Does picking big teams guarantee frequent win?

[Perfectbaby]

Of course it guarantees winning but then you must not go above 5 odds in total if you want to be winning consistently in your bet, in fact even the 5 odds is not also guaranteed while gambling.
The lesser the odds the higher chances for you to win your match. Therefore to be at the safer side you must learn to always reduce your odds while gambling, although I have to understand that some people are low rollers while some are higher rollers so, those who stakes lower would want to accumulate higher odds to boost their amount to win while those who stakes higher would go for a lower odds and stake higher amounts this gives them more chances to stand in a better position to win their bet.

[stompix]

I love how tons of people throw away opinions as hard facts without even bothering to check ACTUAL numbers

So here are some numbers for you:
If you had bet $1 on Barcelona on every game in La Liga, you would have
- won 31 times, lost 7 times
The wins from those odds (1..37/1.71/1.71/1.65/1.27/1.34/2.05/1.24/1.33/1.67/1.42/1.14/1.18/1.31/1.16/1.55/1.8/1.23/1.93/1.72/1.28/1.45/1.8/1.22/1.24/1.4/1.26/1.28/1.4/1.26/1.35)
would have got you 11.72 so $4.62 on $38 bet!

Yes, despite the low odds (and the fact that Barca basically threw away the last games when it had nothing to lose ) betting constantly on Barcelona would have been profitable.

Even Arsenal would have been profitable with 26 wins and 12 losses.
Those 26 wins would have had on average a 13.51 win over 12 losses.

So, how about we see more numbers and facts than opinions?

[jossiel]

I love how tons of people throw away opinions as hard facts without even bothering to check ACTUAL numbers

So here are some numbers for you:
If you had bet $1 on Barcelona on every game in La Liga, you would have
- won 31 times, lost 7 times
The wins from those odds (1..37/1.71/1.71/1.65/1.27/1.34/2.05/1.24/1.33/1.67/1.42/1.14/1.18/1.31/1.16/1.55/1.8/1.23/1.93/1.72/1.28/1.45/1.8/1.22/1.24/1.4/1.26/1.28/1.4/1.26/1.35)
would have got you 11.72 so $4.62 on $38 bet!

Yes, despite the low odds (and the fact that Barca basically threw away the last games when it had nothing to lose ) betting constantly on Barcelona would have been profitable.

Even Arsenal would have been profitable with 26 wins and 12 losses.
Those 26 wins would have had on average a 13.51 win over 12 losses.

So, how about we see more numbers and facts than opinions?

This is a good basis of how it can make someone profitable by just being consistent on one favorite team.

While the others are saying also some facts that it doesn't guarantee win but, with basis and backing it up with data and some experiments.

It can show that it can be profitable while having some losses too. In summary, it's profitable regardless of how low the odds are.

[bakasabo]

We have gone through that already - there are no safe bets in gambling. Selecting favorites against huge underdogs gives no guarantees. Second reason - it is unprofitable. Casinos never give good odds for such games. Risking everything to gain several percent of profit isnt smart. OP has mentioned football clubs, then it increases risk of losing "guarantee frequent win" because it is not rare when games end with 0:0.

[POPOLUV]

Gambling on big teams can be more advantageous to gamblers, and consequently make more wins than losses for instance, gambling on teams like man city, FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Inter Milan and Bayern Munich, These are top teams in the to European leagues, and they actually win most of their matches. However, they also drop points, and does not guarantee 100% winning.
These teams are usually not given big odds, but small odds like 1.26 or there about making bettors to combine their games with other teams with bigger odds.

So, does picking top teams guarantee frequent wins? What are your opinions on this?

Picking bigger teams which can produce winning for you as a gambler is not a bad idea but i will love to kick against when you mentioned picking a bigger teams which can guarantee your frequent winning, the performance of those teams you mentioned above is not news to all gamblers, so it is gone on those days that a bigger teams can frequently guarantee your winnings  as a gambling, so i will advice base on my experience because from the beginning of the past recent season, my prediction was mainly on the bigger teams but sometimes i end up being so disappointed by the bigger teams that fail to win. So i started experience much winning when i changed my strategy of prediction in the middle of the season, it is not a bad idea as a gambler to analyze very well before concluding or precceding with your prediction, there are teams that their keys players might be surfrreing from injurying or Red cards and you fail to check the stats because the big name your saw is enough reason to give you winning, for me it is totally a bad idea as a gambler.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

So, does picking top teams guarantee frequent wins? What are your opinions on this?

Picking top teams doesn't guarantee wins at all, in gambling there is practically no guarantee on winning even with 1.10 odds, there is still an equal possibility that it could loose, so staking huge on big teams with little odds frequently would only land you in big losses, you can relate with Manchester city having a draw with Everton during the title race of which with the intensity of the moment they were expected to win. Another one is Arsenal loosing out to Southampton in the Carabao cup quarter finals. These are few examples to show you that big teams can fuck up when you least expected.

[Salahmu]

Of course it guarantees winning but then you must not go above 5 odds in total if you want to be winning consistently in your bet, in fact even the 5 odds is not also guaranteed while gambling.
The lesser the odds the higher chances for you to win your match.

