Statistical Analysis of the biggest Signature Campaign

[coupable]

Is this some AI processed post or data analysis by OP due to all the nonsense emojis in bullet points and whereever else? It looks strange to me and I guess no human would choose such emojis randomly just for the sake of it.

I don't know if Op uses AI but some stats looks questionable.

According to his methodology, OP claims to have done his research manually and made no mention of using AI assistance. I’m not sure what OP’s motive is, the posts sounds like someone who is unhappy they didn’t get accepted into the campaign but OP isn’t even full member yet so I don’t get it.

I guess he might be using one of his alts to post this useless thread after his application to join the campaign has been rejected many times. If not, then what is the reason to spend time analyzing data from this particular campaign? Note that Rollbit signature campaign is another big campaign also managed by Hhampuz.

I confess that it is an interesting finding. But I can't discuss it from the angle to attack Nigerian posters or argue about the campaign manager standards, especially since the campaign has been running smoothly for more than a year, which means it is a successful one.

[Lucius]

Regardless of what anyone thinks about the OP's motives, I find this statistic interesting since it shows that one local community dominates when it comes to the sig campaign with the most users overall. I think the manager didn't go check where the campaign participants came from, all that mattered was that they met his requirements.

I would be even more interested in seeing statistics for all current sig campaigns.

[examplens]

Regardless of what anyone thinks about the OP's motives, I find this statistic interesting since it shows that one local community dominates when it comes to the sig campaign with the most users overall. I think the manager didn't go check where the campaign participants came from, all that mattered was that they met his requirements.

Everything can have multiple viewing angles. I almost found some data, where Nigeria is one of the top 3 crypto users/number of inhabitants, and they are quite numerous. Looking from that aspect, it is not surprising that their local board is the most numerous and active, at least one of those.
Also, taking into account the OP's hidden motive, lately, there have been many accusations against multiaccounting from that local board.

I would be even more interested in seeing statistics for all current sig campaigns.

This might be an interesting statistic.

[Darker45]

Regardless of what anyone thinks about the OP's motives, I find this statistic interesting since it shows that one local community dominates when it comes to the sig campaign with the most users overall. I think the manager didn't go check where the campaign participants came from, all that mattered was that they met his requirements.

I would be even more interested in seeing statistics for all current sig campaigns.

Whatever OP's motives are, we can only guess. But what OP presented are raw data, therefore more or less neutral, except perhaps his/her interpretation that the local's failure to dominate Hero/Legendary spots is due to the community being young. Whatever further information we want to deduce from this, it's up to us.

As for OP, he/she's been on the forum for just a little more than 3 months. He/she's already started 30 topics. That's 30% of all his/her total posts. He/she's indeed curious as he/she's active. However we interpret this, we can only speculate as well.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Regardless of what anyone thinks about the OP's motives, I find this statistic interesting since it shows that one local community dominates when it comes to the sig campaign with the most users overall. I think the manager didn't go check where the campaign participants came from, all that mattered was that they met his requirements.

Everything can have multiple viewing angles. I almost found some data, where Nigeria is one of the top 3 crypto users/number of inhabitants, and they are quite numerous. Looking from that aspect, it is not surprising that their local board is the most numerous and active, at least one of those.
Also, taking into account the OP's hidden motive, lately, there have been many accusations against multiaccounting from that local board.

I would be even more interested in seeing statistics for all current sig campaigns.

This might be an interesting statistic.

Everything is obvious here. There are more participants from Nigeria, as almost everyone has several alternative accounts that have learned very well how to manage them without making mistakes that can lead to accusations of allts and then cheating. (I will say this because I understand their financial need and I do not believe that anyone, given the opportunity, would not take steps to improve it for themselves.🥴😎)

Why are there few legends? Again, it's simple. Firstly, it takes time to rank a legend, and here you need to calculate how many accounts you can create with the rank of full members while someone is developing one legend account. Similarly, if you add up the total payouts received from five Full Members' or Senior Members' accounts, which are easier to raise by exchanging merits with each other, then it is more profitable for them to have five low-ranking accounts than one Legend account. Divide these 77 Nigerian accounts (at least) by at least 5 or 6, and the number of real people will decrease a little, I emphasize, a little, although you can observe how they and their "referrals" regularly create new accounts.

I think if there are general statistics of all the signature companies, then the Nigerians will remain the leaders there. Low payouts will not stop those with multiple accounts from participating. However, if someone feels good, this cannot mean that the forum is also fine from this. Many people complain about posts that are not useful, and if we're going to make statistics. Then this parameter must also be taken into account. What is the predominant one: quality or quantity?

[FinneysTrueVision]

Why are there few legends? Again, it's simple. Firstly, it takes time to rank a legend, and here you need to calculate how many accounts you can create with the rank of full members while someone is developing one legend account. Similarly, if you add up the total payouts received from five Full Members' or Senior Members' accounts, which are easier to raise by exchanging merits with each other, then it is more profitable for them to have five low-ranking accounts than one Legend account.

It takes 10x the effort to reach Legendary status than Full Member, but the pay rates are usually less than 2x better. Lower ranking accounts also have a smaller footprint, which makes it harder to find their alts.

The same problems with campaign cheating and AI spamming have been discovered in the OP’s local board. The ratio of spammers might even be similar, but they have fewer sources of merit and that limits the total number of accounts being created.

[LTU_btc]

You have done quite big research, but I'm not really sure what's the point of it? How it can be useful to know where from campaign participants is/ Though, I must admit I had no idea that almost participants comes from Nigeria.

Another interesting data to look at presence of participants who could not be associated with any specific local board. This members who are in the campaign and upon checking, haven't post in any local boards so it's hard to identify which local community they belong. And we could also deduce that that a significant number of campaign participants either do not what to engage in local communities or prefer to post primarily in the global sections of the forum.

Yes, there one aspect, not everyone wants to asociate themselves with local board, after all it's anonymous forum. But there is another thing. Not everyone have active local board where to post. For example me, there is no local board for my country.