BitcoinGirl.club is a perverted liar - support my flag to end the drama

[Vod]

While my investigative team was going through the recent KazKaz27 attack to look for evidence in my lawsuit (yes, that's still going on...) I discovered this lie suggesting Bitcoingirl.club has morals.

b) a pervert that joked about sex with children for over a decade?

Not a joke, It's available online, recorded, archived. I read it personally. I am too good not to share it with anyone else, after all it will bring bad name to our community.

Wouldn't your ban last year for sharing the link be the reason you don't share it now?   Certainly not from imagined holiness.  

Your perversion is related to a joke you will not let die.  Your lie is still suggesting it's true.  Look what your words did to KazKaz27 - if he can recover damages from you, and you can recoup them from OgNasty, that will make the forum whole.  In the meantime, a flag is necessary if you are going to spread lies about sex with children in order to help another Legendary member scam newbies.

Flag created.  Stop with the act before you get arrested too.

[Excimer]

I support this topic. I don't like Vod, but objectively speaking BitcoinGirl.club is a troll

[Vod]

I support this topic. I don't like Vod, but objectively speaking BitcoinGirl.club is a troll

Excimer, you've written the same illegal garbage she has - luckily you're already identified as a troll, but BitcoinGirl.club was not when she wrote those lies and it lead to at least one user committing at least one felony. 

I don't want to constantly and aggressively defend my reputation with RL consequences, but these fantasies you perverts have must stop now. 

[Vod]

This is posted to support my flag.

b) a pervert that joked about sex with children for over a decade?

Not a joke, It's available online, recorded, archived. I read it personally. I am too good not to share it with anyone else, after all it will bring bad name to our community.

OgNasty claimed he was just joking many times.    Then recently he changed it to lying to everyone because he was trying to distance himself from me.   He also gave multiple merits to your post parroting his accusation.

BitcoinGirl.club idolizes him - claims she is too good to share OG's perverted link with anyone else, but she did share it last year and received a ban.    

I'm forced to post here to pay for food until at least June 18.  I'd like for OgNasty's perverted joke to die out naturally, and I do not trust people that support his sick jokes.   I'm certainly not the first person to be targeted by him.   I ask you to support my flag not because of her perverted trolling, but because she is a liar and one day may decide to self destruct like kazkaz27..  

[JollyGood]

I guess the BitcoinGirl.Club account has been rendered useless as far as earning from a signature campaign is concerned. Now, if the account was being used to post several times a day on a regular basis over weeks and/or months, one could deduce he would continue posting for reasons known to him (such as hoping to join a campaign or maybe not caring about campaigns and/or earning and instead taking a stand as a matter of principle).

Had he started posting sporadically after the number of tags against his name increased, then one could assume it was because he lost hope of monetising it and was only interested in using it from time to time in order to maintain a public face showing he is taking a stand against the so-called injustices he encountered. In that case, the common sense approach would be use another account with the intention of monetising it and completely disassociating it from the BitcoinGirl.Club account. Not that I pay too much attention to his account but it seems there is nothing to suggest that has happened.

I suppose eventually the motives for his reaction to the negative tag will be known, whether it is just a case of him believing it was a wrong use of the trust system or whether he is seeking attention from time to time as that is all he can do with the account now (and hope that a campaign manager that does not have a high opinion of several members that excluded him will offer him a spot in a campaign).

[Satofan44]

Opposition: nutildah, BTCforJoe, Epaper

@nutildah perhaps give your opinion? But something very strange is happening with the other 2 users, are they possibly related accounts or alt accounts?

BTCforJoe made his last post in October 12, 2018 for the sections that I see, and has a defaulted loan from 2022.

Epaper made his last post in February 13, 2026, with very little activity in the prior years. It is very unlikely that these accounts randomly found this case and decided to vote in opposition.

I guess the BitcoinGirl.Club account has been rendered useless as far as earning from a signature campaign is concerned. Now, if the account was being used to post several times a day on a regular basis over weeks and/or months, one could deduce he would continue posting for reasons known to him (such as hoping to join a campaign or maybe not caring about campaigns and/or earning and instead taking stand as a matter of principle).

There is a big problem with users like that since no group in power wants to completely get rid of them swiftly, instead good members have to tolerate various levels of abuse. Only if the member in question reaches a crazy-level behavior and starts strongly breaking the forum rules does something actually happen, the level of leniency here is incredible and it is a case example that can be used as an argument against leniency in anything.

[Vod]

@nutildah perhaps give your opinion? But something very strange is happening with the other 2 users, are they possibly related accounts or alt accounts?

BTCforJoe made his last post in October 12, 2018 for the sections that I see, and has a defaulted loan from 2022.

Epaper made his last post in February 13, 2026, with very little activity in the prior years. It is very unlikely that these accounts randomly found this case and decided to vote in opposition.

