower and there's no selling pressure from investors or the team anymore.
Yet the token doesn't grow at all either.
Many things are just awfully mispriced.