The Bullshit Monitor, Trust Us, Bro

[Pmalek]

Controversial posts, misleading marketing, absurdity, corporate spin, controversies, failed promises, and funny statements are things that many companies and services in the Bitcoin and crypto world have been guilty of. I would like all of us to collect such posts and statements to mock them a little bit and have fun. It can be brand-new posts (preferably) or something from the past that turned out to be false.

I will self-moderate this thread to avoid turning it into a spam fest, but I welcome everyone to contribute to it.
If you share a post, please also include your own comment, explaining what is wrong with the statement, what's questionable or misleading.

I call this segment The Bullshit Monitor, Trust Us, Bro.

I will begin with good ol' Ledger.
Two days ago, they wanted to remind everyone that they will never ask their users for their secret recovery phrases. Of course not. Why would they? They only created a feature, built into the firmware that extracts your keys for you and sends them over the internet to multiple third-parties for "safe-keeping."


https://x.com/Ledger/status/2060462385052172382

[Zaguru12]

While this has been discussed in its thread already but since this is a dedicated thread for such controversial posts, I think it’s best to have it here too.

This is unstoppable wallet actually marketing themselves while trying to de market the hardware wallets, in a wider space like this (crypto) they could have done the marketing without talking bad about other brands, they themselves aren’t doing so well in what they offer too,

They still can’t support bitcoin fees less than 1 sats/vbyte and no one has used that against them.
There swap provider exolix is been called out for a vulnerability of leaking customers data too.

So they belong to this thread and to the tag ”Trust us, Bro”

[UchihaSarada]

I will begin with good ol' Ledger.
Two days ago, they wanted to remind everyone that they will never ask their users for their secret recovery phrases. Of course not. Why would they? They only created a feature, built into the firmware that extracts your keys for you and sends them over the internet to multiple third-parties for "safe-keeping."

Ledger again.

From Ledger Recover years ago, now they are doing something more dangerous for users and stupid for their business growth because there will be more people feeling fearful about Ledger and its present products and future ones.
Ledger Recovery - Send your (encrypted) recovery phrase to 3rd parties entities.
Ledger Recover: What The Hell is Happening? With aantonop and lopp.

[Pmalek]

There swap provider exolix is been called out for a vulnerability of leaking customers data too.

I remember Exolix negatively ever since that incident when they sent stolen funds to one user who used their swap service. They showed back then that they don't care and this is just another proof of that. The ability for third parties to access sensitive swaps data that is supposed to remain hidden is apparently a "feature" for them and something normal.

[devisssss]

Controversial posts, misleading marketing, absurdity, corporate spin, controversies, failed promises, and funny statements are things that many companies and services in the Bitcoin and crypto world have been guilty of. I would like all of us to collect such posts and statements to mock them a little bit and have fun. It can be brand-new posts (preferably) or something from the past that turned out to be false.

I will self-moderate this thread to avoid turning it into a spam fest, but I welcome everyone to contribute to it.
If you share a post, please also include your own comment, explaining what is wrong with the statement, what's questionable or misleading.

I call this segment The Bullshit Monitor, Trust Us, Bro.

I will begin with good ol' Ledger.
Two days ago, they wanted to remind everyone that they will never ask their users for their secret recovery phrases. Of course not. Why would they? They only created a feature, built into the firmware that extracts your keys for you and sends them over the internet to multiple third-parties for "safe-keeping."

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/05/31/Ujy5U8.jpeg
https://x.com/Ledger/status/2060462385052172382

Sounds like a fun idea, as long as the focus stays on the claims themselves rather than personal attacks. There’s certainly no shortage of “trust us, bro” moments in crypto that aged poorly.

Are you planning to cover only recent examples, or are classic cases like unrealistic roadmap promises and failed exchange assurances fair game as well?

[buwaytress]

Not sure if this is in the same vein but I recall the gushing over PayPal when they suddenly announced that you could 'buy, sell, hold' Bitcoin. You know, to democratise Bitcoin access and allowing everyone to buy directly from the app.

Except, there was never any coin to begin with. All they did was offer a contract for speculation.  You could name any other app for selling this bullshit.

This was supposed to be "massive" for Bitcoin adoption.

[noorman0]

Sounds like a fun idea, as long as the focus stays on the claims themselves rather than personal attacks. There’s certainly no shortage of “trust us, bro” moments in crypto that aged poorly.

If this feature becomes a vulnerability, it is not just a personal attack, but a collective attack. If you fail to curate your wallet, your trust will be useless even if you conservatively choose old coins that tend to be stable risk.

[Pmalek]

Sounds like a fun idea, as long as the focus stays on the claims themselves rather than personal attacks.

Of course. That's the idea.

Are you planning to cover only recent examples, or are classic cases like unrealistic roadmap promises and failed exchange assurances fair game as well?

I think it's better to focus on recent cases and not recycle old incidents. All exchanges have probably been guilty of promising that their users are safe and nothing bad will happen to them at least once and so many of them have been hacked or had their data leaked. I wouldn't focus on that either. Same thing with roadmaps and unrealistic expectations.

Not sure if this is in the same vein but I recall the gushing over PayPal when they suddenly announced that you could 'buy, sell, hold' Bitcoin. You know, to democratise Bitcoin access and allowing everyone to buy directly from the app.

Except, there was never any coin to begin with. All they did was offer a contract for speculation.

I think that's how it started with PayPal but later they made it possible to withdraw bitcoin to external third-party wallets outside of their service. It's available in selected markets only, of course, just as the possibility of buying/selling bitcoin is.

[tread93]

I will begin with good ol' Ledger.
Two days ago, they wanted to remind everyone that they will never ask their users for their secret recovery phrases. Of course not. Why would they? They only created a feature, built into the firmware that extracts your keys for you and sends them over the internet to multiple third-parties for "safe-keeping."

Ledger again.

From Ledger Recover years ago, now they are doing something more dangerous for users and stupid for their business growth because there will be more people feeling fearful about Ledger and its present products and future ones.
Ledger Recovery - Send your (encrypted) recovery phrase to 3rd parties entities.
Ledger Recover: What The Hell is Happening? With aantonop and lopp.

Hey honestly im glad they did it so that we know not to use them! Its crazy that they ever thought that was ever a viable option. Like you run a crypto wallet company and you think we want people with their hands on our seed phrases yeah okay lol 😆 they are such a joke of a crypto company