👻 GhostSwap — Crypto Exchange for Privacy Coins | Monero, Zcash & 1,600+ Coins

[Zwei]

We are currently in direct communication with the user involved in the case that was reported on KycNot about a year ago.

Since then, we have made significant progress as a platform, and we are now working with him toward a refund from our side to resolve the matter properly.

better late than never i guess, but it is very and i mean VERY concerning that it has been so long and the case is yet to be resolved.

We will keep you updated as soon as there are any developments, including if he updates his public comment.

i hope he gets his refund soon.

FYI, we currently have a $5,000 security deposit with OrangeFren, which will be increased to $25,000 this month. We also have a $2,000 security deposit with Trevoid, which will be increased to $5,000 this month.

the security deposits are good, and i'm all for it, but it also gives a false sense of security we just had another exchange pull an exit scam while having $20k with different escrows.

so users across all platforms can feel safe and confident using our service.

want people to feel safe and confident using your site, be more transparent and cut the NO KYC bullshit, and other misleading marketing.

[Trêvoid]

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I confirm on behalf of @Ghostswap.io (OP) that I hold 6.35 XMR + 8 XMR (at today's rate, since XMR a bit down it was approximately $5,000). This is Trêvoid from bitcointalk.org. I do not have an escrow fee.

Service thread and active intermediary details:
https://trevoid.com/threads/ghostswap-non-custodial-privacy-first-crypto-exchange.25

My PGP public key is published at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539912.0
Please use this key to verify this guarantee of letter.

PGP Fingerprint:  F642 642B 1E73 F786 7AD3  EA0D 8E63 A6E0 D659 B2CC

Latest Bitcoin block is: 000000000000000000007a41c988468da35959fa8defb860fb25d54cd4024a0b

Regards,
Trêvoid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iJEEARYKADkWIQT2QmQrHnP3hnrT6g2OY6bg1lmyzAUCai0jDhsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDEACgkQjmOm4NZZssxKmAD/cxU7JjXMug1sGCXTAukt
11kSHFD6eOJRlHwuXATkAj4BAI09p/+AbqE1pKi6esdLYMhBqZ+a3D4lpHGXrDEX
P7IF
=16d8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Best regards,
— Trêvoid

[Murat]

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I confirm on behalf of @Ghostswap.io (OP) that I hold 6.35 XMR + 8 XMR (at today's rate, since XMR a bit down it was approximately $5,000). This is Trêvoid from bitcointalk.org. I do not have an escrow fee.

Service thread and active intermediary details:
https://trevoid.com/threads/ghostswap-non-custodial-privacy-first-crypto-exchange.25

My PGP public key is published at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539912.0
Please use this key to verify this guarantee of letter.

PGP Fingerprint:  F642 642B 1E73 F786 7AD3  EA0D 8E63 A6E0 D659 B2CC

Latest Bitcoin block is: 000000000000000000007a41c988468da35959fa8defb860fb25d54cd4024a0b

Regards,
Trêvoid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iJEEARYKADkWIQT2QmQrHnP3hnrT6g2OY6bg1lmyzAUCai0jDhsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDEACgkQjmOm4NZZssxKmAD/cxU7JjXMug1sGCXTAukt
11kSHFD6eOJRlHwuXATkAj4BAI09p/+AbqE1pKi6esdLYMhBqZ+a3D4lpHGXrDEX
P7IF
=16d8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Best regards,
— Trêvoid

Quoted

[ESG]

So, according to this link, the service
 may request KYC and may freeze transactions,
 so it's best to avoid it.

$10 in BTC for first 50 Reviews
 about our exchange!

for forum members, please be
more careful with such paid reviews.


