The reason I'm so puzzled by this is that AddMeFast was legitimately one of the largest Web2 social exchange platforms on the internet long before they ever touched crypto. They had a massive, active user base and a highly profitable, functional business model based on points and ad revenue.
When they introduced the $AMF token, the entire pitch was revolutionary for their ecosystem: allowing users to finally convert the likes and follows they generated into real-world monetary value, effectively turning Web2 actions into Web3 earnings.
What I don't understand from an economic standpoint is: how does a historically successful, cash-flowing business completely destroy its ecosystem by introducing a token?
I have seen many big enterprises that was doing extremely well in their business went down because they introduce cryptocurrency into their system but failed. Failure I mean is crypto usability failure not the business entirely. Crypto alone has a different and distinct features when integrating into an already existing business, because they work on demand and supply, new and existing customers might find it hard to understand the usage of crypto for business because they are already used to using Fiat within the business.
Addmefast wouldn't have gone on site shutdown because of the introduce of crypto, at least the initial business model using Fiat will still be in function but the crypto integration will be put on hold for some reasons best known to them.