Recent Jack Dorsey interview admitting he is satoshi.

[zeolacoin]

'Did anyone else notice the interview where Jack Dorsey admitted he was Satoshi by answering a question that only Satoshi would find relevant. The question posed by the interviewer was a question that only satoshi would have an answer for. The question asked was, "what would you do if you were able to confront craig wright?"

Jack Dorsey already took Craig Wright to court and won the case, he was funding Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) who filed a lawsuit against Craig Wright in U.K. High Court and won, what more do you need.

Jack dorsey answers saying, "there are no words". Only satoshi would have a problem with craig wright, Dorsey seemingly admitted he is satoshi by asnwering the question. All other people on earth besides satoshi would be confused by the question answering means you are satoshi.

I really cannot understand this part, how does this answer gives anyone a conclusion that Jack Dorsey admitted he is Satoshi, he will never make that claim.

~
its game theory brilliant question by the interviewer.

You can link that interview here, so that we could understand what you are implying here.

~
the thing that satoshi was moving onto was working at twitter becuz satoshi is jack dorsey. Thats the reason none of the original bitcoin has ever been moved becuz dorsey used the twitter money to live off of. At one point shortly after bitcoin gained traction dorsey already had over a billion in twitter stock options.

It is a good theory, the problem is that Satoshi Nakamoto was an expert in C++ while Dorsey was an expert in web application framework. If Jack was Satoshi, he could have signed from the original Genesis Block and silenced Craig, rather than taking him to court.  

The question asked by the interviewer implies 1 of 2 options: that you have a personal beef with craig because you are in fact satoshi so you respond by being annoyed by craig wright OR all other people on earth would answer the question with "why would i have a problem with craig wright saying he is satoshi that doesnt have anything to do with me." The interview is found searching on youtube "between two asics with jack dorsey" the craig wright question is near the end of video. The interviewer hints 3-4 times that jack dorsey is satoshi in multiple different contexts.

[Bastketsrus]

I honestly think this discussion will get to nowhere, the only way to prove someone is Satoshi is through signing a message with the addresses identified as owned by Satoshi.
You can say to the world that you are Satoshi, or someone else is Satoshi but if none of them prove and verify themselves through signing a message with the Satoshi owned address, nobody gonna believe.

I agree. Without a signed message from a known Satoshi address, every claim is just talk. That's the only proof the Bitcoin community is likely to accept.

[moneystery]

It's ridiculous to conclude that Jack Dorsey is Satoshi based on such a simple answer. Anyone could say something like that if asked, so does that mean everyone is Satoshi then? So I think your line of reasoning is pretty ridiculous and doesn't make sense.
If someone is truly 'satoshi' it doesn't need to be complicated, just prove that they can sign messages from satoshi's wallet, until then if they can't do that, then there is no need to assume that person is satoshi.

[Decimetre]

'Did anyone else notice the interview where Jack Dorsey admitted he was Satoshi by answering a question that only Satoshi would find relevant. The question posed by the interviewer was a question that only satoshi would have an answer for. The question asked was, "what would you do if you were able to confront craig wright?" Jack dorsey answers saying, "there are no words". Only satoshi would have a problem with craig wright, Dorsey seemingly admitted he is satoshi by asnwering the question. All other people on earth besides satoshi would be confused by the question answering means you are satoshi.

https://youtu.be/CgVwjaZh3-k?si=z-1X1zBDyHlHThL9

There's no way Jack Dorsey would have said that, he only answered a logical question logically. This clip is apt and short. Satoshi remains unknown.

[zeolacoin]

jack also has said in multiple interviews "if we dont find a use for bitcoin then the project failed" in some interviews the context is clear and obvious he's taking ownership of it as its creator. Youre telling me the first company to adopt bitcoin was square which is owned by dorsey and he's not the creator??? come on folks plenty of evidence. Satoshi literally joined the bitcoin forum on jacks birthday. The st louis email hacking jack is from st louis and his family is there. satoshi wrote code to pick specific addresses and the address he chose first started with Jdxxxxxxxxxx literally so much evidence. Jack dorsey's last major job before bitcoin was at a company that literally has white papers exactly like the bitcoin white paper. same exact formatting so obvious.