How to go viral on X?

[NotATether]

I find it quite weird asking this, as one can feel very proud and happy about what they have accomplished on one site, only to feel... inadequate, on a larger one.

 A few things I have found:

- Ads do not work. They don't even make it to blue checks.
- Follow and follow-back does not work.
- Getting replied to by a large account does work, temporarily. Because unless there are mainly bots who followed you from a given action, the churn rate should be very low.

So the strategy becomes finding large accounts' posts fast enough, and replying to them.

But how? How to measure if a given post will go viral and its worth taking a shot?

[jvanname]

I find it quite weird asking this, as one can feel very proud and happy about what they have accomplished on one site, only to feel... inadequate, on a larger one.

 A few things I have found:

- Ads do not work. They don't even make it to blue checks.
- Follow and follow-back does not work.
- Getting replied to by a large account does work, temporarily. Because unless there are mainly bots who followed you from a given action, the churn rate should be very low.

So the strategy becomes finding large accounts' posts fast enough, and replying to them.

But how? How to measure if a given post will go viral and its worth taking a shot?

People on Twitter are morons, so just say the stupidest shit imaginable, and you will have trillions of followers.

[gracreavix]

I find it quite weird asking this, as one can feel very proud and happy about what they have accomplished on one site, only to feel... inadequate, on a larger one.

 A few things I have found:

- Ads do not work. They don't even make it to blue checks.
- Follow and follow-back does not work.
- Getting replied to by a large account does work, temporarily. Because unless there are mainly bots who followed you from a given action, the churn rate should be very low.

So the strategy becomes finding large accounts' posts fast enough, and replying to them.

But how? How to measure if a given post will go viral and its worth taking a shot?

It's simple. Just tweet a controversial stuff. Relationships works faster. Paint a very weird scenario that favours women. Make it something a little bit new and weird. Stick with it and say more if that. Come up with more stories. Encourage bad things but don't make it look like you are encouraging it. Use words that doesn't hurt feelings. For example instead of saying prostitute. Use baddie instead. Try and make your words sweet. If you don't want relationships, use another thing. Main point is that try and be controversial. Hope this helps you.

[escrow.ms]

I find it quite weird asking this, as one can feel very proud and happy about what they have accomplished on one site, only to feel... inadequate, on a larger one.

 A few things I have found:

- Ads do not work. They don't even make it to blue checks.
- Follow and follow-back does not work.
- Getting replied to by a large account does work, temporarily. Because unless there are mainly bots who followed you from a given action, the churn rate should be very low.

So the strategy becomes finding large accounts' posts fast enough, and replying to them.

But how? How to measure if a given post will go viral and its worth taking a shot?

It's simple. Just tweet a controversial stuff. Relationships works faster. Paint a very weird scenario that favours women. Make it something a little bit new and weird. Stick with it and say more if that. Come up with more stories. Encourage bad things but don't make it look like you are encouraging it. Use words that doesn't hurt feelings. For example instead of saying prostitute. Use baddie instead. Try and make your words sweet. If you don't want relationships, use another thing. Main point is that try and be controversial. Hope this helps you.

+1 controversial tweets do work and stories about anything thats trending. But to succeed on X, you'll need premium membership with blue check mark. People prefer to follow and read tweets of premium/verified users.

[jvanname]

+1 controversial tweets do work and stories about anything thats trending. But to succeed on X, you'll need premium membership with blue check mark. People prefer to follow and read tweets of premium/verified users.

Instead of calling these tweets controversial, you can call them absolutely fucking stupid. This is because nearly everyone on Twitter is a fucking moron who deserves to be fed into a meat grinder because they are just useless sacks of meat meant to feed lions and nothing more.

[Accardo]

Build genuine connection on X, follow active users with smaller accounts and interact on their tweets, they'll easily follow back, do this gradually, get to know them through DM, in a short time they'll begin to reciprocate on your tweets or replies, it takes a little time, but, sooner by making the right controversial content and their activities added to it, you'd go viral on X.

[jvanname]

Build genuine connection on X, follow active users with smaller accounts and interact on their tweets, they'll easily follow back, do this gradually, get to know them through DM, in a short time they'll begin to reciprocate on your tweets or replies, it takes a little time, but, sooner by making the right controversial content and their activities added to it, you'd go viral on X.

Nope. There is absolutely no way to build any genuine connection with anyone from X because 99.9999999% of the entities there are idiots.