Have you involved on physical betting before?

[Alphakilo]

This is one of the oldest forms of gambling since history and the outcome sometimes isn't always guaranteed even when you win. Something like this could result into serious dispute that could lead to harm or bloodshed all because the game isn't fair or it is rigged against you.

I have always tried my best to avoid betting with physical humans who are friends or associates over anything mostly when there's huge profit to be made. It is greedy people that do such kind of bets to manipulate and extort potential victims that have no clue and that's why online gambling remains the best bet to save your head and peace of mind.

[skarais]

I want to know if you have involved yourself with person to person betting methods, I mean person to person where you would deposit any amount to gamble between but they have someone who is functioning as either third party, or middle man. When you indulged your with person 2 person gambling method, how were you able to collect your winning, was it straight or not.

Yes, exactly as you suspected and this is something we have actually done together with a small group consisting of just a few people. In reality, this kind of gambling is merely an excuse to spend a lot of free time with friends, rather than a means of making money. Dominoes is one of the favorite games, but some other friend might prefer card games. Whoever wins the most will treat everyone to food and drinks, so that no one feels loss even though we all spend some money. In conclusion, this is how some of us choose to spend our free time together, not for money.

[Nheer]

I think betting like this is more suitable when it is a game where you bet at the same point, and if you win, you get the reward at the same time. It shouldn't be a game where you bet, and the game and the result take days, because you might not see the person who is holding the money, and it is possible for them to come up with a story, and there is nothing you can do about it. For me, if it is not a game that takes place at the same time as the outcome, I see it as a risky game that I will not involve myself in. Predicting elections is a process that takes time, and it is impossible for all those involved in the game to be at the same point until the result is out.

I do support you here, betting like this are very risky and just as you predicted the holder might end up coming up with stories or even might use the funds for something else. Involving ourself is such physical betting like this is just under probability to see a good outcome but when the holder turns out to be a trustworthy person and God fearing then things will end well but when it the opposite then all gone lol.

Physical betting when the results yield instantly and the reward would be given to the individual is just a physical betting I could risk though and involve into but when it becomes days, weeks, months the the risk is getting more higher.

[I_Anime]

Yes this question came to the right section which I believe should be the right section posted here..
Like the title has already questioned above.
I want to know if you have involved yourself with person to person betting methods, I mean person to person where you would deposit any amount to gamble between but they have someone who is functioning as either third party, or middle man. When you indulged your with person 2 person gambling method, how were you able to collect your winning, was it straight or not.

The reason why I came up this little discussion I have been thinking for moment about p2p personal bet, if you win did that person surrender entirely or such person do not care to give you money you l won on the process.

I involved in gambling with someone few weeks ago about election who would emerge on the primary election and it happens the was I made analysis on, and now I was denied the amount won,according to how i involved myself on p2p betting. Today I asked the person to pay and he disagree. I was actually want to involved more people who could help to settle the whole case on the ground.

At same time this triggered my interest to share same thing with the community if you have successfully collected a decent amount from you the next person whom you gambled with or not?

I will just say you should mind the kind of folks you bet with, because some will keep to their word while some won't . Some will bring some kind of excuse like "I thought we where joking" and some mag even oppress you one way or the other thtaa why is always good for a third party is involved.

Well I've involved in such but we don't usually stake anything, we just do it for the vibe of just being right . Like we beg during some certain occasions without putting money on the line .

[Creeper0]

This reminds me of my childhood. At that time we used to bet on any controversial discussion or uncertain outcome and if anyone lost the bet, he would naturally be reluctant to pay the bet. We would even participate in physical sports with some bets, but the losing team would be reluctant to pay the bet. This is normal.

In your case, the mindset at the time of betting is important. If you are betting as a joke, then it is better to leave it or you can leave it with a small compromise. If the bet is made in a serious moment and there are witnesses, then it depends on you, but in this case it creates trouble most of the time.