The frequent it will guarantee depends on how form any of those clubs are because even if they have presented as best teams but some season a lot of them are not actually wining a lot but if on the season they are strong you will be wining a lot of times from them, like Barcelona that won the trophy if someone had dependently bet on Barcelona till the end the person could have win a lot of there matches because they were consistent on that but the amount to be wining is the concern because if someone is betting on this few top clubs you wouldn't get up to the 5 odds or 3 because they're more certain and bookies knows that high volume of stakes will be bet on them.

[Judith87403]

I don't think so, if picking of top team will make people win how come we don't win frequently? Because as far as I know majority of gambler or bettors chose big team to win and yet they lose. I believe thar gambling win is basically on luck, and of course we have deliberated on this on several occasions. There is no perfect strategy to win, wether you chose theost strongest team or look for the smallest odd that proves their ability or chance of winning, they will still fail you. What you should know is that no man is perfect and this game is played by man that isn't perfect, so tell me how you can be guaranteed that strong team will win when they themselves Dont know how  the outcome will be.

Not by strategy neither by skills, with this mindset, helps to keep the game fun for you because letting luck to have its own way is important, as one can still lose their game even with a little odds. So odds are not promises and for one to avoid a bad day, they had to gamble and expect the worst to happen, as no one can't be in control of how the game will played out and the players are also expected to make mistakes.

[Agbam]

Gambling on big teams can be more advantageous to gamblers, and consequently make more wins than losses for instance, gambling on teams like man city, FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Inter Milan and Bayern Munich, These are top teams in the to European leagues, and they actually win most of their matches. However, they also drop points, and does not guarantee 100% winning.
These teams are usually not given big odds, but small odds like 1.26 or there about making bettors to combine their games with other teams with bigger odds.

So, does picking top teams guarantee frequent wins? What are your opinions on this?

I’ll say yes, just depending who the opponents are at the time of pick. This big teams have a better odds winning their games than the unpredictable happening. Football might be quite unpredictable even when it’s a big team against smaller ones. Upsets do happen but it’s not often so many of the times the big teams delivers more than they cost a parley.

Sometimes you have to check the form the club is in before you place that bet, once they’re in high flying form there’s every chance they’ll keep going.

[Nheer]

Gambling on big teams can be more advantageous to gamblers, and consequently make more wins than losses for instance, gambling on teams like man city, FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Inter Milan and Bayern Munich, These are top teams in the to European leagues, and they actually win most of their matches. However, they also drop points, and does not guarantee 100% winning.
These teams are usually not given big odds, but small odds like 1.26 or there about making bettors to combine their games with other teams with bigger odds.

So, does picking top teams guarantee frequent wins? What are your opinions on this?

Nothing in gambling ever guarantees 100% winning. Betting on big teams usually has a smaller odds which means they have higher possibility of winning the match but these kind of odds are what I fear the most.  Every gambler has experienced where big teams with the smallest of odds deny them winning a bet.

It's true that betting on big teams can get you more wins but then for most gamblers on such small odds will require staking high to win a reasonable amount which would make you to bet more than you you would want. Also the more games you add just to boost the odds the more your chances of losing the bet because not all predictions are likely to go well.

[Achalugo BTC]

Picking bigger teams which can produce winning for you as a gambler is not a bad idea but i will love to kick against when you mentioned picking a bigger teams which can guarantee your frequent winning, the performance of those teams you mentioned above is not news to all gamblers, so it is gone on those days that a bigger teams can frequently guarantee your winnings  as a gambling, so i will advice base on my experience because from the beginning of the past recent season, my prediction was mainly on the bigger teams but sometimes i end up being so disappointed by the bigger teams that fail to win. So i started experience much winning when i changed my strategy of prediction in the middle of the season, it is not a bad idea as a gambler to analyze very well before concluding or precceding with your prediction, there are teams that their keys players might be surfrreing from injurying or Red cards and you fail to check the stats because the big name your saw is enough reason to give you winning, for me it is totally a bad idea as a gambler.

Gambers should be aware of this already, gambling can't favour them all the times, as they have designed it to favour the house edge the more. So, even if one is very good at analysis, they should not forget that luck still has a part to play, which they are to adjust smartly and play with the right mindset, as that's the one way they can beat gambling. But, to think that big teams will guaranteed the frequent wins, will make them to learn in a hard way.

[danherbias07]

In singles, you have higher chances. Try making a parlay of the heavy favorites, and there's a high percentage of losing it.

We cannot identify traps that were made by oddsmakers, and sometimes they just put them there for a reason. They don't want anyone to win high multipliers by making a long parlay of heavy favorites because it will be bad for business.
So, if you are really good at spotting what odds look like a trap, then you might have a successful betting life. 

[Zadicar]

Gambling on big teams can be more advantageous to gamblers, and consequently make more wins than losses for instance, gambling on teams like man city, FC Barcelona, Real Madrid, Inter Milan and Bayern Munich, These are top teams in the to European leagues, and they actually win most of their matches. However, they also drop points, and does not guarantee 100% winning.
These teams are usually not given big odds, but small odds like 1.26 or there about making bettors to combine their games with other teams with bigger odds.