[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/monerosupport/comments/1kioucr/btc_to_xmr_via_ghostswap_tx_marked_finishe/

well, I found this site a while ago, but I didn't have confidence, and yesterday I decided to test it, because I needed to send RLUSD and this site offers the service, there are few, I sent 63,... RLUSD, and before sending it gave 0.000934btc, as soon as I sent it, it showed 0.000932, well the rlusd arrived at the requested address at the same minute, but,... But... The site did not recognize it.... nothing... awaiting deposit? good,try to contact the suport, following options....> email,telegram, simpleX, I add simpleX to the contacts, and I sent the transaction id.
I was waiting and nothing, I slept, and woke up, there was a message, and then I answered, and then he asked me for the TX of sending, I don't understand, the same way I have access to ,  the site also has, but I sent the tx and it didn't answer anymore, I had looking, and as soon as the 63rlusd was delivered, in the same minute it left the address, But so far nothing, neither BTC nor support response...

Well, the interesting thing is that I was logged out here from the forum, but when looking for information, I ended up finding this topic, and since yesterday, many posts have been deleted,...

What I would like is not to need to come here to talk about, yes, a site that solves the problem on the site itself, and that they are transparent... for example, the site has an AML policy, and they say it is noKYC, some of the deleted posts were about a user who has had currency stuck on the site for more than a year..... The least that should happen to be considered a good nokyc service, was to return the guy's coins at the same time and say, your coins are dirty and are being returned with the fees already discounted, and say not to send them again, because it would be returned again discounting more fees,... but no, they take the funds from the users, and let them talk to themselves, and still spend time here, leaving my rewiew...

I believe that negative rewiew would not be welcome here, since it is doing escrow with several here, in order to make an advertisement for something that is very unreliable, but yes, it would be good a site like this with a good reputation, but good reputation in the build by paying others to say that the service is good, but the time... but good sites that I followed here on the forum, had a good reputation and suddenly, over the years, paahammm, SCAM Alerts, RedFlags... owwww...

I logged in here on the forum today only because of this,. And the time I wasted with this doesn't pay for the time of other problems that I already have to solve here, I didn't need more problems to solve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ok, I'll leave the prints here.. and confirm that as soon as I sent the 'TX' so important, nothing else was answered to my SimpleX.... Damn...(Well, he replied as soon as I said I would leave a rewiew about the service, but I didn't say where)...

well if this happened to RLUSD, imagine with a dirty bitcoin, just like they say... lol dirty... hahaha... I'm sorry bitcoin, for saying that you have dirty bitcoins, that's a label imposed by the rulers of the rottenness of the world, just like they say that about things they do but don't assume, "conspiracy theory" oHHH... Conspiracy theory and dirty bites come from the same foul mouth that invented these names!

Okay, I'm still waiting here and nothing...... follow the image>>>



"We are checking your exchange,please give us  more time.

Funds are not lost and everything is undercontrol."

Good sir, this option to take more time is not in my control,
 you have the time, and I can only wait.


#:
 Maybe the site has even sent my satoshis, and not even the site itself knows,
 because they are ghost coins, and if they have already arrived at my address,
I can't see, because they are ghost coins hahahaha....


###

the Ghost IO  Nightmare Rewiew Update>




(click to full img)
>>>

this is my live rewiew from this service,
and,
 if I don't send the photo from my wallet, my coins will get stuck.......
 I believe that if you were paying for the first 50 people we rewiew here,
that rewiew should be worth at least 1k,
 but negative rewiews are not valued by the payers...

 What a pity...

I'm not going to send the picture of my wallet,
 and so I believe that because of that my coins will be frozen forever...
Is there a way I can say that your service is of quality, could you answer me that?


#Well, for the time I lost here,
I believe I can already open a topic on scam accusations?
... I already have a reason...

[Ghostswap.io]

...

Hello,

We would like to clarify this case transparently.

The exchange was not processed automatically because the RLUSD payment was not received with the correct/recognized MEMO / Extra ID required for automatic matching. This is why the order stayed on “awaiting deposit” even though funds arrived at the deposit address.

The RLUSD moving out of the deposit address shortly after arrival is not suspicious. This is an automated wallet sweep process done by our wallet system/provider. It does not mean the funds are lost or stolen.

