Evil Vs good or both for a better economy?

[Exitoral]

I have a theory that evil in terms of wars, famine, corruption, hardship etc. are necessary for a better economy. For instance, if people don't see the negativity in evil, they won't respect good. As the only purpose of good is to preserve better things. For such things to be created, evil has to find loopholes in those good things and chaos comes to disrupt. Change happens and good again comes into play and then is preserved.

Hardship creates innovation. When things are hard, humans with intellect or those that hate hardship create a system for ease. Good is only valued when evil is experienced.
For a better economy, competition and conflict are necessary and people will see the negativity in it and choose good to preserve. When greed, corruption or scarcity comes into play, economic growth emerges to tackle those problems. So, without problems, a better society is not possible.

With what I have said, are you of the opinion that for a better economy, good has to be valued as evil forces that to happen?

[Odusko]

Not all evil brings about progress; in fact, evil destroys totally. So, using "evil" is extreme in this context when we talk about economic improvement and progress based on demand or the challenges of the time. Challenges push us to improve, and when there are none, we will have no reason to push for progress.
Economic scarcity leads to innovation, just as corruption leads to more active and stronger economic institutions. Crime challenges security bodies, while diseases like COVID-19 and AIDS force more medical studies and development. These are positive challenges.

[coin-investor]

I have a theory that evil in terms of wars, famine, corruption, hardship etc. are necessary for a better economy. For instance, if people don't see the negativity in evil, they won't respect good. As the only purpose of good is to preserve better things. For such things to be created, evil has to find loopholes in those good things and chaos comes to disrupt. Change happens and good again comes into play and then is preserved..

I could agree on that. The flood-control scandal in our country is a prime example, given the devastating effects of floods. The flood control scandals have been exposed, billions of pesos of projects allocated for flood control were not used, and just got into the pockets of the politicians, and with the senate exposee,' the nation has seen the devastating effect, and because of what happened, the government tighten their regulation on budget and even integrated the blockchain.

So many corrections have been made on the budget, and these corrupt politicians and contractors are now facing jail terms, so with what happened to our country, where evil deeds have been done for the good implementation of laws, it's just hard to accept for the nation that it's not flood that ruins the nation but the greed of corrupt politicians

[Stepstowealth]

I have a theory that evil in terms of wars, famine, corruption, hardship etc. are necessary for a better economy.

There are countries and economies that actually benefit from wars, famine and corruption of other countries these countries that benefit economically are heavy on production of war supplies in terms of maybe bullets or other military equipment, or countries who are deep into food production that are depended on during times of crisis by other countries, or countries who service and encourage the corruption in other countries just so that they can be of benefit from the corruption happening in other countries. It happens, so your theory is already somehow correct. Crisis betters the economy of some countries.

[Merit.s]

The fact is that we are humans and there must be good and evil because that was how we came to meet the world. God needed a perfect world without evil but the devil due to pride challenged God and he was chased down to the earth. From that day evil dwells on earth and it's through human that the devil manifest it. Good and Evil is inevitable on earth and we must learn to be at the good side for proper progress physically and spiritually. Gynocide is one of the evil act, I hate.

[Fortify]

I have a theory that evil in terms of wars, famine, corruption, hardship etc. are necessary for a better economy. For instance, if people don't see the negativity in evil, they won't respect good. As the only purpose of good is to preserve better things. For such things to be created, evil has to find loopholes in those good things and chaos comes to disrupt. Change happens and good again comes into play and then is preserved.

Hardship creates innovation. When things are hard, humans with intellect or those that hate hardship create a system for ease. Good is only valued when evil is experienced.
For a better economy, competition and conflict are necessary and people will see the negativity in it and choose good to preserve. When greed, corruption or scarcity comes into play, economic growth emerges to tackle those problems. So, without problems, a better society is not possible.

With what I have said, are you of the opinion that for a better economy, good has to be valued as evil forces that to happen?

It's hardly your theory. There's an old saying "necessity is the mother of invention" which often finds it's roots in conflict. That's how things like the internet came into being, as it was a method of communication created around the end of the cold war for military networks, that found an expanded use for civilians. If you are fighting to survive then you often get very creative with limited resources, just like we watch Ukraine kicking Russia's ass when it comes to drone warfare because they are a free people that encourages innovation. However things like the drug trade don't seem to be contributing much in the way of value, so not all evil things are leading to better outcomes in the end.

