SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030

[zasad@]

SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-makes-digital-assets-strategic-priority-through-2030?
The regulator’s five-year roadmap calls for clearer crypto rules, support for tokenization and a framework for staking and onchain markets.
"The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has elevated digital assets to a strategic priority, calling for regulatory clarity around blockchain technology, tokenization and crypto market infrastructure through 2030.

The shift was outlined in the agency’s draft Strategic Plan for fiscal years 2026–2030, published Tuesday. Alongside broader goals focused on capital formation, investor protection and agency modernization, the SEC dedicated an entire objective to digital assets and distributed ledger technology."

[Z-tight]

Digital assets can no longer be ignored, so i am not surprised to read about this. However, the Clarity Act would have to be signed into law, in order to achieve regulatory clarity in the U.S., and it would also delineate the jurisdictional boundaries of both the SEC and the CFTC, so they are not always at 'war' over would should regulate or oversee what. So, the Clarity Act getting over the line is also important in this roadmap by the SEC.

[zasad@]

Digital assets can no longer be ignored, so i am not surprised to read about this. However, the Clarity Act would have to be signed into law, in order to achieve regulatory clarity in the U.S., and it would also delineate the jurisdictional boundaries of both the SEC and the CFTC, so they are not always at 'war' over would should regulate or oversee what. So, the Clarity Act getting over the line is also important in this roadmap by the SEC.

These actions will push the Senate to pass the Clarity Act sooner, as the process has already dragged on.
Ideally, the Clarity Act would be passed in July-August, or it could even be delayed until December.

After that, the reorganized Senate would begin its work, and the prospects for this law's passage are unclear.

[bitmover]

SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-makes-digital-assets-strategic-priority-through-2030?
The regulator’s five-year roadmap calls for clearer crypto rules, support for tokenization and a framework for staking and onchain markets.
"The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has elevated digital assets to a strategic priority, calling for regulatory clarity around blockchain technology, tokenization and crypto market infrastructure through 2030.

I believe we will soon see the traditional markets allowing negotiations 24 hours 7 days a week.

This is the blockchain coming to wall street.

[foxafi8502]

If the SEC follows through on this roadmap with clear, consistent rules rather than regulation by enforcement, it could provide the certainty that both crypto businesses and investors have been asking for, though the real impact will depend on how those policies are implemented in practice.

[YOSHIE]

SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030

Personally I support prioritizing SEC regulation of digital assets, my assessment is that if the SEC actually does this it will create a conventional framework which will provide legal action and certainty for exchanges and also legal regulations for crypto market intermediaries.

This means that the SEC policy will add confidence to new investors to target crypto assets as a form of long-term investment, because it provides broad legal certainty, This policy will broadly add confidence in the future of crypto markets and assets, of course this situation will form a safe ecosystem for crypto users globally.

[MarryWithBTC]

SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-makes-digital-assets-strategic-priority-through-2030?
The regulator’s five-year roadmap calls for clearer crypto rules, support for tokenization and a framework for staking and onchain markets.
"The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has elevated digital assets to a strategic priority, calling for regulatory clarity around blockchain technology, tokenization and crypto market infrastructure through 2030.

The shift was outlined in the agency’s draft Strategic Plan for fiscal years 2026–2030, published Tuesday. Alongside broader goals focused on capital formation, investor protection and agency modernization, the SEC dedicated an entire objective to digital assets and distributed ledger technology."

For donkey yes, CEC has been regulating the crypto industry through enforcement, rather than by providing rules. If they have now decided to change the narrative by treating digital assets as priority through 2030, it means that they have surely recognized and aggreged that blockchain and tokenization has come to stay.

What I am seeing here is facilitation of the clarity bill. This is the time for crypto.
Although I am not wholly optimistic because strategic priority and plans are mere statements and not a gurantee.

[zasad@]

SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-makes-digital-assets-strategic-priority-through-2030?
The regulator’s five-year roadmap calls for clearer crypto rules, support for tokenization and a framework for staking and onchain markets.
"The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has elevated digital assets to a strategic priority, calling for regulatory clarity around blockchain technology, tokenization and crypto market infrastructure through 2030.

I believe we will soon see the traditional markets allowing negotiations 24 hours 7 days a week.

This is the blockchain coming to wall street.

I've been wondering for a long time why Wall Street hasn't migrated to blockchain.

If I'm the smartest person and Wall Street is run by idiots, the answer is obvious.
But more likely, Wall Street is run by the smartest people, and I'm the idiot. Blockchain technology is riddled with bugs and vulnerabilities, and thanks to the advancement of AI, we see them in the news every week. But Wall Street runs smoothly and without hacks.