Our support team contacted the user and asked for the required verification proof: a full-screen, unedited screenshot from his own wallet history showing the withdrawal to our deposit address. This does not expose private keys, seed phrase, wallet access, or any sensitive login information. It only proves that the payment came from his wallet.

The user refused to provide this required screenshot. Without this step, we cannot manually verify the payment and initiate the refund from our side/provider side.

The funds are not lost, and we are still ready to resolve this. As soon as the user provides the requested wallet screenshot, we can continue the manual verification and refund process.

We understand the frustration, but this is not a scam case. The issue happened because the payment could not be automatically matched due to the MEMO / Extra ID problem, and we are actively trying to help the user resolve it.

[examplens]

...

You wrote this in a rather confusing way, but we understand what you're talking about here. You tried an exchange, sent funds, and got nothing back.
This thread is not self-moderated, so there is no possibility for the OP to delete other users' posts. Also, Ghostswap has only been here on the forum for a week, so we don't even know much about them. There's no reason to be negative about the forum, you can only get help from here.

We understand the frustration, but this is not a scam case. The issue happened because the payment could not be automatically matched due to the MEMO / Extra ID problem, and we are actively trying to help the user resolve it.

First, if MEMO is mandatory, how was the user even able to make a transaction at your address without filling in all the necessary details?
Is it feasible to just refund the user to the address from which he sent the coins? That would end any dilemma
You will agree that submitting wallet screenshots is not the way crypto transactions should work.

[Murat]

First, if MEMO is mandatory, how was the user even able to make a transaction at your address without filling in all the necessary details?

anyone can make any transcation from their wallet. not sure how ghostswap can prevent this.

from my understanding he sent the transaction without MEMO.

I just did a search on google & found this.

Yes, you can send RLUSD (Ripple USD) without a memo

You must include a memo if you are sending RLUSD to a exchange. Exchanges usually pool all incoming deposits into one main wallet, and the memo is the only way for the exchange to identify and credit your specific user account.

[AGogi2003]

FYI, we currently have a $5,000 security deposit with OrangeFren, which will be increased to $25,000 this month. We also have a $2,000 security deposit with Trevoid, which will be increased to $5,000 this month.

We are also looking to get in contact with KycNot directly and place a security deposit there as well, if needed, so users across all platforms can feel safe and confident using our service.

This is a welcome idea and it will increase the trust of users that want to use your platform for exchanges.
Transparency is what most users are looking for when dealing with a NoKYC exchange they are interested in for swapping of their coins instead of using centralized exchanges that would require personal verification before exchanging huge amount of fund.
No KYC exchange has been a good choice for me and I have used some of them which I had no issue with. I am going to test your platform and share my experience here soon.

Sure, that will give members trust that you’re offering a legitimate service and won’t make member feel scared. No KYC exchange make you exchange coin easily without wasting time to put there personal information before you can swap coin. When I start to used NO KYC I see they is not any difficult transaction he make everything work fast and am enjoying using it, and am sure many members will really like it people that need fast swap. Now that you people are trying to do everything possible to make every member enjoy using your services will be a good move and you people will get the trust. Privacy is very important and when ever they mistakenly hack your account your personal information will be safe without sharing to others so NO KYC exchange is good for wise once.

[ESG]

First, if MEMO is mandatory, how was the user even able to make a transaction at your address without filling in all the necessary details?

anyone can make any transcation from
their wallet. not sure how ghostswap
can prevent this.
from my understanding he sent the
transaction without MEMO.(no)

I just did a search on
google & found this.

Yes, you can send RLUSD
(Ripple USD) without a memo

You must include a memo if you are sending RLUSD to a exchange. Exchanges usually pool all incoming deposits into one main wallet, and the memo is the only way for the exchange to identify and credit your specific user account.

Man, I put the memo, if I hadn't put it, my wallet didn't allow me to send it, and you know what's worse, their team said I put the memo as a comment!hahahah... i don't have this fieldon my wallet.... comment hahaha...

...

We understand the frustration, but this is not a scam case. The issue happened because the payment could not be automatically matched due to the MEMO / Extra ID problem, and we are actively trying to help the user resolve it.