[uneng]

You talk about what fuels the movement of life: chaos and order. One is the opposite of the other, but both are necessary in order to keep pushing this physical world ahead. Remember that everything was created from chaos, but with the goal of reaching order after all. That is what we actually seek: order, although we live in chaos.

Everyone aims a more stable and prosperous economy, and those who achieve that end falling in a comfort zone where it's not enough for them anymore. So, chaos takes place once again, as these individuals aren't satisfied anymore with their achievements. They want something else, or they want something different.

Without this movement and collision of forces, there isn't life at all...

[Cheema02]

Not all evil brings about progress; in fact, evil destroys totally. So, using "evil" is extreme in this context when we talk about economic improvement and progress based on demand or the challenges of the time. Challenges push us to improve, and when there are none, we will have no reason to push for progress.
Economic scarcity leads to innovation, just as corruption leads to more active and stronger economic institutions. Crime challenges security bodies, while diseases like COVID-19 and AIDS force more medical studies and development. These are positive challenges.

Mostly innovations and improvements are comes through the output of challenges. When we have less resources than this situation gives us push to find or refine new resources and in the same way diseases also motivates to scientists to develope advance treatments and tools. So throughout history we found that many innovations are the results of some serious problems. Also there is need to find the difference between challenges or hard conditions. Lets see corruption and crime leads to strong discipline or better solutions but at the same time they also creat damage at large scale. So actual improvements comes from better solutions in harsh conditions and not from problems itself. Success always comes from ours best decision and also challenges helps to survive in harsh conditions and makes the path of success much more easier.

[Mhizlove]

I will say that progress don't always need crisis before it can happen, most times people do innovate because they want to improve what is already working and not because they're suffering. Even though challenges can bring out creativity and resilience, too much hardship can also slow down development and limits opportunities. A healthy society is the one that learns from problems but still yet do not depends on them before seeing improvement.

[BitBakerr1]

Evil things or bad things don’t need to happen for there to be progress in a society or in a country, I don’t believe that evil or bad things needs to happen in a country or society for good things can come. It is true that sometimes this bad or evil things that happen usually motivates people to do better in a society, but people can also be motivated by other things apart from bad or evil things people should just learn to be motivated by the good things around them to do more better.
The government sometimes use crisis and viruses to reduce population, which is very bad. there are other ways to reduce the population of your country. You can give a law that people should only give birth to one child if that should happen you will see that population will reduce in your country.
what I’m trying to say is that it is not only when evil or bad things happen that the country or society can progress there are other ways for progress to happen and it must not be evil.

[Zlantann]

With what I have said, are you of the opinion that for a better economy, good has to be valued as evil forces that to happen?

Instead of lamenting or regretting bad experiences, I try to learn lessons from them. I also agree that challenges could trigger creative thinking which could lead to innovations. However, I don't agree that there must be evil experiences before positive outcomes. Some of the problems that humans face are man-made. We all know that there could be natural disasters. But man's actions have caused more harm to humanity.

Wars, pandemics, corruption, and others have caused irreparable damage to individuals, families, and businesses. Why must there be an evil occurrence for good to manifest? If you give people who have suffered because of government negligence this analogy they will not be happy with you. Must there be death in hospitals caused by corruption for the government to provide facilities? The COVID-19 pandemic destroyed the joy of many homes.

My take is that the assumption that evil would come before good is wrong.

[Somegory]

We got a serious problem in our country simply because people don't call a spade a spade anymore, they find a way to justify evil things and slowly everything start getting affected.

I don't want to go too deep on this, but a good question is people doing evil thing and blaming it on slave trades in the past, many years ago that they can't even say if their fore fathers are part of that slavery.

Also is there any part of the world that was free from slavery at the time? Even in America there was slave trades, I can still remember Lincoln trying to put an end to it and a brutal war erupted.

My people put blames on white people for the slave trades but history shows that some blacks are the ones selling blacks to the white too, they don't hold that accountable, now the country is in shambles, crumbling on its knees and everybody now seeing how dangerous it is to call evil good.

[DiMarxist]

Check all the nations of the world that are first world today they have a dark history of hardship and suffering which they experienced before getting to this place. Countries like the united arab emirate were all desserts, are we to talk about China which was suffering some decades back. America too is not excluded hardship is what actually brings out the best in an individual which translates to the entire nation. If not of hardship places like Singapore will not be as it is so to a large extent you are correct OP that hardship has a way of bringing out the best in a person, people and nation in general.