[Wiwo]

Let me tell you why such peer to peer betting never worked out. Most bets are not honoured because they are made with friends and those close to you, without any legal agreement or backing.

Avoid such a bet or you just do it for fun.

I have been involved in this kind of bet several times and each time the winning is never honoured because both sides take it as a joke.

[Joy- maker]

Person to person betting over something or someone is what I do with elder brother almost every day and recently we did one. Whenever he wins me I transfer his money immediately to him, and  when I win he does the same thing without argument or quarrel.

But, whenever I do person to person with someone else I usually pass through hel before collecting my winning, because they will argue and quarrel.

Sometimes they and I almost got fights before they finally transfer me. So, because of all this dramas I only  do person to person with my eider brother.

[Chinesebaby]

if you win did that person surrender entirely or such person do not care to give you money you l won on the process.

When it comes to me personally, I'm the type who don't like the physical person 2 person betting that people go about staking a physical item or real cash of their prediction goes as planned. Because I know how unpredictable humans could be when you happens to win them in such a scenario. And for that reason, I rather gamble on a physical or online casino, than stake as bet with a family or friend. To avoid we having issues tomorrow.

I involved in gambling with someone few weeks ago about election who would emerge on the primary election and it happens the was I made analysis on, and now I was denied the amount won,according to how i involved myself on p2p betting. Today I asked the person to pay and he disagree. I was actually want to involved more people who could help to settle the whole case on the ground.

At same time this triggered my interest to share same thing with the community if you have successfully collected a decent amount from you the next person whom you gambled with or not?

But if I may ask, was there any physical witness or proof to testify and show that both of you did actually gambled a certain amount on who will emerge the winner of that election? Because if there is any proof to show that was a valid agreement, then I will advise you to report this case to the right authorities. Because it is actually unfair that you will win, and then the next party will refuse to honour the agreement they made. Because I'm very much sure that if it was him who won this bet, he would have disturbed you to pay him his money.

[IjawMan]

At same time this triggered my interest to share same thing with the community if you have successfully collected a decent amount from you the next person whom you gambled with or not?

If you mean going to a physical shop to place bets, that's normal.. and a I do alot of betting in real life but it's mostly with friends who in very sure understands how we do things. You can't be making bets offline with people you don't trust. It's not just about them not fulfilling their part of the bets, but also you might be in danger. Some people can be dangerous when they make bets that doesn't end up good. That's why you should be wise with who you place physical bets with. Another way to do this is to make sure that there is a third party involved. Someone who will be responsible for holding the money and paying off the winner when the time comes..but be wise like I said when making physical bets, not everyone can be trusted in this regards..

That is not what the op was struggling to narrate out as I understood it he was talking about where two people come together and out of argument about an event they decided to make a bet about it thereby involving money into the hand of a third-party like an escrow to hold for them, whoever wins in their bet for what they were arguing about collects the money from the escrowed person.

Apparently, is silly to make rela life bet with people you can not trust their reputation to be transparent and fair about money matters. When I used to take part in this real time physical bets within our guys we make sure to hand the money over to a person we are certain of given back the money to who ever wins it just to avoid altercation that can cause exchange of words or blows.

[Davidvictorson]

Yes this question came to the right section which I believe should be the right section posted here..
Like the title has already questioned above.
I want to know if you have involved yourself with person to person betting methods, I mean person to person where you would deposit any amount to gamble between but they have someone who is functioning as either third party, or middle man. When you indulged your with person 2 person gambling method, how were you able to collect your winning, was it straight or not.

The reason why I came up this little discussion I have been thinking for moment about p2p personal bet, if you win did that person surrender entirely or such person do not care to give you money you l won on the process.

I involved in gambling with someone few weeks ago about election who would emerge on the primary election and it happens the was I made analysis on, and now I was denied the amount won,according to how i involved myself on p2p betting. Today I asked the person to pay and he disagree. I was actually want to involved more people who could help to settle the whole case on the ground.

