Anyone using ChatGPT for betting analysis?

[alastantiger]

The use of AI has its own benefits and where they are being made applicable when it comes to gambling speculations and other research people tend to get information about, but using AI does not give us the precision needed to be accurate about the bet we are taking, you have to be more conscious of how we play and be smarter in our gambling decision to as to minimize the risk that may be associated to all these.

I don't see a problem with using chatGTP for analyzing your games before you place a bet on them. As far as what you are using the AI for is for you just to get some information that you can't easily access on your own then you are not doing anything wrong but when you rely on chat GTP or any other AI to give you scores on the game you are about to bet on then you are using them for the wrong reason and you are going to get disappointed with the outcome that you get since none of this AI are 100% accurate all the time. They are predictions are just based on information that are available to anybody that is willing to look very well on the internet, this AI just make it easy for you to get the information first hand but their information does not guarantee that you are going to get a correct score and if you gamble blindly with an intention of making a big profit you are most likely going to lose your money and also get disappointed.

[Ayers]

it does not make sense to invest one's time using AI if one's results are lack-lustre when compared with someone who does basic analysis and uses common sense and get consistent good results.

You are right, I will not deny that AI is good one at processing huge data and statistics in a second. But when it comes to real world situations outside the field, such as how the player are motivated, whether they have the hunger to win, whether the coach has a last minute gambit, how the weather is on match day, whether referee will have any influence on game or whether there is a dirty fight going on in dressing room, AI's coding brain simply does not have any ability to capture these living factors. So in sports betting if you want to survive for long run then AI analysis alone is no match for human eyes and on field experience. Otherwise I could ask AI to make prediction for me and I could win every match,, lol

[Floxynice]

Actually, I tried it once or twice but the results were hilariously bad. The "kind of" analysis of the match I was interested in had so many mistake, it wasn't even funny anymore. Sure, AI is learning and most likely it already improved again since I tried that but at that point I was thinking, how would anybody ever use that to make a decision on what side to bet? It talked about players that left the team a year ago and other nonsense. 

LoL,who gave you the suggestion I mean how did you even come up with that? You know whenever I'm thinking of what to do, my instincts don't even go there because I know AI can't give me what I want, moreover AI is not in a position to predict or help us analyze football game because they are not created for that purpose I think their role is far from this thing we are asking them to do and of course since they are not created for this purpose what did you expect? Definitely they will give you whatever their instincts tells them.

AI is not 100% reliable, there are usually some inaccuracies some times. That is why when AI generates your data, you double check for errors and inaccuracies. Op already stated that you do not use the data AI generated blindly, that is where some sports bettors are getting it wrong. AI tools can be used to get specific data which you will use to form your decision, but asking AI to make predictions for you doesn't usually end well.

[Patikno]

Do you use AI for sports betting?

I wouldn't use an AI like ChatGPT, or anything similar to analyze a match. I think the fun lies in my own analysis, and it is also incredibly rewarding to win based on my personal analysis. So, I don't think the adrenaline rush from using AI is as enjoyable as it is from personal analysis. Furthermore, I am not convinced AI can keep up-to-date with the latest information, or updates regarding a match. For example: I don't think AI can get up-to-date information on starting lineups, and I am not sure it can get the latest starting lineups right after the announcement.

For the reasons I have mentioned, I choose not to use AI to analyze my bets. Based on my opinions, is there anything wrong with it? and, do you think it (AI) can analyze that quickly?

[ultrloa]

it does not make sense to invest one's time using AI if one's results are lack-lustre when compared with someone who does basic analysis and uses common sense and get consistent good results.

You are right, I will not deny that AI is good one at processing huge data and statistics in a second. But when it comes to real world situations outside the field, such as how the player are motivated, whether they have the hunger to win, whether the coach has a last minute gambit, how the weather is on match day, whether referee will have any influence on game or whether there is a dirty fight going on in dressing room, AI's coding brain simply does not have any ability to capture these living factors. So in sports betting if you want to survive for long run then AI analysis alone is no match for human eyes and on field experience. Otherwise I could ask AI to make prediction for me and I could win every match,, lol

Its good for researching matter and Ai is so helpful for more faster data gathering, but people should not overlook the capability of Ai. Since if we talk about betting that bot is not been program to give 100% win rate to sports bettor or any gamblers out there.

