It will signal theymos that there is still insufficient number of merit sources
I think there is more than enough sources. However, there is still insufficient number of good posts. And making them is much harder, than getting new merits out of thin air.
There are still many unsolved technical issues, which could be rewarded with a lot of merits, if anyone would write about them. For example: the current code won't scale to billions of users in a decentralized way: if all people would want to suddenly switch to BTCs, then only whales would be able to do that, and regular users could then only join through centralized custodians. And there are specific technical solutions, which could help to solve that problem, but nobody wrote about them yet, because it is difficult, to understand the cryptography behind some of such solutions, and implement even a working prototype for these things.
I understand that this forum is about bitcoin, but you have to wake to the reality that despite the fact that this is a bitcoin forum, it has accommodated other aspects of life.
It is must not be all about writing codes or updating bitcoin network.
If someone is able to burst the major means new scam casinos operate successfully, they deserve some merits.
If someone is able to suggest how this forum could be run better, they deserve some merits.
If someone is able to make convincing bitcoin predictions with the available data, they deserve some merits.
If someone answers a pain point question, they deserve some merits.
If someone deliveres so well in the collectibles, they deserve some merits.
It doesn't just start and ends in the technical board.