First, if MEMO is mandatory, how was the user even able to make a transaction at your address without filling in all the necessary details?
Is it feasible to just refund the user to the address from which he sent the coins? That would end any dilemma
You will agree that submitting wallet screenshots is not the way crypto transactions should work.

Man, my friend, I didn't know if sending them back would be right, because when I started the exchange, I wanted to receive the satoshis at the other end, that's all I wanted...

 but putting the memo as a comment this is the newest attraction of the moment,

 I don't know how I can hear these things...

and also, I didn't find them here, I just found them later, but I had already read some bad rewiews of them, and even so I decided to take a risk, and then after that, investigating a little more I arrived here on their topic, yesterday and I was logged out, and I logged in today to leave my rewiew, and I'm not lying at all, just exposing the inconvenience, as if I had nothing to do but test swaps around... dammm,

follow the last thing I told them, but thank you, that's exactly what is important,

 he wants a photo of my wallet and

 I just want the satoshis at the other end,

what service is this?

I buy an apple

and he wants to give me a banana?

>

[Ghostswap.io]

...

You wrote this in a rather confusing way, but we understand what you're talking about here. You tried an exchange, sent funds, and got nothing back.
This thread is not self-moderated, so there is no possibility for the OP to delete other users' posts. Also, Ghostswap has only been here on the forum for a week, so we don't even know much about them. There's no reason to be negative about the forum, you can only get help from here.

We understand the frustration, but this is not a scam case. The issue happened because the payment could not be automatically matched due to the MEMO / Extra ID problem, and we are actively trying to help the user resolve it.

First, if MEMO is mandatory, how was the user even able to make a transaction at your address without filling in all the necessary details?
Is it feasible to just refund the user to the address from which he sent the coins? That would end any dilemma
You will agree that submitting wallet screenshots is not the way crypto transactions should work.

A MEMO / Destination Tag can be mandatory for our system to automatically match the payment, but the blockchain/wallet can still allow the funds to be sent without it, or with it placed in the wrong field.

In this case, the tag was entered as a comment instead of the actual Destination Tag field, so the deposit arrived on-chain but was not matched automatically.

Funds are not lost, and we are trying to resolve this properly.

[examplens]

A MEMO / Destination Tag can be mandatory for our system to automatically match the payment, but the blockchain/wallet can still allow the funds to be sent without it, or with it placed in the wrong field.

In this case, the tag was entered as a comment instead of the actual Destination Tag field, so the deposit arrived on-chain but was not matched automatically.

Funds are not lost, and we are trying to resolve this properly.

I'm sorry, you don't know what you're talking about,
 I put the memo in the memo field, ID,(destinationtag)
there is no field in my wallet where I can put a comment,

Obviously, there is a shortcoming here on the platform itself, it can be said that it is a bug.

I haven't seen what a similar order looks like, and honestly, I haven't used RLUSD too much so I don't have enough experience with it, but @Ghostswap.io, what's stopping you from refunding this user, and later making sure that such cases don't happen again?
If you are this slow when solving an issue worth $63, what should we expect from you if it were $63k for example

[coupable]

What do we have here?

A user said that he sent RLUSD to his Ghostswap deposit address with the required MEMO, while the exchanger said the deposit address received the RLUSD without the destination tag.

Honestly, I haven't used RLUSD before, so I don't have enough experience with it, but I just did some searching and found that it is possible to verify if a transaction was broadcasted with a MEMO or without. I am not trying to defend the service, as it can be a glitch in the system, and this is an opportunity to fix it.

User @ESG, you can show the transaction ID in a blockchain [1] to check details. I think this will help your narrative, and if you care about your privacy too much, you can share the transaction ID with someone reputable from the forum, such as one of the users commenting about the case above.

