Statistical Analysis of the biggest Signature Campaign

[SatsPH]

I was very curious to see if there are local posters from our community in the biggest signature campaigns being handled by Hhampuz which is the Rainbet.com | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Signature Campaign ~ Full+. Which compose of the following: 54 Full Members, 60 Senior Members and 60 Hero/Legendary Members for a total of 174 members. And we have a lot of discussions of past and current signature campaigns, including the campaign managers themselves on how they select their participants, and how merit could be a factor on who's going to be chosen, spams, but I don't think I've ever seen much discussion about the demographic composition of signature campaigns. Although this is just one campaign and could only be a snapshot, but the result could be very interesting glimpse on how different communities (with or without local baords) might be represented.

Methodology:

• 🔍 I visited https://bitlist.co, reviewed the spreadsheet, downloaded a local copy, and manually checked each participant's posting history to determine whether they were active in a particular local board.
• 🔢 I recorded how many times each local board/country appeared across the different rank categories in the campaign.
• 📊 I then compared the number of users associated with each local board to identify which communities were the most represented in the dataset.

Full Members:

• 📊 38 out of 54 participants come from the Nigerian community, and it is 📈70.37% of the dataset.
• 🌍 The rest are other local boards that has only 1 to 4 users of the 54 participants.
• We only have 1 member that is included in this position.

Senior Members:

• 📊 In this position, it is similar to the Full Member, as 39 out of 60 participants, came from 📈 65% Nigeria community again
• 🌍 Followed by Indonesia with 5, Italy 4, and Pakistan 3
• And in terms of our Filipino community, we only have one representation

Hero/Legendary Members:

• 📊In this position both Turkey and Nigeria are tied, with 12 members each out of 60 participants. Then followed by Pakistan with 8 and then Indonesia with 6
• And from our local community we have 2.
  

Conclusion:

We might not be surprised by the numbers or how dominant the Nigerian community in this signature campaign. As what we have seen in [CHARTS] Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity by @Rikafip, their presence is really insane. And their dominance is evident in the Full/Senior member position. But it was less pronounced in the Hero/Legendary which might be interpreted that their community, although very strong, their community might still be very young as compare to others.

Another interesting data to look at presence of participants who could not be associated with any specific local board. This members who are in the campaign and upon checking, haven't post in any local boards so it's hard to identify which local community they belong. And we could also deduce that that a significant number of campaign participants either do not what to engage in local communities or prefer to post primarily in the global sections of the forum.

[Odohu]

You really do not have any right to question the campaign manager on how he select his participants or who he selects into the campaign, he was hired to give visibility to the casino so he is doing just that. As a member rank who is not even qualified to be in that campaign, what exactly do you want to achieve by this post? Maybe you forgot to post with your main account to justify your concern because when I was a member rank, I do not even know much how the signature campaign works talk more of pulling these stats.

Simply lock this thread because it is a baseless thread aimed at discrediting one of the best campaign manager of the forum. Rainbet is doing well as a casino which means Hhampuz have been successful at the job given to him which justifies the fact that his choice of participants.

[Majestic-milf]

You really do not have any right to question the campaign manager on how he select his participants or who he selects into the campaign, he was hired to give visibility to the casino so he is doing just that. As a member rank who is not even qualified to be in that campaign, what exactly do you want to achieve by this post? Maybe you forgot to post with your main account to justify your concern because when I was a member rank, I do not even know much how the signature campaign works talk more of pulling these stats.

Simply lock this thread because it is a baseless thread aimed at discrediting one of the best campaign manager of the forum. Rainbet is doing well as a casino which means Hhampuz have been successful at the job given to him which justifies the fact that his choice of participants.

Don't get your hackles up, it's just a post and the OP is just dropping his observations and since this is a platform where free speech is practiced, it's something you should just see and let slide. Like you said, Hhampuz has his way of handling his signature campaigns and this isn't the first time his pattern of management is being called into question.
 It's a well put out analysis and I don't see why his rank needs to be called into question or wonder how they got access to such information when there are tools that have been made available. He just made good use of them and no need to attack him as there is nothing wrong with what he posted. Stop sounding like he called you out on something.

[Bright0515]

What an amazing person you are ＼⁠(⁠°⁠o⁠°⁠)⁠／
Last month you posted this same topic in the local section now for the fact t that you didn't get the response you expected, you have decided to bring it to the public.

No offense but try to become a campaign manger so that you can do it the way you want, that looks very perfect as you wish.

[Odohu]

You really do not have any right to question the campaign manager on how he select his participants or who he selects into the campaign, he was hired to give visibility to the casino so he is doing just that. As a member rank who is not even qualified to be in that campaign, what exactly do you want to achieve by this post? Maybe you forgot to post with your main account to justify your concern because when I was a member rank, I do not even know much how the signature campaign works talk more of pulling these stats.

Simply lock this thread because it is a baseless thread aimed at discrediting one of the best campaign manager of the forum. Rainbet is doing well as a casino which means Hhampuz have been successful at the job given to him which justifies the fact that his choice of participants.

Don't get your hackles up, it's just a post and the OP is just dropping his observations and since this is a platform where free speech is practiced, it's something you should just see and let slide. Like you said, Hhampuz has his way of handling his signature campaigns and this isn't the first time his pattern of management is being called into question.
 It's a well put out analysis and I don't see why his rank needs to be called into question or wonder how they got access to such information when there are tools that have been made available. He just made good use of them and no need to attack him as there is nothing wrong with what he posted. Stop sounding like he called you out on something.

