IMF anti crypto in Nepal

[_act_]

Cryptocurrencies is banned in Nepal, but bitcoin and other crypto adoption in the country continue to increase. Why should a country ban something very good like bitcoin? I do not care if they ban crypto, but any country that ban bitcoin only ban one of the human rights and freedom because of invalid reasons.

The IMF said crypto flows in Nepal grew markedly between 2019 and 2024 despite a legal ban, peaking above 13% of GDP in 2021.
It urged Nepal to regulate crypto under international standards, warning of capital-control evasion and deposit outflows.
An expert told Decrypt that trading and remittances keep crypto alive in banned markets, making regulation a smarter tool than prohibition.

Crypto is not a threat, but why is IMF so concerned. IMF that supposed to advise the country to legalized crypto because it is what the people in the country want.

https://decrypt.co/370738/imf-urges-nepal-monitor-crypto-as-usage-rises-despite-ban

[Dunamisx]

Bitcoin is also a cryptocurrency and there is no way they can ban crypto and decide to exempt bitcoin alone, do I understand your plight here? As bitcoin can not be compared to any other altcoin.

If we are also going to look at the event that happened in Nepal sometimes back, regarding the protest that struck the country as the Gen Z massive protest against their government action on social media clamp down and the likes, I think the leadership are still inconsiderate to hearken to the people's demands, I don't expect them to ban bitcoin as well, they may even take it more with stricter regulations than placing a ban, except they want another round two of the gen z protest in Nepal.

[Majestic-milf]

 The only thing I could derive from the "concern" the IMF is showing is that they don't want Nepal to get too carried away by crypto activities so that there'd would be a form of dependency on them because who doesn't know that Bitcoin is good for a a growing country? This was the same concern they showed when El Salvador was buying in bulk and it was going to affect the IMF and as such they are just being selfish by asking the authorities to put an eye on crypto activities.

[Joy_learns_crypto]

To think that the International Monetary Fund cares about countries like Nepal is laughable, The act like warning Nepal that Bitcoin would forge capital control evasion but that is just playing to the gallery because the International Monetary Fund is trying to stop Nepal from financial freedom.
I think Nepal has many economic problems that the International Monetary Fund couldn’t give them any information to guide them out.

[moneystery]

We understand their goal, they're unhappy with the growing adoption of Bitcoin and are trying to influence countries that need their help to create regulations that would discredit Bitcoin.
This is essentially a restrictive effort, and it seems ridiculous that the IMF is so determined to dissuade countries from Bitcoin. As far as I know, El Salvador also revoked its legal tender because of the IMF. So, their goal is clear from this.

[Ambatman]

This isn't their first rodeo
They did something similar to El Salvador
They are doing it to protect their interest because to them
Crypto pose a huge risk and shouldn't be granted legal status.
They don't care if it's revolutionary or anything what they care about is how it would affect their sovereign.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Bans never really work, that meaningless 13% of GDP figure proves people will use bitcoin regardless of what the law says. The IMF isn't worried about citizens, they're worried about losing control over capital flows.

Nepal would be better off regulating it properly than pretending a ban does anything but push activity underground. What can you say other than HFSP?

[EluguHcman]

Cryptocurrencies is banned in Nepal, but bitcoin and other crypto adoption in the country continue to increase. Why should a country ban something very good like bitcoin? I do not care if they ban crypto, but any country that ban bitcoin only ban one of the human rights and freedom because of invalid reasons.

Why are you sounding so emotional like the news from the Nepal banning Bitcoin amd crypto currencies in her place is your first experience.
I am definitely not going to be surprise at whatever level of restrictions and policies any government will place on the digital market.

Don't also forget that we are talking about Decentralized currencies here which is an opposite of the traditional monetary system that denies the authority control.
So selfish governments like this one and others that are showing this magnitude of restricting Bitcoin and Crypto currencies adoptions in her jurisdictions will always act this way because they can not control the monetary system and hijacks it to enrich themselves as they do with the fiats.

[Faisal2202]

Cryptocurrencies is banned in Nepal, but bitcoin and other crypto adoption in the country continue to increase. Why should a country ban something very good like bitcoin? I do not care if they ban crypto, but any country that ban bitcoin only ban one of the human rights and freedom because of invalid reasons.

If IMF has pointed this out then Nepal is going to be the next country to adopt cryptocurrency. The regime change last year or year before that (don't remember the exact one) must have left the country in a weak condition but that's not an excuse. These countries have real crypto users and once the exchanges have enough data on how many users are trading how much money then eventually the governments, IMF and the exchanges will form a coalition which won't be official but they will streamline the adoption of crypto by changing the laws.

I am saying this because it has happened with us. IMF was the first step, they said to tax the country because the country has taken the loan from them so they have a say, so after a long wait our country has officially accepted the crypto and now we are about to be taxed, this part is not my favorite one.