At same time this triggered my interest to share same thing with the community if you have successfully collected a decent amount from you the next person whom you gambled with or not?

I have been involved in this type of betting . Infact this is the type that is most common in the past when formalized betting options hadn’t reached some places. And I believe they are still functioning in some settings. I understand why the person disagreed. In this type of situation, to avoid any disagreement, it must be a bet where the results are immediate. It mustn’t be more than a few hours. The longer the hours the lower your chances of getting your wins if you were right. Or the longer the hours the higher the chances of a dispute. It doesn’t work well with predictions- like election results which takes time.

[DPHOR]

I want to know if you have involved yourself with person to person betting methods, I mean person to person where you would deposit any amount to gamble between but they have someone who is functioning as either third party, or middle man. When you indulged your with person 2 person gambling method, how were you able to collect your winning, was it straight or not.

Yes, exactly as you suspected and this is something we have actually done together with a small group consisting of just a few people. In reality, this kind of gambling is merely an excuse to spend a lot of free time with friends, rather than a means of making money. Dominoes is one of the favorite games, but some other friend might prefer card games. Whoever wins the most will treat everyone to food and drinks, so that no one feels loss even though we all spend some money. In conclusion, this is how some of us choose to spend our free time together, not for money.

Gambling is something else where you wouldn't be able to understand gambling entirely. Most people gambles for profits and while some other people do spare what they can afford to lose to gamble without being excessively being attracted or lure to gamble irresponsibly. When you take gambling for entertainment you would hardly have sleepless night because already you used an amount you can afford to lose, this is how responsible gambling should be handled not gambling aggressively.

[Achalugo BTC]

Yes, exactly as you suspected and this is something we have actually done together with a small group consisting of just a few people. In reality, this kind of gambling is merely an excuse to spend a lot of free time with friends, rather than a means of making money. Dominoes is one of the favorite games, but some other friend might prefer card games. Whoever wins the most will treat everyone to food and drinks, so that no one feels loss even though we all spend some money. In conclusion, this is how some of us choose to spend our free time together, not for money.

That's true, there are some persons that like to bet in physical shops due to the excitement in it, some people even make friends in those places, though there are both bad days and good days but its good to also be there, as one can learn some vital things from people in there. But, let your focus be to just have fun and nothing more than that, because there are some people that are easily lose their controls especially if they see some gamblers winning in a long streak.

[Fortify]

Yes this question came to the right section which I believe should be the right section posted here..
Like the title has already questioned above.
I want to know if you have involved yourself with person to person betting methods, I mean person to person where you would deposit any amount to gamble between but they have someone who is functioning as either third party, or middle man. When you indulged your with person 2 person gambling method, how were you able to collect your winning, was it straight or not.

The reason why I came up this little discussion I have been thinking for moment about p2p personal bet, if you win did that person surrender entirely or such person do not care to give you money you l won on the process.

I involved in gambling with someone few weeks ago about election who would emerge on the primary election and it happens the was I made analysis on, and now I was denied the amount won,according to how i involved myself on p2p betting. Today I asked the person to pay and he disagree. I was actually want to involved more people who could help to settle the whole case on the ground.

At same time this triggered my interest to share same thing with the community if you have successfully collected a decent amount from you the next person whom you gambled with or not?

Yes and it's quite a fun experience, especially when you're in the right company and usually best when you first try generous casinos. I remember one successful session where most of the group won money on their initial free bets and we walked out of the casino ahead, which is the definition of success. I've also been into the occasional bookmaker and placed a bet. This was always as a casual gamer though and I've seen some characters in these places that look quite depressed and angry - it's not somewhere you'd want to go back on a regular basis. It can also be a bonus when you get the occasional free drink out of it, especially on a night out when the casino is just one of your stops.

