The wickedness leaders controls followership

[Israelgogo]

We're in a Gen Z era but so could old politicians still controls everything irrespective of their actions, bad reputations, reports, inability to lead right yet this formulating political systems still controls crowds whenever they appear on a request to rule again like second term. Supportedly someone says in every bad and failed leadership they're people who enjoy moment as best recalling hits of their lives, most people benefits more with such leaders and that's why they can never lack supporters in their next election. What's your takes?

[DYOR+BTC]

We're in a Gen Z era but so could old politicians still controls everything irrespective of their actions, bad reputations, reports, inability to lead right yet this formulating political systems still controls crowds whenever they appear on a request to rule again like second term. Supportedly someone says in every bad and failed leadership they're people who enjoy moment as best recalling hits of their lives, most people benefits more with such leaders and that's why they can never lack supporters in their next election. What's your takes?

Citizens that claims to be leaders of tomorrow been controlled by wicked and corrupt leaders with there  rubbish leadership patterns still controlling all is just because we allow ourselves to be used. Assuming we are ready to stand by what we want and say know to those evil and wicked manipulations  all those nonsense would have been stopped, how can we still stand by the side of someone killing and taking all from us claiming he is our leaders when he is the same person killing us without mercy. Its the right time we stand and say know to those there evil plans and stand by what we want.

[AVE5]

Supportedly someone says in every bad and failed leadership they're people who enjoy moment as best recalling hits of their lives, most people benefits more with such leaders and that's why they can never lack supporters in their next election. What's your takes?

In other words the government is bad or good can only be described based on the accountability of our experiences in the specified government.
Some of us could be sentimental in giving remarks about the performance of any government or our supports on the politicians can be determined by what we're achieving in the governance.
So we can at our pleases criticize the leadership that doesn't favour us personally and promotes that positively impacts us while politics remains a social engineering activity that's based on personal interests.

[Ucy]

That could happen because the bad leader has the support of the master/king of the world.
If you are leading below the expectation of your people and they are still willing to help you win election, it's very likely the master is behind you as he controls the minds of the people and will use propaganda, deciets, gifts, bribing the heads of communities/groups, etc, to move the majority to do his will.  
If the minority or the silent majority are more desperate for change they will have to become more moral and rely on Power that's above the king's power to effectively counter him. This is the only way to defeat the choice of the system.

[Sim_card]

There are people who supports bad things and encourage people to do evil. Those are the ones who will definitely be a follower to these bad leaders because they like the way they are leading and they're benefiting them. In my country, before you talk about a corrupt politician, his dogs have already reported you to the politician. This is why we have bad government because if everyone supports good leadership, bad government will be elected out since they don't have anyone to support them.

[Dunamisx]

Choose right the kind of leaders you want to take their face of your country and don't sell your vote because of peanuts you will be given, also as the followership is not mandatory to do, it's a decision to be subject to those who are in position, don't sell your right because of your bag of rice and face a four years hardship of poor economy and poverty with lack of opportunity from corrupt leaders you voted in for.

[Mhizlove]

Honestly I think that politics is not always based on  performance alone, because you see some people they support leaders because of their personal benefits, loyalty, party connection or the belief that those leaders will represent their interests better than other candidates. And another thing is that every government both the ones that are not popular, usually has a group of people that benefits from the system, so as long as those set of people exist, the leaders will always have supporters no matter how they're be criticised out there. That's why voters needs accountability, focus more on the results and future or tomorrow plans instead of focusing only on individuals

[Doll2233]

We're in a Gen Z era but so could old politicians still controls everything irrespective of their actions, bad reputations, reports, inability to lead right yet this formulating political systems still controls crowds whenever they appear on a request to rule again like second term. Supportedly someone says in every bad and failed leadership they're people who enjoy moment as best recalling hits of their lives, most people benefits more with such leaders and that's why they can never lack supporters in their next election. What's your takes?

I agree with your point of view. Some bad old politician remain in power for a longer period of time despite of their bad performance because of the support from people, their strong system and support from their loyal suppoters who take their side because they might get benefit from those politicians during their rules and in certain cases the politics is not always about the good performance but it is about the people who support them and vote for them despite of their bad records , they still win because they have back from the particular set of people , politicians who are in power they have resources , money so they invest in their people who will support them in elections and make them win because of despite they have over all bad performance. For some people it is not about the person who is in position or power but it is about the person who they are sticked with who will make them feel secure and represented and they eventually will get benefit from them but that type of support actually hurt the country in the long run.

[Floxynice]

There are people who supports bad things and encourage people to do evil. Those are the ones who will definitely be a follower to these bad leaders because they like the way they are leading and they're benefiting them. In my country, before you talk about a corrupt politician, his dogs have already reported you to the politician. This is why we have bad government because if everyone supports good leadership, bad government will be elected out since they don't have anyone to support them.

We can now see that politicians are not the only cause of corruption. Citizens, both young and old, who know these politicians are corrupt but still cast their votes for them in every election are also part of the corrupt system. Everyone is suffering from it, yet everyone continues to blame only the politicians.

In this kind of system, where the older generation is still ruling, young people are also part of the problem. They are not ready; they are not ready to change the system if they keep enabling bad leadership through their actions and choices.

[uneng]

We're in a Gen Z era but so could old politicians still controls everything irrespective of their actions, bad reputations, reports, inability to lead right yet this formulating political systems still controls crowds

And in what aspects are the Generation Z and below different from the characteristics you mentioned regards the old leaders? Generation Z is probably the most unethical, immoral and lazy one compared to past generations. These young generations are product of moral relativism which has been going strong since the beginning of the 2000's.

Not every politicians are old. The new generations are already participating the political scenario, and if you check their history you will see they aren't different from old politicians. Actually, they are simply evolving the old schemes and behaving in a more cynical way towards the crowds.

If you put your hope and expectations on politics and politicians from the current era, you are already doomed to failure.