Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2026, 03:41:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] PayNexor — Bi-directional DCA bot  (Read 30 times)
Paynexor (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 14, 2026, 09:37:49 PM
Last edit: Today at 04:28:59 AM by Paynexor
 #1

PayNexor — Bi-directional DCA bot, candle-replay backtests, 50% recurring affiliate

Hello,

I've been building PayNexor (paynexor.com) — an automated positions-management platform for spot on Binance and MEXC — and I'd genuinely like some outside eyes on it before I push harder on growth. Backtests are free, no card needed, and the part I actually want from this thread is for a few of you to run your own pairs through it and tell me where the numbers (or the UI, or the docs) don't add up.

Short tour of what's different from the usual DCA bot:

Bi-directional bots
Long AND short on the same pair, same session, same capital. Most DCA tools only buy the dip. PayNexor runs both sides simultaneously and uses cross-side profit subsidy so the winning leg pulls the losing leg back into profit faster.

Candle-by-candle replay — backtests AND live
Every backtest is reproducible bar-for-bar against historical OHLC. Same engine runs live, so what you see in the backtest is what the bot actually does on real fills. You get a TP-by-TP breakdown of every cycle: entries, fills, fees, residual base, quote profit, the lot. If something looks off in a TP cycle you can drill into that exact cycle and see why.

Concrete example you can poke at — Strategy BT66 (SUI/USDC, bi-directional): SUI fell 14.56% over the 11-day window (2026-06-02 → 2026-06-12), the bot did 103 confirmed TPs and ended at +0.24% on stake (+$23.72 on $10k). Modest in absolute terms, but the point is the portfolio rose while the underlying coin lost a sixth of its value. Click in and you can see every fill on the chart. Backtest was run on the 14/6/2026 build.

Caveat I want on the record: live results will be slightly worse than the backtest. Backtests fill at the candle's price assuming the bot's order is exactly there at that moment; in real trading you also pay the bid/ask spread and there's latency between an exchange execution-report arriving and the bot placing the next order. On a tight-grid strategy like BT66 that typically eats a few basis points per cycle. The candle-replay engine is identical in sim and live — the part the simulator can't perfectly model is market microstructure (spread + response time). Treat backtest numbers as the upper bound, not the expected value. I'd rather flag that here than have someone find out the awkward way.

Capital recycling via reinvest
Configurable reinvest % per session. Profits compound back into the grid automatically — not into a separate bucket you have to babysit. The asymmetric long model extracts profit in base asset, so you're stacking sats while the bot trades.

Anchor pulling
Cross-TP subsidy lets a winning side fund the other side's TP at a tighter spread, so the lagging side closes earlier. Aggressive ranges that would normally trap a one-direction grid get unwound.

50% recurring affiliate
Not 50% on the first month — 50% of every renewal, for as long as your referral pays. Full spec and honest version of how it works: Creator Collaboration (not linked from the public menu — sharing it directly with the BTT crowd).



How to actually use this thread

The site has a free trial — sign up, run backtests, browse the strategy marketplace, build saved strategies on any supported pair. No card required for any of that. What I'd love from anyone reading:

  • Run a backtest on a pair you actually trade. See if the numbers make sense to you. Post the BTID here, or DM me if you want the breakdown discussed privately.
  • Tell me what's confusing in the UI or the docs. I'm too close to the code to see it anymore.
  • If you have a strategy you swear by — bi-directional or one-side(coming up) — try to model it in PayNexor and tell me what's missing. I'd rather hear "your tool can't express X" than guess at what's needed.
  • If you run a competing DCA tool, A/B against this on a pair and post the comparison.



Honest disclosure

Two things I want to be straight about before you click around:

  • The site is early-stage. The engine and bot logic are mature and stress-tested in backtests, but the platform itself is still being polished — expect rough edges in the UI, occasional copy tweaks, and features being added regularly. If you find something broken, tell me and I'll fix it (often same-day).
  • Most of the site copy was AI-translated/edited from my drafts. I'm not a native English writer and I'd rather ship clear text than perfect text. If anything reads weirdly, the meaning is mine; the prose was AI-cleaned. The semantics are entirely my own work.



Get in touch

Discord is the fastest: discord.gg/9QAV3fw77F — drop into #general and ping me.


Affiliates specifically — read the Creator Collaboration page and then come talk to me on Discord with what kind of audience you're working with. I'd rather have five people who actually understand the product than fifty link-droppers.

Thanks for reading.

paynexor.com.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!