First why are you pretending this is new to you? You've seen this same correction of this vile slander previously and you chose to repeat it again. Secondly: No, it's not the 'start' it's the entirety of it.
So say you, Greg. If there is more to it, it would be in the other 90% of the files that are not released. I say 90% because the 30% that was released is so heavily redacted as to be meaningless.
Perhaps at some point, the rest of the files will be released and we will find out core blockstream staff were going to pedo island to play Bingo and shuffle board?
I quoted the change your discussing it did not such thing. The word "money" the text it isn't even referring to money in that sense, it's discussing the seigniorage of new coins in mining ("issuing money")! The new text doesn't say anything about Bitcoin-- it's just talking about what Bitcoin core is. Absolutely no one involved with the project has ever suggested bitcoin isn't money, this is just outright deranged.
The definition of "What is Bitcoin?" was replaced with the definition of "What is Bitcoin Core?".
And the claimed reasoning for this is that it's already self evident what Bitcoin is.
Next a bunch of coretards and core devs went on podcasts, talking up a storm about " new use cases" and insulting bitcoin maximalists.
I'm an ass for pointing out that the doc change is uninteresting and that Knots has the same thing? How does that make me an ass? Because I rudely disrupted your dishonesty, I guess.
The change is uninteresting for me because it is self evident for me what Bitcoin is. But it's not self evident to coretards who will never be able to find out Bitcoin is money if all they read is the core documebtation.
And the change that Luke did was completely different. He switched the word core for the work Knots. He did not remove the definition of bitcoin as money or currency.
Luke-jr is notorious online for defining things in constantly shifting idiosyncratic and often self-serving ways... and even was prior to Bitcoin existing. Ask him about the sun revolving around the earth sometime.
How is that relevant to anything we discuss here?
And all he did is change the word core and replaced it with Knots.
No, he also manually incorporated what you claim is a changed definition of Bitcoin. Then later, confirming it wasn't just an accident, changed it up to say Knots. There was nothing wrong with that, of course, but it exposes that you're gaslighting us all here. If Core is bad for that change Knots is bad for it too.
Core removed the definition of bitcoin as money/currency from their own documentation. That by itself could be considered unimportant. Until you realise they spent the next 4 years pushing for "use cases" that have nothing to do with money, and ridiculing bitcoin maxis. All while trying to portrait any anti-malware measure as censorship.
And it's not the only instance of core changing documentation to avoid addressing something or to reject something they didn't like.
Remember that time when core turned a bug into a feature by changing their documentation?
Remember when core changed the definition of datacarriersize in order to reject Luke's ordinal filter?
If the new P2PK output have small satoshi, it only means someone creating dust output.
Yes. And in the vast majority of cases, dust outputs of exactly 330 sats or 546 sats tend to belong to malware assholes. You and I could generate such outputs without even realizing it. But odds are pretty good than a 330 sat UTXO or a 546 sat UTXO were generated by some malware asshole.
But all that is pretty much irrelevant. Because neither you or I were able to find any recent P2PK UTXOs.
P2PK is dead, nobody sends to those addresse anymore. And even if anyone did, blocking them from doing so still would not be a big deal.
Stop trying to make an ant hill out of a big nothing burger.
This is not constructive criticism. Just like Maxwell claiming if you delete your keys, BIP110 will confiscate your coin. This is just retarded obstructionism.