So, does picking top teams guarantee frequent wins? What are your opinions on this?

Picking bigger teams which can produce winning for you as a gambler is not a bad idea but i will love to kick against when you mentioned picking a bigger teams which can guarantee your frequent winning, the performance of those teams you mentioned above is not news to all gamblers, so it is gone on those days that a bigger teams can frequently guarantee your winnings  as a gambling, so i will advice base on my experience because from the beginning of the past recent season, my prediction was mainly on the bigger teams but sometimes i end up being so disappointed by the bigger teams that fail to win. So i started experience much winning when i changed my strategy of prediction in the middle of the season, it is not a bad idea as a gambler to analyze very well before concluding or precceding with your prediction, there are teams that their keys players might be surfrreing from injurying or Red cards and you fail to check the stats because the big name your saw is enough reason to give you winning, for me it is totally a bad idea as a gambler.

Never ever think about having that guaranteed win when you do simply stick into those bigger teams or much better stats compared to other teams on which these numbers or status wouldnt really be giving out that guarantee that you would be able to win up that bet or simply having that sure win. Come to think that we are dealing up with gambling/betting on which it is that still heavily relying with luck if we do speak on total winning and thats something that you do put up into your mind but somehow having that kind of analysis on trying out to stick with those bigger teams or stronger ones is that not a bad idea either on which once you do made out some analysis with your bets then of course the main thing you would be seeking out on whose stronger or better when it comes to stats on which you would really be able to make out some comparison but somehow you wouldnt be that just that relying with that and there's still that needs to look upon.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Whether you pick only big team or not, it is what it is, you are not guarantee of a win, you can be accurate in your prediction but something can just happen to make you lose your bet, just like the recent match of arsenal and PSG, so many people (fans) who bet on the game were completely disappointed because they lost the game and their bet as well. So, that's to tell you that nothing is guaranteed in betting, just do proper analysis and then let luck also favour you.

[Obulis]

Picking big teams can give feeling, that assurance of a win and might even warrant high amount but that's not always the case because taking into statistics the number of slip play to the number of slip won you will notice more people lose than win per slip count. This big teams has their various times of winning, losing and draw which happens differently. Howbeit, there'll be a certain percentage win by picking big teams compared to outrageous lose like out of ten games, there might be 8 win few at times will you see more than 3 lose. But even on that gambling is gambling. As much as possible know when to bet on which team.

[Betwrong]

~These teams are usually not given big odds, but small odds like 1.26 or there about making bettors to combine their games with other teams with bigger odds.

So, does picking top teams guarantee frequent wins? What are your opinions on this?

If you are betting on big teams, the odds you get are 1.2 on average. So, if you make 5 bets and lose just one of them, hardly you will find yourself in profit in the end. Combining your bet with teams with bigger odds makes it even riskier. I'm not trying to say that you shouldn't bet like that, though. I often make such bets myself and it's fun. You just have to be ready for many losses in a row, but some bets like this one



will be won. Again, don't try to make money through this strategy, but if your intention is to have fun - it's perfect.

[The Founding Titan]

They actually end up winning more often than not but that's still not a guarantee that they will win, they are cases where the underdog end up winning against the big names and even when they win against the underdogs their odds are relatively very low so the winnings don't really amount to much unless you stack them together in multiples and when you do that the risks increase as well since a single loss will lead to losing them all.

[Bluedrem]

When you always choose the bigger team as the winner in gambling, you will win less money against your bigger money but the winning ratio will increase. For example, if you bet $100 on the stronger team and the team wins, your winnings will be $10, $15, etc.
But if you bet on the weaker team, you can win more money on any bet, but the winning ratio will decrease. People cannot stay calm here, when they see that even if they bet on the weaker team, there is a possibility of winning more money, they test their luck in the hope that if the weaker team wins, they will win a lot of money.

[bitLeap]

So, does picking top teams guarantee frequent wins? What are your opinions on this?

If the goal is to win more often, big teams naturally offer better odds. Their low odds make gamblers dissatisfied with the results. Betting on big teams is often considered a safe bet due to their superior performance. However, the problem is that we still need to analyze the team's performance statistics first, as some of the biggest teams have recently experienced significant setbacks.

[Promocodeudo]

Whether you pick only big team or not, it is what it is, you are not guarantee of a win, you can be accurate in your prediction but something can just happen to make you lose your bet, just like the recent match of arsenal and PSG, so many people (fans) who bet on the game were completely disappointed because they lost the game and their bet as well. So, that's to tell you that nothing is guaranteed in betting, just do proper analysis and then let luck also favour you.

Exactly what people should know, picking big teams doesn't give anyone any assurance that they are gonna win because they choosed big teams as their preferred side, we have seen big teams lose their matches severally, in the game of football soccer or any sports at all anyone can win, no one should deceive himself, one thing I remind myself while making my selections or picking teams even when I know that such teams are in good form is that anything can happen because many things can influence the outcome of any match even in the die minutes, match results can still change, so no won should be too sure of anything.