[bitmover]

SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-makes-digital-assets-strategic-priority-through-2030?
The regulator’s five-year roadmap calls for clearer crypto rules, support for tokenization and a framework for staking and onchain markets.
"The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has elevated digital assets to a strategic priority, calling for regulatory clarity around blockchain technology, tokenization and crypto market infrastructure through 2030.

I believe we will soon see the traditional markets allowing negotiations 24 hours 7 days a week.

This is the blockchain coming to wall street.

I've been wondering for a long time why Wall Street hasn't migrated to blockchain.

If I'm the smartest person and Wall Street is run by idiots, the answer is obvious.
But more likely, Wall Street is run by the smartest people, and I'm the idiot. Blockchain technology is riddled with bugs and vulnerabilities, and thanks to the advancement of AI, we see them in the news every week. But Wall Street runs smoothly and without hacks.

I dont think it is about the smart person or better option.

Wall Street banks and brokers make a lot of money the way things are.

Blockchain solutions would cut off intermediaries. And wall street are basically intermediaries

[Z-tight]

If the SEC follows through on this roadmap with clear, consistent rules rather than regulation by enforcement, it could provide the certainty that both crypto businesses and investors have been asking for, though the real impact will depend on how those policies are implemented in practice.

That is exactly what it is. There is a lot of ambiguity as to how cryptocurrencies should be regulated by the authorities and it is this sort of clarity that the network requires, in order to move to the next level.

The authorities have even set a dangerous precedent, convicting devs of open source code and softwares for operating an unlicensed money trasmitting business, when they never held funds of people who use their code or software. The Clarity Act also addresses this and aims to provide protection for these developers from being dubbed money transmitters.

[zasad@]

SEC makes digital assets strategic priority through 2030
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-makes-digital-assets-strategic-priority-through-2030?
The regulator’s five-year roadmap calls for clearer crypto rules, support for tokenization and a framework for staking and onchain markets.
"The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has elevated digital assets to a strategic priority, calling for regulatory clarity around blockchain technology, tokenization and crypto market infrastructure through 2030.

I believe we will soon see the traditional markets allowing negotiations 24 hours 7 days a week.

This is the blockchain coming to wall street.

I've been wondering for a long time why Wall Street hasn't migrated to blockchain.

If I'm the smartest person and Wall Street is run by idiots, the answer is obvious.
But more likely, Wall Street is run by the smartest people, and I'm the idiot. Blockchain technology is riddled with bugs and vulnerabilities, and thanks to the advancement of AI, we see them in the news every week. But Wall Street runs smoothly and without hacks.

I dont think it is about the smart person or better option.

Wall Street banks and brokers make a lot of money the way things are.

Blockchain solutions would cut off intermediaries. And wall street are basically intermediaries

Okay, down with the middlemen. Let's all move to decentralized solutions.

On Wall Street, corporations are held accountable for every outage, hack, or other event, and security there is top-notch.
In a decentralized ecosystem, there's complete anarchy, and any failure will cost a major investor their assets.

On Wall Street, traders can't manipulate prices without a long prison sentence, while in cryptocurrency, thousands of pump-and-dump projects pop up daily.

[Sulegzy39]

Digital assets can no longer be ignored, so i am not surprised to read about this. However, the Clarity Act would have to be signed into law, in order to achieve regulatory clarity in the U.S., and it would also delineate the jurisdictional boundaries of both the SEC and the CFTC, so they are not always at 'war' over would should regulate or oversee what. So, the Clarity Act getting over the line is also important in this roadmap by the SEC.

In my own opinion Digital assets can no longer be disregarded, thus I am not surprised to hear about this. However, in order to create regulatory clarity in the United States, the Clarity Act must be signed into law. It would also define the jurisdictional boundaries of both the SEC and the CFTC, so they are not always at 'war' about who should regulate or oversee what. So, getting the Clarity Act passed is also critical in the SEC's strategy.

[yhiaali3]

I hope this will expedite the Clarity Act, which I believe is overdue, because if I understand correctly, the SEC in its plan adopts the same goals as the Clarity Act in terms of defining what is Security and what is Commodity, defining the jurisdiction of the SEC and CFTC, and setting a clear framework for trading and custody and supporting innovation instead of fighting it.

But the question that comes to mind is, after the end of Trump’s term and the arrival of a new administration, will the SEC’s 2026–2030 strategic plan remain the same or could it be canceled with the arrival of an administration that is not friendly towards crypto?