Why would someone need to cheat in a flag on lying? 

The fact is we are about three weeks away from a fundamental shift in attitude on the forum as perverted liars like Bitcoingirl.club realize their idol is receiving consequences.    I don't want to start new battles over something that is close to closure.   But this entire opposition reminds me of what Trump was called on his auto plant tour a while ago.

[holydarkness]

Opposition: nutildah, BTCforJoe, Epaper

@nutildah perhaps give your opinion? [...]

Not wanting to enter this swamp of whirlwind of chaos and uhh a topic that I believe predate my existence as I am not aware of it and not acquainted with it. Completely from neutral side here, and returning a good gesture since Vod commented on my own heated thread and flag and help with de/escalation of the case and flag... does someone really need to explain why they support or oppose a flag?

It's the show of DT's judgment capability, if we have to explain it, DTs has to anwer to a lot, and I mean A LOT, of flags, since there are thousand of flags with support/opposition.

[Vod]

does someone really need to explain why they support or oppose a flag?

Of course not.   But Satofan44 has a valid point about two old accounts waking up just to oppose the flag.  That is odd, but it does not mean nutildah had anything to do with it.

[holydarkness]

does someone really need to explain why they support or oppose a flag?

Of course not.   But Satofan44 has a valid point about two old accounts waking up just to oppose the flag.  That is odd, but it does not mean nutildah had anything to do with it.

I believe it's not, neither nutildah and not BCG too. BCG, for the reason that he's one of the few that share similar writing-quirk as me to use square bracket --"[" and "]", namely "[a text here]"-- instead of round bracket for bracketing purpose. Maybe an alt of someone who want to support but not with their main. And thus I don't think they're on DT as if they're on DT, they'll understand supporting from alt-and-non-DT is practically useless.

Both shouldn't be connected, one stated they live in Central America, the other from Indonesia,

Still doesn't work for me. I uninstalled adblock completely. I enter my id. Then I enter the captcha, then I wait for the timer, hit the button, and the page just refreshes. I don't get a message saying that I was paid out to my faucetbox, and all the fields are still open. So I tried to put in all my info again, and the same thing happened. I'm in Central America, if this helps anything.

Tidak semua signature melarang newbi untuk masuk dalam peserta kampanye. Ada beberapa kampanye yang menerima newbi sebagai pesertanya.. mungkin jika ada kampanye yg tidak menggunakan newbi... karena mereka masih belum yakin kepada si newbi untuk menjalankan kampanye mereka ditakutkan spam. Trus signture newbi terbatas hanya beberapa karakter saja.

[nutildah]

does someone really need to explain why they support or oppose a flag?

Of course not.   But Satofan44 has a valid point about two old accounts waking up just to oppose the flag.  That is odd, but it does not mean nutildah had anything to do with it.

Of course I have nothing to do with those accounts.

You're bullying people with your DT status and forcing everyone to pay attention to your personal drama. If you think this is acceptable behavior, you shouldn't be on DT.

[Satofan44]

Opposition: nutildah, BTCforJoe, Epaper

@nutildah perhaps give your opinion? [...]

Not wanting to enter this swamp of whirlwind of chaos and uhh a topic that I believe predate my existence as I am not aware of it and not acquainted with it. Completely from neutral side here, and returning a good gesture since Vod commented on my own heated thread and flag and help with de/escalation of the case and flag... does someone really need to explain why they support or oppose a flag?

It's the show of DT's judgment capability, if we have to explain it, DTs has to anwer to a lot, and I mean A LOT, of flags, since there are thousand of flags with support/opposition.

Of course not, that is why I asked and not demanded. In cases like this I would not be able to properly assets the reasons for which someone has done something unless they provide their thoughts on it as well. It would be good if he shared his thoughts for learning purposes, many more users are reading these threads than are posting in them. He does not have to though, it is entirely his choice.

does someone really need to explain why they support or oppose a flag?

Of course not.   But Satofan44 has a valid point about two old accounts waking up just to oppose the flag.  That is odd, but it does not mean nutildah had anything to do with it.

That was not the implication that I was trying to make anyway, the idea is that the two accounts are somehow related to BitcoinGirl.club.

Both shouldn't be connected, one stated they live in Central America, the other from Indonesia,

It does not matter what they said, their behavior regarding this particular case and the specifics of the accounts is what is connecting them. Random dead accounts don't just suddenly wake up by chance to only act on a flag that most active users and DT users are ignoring.

You're bullying people with your DT status and forcing everyone to pay attention to your personal drama. If you think this is acceptable behavior, you shouldn't be on DT.

All of this seems to be instigated by BitcoinGirl.club themselves, unless you are referring to something else.

