How high or low can you go on the forum?

[Mitchell]

Looking back now, I clearly didn't read it thoroughly enough. Just saw what LoyceV and fillippone did and copied it. My bad.
So then it is either a straight up +100 or a +90 if you count the neutral rating from Welsh.

^ I am surprised with comments above cause you aren't supposed to add numbers up and it's already clarified earlier.

Just quote me, no need to do it like this. I am, in the end, only human.

[LoyceV]

Fun fact: LoyceV is actually not LoyceV because he is +90 + -10 (neutral trust) = 80.
~
LoyceV = 80
Rizzrack = +100 (staff) + -50 (red trust) = 50

So you're saying Global Moderator hilariousandco gets +100 - 10 (Neutral trust) = +90, which makes him LoyceV? Maybe this makes sense when I've had some alcohol, but it's too early for that

[dragonvslinux]

-20 (excluded by DT members)

Ok so now you got your own scale wrong which will likely confuse others even further

Excluded by DT1 Members means you are excluded from DefaultTrust. Did you mean distrusted by DT1 members? As that'd be a different thing. Hopefully I don't have to explain the difference between the terminology "excluded" and "distrusted" here.

So by your own scale, you get: +80: Consistent DT1 eligibility -10: Neutral trust = +70 (aka Green trust from theymos, something you do not have ironically). Hope that helps.

[TypoTonic]

With all the drama going on in this board, this topic is like a breath of fresh air.

So basically, the success of an average account (0) is equal to a banned moderator;

+100: Moderator / Staff
-100: Banned

Or LoyceV if he had red trust and red flag.

+90: LoyceV
-90: Red trust with red flag

But why negative for neutral trust? I get -10 for giving away free signatures to babo, haha.

+30: Green trust
-10: Neutral trust

So I'm at +20, I'm pretty happy with that. The fact that I'm able to make some sort of income here in the forum is already a success for me.

[libert19]

Your total score is supposed to be your highest positive score minus your lowest negative score, which pretty much makes it a scale.

You should add this to op.

Fun fact: LoyceV is actually not LoyceV because he is +90 + -10 (neutral trust) = 80.

This was funny.

^ I am surprised with comments above cause you aren't supposed to add numbers up and it's already clarified earlier.

Just quote me, no need to do it like this. I am, in the end, only human.

I am just sayin, it's nothingburger. As for this, '^', if comment is above mine, I like to do this instead of quoting, it's just convenient.

...

So I'm at +20, I'm pretty happy with that. The fact that I'm able to make some sort of income here in the forum is already a success for me.

+10 good sir. You can't compete with me yet.

Edit: ^ Oh shit, nvm.

[Welsh]

Proposal: Active reporter +110

-10: Neutral trust

Or 320 if you count the neutral rating from Welsh.

So then it is either a straight up +100 or a +90 if you count the neutral rating from Welsh.

That bastard!


I would work mine out, but I think users might count the neutral from a user who goes by the name of; Mitchell .

[dragonvslinux]

Proposal: Active reporter +110

No need to sell yourself short, +100 for active reporters would be fair enough. Its a two part process after all.

As long as +100 was for active moderators rather than those in name only, along with -10 for being an inactive mod