[Z-tight]

I hope this will expedite the Clarity Act, which I believe is overdue

No, this cannot expedite the Clarity Act. The Clarity Act becoming law would make this roadmap possible, but the fate of the bill rests only in the hands of the legislators and nothing else. The bill is expected to face hurdles in the Senate and would require bipartisan support from the Democrats in order to proceed to a final vote.

As you can see, there are still hurdles to be crossed and the general outlook from the community on its passage this year keeps moving from optimistic to pessimistic, so we'll see.

[zasad@]

But the question that comes to mind is, after the end of Trump’s term and the arrival of a new administration, will the SEC’s 2026–2030 strategic plan remain the same or could it be canceled with the arrival of an administration that is not friendly towards crypto?

A new president can easily repeal the decrees of the previous US president, but repealing the Clarity Act in the future requires an even more complex procedure than the one used to pass it.
In practice, such procedures in the US take years, and if Republicans disagree, they can drag the process out for ages. From this point of view, I like American legislation.

[SamReomo]

But the question that comes to mind is, after the end of Trump’s term and the arrival of a new administration, will the SEC’s 2026–2030 strategic plan remain the same or could it be canceled with the arrival of an administration that is not friendly towards crypto?

Even if new administration arrives they'll still not change that strategic plan because it's going to be helpful for the country in long term. We can't deny that nowadays everyone is mostly into digital assets like Bitcoin and a few other coins and thus it's better to work and improve the plan instead of changing it or delaying it. However, if new administration decides to stop the strategic plan then it could do it but it's still going to be a though job not an easy one.

[Z-tight]

Even if new administration arrives they'll still not change that strategic plan because it's going to be helpful for the country in long term.

It is not a strategic plan. If the Clarity Act passes congress and is signed by the president; it becomes statutory law and a new administration cannot simply revoke it. The process is not as easy as revoking an executive order.

However, if new administration decides to stop the strategic plan then it could do it but it's still going to be a though job not an easy one.

Again, it is not a strategic plan, but a law. The chances of repealing a statutory law is slim to none.

[yhiaali3]

But the question that comes to mind is, after the end of Trump’s term and the arrival of a new administration, will the SEC’s 2026–2030 strategic plan remain the same or could it be canceled with the arrival of an administration that is not friendly towards crypto?

A new president can easily repeal the decrees of the previous US president, but repealing the Clarity Act in the future requires an even more complex procedure than the one used to pass it.
In practice, such procedures in the US take years, and if Republicans disagree, they can drag the process out for ages. From this point of view, I like American legislation.

This is good; these complexities will benefit the crypto community.😍
So I hope the Clarity Act is passed before the end of Trump's term. At least then the world will have gained something positive from Trump's presidency after he stirred up trouble globally through tariffs, the wars on Venezuela and Iran, and many other tensions that may arise before his term ends.

[MarryWithBTC]

But the question that comes to mind is, after the end of Trump’s term and the arrival of a new administration, will the SEC’s 2026–2030 strategic plan remain the same or could it be canceled with the arrival of an administration that is not friendly towards crypto?

A new president can easily repeal the decrees of the previous US president, but repealing the Clarity Act in the future requires an even more complex procedure than the one used to pass it.
In practice, such procedures in the US take years, and if Republicans disagree, they can drag the process out for ages. From this point of view, I like American legislation.

A very good reason to like American legislation and legislatures but at a time, they understand that it is America first. The government of some African countries doesn't behave so even if they model the type of government America practices. In their own case, a legislature from the opposition party could blatantly oppose a good proposal/bill that will better the society because the proposal came from the opposition party.

In the same way a senate president is ever willing to pass to bill every trash that the executive president has sponsored through his allies.

While US is deliberating her future and positioning it for digital greatness, some countries are just sleeping.

[Sulegzy39]

At this stage Digital assets can no longer be disregarded, thus I am not surprised to hear about this. However, in order to create regulatory clarity in the United States, the Clarity Act must be signed into law. It would also define the jurisdictional boundaries of both the SEC and the CFTC, so they are not always at 'war' about who should regulate or oversee what. So, getting the Clarity Act passed is also critical in the SEC's strategy.

 In my perspective, digital assets can no longer be ignored, thus I'm not surprised to learn about this. However, in order to provide regulatory clarity in the United States, the Clarity Act must be signed into law. It would also define the SEC and CFTC's authority boundaries, ensuring that they are not constantly at odds over who should regulate or oversee what. Getting the Clarity Act passed is also important to the SEC's plan.