$63 isn't a lot of money to make all the noise about since the rep wants to resolve it through their ways (asking for a screenshot or whatever), but you refuse to do so, and you also seem not to accept a refund but insist on getting the swap completed despite the useless debate (imo). I really don't like your tone, like you are having fun arguing the case. At first you said you decided to test the service despite the bad reviews you read about (please show some of those reviews), and then later you insisted on completing the swap without following suggested solutions. Also, you accused OP of deleting unwanted reviews despite the topic not being self-moderated. How did you conclude this?

[1] https://livenet.xrpl.org/

[ESG]

What do we have here?

A user said that he sent RLUSD to his Ghostswap deposit address with the required MEMO, while the exchanger said the deposit address received the RLUSD without the destination tag.

Honestly, I haven't used RLUSD before, so I don't have enough experience with it, but I just did some searching and found that it is possible to verify if a transaction was broadcasted with a MEMO or without. I am not trying to defend the service, as it can be a glitch in the system, and this is an opportunity to fix it.

User @ESG, you can show the transaction ID in a blockchain [1] to check details. I think this will help your narrative, and if you care about your privacy too much, you can share the transaction ID with someone reputable from the forum, such as one of the users commenting about the case above.

$63 isn't a lot of money to make all the noise about since the rep wants to resolve it through their ways (asking for a screenshot or whatever), but you refuse to do so, and you also seem not to accept a refund but insist on getting the swap completed despite the useless debate (imo). I really don't like your tone, like you are having fun arguing the case.

Sorry my tone, I'm not having fun with this at all.!

-If you want, when you want to give me back the money,
 the two wallets are mine, both the receiving address,
 as much as the address I sent it from,
 anything you want to do, if you really want to do it,
 it will be good for me anyway...

You wrote me in the message that you would take it out of your pocket
to pay me, and I said it's not right, but it's okay if you want it,
 and I said your partner is wrong with that thought of his.

At first you said you decided to test the service despite the bad reviews you read about (please show some of those reviews), and then later you insisted on completing the swap without following suggested solutions. Also, you accused OP of deleting unwanted reviews despite the topic not being self-moderated. How did you conclude this?

[1] https://livenet.xrpl.org/

The various posts he deleted, he posted himself.
 About paying Rewiews and about one or two cases that he said he wanted to solve,
 but it's been a long time, and if you notice well, in my first post here, there are some of these things that you mention, but if you do a good search,
you'll see that there are some more cases of frozen coins...
You can do it yourself, about posts deleted from yesterday to today,
 he knows he did, and he didn't say anything about it,
 but you're saying it, so it's good.,...

then, he wantafullscreenshot, and not edited like this>

Do You would want more something?

###:
This was amount received,  i am thankfully.>

  ok, support team solved the problem,

 I appreciate it,...

also all the posts I made here I will leave in minimum size.

i apologize for the noise caused

[Ghostswap.io]

Obviously, there is a shortcoming here on the platform itself, it can be said that it is a bug.

I haven't seen what a similar order looks like, and honestly, I haven't used RLUSD too much so I don't have enough experience with it, but @Ghostswap.io, what's stopping you from refunding this user, and later making sure that such cases don't happen again?
If you are this slow when solving an issue worth $63, what should we expect from you if it were $63k for example

This type of issue is not related to the amount being $63 or $63k. It is related to specific networks/assets that rely on MEMO / Destination Tag handling, such as XRP/XLM-style networks.

On these networks, funds can still arrive on-chain to the deposit address, but if the MEMO/Tag is missing or placed in the wrong field, the system cannot automatically match that payment to the correct order. That is why it becomes a manual verification case.

For manual verification, wallet-side proof of the specific transaction is required. This is not asking for private keys, seed phrase, login details, or wallet access — only proof of that payment.

We understand the frustration and we are sorry for the inconvenience. To resolve this faster, we are refunding the user directly from our own side instead of making him wait longer. Funds are not lost, and our goal is to close this case properly.

The user has been refunded from our side. This case is now resolved.

[Cryptock]

I can't wait for this all to disappear 

Just want to tell you about some connection..

