Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2026, 07:23:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 5 connected Accounts - 1 Senior Member - 4 Full Members (Possible Merit Abuse)  (Read 138 times)
Nrcewker (OP)
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 2478
Merit: 540


English to Hindi Translation? -> t.me/NrcewkerBTC


View Profile WWW
Today at 05:15:50 AM
 #1

Possible Accounts Involved

1. Al-Ghifary
2. shendy
3. StreakW
4. bots1
5. guffie

Today, user Al-Ghifary created a thread in the Gambling section. After reviewing the thread, I noticed that all of the replies were made by the accounts listed above.

What caught my attention is that these accounts had been inactive for some time and suddenly became active in the same thread.

In addition, the other three accounts sent merit to Al-Ghifary shortly after participating in the thread.

Merit history of Al-Ghifary:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1116100


Registration Dates

• shendy — February 2017
• Al-Ghifary — August 2017
• bots1 — September 2017
• StreakW — October 2017
• guffie — Feburary 2017

All five accounts were registered within the same general time period.

While this alone is not conclusive proof that the accounts are connected, the coordinated activity, sudden reactivation of accounts, participation in the same thread, and continuos merit transfers to Al-Ghifary raise concerns about possible account connections and merit abuse.

The gambling site itself also appears questionable, particularly because it is using a .xyz domain, which prompted me to take a closer look and share this information for community review.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀████████████▀██████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄████████▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄█████
████████████▀▀███▄██████████████▀▀███▄████▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████▀███████████████████▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████▄▄█▄████████████████▄▄█▄█████▀███▀▀▀▀███▀██████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄████████▀▀▀▀████████▀▀▀▀▀▀████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄███████████▄████████████████████
███████████████████▀▄███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████▀▄█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████





 🎲 
 
CASINO


 🏀 

SPORTS


 📊 

FUTURES




|
$100K
WEEKLY
RACE
|
VIP
TRANSFER
|
UP TO 30%
DAILY
CASHBACK
|
Somegory
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 146



View Profile
Today at 06:46:13 AM
 #2

You are up to something here for sure, however these proofs aren't enough to tag all the accounts with red trust, no rules is broken here unless they join the same signature campaign or similar, you did well already and I am sure that all eye will be on these accounts.

The merit side of thing looks suspicious but I doubt this is enough to give these accounts red trust.

Majestic-milf
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 750



View Profile
Today at 01:20:31 PM
 #3


What caught my attention is that these accounts had been inactive for some time and suddenly became active in the same thread.

In addition, the other three accounts sent merit to Al-Ghifary shortly after participating in the thread.
This is suspicious. I know that anyone is free to do with their merit however they see fit but this act will surely raise eyebrows because it's as though the person wants to distribute merit to the different accounts but had to comment first to make it look legit.
Quote
Merit history of Al-Ghifary:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1116100


Registration Dates

• shendy — February 2017
• Al-Ghifary — August 2017
• bots1 — September 2017
• StreakW — October 2017
• guffie — Feburary 2017

All five accounts were registered within the same general time period.

While this alone is not conclusive proof that the accounts are connected, the coordinated activity, sudden reactivation of accounts, participation in the same thread, and continuos merit transfers to Al-Ghifary raise concerns about possible account connections and merit abuse.

The gambling site itself also appears questionable, particularly because it is using a .xyz domain, which prompted me to take a closer look and share this information for community review.

Although it's not abnormal for such things to happen, but it's the fact that they traded merits within the same accounts that got registered within the same timeframe that will land them in trouble.

████
██









██
████



███████████████▄▄███████████████▄███████████████▄█████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄█████▄█████▄███████▄
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████▀▀███████████████▀███████████████▀████████████████████████████████▀█████▀█████▀██████
████
██









██
████
████
██









██
████

🍒
████
██









██
████
████
██









██
████

⚽️
████
██









██
████
████
██









██
████
 
 IIIIIFASTEST GROWING CASINO & SPORTSBOOK  [ Play Now ]
████
██









██
████
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!