Much better to research then analyze the game. For sure that they could see the real scenario if they pay attention on the team details,stats and anything important t look at.

They might just get disappointed on the result if they have that 100% belief that Ai will bring passive win in their tables.

[coinlary]

There are available models out there designed specifically  for that, it could be wirth trying than just using that .  If you're  satisfeita  then fine you can go ahead. I never tried any models for it  anyway because I have no business using AI for direct analysis,  it helps in some aspect though.

What I will tell you is not to rely on it, it can never be accurate. I've used it for trying to get a particular historical answer in football and it boldly gave .e wrong answers .

[Furious 7]

To analyze I often do AI assistance for some things but to decide the gamble the answer remains the same no.

The analysis that AI can add a reference for us because apart from us who do have our own analysis for now AI will be very useful to make us have more options because the data provided will be very helpful.
But this is only limited to analytical assistance in the end does not mean that this is considered a reference for us to bet.
Many gamblers are always misguided here sometimes the help of AI is always used as the biggest reference for betting even though we should realize that this is only a tool to help us decide which is the best but not a few gamblers who actually rely on AI.

[knuckey]

I also use chatgpt or other AI to get concise information if I am unsure about a match, not just to be a benchmark for betting but to choose a less risky alternative, but most of my bets are based on my own research, only partially using chatGpt, I think chatgpt is very helpful for getting match statistics information

[|MINER|]

Actually, I have seen many topics and discussions so far where people are asking questions about AI like whether it is possible for AI to win gambling games. But I found your topic a little different.

And it is also true that I myself currently when I go to analyze a match, AI tries to find out information like whether a player in a team is injured, whether they are key players. And what is the recent form of that team etc.  And these are things where I used to go to different platforms to find out and waste time. Now I get real-time information very easily through artificial intelligence. I don't really see AI as a bad thing for analysis tools.

[Josefjix]

For me personally AI was actually more useful than I expected, specially for NBA and tennis.
Not saying it can magically predict games, but it helps a lot with checking player form, injuries, playstyles, motivation spots and sometimes finding value bets faster.

we have discussed it here many times, this is what i have been saying about using AI for sport betting, some people thinks it can give out the best prediction but thats not how it works. With these analysis given by the AI, you can literally pick out the best prediction and option best fit for you.  

[Felicity_Tide]

Do you use AI for sports betting?

I have never tried it, and I honestly don't see myself doing it.
I used to think that Chatgpt only had access to old information that are a bit dated backwards, but from what I just saw, it can actually provide an almost accurate answers to current happenings, because I just prompted to enquire about the current injuries between both teams that are playing the UCL final tomorrow, and to my surprise, it gave something very close to what I already know.

I must say that I'm impressed, but I just don't see myself using it any moment from now. At least, I watch the games for myself, so I should be able to make my own decisions.

[l99l]

I can say it's useful but never reliable enough. Useful in the means that it can be an educational assistant like explaining those betting concepts and statistics, but of course the final analysis  should always come from us. AI can be a helpful tool but it can never be a crystal ball that can reliably predict the outcome of the game nor help us in picking a winning bet.

Still, I am into chatgpt to ask some updates but the final analysis, it should be solely made by me and my prediction concepts.

I think the same thing. I also believe that useful information can be seen when analyzing thanks to artificial intelligence because it researches and presents it to you in the most in-depth way.
It's a good tool, and nowadays, using these tools in the right places always provides benefits. Tools have always been important for people, and the best tool today is artificial intelligence.
If I were someone who bet frequently, I would definitely use analyses, but I wouldn't rely solely on it.

[Crypto Library]

we have discussed it here many times, this is what i have been saying about using AI for sport betting, some people thinks it can give out the best prediction but thats not how it works. With these analysis given by the AI, you can literally pick out the best prediction and option best fit for you.  

