[ANN] NULL_ROUTE Privacy Directory — Free Listing for No-KYC Crypto Services

[marto25]

There's no clean, community-maintained
index of privacy-first crypto services.
So we built one.

cetoc.org/routen.html

Manually curated. No paid rankings.
No KYC to submit.

── CATEGORIES ──
Swap / Exchange · Wallets · VPN
Hosting / VPS · Privacy Tools
Merchants · Education · Travel
Services / Banking · Community · Jobs

── REQUIREMENT ──
Must accept at least one privacy coin
(XMR, ZEC, LTC, DASH)

── LISTING OPTIONS ──

FREE
Basic listing · 7 days review

PRIVACY FRIEND
Priority review 48h · Top placement
Supporter badge

FEATURED
Highlighted card · Top placement
Privacy Score badge · 24h review

SPONSOR
Maximum visibility · Banner
Featured in directory header

── SUBMIT ──
cetoc.org/submit.html

What categories or services do you think
are missing from a directory like this?

null_route / cetoc.org

[marto25]

── WEEK 1 UPDATE ──

NULL_ROUTE Privacy Directory is live.

48 services indexed across 10 categories.
All manually reviewed. No paid rankings.

── NEW THIS WEEK ──

✦ Vector (9.4) — Privacy Friend
   E2E messenger · No-KYC · TOR · XMR
✦ Xeovo VPN (9.2) — Privacy Friend
   No-KYC · TOR · XMR/LTC/BTC

── HIGHLIGHTS ──

Top rated: ZERO TRACE (10.0) · Feather Wallet (9.
· Kuno (9.5) · Cake Wallet (9.5)

Categories live:
Swap · Wallets · Hosting · Tools
Grants · Merchants · Travel
Services · Community · Jobs

Submissions open — free basic listing:
cetoc.org/submit.html

[internetional]

I learned about your website from the b1exch thread. I took a look at the site and noticed that it contains a genuinely useful list. I like that it indicates which services are open source. And I like even more that it indicates services perform AML checks. That's important to me as well, because the biggest risk when using NoKYC services is ending up with tainted funds.

Am I correct in understanding that you do not add new services to the list yourself and instead wait for the service owners to take the initiative and submit their platforms? Don't you think that this reduces the value of the list for users?

Also, why do you limit the scope to XMR, ZEC, LTC, and DASH? Why not include services that accept Bitcoin through privacy-enhancing protocols such as the Lightning Network and Tacit, or Litecoin through MWEB? Or services that support other cryptocurrencies through privacy-preserving channels?