Don't get me wrong dear,  I'm not in that campaign so there is no one I will feel he called me out. I was just worried by the fact that he tend to use subtle ways to question the selection criteria of the campaign manager knowing that a campaign manager have the right to decide what to use in his selection and who to hire. Some managers even hire on invites only and that is within their rights. As long as the job is done, the project owners will be happy.

[hd49728]

This topic is better to be in Reputation board, and the topic can be clearer like "Statistical analysis of Rainbet signature campaign". Biggest or not, it's another factor but if it is about Rainbet signature campaign, you can write it clearly in the topic title.

What an amazing person you are ＼⁠(⁠°⁠o⁠°⁠)⁠／
Last month you posted this same topic in the local section now for the fact t that you didn't get the response you expected, you have decided to bring it to the public.

Local board or Meta board or Reputation board, the topic is always public, not private.

No offense but try to become a campaign manger so that you can do it the way you want, that looks very perfect as you wish.

I don't see any complaints about the signature campaign manager and selection of participants in conclusion of OP.

Are you just too sensitive with OP's topic?

[ene1980]

You really do not have any right to question the campaign manager on how he select his participants or who he selects into the campaign, he was hired to give visibility to the casino so he is doing just that. As a member rank who is not even qualified to be in that campaign, what exactly do you want to achieve by this post? Maybe you forgot to post with your main account to justify your concern because when I was a member rank, I do not even know much how the signature campaign works talk more of pulling these stats.

You do not need to be so hostile like this. Did you even read what he posted ?, I could not find anything that questioned the campaign manager.

What does the ranking have to do with what he posted ? Baseless accusation to post from main account !!!

He presented his findings. If you do not like them, just move on rather than creating a hostile environment.  

Simply lock this thread because it is a baseless thread aimed at discrediting one of the best campaign manager of the forum. Rainbet is doing well as a casino which means Hhampuz have been successful at the job given to him which justifies the fact that his choice of participants.

There is nothing that he has written that is not public. Why should he lock this thread ?

What an amazing person you are ＼⁠(⁠°⁠o⁠°⁠)⁠／
Last month you posted this same topic in the local section now for the fact t that you didn't get the response you expected, you have decided to bring it to the public.

No wonder he posted in English , he made an effort. Just checked the local thread, not sure why no one engaged.

[Royal Cap]

Interesting analysis indeed, but one thing comes to mind, how much value will this actually add to the forum? Because it is difficult to draw much practical conclusion from looking at the participant demographic of a single campaign. Different managers have different selection criteria, so the data from one campaign does not represent the entire forum.

Another thing is that your full member graph shows two separate columns for Bangladesh and Bengal. Actually, they are the same country. And there is no board named Bangladesh.

[Sally9256]

It's easy, I just think more number of Nigerians met the requirements needed by the manager that's all. Since Hhampuz is one of the best, fair and trusted manager in the forum.

[Majestic-milf]

Don't get me wrong dear,  I'm not in that campaign so there is no one I will feel he called me out. I was just worried by the fact that he tend to use subtle ways to question the selection criteria of the campaign manager knowing that a campaign manager have the right to decide what to use in his selection and who to hire. Some managers even hire on invites only and that is within their rights. As long as the job is done, the project owners will be happy.

Well, let him. The more attention you pay to these kinds of things is what makes it spread. You think Hhampuz gives two shits? If I can check properly, he didn't exactly damage the rep of the manager. He did a very good job but if it's a subtle jab at Hhampuz and his style of managerial practice, I think it's up to him to know how to put the user in his place.
I noticed one of the comments stating that this user has brought something like this up before and it didn't get to the target audience, maybe that's because it was ignored. You should do same if you feel it's not something you find interesting.
What I meant was that by bashing him like that, it might seem as if he called you out. Just ignore, dear..

[SatoPrincess]

This is interesting. I was wondering if you could you do analysis of other campaigns as well. AFAIK, hhampuz screens applications based on merit and activity, if you feel that some members are spamming or cheating, you can always send a message to the CM.

Signature campaigns is not a meta issue, I think this thread is better suited for the service discussion sub unless you have something to say about the campaign manager.

[Pmalek]

If you think that the Filipino community is underrepresented with only a handful of participants, what are we Croats supposed to say when there is not a single Croatian member according to your analysis? #Justice for Croats, #We Want In, #Why Don't You See Us Hhampuz?

Now on a serious note. Hhampuz is experienced enough to know who to pick for his campaigns. I am sure he has a lengthy list with names of users he has worked with in the past who meet his expectations but also those who don't. As soon as he sees that the right person has applied, he accepts them and stops looking further. That's how he works when a new position opens up in one of his campaigns and it's probably not much different when a new campaign starts. He generally fills positions quickly. 

[rat03gopoh]

This topic is better to be in Reputation board, and the topic can be clearer like "Statistical analysis of Rainbet signature campaign". Biggest or not, it's another factor but if it is about Rainbet signature campaign, you can write it clearly in the topic title.

The OP actually addresses this:

And we have a lot of discussions of past and current signature campaigns, including the campaign managers themselves on how they select their participants, and how merit could be a factor on who's going to be chosen, spams, but I don't think I've ever seen much discussion about the demographic composition of signature campaigns.

The statistics present campaign participants based on user base, Rainbet just happens to be the sample here because it has the most participants. Not at all focused on how managers recruit them. That's all, this is more suited to a service discussion board.