[Franklyn-wood]

I will say that progress don't always need crisis before it can happen, most times people do innovate because they want to improve what is already working and not because they're suffering. Even though challenges can bring out creativity and resilience, too much hardship can also slow down development and limits opportunities. A healthy society is the one that learns from problems but still yet do not depends on them before seeing improvement.

Our believe and point of view are different individually. Some people don't make moves until they are in a tight corner which sometimes may not yield quick results like when they prepare for the challenges before it comes. We often relax and feels comfortable with high hopes that naturally things will become good with time in the future failing to know that the future we are talking about Is now.

[Rockstarguy]

greed, corruption or scarcity comes into play, economic growth emerges to tackle those problems. So, without problems, a better society is not possible.

With what I have said, are you of the opinion that for a better economy, good has to be valued as evil forces that to happen?

This will only let people work hard to help themselves, but nobody is happy about it. Corruption, greed, and a bad economy even cause things to become worse. When we have leaders who are incompetent, it builds a corrupt system because incompetent leaders don't desire better leadership or someone else to take over from them who can do the job; instead, they become more hungry for power to continue or hand over to someone who is just the same because of what they benefit from bad leadership.

[Findingnemo]

Wars, famine, drought or whatever is gonna eat the wealth that took generations to build and recovering from that will take a few more generations and imagine they are going through the cycle and what happens if they gove up and there is no development at all in the economy. No one wants bad thing to happen but some are inevitable and some can be avoided with the right policies and long term vision. If you want to build a better economy then learn to keep the happy index on the higher level then rest will follow.

[Queen uloma]

I don’t fully agree that evil must happen before good can exist, but I  agree that sometimes it’s challenges and problem that pushes people more to find solutions. For example, hardship can lead to innovation because people will look for a better opportunities to survive, Scarcity can encourage production, and corruption can make a society create stronger laws and institutions. So in all, problems sometimes becomes the purpose for progress.
Mind you not all evil always produce positive results. because corruption can discourage development and investment. Sometimes the damage from evil can be more than the benefit we get from it. Good does not necessarily need evil to exist, but evil often helps people to appreciate the value of good. Likewise the economic progress does not require suffering even though many innovations and responses come as a response to problems and difficulties. So instead of saying evil is necessary for a good economy, I would rather say human beings has the capacity to change hardship and challenges into positive outcomes for growth.

[JoyMarsha]

The inability to get things done in a simple and fast way is the reason we have different innovations created by humans. Not because of the sole reason to be evil.

Take for instance, we have electricity, gadgets, and cars. Why was that created by a human? Is it because evil was happening in the world? There is a need to have that, if not to make life easier for human beings.

OP, don't give the perception that evil brings about progress because that's not true because the challenge we have over some certain to be accessible and easily used by us, to make life simple and enjoying are the more reason we are having different innovations put together

[Royal Cap]

Well, some hardships or minor problems in personal life can make people stronger, but it cannot be extended to the economy of the country or on a large scale. War or famine does not improve a society, but rather cripples an entire generation. Because many countries remain in these problems for years but instead of improving from there, more instability is created.  People do not always need to see destruction for their well being or to discover something new, rather real progress comes through a peaceful environment and order. Healthy competition is certainly necessary but chaos can never be the path to progress.

[Yeesha]

I have a theory that evil in terms of wars, famine, corruption, hardship etc. are necessary for a better economy. For instance, if people don't see the negativity in evil, they won't respect good. As the only purpose of good is to preserve better things. For such things to be created, evil has to find loopholes in those good things and chaos comes to disrupt. Change happens and good again comes into play and then is preserved.

Hardship creates innovation. When things are hard, humans with intellect or those that hate hardship create a system for ease. Good is only valued when evil is experienced.
For a better economy, competition and conflict are necessary and people will see the negativity in it and choose good to preserve. When greed, corruption or scarcity comes into play, economic growth emerges to tackle those problems. So, without problems, a better society is not possible.

With what I have said, are you of the opinion that for a better economy, good has to be valued as evil forces that to happen?

Evil act cannot contribute anything positive to the society, because if evil deeds has anything to offer I believe they would be no poor on earth at this moment, I can't even imagine the total number of evil deeds going on now as a result of insecurity. The numbers of murder cases is uncountable, talkless of the kidnapping cases, rapping, theft, armed robbery, bandits and so on. I believe they are people who are capable of creating a system for ease, but they lack the necessities and requirements. Is only good that can preserve great things, evil deeds can only lead to destruction, it has nothing to preserve, so we shouldn't deceive ourselves.