[Vod]

I believe it's not, neither nutildah and not BCG too. BCG, for the reason that he's one of the few that share similar writing-quirk as me to use square bracket --"[" and "]", namely "[a text here]"-- instead of round bracket for bracketing purpose.

I use [] if I am quoting someone and I'm inserting a word or phrase to help keep it in context, as that's what I see the news sources do.    I think multiple flags would be needed, such as using a comma to indicate a decimal point vs a "." or ":".  

You're bullying people with your DT status and forcing everyone to pay attention to your personal drama.

I am trying to end the drama.  Don't try to squash discussion like Trump - just put me on ignore, hypocrite.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5583217.0

Edited to include personal drama I had to endure that lead to felony extortion against me.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

b) a pervert that joked about sex with children for over a decade?

Not a joke, It's available online, recorded, archived. I read it personally. I am too good not to share it with anyone else, after all it will bring bad name to our community.

Wouldn't your ban last year for sharing the link be the reason you don't share it now?   Certainly not from imagined holiness.  

Your perversion is related to a joke you will not let die.  Your lie is still suggesting it's true.  Look what your words did to KazKaz27 - if he can recover damages from you, and you can recoup them from OgNasty, that will make the forum whole.  In the meantime, a flag is necessary if you are going to spread lies about sex with children in order to help another Legendary member scam newbies.

Flag created.  Stop with the act before you get arrested too.

Vod when people get older they want to find peace with everything they have. They spend more time with family and friends. Let go the conflicts and grudges that are no longer meaningful in life anymore. I am sorry that you have no family and friends left in real life [At-least it looks like you don't, I heard you even betrayed your wife's trust ... stepdaughter ...]. You are hopeless and I don't have any good hope for you.

You are vindictive because I shared truth about you written on that page [and you have not denied the accusations written on that page yet which means I can easily assume that the accusations against you were not made up by that author, the people who left several comments about you were not wrong too][instead you are trying to shift the attention to me and trying to create a drama about sharing the link] and I am sorry to say that people like you are not the true face of this community.

Congratulations on letting spite define your life.

[Vod]

I heard you even betrayed your wife's trust ... stepdaughter ...]. Y

Another perverted lie got you another supporter - your flag is now inactive.     I wish I could understood why taboo sex subjects turn you on and make you discuss them so much.

[dragonvslinux]

I heard you even betrayed your wife's trust ... stepdaughter ...]. Y

Another perverted lie got you another supporter - your flag is now inactive.     I wish I could understood why taboo sex subjects turn you on and make you discuss them so much.

It didn't and you know that. I opposed the flag because I didn't agree with the statement of fact given the referenced topic, that's it. I'll highlight the important part though:

Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with BitcoinGirl.Club is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.

It's a been a week, no DT member has supported it. Your flag is therefore wrong, regardless of if your allegation is accurate. Unfortunately DT has largely evolved into a sneak of spineless weasels by the looks of it.

This is therefore not an appropriate use of the flag system, nor is using the feedback system for your own personal drama.

~Vod

[Vod]

It's a been a week, no DT member has supported it. Your flag is therefore wrong, regardless of if your allegation is accurate.

I don't follow that logic, and I even created an entire topic about it.   If my flag is active, why would other's involve themselves?

[dragonvslinux]

It's a been a week, no DT member has supported it. Your flag is therefore wrong, regardless of if your allegation is accurate.

If my flag is active, why would other's involve themselves?

Because it'd be the right thing to do and that's what DT members are supposed to be doing. If you get 2 DT members supporting this, I'll remove my opposition (as my current basis for it would be somewhat invalidated). That sound fair? Just ping me.


What is with DT(0) flags anyway, has it always been like that? +1 vs. -1 = flag? It shouldn't be active by any stretch of the imagination based on the phrasing alone. I assumed it was already inactive lol, I need to do some catching up.

[Vod]

Because it'd be the right thing to do and that's what DT members are supposed to be doing. If you get 2 DT members supporting this, I'll remove my opposition (as my current basis for it would be somewhat invalidated). That sound fair? Just ping me.

No, I don't want to force DT members to do anything based on someone's opinion of "the right thing".  If you are willing to remove your opposition, maybe it's you that is starting new drama, or your opinion is not that balanced?

BG is obviously in communities involved in child porn.  If she is asking people there to support her here, those newbies should be made aware the stories are false.  

Please support my flag.

[holydarkness]

It's a been a week, no DT member has supported it. Your flag is therefore wrong, regardless of if your allegation is accurate.

I don't follow that logic, and I even created an entire topic about it.   If my flag is active, why would other's involve themselves?

But... uhhh, your flag is inactive due to the need of net +1 opposition or support. Currently it's net +1 opposition from DTs, with ]as the time this post made] two DT oppose it and only one DT [the flag creator] support it, resulting in -1 DT support. You'll need 2 more DT support.