In fact, we cannot do this here that AI is giving us a prediction and we are making our betting placement based on that.

What I would consider common or good here is to use AI as an analysis tool, which will basically help you make betting decisions in a short time with data in a short time. I mean, it will basically save our time. Moreover, I think it is foolish to use it on top of that because many times AI also gives results based on discussions on various websites or platforms and it is not uncommon for there to be mistakes.

[Wakate]

There are available models out there designed specifically  for that, it could be wirth trying than just using that .  If you're  satisfeita  then fine you can go ahead. I never tried any models for it  anyway because I have no business using AI for direct analysis,  it helps in some aspect though.

What I will tell you is not to rely on it, it can never be accurate. I've used it for trying to get a particular historical answer in football and it boldly gave .e wrong answers .

I have seen different AI applications that are used to predict football matches but there is no way these apps can 100% accurately predict the outcome of a bet. Gamblers must understand that depending on only AI for prediction of matches can lead to lose.
For those that are real users of AI for match predictions, they have to mix it with statistics before predicting about outcome.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I recently noticed that even artificial intelligence can give some wrong analysis in data So sometimes you need to even verify the data that you get from using artificial intelligence because it may just be wrong.

AI will always be a work tool to help us, but not something we should use as a means to give us reliable predictions. I don't use AI; AI is good for providing statistics, probabilities, among other things that are sometimes more tedious for us to calculate ourselves. AI can provide that, however, the analysis we do ourselves is much better, since it involves many things: reason, intelligence, logic.

[ingiltere]

I don't use these tools and I don't trust them. Even if you are premium user of this, it won't give %100 true analysis. When I bet, I rely solely on my own knowledge and instincts. There's no harm in reading analyses, but I don't let them influence my thinking. If AI were truly successful in this field, the people who create these tools would be rich from betting. That's not the reality. Betting isn't something that can be determined solely by statistics, it's more than that.

[rachael9385]

Using chatgpt for betting analysis is a choice and as a gambler it's okay if you choose to but one thing you must know is that the results gotten from using chat to analyze our bets is not really accurate like the way some gamblers think, you cannot really get an accurate prediction using Ai because it was not designed to predict any sport games, it is possible to get suggestions but not accurate predictions.

[freedomgo]

Using chatgpt for betting analysis is a choice and as a gambler it's okay if you choose to but one thing you must know is that the results gotten from using chat to analyze our bets is not really accurate like the way some gamblers think, you cannot really get an accurate prediction using Ai because it was not designed to predict any sport games, it is possible to get suggestions but not accurate predictions.

AI can predict, but it does not guarantee a win. The logic is simple, if people who subscribe to AI tools can easily win in sports betting, then bookies would be struggling already.

But that is not what is happening. In fact, bookies probably find AI useful too, especially in their operations and even with odds providers. So both sides can use AI, not only bettors. But let’s ask ourselves honestly, are we really winning just because we use AI? I’m sure the answer is no. AI can help with analysis, but it still cannot remove the risk or guarantee profit.

[suzanne5223]

I have around 15 years experience in sports betting.
I feel there is not much discussion here about using AI tools and our own prompts for betting analysis.

I dont the reason why there's no much discussion about the use of AI tools for sports betting, maybe it's because of this forum's stance toward the use of AI for messaging, etc. However, the bettors that use AI for sports betting are not using ChatGPT and based on my understanding of such a platform.
There are specific AI betting platforms, but it is not ChatGPT.

For me personally AI was actually more useful than I expected, specially for NBA and tennis.

I know AI is useful, but I don't know how useful it was for the NBA and tennis since i have used it for betting.

[junder]

yes rarely do sports betting, once I do sports betting I do it when my team competes only and in big matches such as the Final for example. So my own statement I do not involve AI or Chatgpt in gambling.

But for people who like to do sports betting, this should be a tool that can help them in making bets, as you said by providing information related to player performance and others.