If US invade Cuba, is that different from Russia invasion of Ukraine?

[PostQuantumBTC]

If United States invade Cuba, is that not the same as Russia aggression on Ukraine?

Cuba is nothing before US in military, power and any other thing, it will be an easy mission for US but is that fair at all? Trump want to invade the country because it is communist government that they are practicing.

[NotFuzzyWarm]

If United States invade Cuba, is that not the same as Russia aggression on Ukraine?

Cuba is nothing before US in military, power and any other thing, it will be an easy mission for US but is that fair at all? Trump want to invade the country because it is communist government that they are practicing.

No difference.
Hopefully Trumoplini will not do that. He got away with Venezuela only because it may actually help the people there.

Iran was/is a huge gamble that he is so far getting away with despite the collateral global economic damage. Biggest question there is if Congress will allow it to continue.

Taking over Cuba would entail installing and long term supporting of a new government. Unlike Venezuela (and Panama, not to mention a few other South American countries back in the early 1900's), AFAIK there are no viable Cuban opposition leaders to take over running the country. In short it would be a nightmare all the way around for both the Cuban people and the US.

[programmer3666]

This era of Donald Trump has made the US appear more aggressive lately, with many political decisions and strong statements that people see as imperialistic or controlling. Because of this, many people are now comparing the actions of major world powers more carefully instead of criticizing only one side. If the US were to invade a smaller country like Cuba because of political or ideological differences, many people would naturally compare it to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. When a powerful country uses force against a weaker one, it raises questions about fairness and double standards in global politics. The world is becoming more aware that powerful nations normally criticize aggression from others while they also sometimes show similar behavior themselves and we are currently witnessing it.

[tvbcof]

Cuba didn't have a powerful coalition pumping them full of arms and 'advisors' with the expressed purpose of killing people in their border regions in order to get a proxy war going against the U.S..

Cuba didn't sign accords with the U.S. that Merkle and company later admitted always were a ruse to buy time to arm Cuba for an inevitable attack.

If these things didn't happen against Russia at the hands of NATO+, I wouldn't consider Russia the to be the good-guys in the current Ukrainian SMO.  Since they did, I consider Russia to be more than right to react in the way they did.  Much harder in fact.  Since their adversaries got stuck in the tar-baby and don't know whether to shit or go blind, it makes sense for Russia to draw things out as long as possible.

[Vod]

If United States invade Cuba, is that not the same as Russia aggression on Ukraine?

No difference.

Wouldn't that be awesome if the US military ran out of ordinance and fuel right in the middle of the invasion?  Unfortunately without fuel, Cuba can't mount a defense.

[DanWalker]

This era of Donald Trump has made the US appear more aggressive lately, with many political decisions and strong statements that people see as imperialistic or controlling. Because of this, many people are now comparing the actions of major world powers more carefully instead of criticizing only one side. If the US were to invade a smaller country like Cuba because of political or ideological differences, many people would naturally compare it to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. When a powerful country uses force against a weaker one, it raises questions about fairness and double standards in global politics. The world is becoming more aware that powerful nations normally criticize aggression from others while they also sometimes show similar behavior themselves and we are currently witnessing it.

What about the wars in Vietnam under Johnson, Iraq and Afghanistan under Bush, Libya under Barack Obama, and the hundreds of other wars they started after WWII? The imperial nature of the US has never disappeared.

If the US invaded Cuba, it would be no surprise, as they have done so hundreds of times in the past. They are people who disregard international law and habitually bully smaller nations. Thats just their nature.

[PostQuantumBTC]

What about the wars in Vietnam under Johnson, Iraq and Afghanistan under Bush, Libya under Barack Obama, and the hundreds of other wars they started after WWII? The imperial nature of the US has never disappeared.

I think the world still supported some, like the Afghanistan which is connected to Islamic terrorists. But not all was supported, example is the Libya which United States should leave them alone and let the fight remain locally within Iran. I do not also see a good reason for the war in Vietnam. US funded the South Vietnamese, but Soviet Union and China funded the North Vietnam. The North Vietnam won and merge the South to be Vietnam of today.

If the US invaded Cuba, it would be no surprise, as they have done so hundreds of times in the past. They are people who disregard international law and habitually bully smaller nations. Thats just their nature.

It will be totally wrong because Cuba did not do US anything than US want to show superiority.

[JeromeTash]

When we talk about the double standards portrayed by the US. This is just one of the examples.
1. You can't say that you are a democratic state, yet you keep invading other sovereign nations and destabilise them.
2. You can say you are on a war against terror, yet you keep terrorising other nations with your army.
3. You can't say that you respect human rights, yet you impose sanctions and blockades on civilians of other nations.

After witnessing what the US has done over the last half a century, I don't think it's anything comparable to what other countries have done.

[Ucy]

Russia did the right thing, though not early enough, by intervening to save and protect vulnerable Russians and Russia speakers in regions that refused to accept a coup that will force them into a union that is against their good Christian or moral values.  They instead choose to be part of Russia.

The regions which are mostly liberated by Russia were actually the ones that were invaded after choosing to be independent from Ukraine. Russia eventually intervened.
 You have the right to go into your neighbors properties to save them from robbers, as well as go into the robbers properties to stop them from attacking your neighbors. This cannot really be considered an invasion since the neighbors properties have be violated and they need help while robbers properties are no longer protected by property law. Law enforcers are allowed to easily go into a  property when there is serious violation by the owner.
Laws are made for the good of people

In regards to Cuba, choosing communism isn't enough reason for intervention unless it is an existential threat issue or violent attack against innocent Cubans that affects their rights. . But they will have to call or ask for help or need help before an intervention by the qualified is allowed.
From experience so far with American interventions in Venezuela and Iran, America won't be allowed to go into Cuba or attack her in anyway, including attacking the leaders. That decision will be done in other ways when necessary. The country is currently under protection and will be sufficiently defended