The account that made first test (review at the beginning of the thread with screenshot): Dextrust_Defi

Years ago, in 2020 had a project of DEX - ANN thread: DexTrust

It so happens that Murat also promoted it     created ANN thread and for example this post: LINK

After two months, project disappeared... without a trace. Silence remained.

I haven't found anything wrong, so I'm just letting you know about this connections and coincidents. Maybe someone will want to dig a bit deeper..

Have fun

[rat03gopoh]

The ANN thread in Bahasa (Indonesian) is now live in the sub-Indo forum, let's discuss. 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5586083.new#new

[examplens]

We understand the frustration and we are sorry for the inconvenience. To resolve this faster, we are refunding the user directly from our own side instead of making him wait longer. Funds are not lost, and our goal is to close this case properly.

The user has been refunded from our side. This case is now resolved.

That was the only real solution. I hope you recognized this case as something that will improve your platform.
I cannot create a similar order to test the whole process. I do not have the RLUSD wallet that is needed to generate the order, but I assume that you have added the necessary warnings, that the user is obliged to enter certain fields during the transaction in similar cases.

That's why, for example, I get information about the error "An unknown error occurred. Please try again" which is quite general, and I would have to research where I went wrong. You should fix this, because it can make the user decide to leave the site and change the exchanger.

I can't wait for this all to disappear 

Just want to tell you about some connection..

The account that made first test (review at the beginning of the thread with screenshot): Dextrust_Defi

Justified doubts about this review have already been expressed by TheAndy500 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=85021
We can guess who is behind that comment.
However, the fact is that we do not believe every word written by an anonymous person. Equally, your doubts are taken with a grain of salt because of -8 trust

[coupable]

Some news updates from telegram channels;

- 🎉 If you trade frequently or move bigger amounts, let's make it even more rewarding — DM @ghostswap1 (in telegram) for custom deals and lower fees. 🎉

- 🎉 Reduced Fees on All Swaps & Pairs! 🎉

Happy Week on GhostSwap is here! Enjoy lower fees on every swap until next Monday.

[pusaka]

I've made several transactions, and the process is truly fast. It only takes one confirmation to complete my transaction. This is what many people want, especially those who are impatient with the transaction process. And here, I can achieve this speed.

[Mandoy]

FYI, we currently have a $5,000 security deposit with OrangeFren, which will be increased to $25,000 this month. We also have a $2,000 security deposit with Trevoid, which will be increased to $5,000 this month.

We are also looking to get in contact with KycNot directly and place a security deposit there as well, if needed, so users across all platforms can feel safe and confident using our service.

This is a welcome idea and it will increase the trust of users that want to use your platform for exchanges.
Transparency is what most users are looking for when dealing with a NoKYC exchange they are interested in for swapping of their coins instead of using centralized exchanges that would require personal verification before exchanging huge amount of fund.
No KYC exchange has been a good choice for me and I have used some of them which I had no issue with. I am going to test your platform and share my experience here soon.

Sure, that will give members trust that you’re offering a legitimate service and won’t make member feel scared. No KYC exchange make you exchange coin easily without wasting time to put there personal information before you can swap coin. When I start to used NO KYC I see they is not any difficult transaction he make everything work fast and am enjoying using it, and am sure many members will really like it people that need fast swap. Now that you people are trying to do everything possible to make every member enjoy using your services will be a good move and you people will get the trust. Privacy is very important and when ever they mistakenly hack your account your personal information will be safe without sharing to others so NO KYC exchange is good for wise once.

I agree that the No-KYC exchanges have some advantages such as accessing these exchanges faster and providing more privacy, however trust should never be based on not having a KYC. Transparency, security measures and long-term track record are what builds trust for the users. It's good that they are willing to put something at stake by increasing security deposits on trusted platforms like escrow and review, as it shows they are willing to provide security. However, all the users should try small amounts of Swaps first before consuming larger quantities. While privacy is important. It's also vital that an exchange is consistent and reliable and has a solid reputation  and that's where it gets complex.There is value in privacy but a reliable and consistent exchange with a good reputation is what makes a No-KYC exchange worth using.