[Ever-young]

But if I may ask, was there any physical witness or proof to testify and show that both of you did actually gambled a certain amount on who will emerge the winner of that election? Because if there is any proof to show that was a valid agreement, then I will advise you to report this case to the right authorities. Because it is actually unfair that you will win, and then the next party will refuse to honour the agreement they made. Because I'm very much sure that if it was him who won this bet, he would have disturbed you to pay him his money.

Many people do fall in this kind of situation, some people can't keep to agreement when it comes to money, they always act as if money is in control of them, that is to say whenever they see money, their brain or their minds will start working somehow and this can bring misunderstanding between one another, expect one of them is mindful, that's when they can settle the matter amicably, just as you said that they can report the matter to the right authorities and that's a very good way to maintain peace.

[hedgeh0g]

I have been involved in this type of betting . Infact this is the type that is most common in the past when formalized betting options hadn’t reached some places. And I believe they are still functioning in some settings. I understand why the person disagreed. In this type of situation, to avoid any disagreement, it must be a bet where the results are immediate. It mustn’t be more than a few hours. The longer the hours the lower your chances of getting your wins if you were right. Or the longer the hours the higher the chances of a dispute. It doesn’t work well with predictions- like election results which takes time.

No, I haven't been involved in betting for a long time, back when it was popular and there was no online betting, but I remember a classmate of mine doing it and often telling me about it. He was actually a good football player himself and thought he knew a lot about it. But in reality, he'd win occasionally and described it as if he were an expert, preferring not to talk about his losses. He also bet on tennis, but I didn't understand anything about it, even though he assured me the odds were higher there. After a while, I realized that tennis does offer better odds, but only with real experts, and I've never met any.

[Grace333]

While growing up in my country, alot of people play a whot game, it's kind of a card game that to make it more fun and interesting we sometimes place bets it doesn't really need to be money, we bet on several kind of things like the looser get to drink a large jug of water. It's fun though bet aside this, the other ones I can remember isn't that serious of a bet but sometimes you lose and the other person just forgives you probably you doubted and entered into a bet with your ignorance while the other person already knew the truth all along.

[Sammye3]

For a physical face-to-face betting, it is best to make a trusted person a mediator that keeps the game transparent to avoid any kind of conflicts. I have some experiences about physical betting where it ended in a bloody fight after the person holding the money ran away with the money and it did not end well at all.

I'm not really a fan of physical betting unless it's between trusted friends as that would not bring any kind of friction even after a loss. It's usually taken as a fun experience and we stake what we could afford to lose, mostly the winner buys refreshments for everyone with the prize money so it's not entirely a loss right? Physical betting is not bad but should be between well-known people not strangers for safety reasons.

[Dareo]

I personally have not been involved in any major P2P betting but I have experience betting on cricket matches among friends in my childhood or in the area. Of course the stakes were not very high then, and everyone knew each other, so there was no problem getting the money after winning. If you lose, you will feel a little upset but in the end you will pay the money.

However if you play with unknown team, then it will be a problem. So if there is no escrow or neutral intermediary in advance then getting the money after winning becomes a problem, In my opinion you should not bet with those who do not have the mentality of accepting defeat, because even after winning, you will have to face problems even if you win.

[red4slash]

From the time I first tried gambling until now I have never experienced physical play even if it is of a serious and money-related nature because apart from gambling still being illegal in my country, not much gambling is not on the surface in my neighborhood and although there may be some physical gambling practices in person but it is of a closed nature and a layman like me would not know about such things.

So I've only been gambling online since the last few years and have never experienced physical gambling let alone tried going to a casino because it's an impossible thing to do in my country.

[Z_MBFM]

I am involved in physical betting but that is with my friends. Every year during the World Cup I bet with my friends every day. I never miss betting with my friends on the World Cup matches, especially on the days when my favorite team is playing. However, I have never been to a physical casino because there are no physical casinos in my country. Gambling is not my profession although I was very addicted to gambling at one time. Accessing online gambling is very easy and you can gamble while hiding yourself, so I am more involved in online gambling. I bet physically only during the World Cup and when there is a special football match.