Why U.S.A Peace deal is a trap to Iran.

[Olotu20]

With the current ceasefire that, has ushered in the peace talks that is currently going on between the united states of America and Iran. There are so much expectations that is hoped to come out of this deal that is expected, which will eventually leads to a lasting peace in the middle east. This is because Iran is a key influencer of what ever that happens in the middle east, but Some commentators has argue that, America's peace deals can sometimes act as a trap for weaker nations. And should be taken with caution because they may come with political, economic and even military conditions that primarily serve U.S. strategic interests and that of American allies. Even though the content of the peace deal has not been made open, for the peace talks to have lasted this long it means that the peace deal may be one sided.

This peace deal talks has been going on for a while infact, the peace talks has been extended with the aim of getting a good deal but Trump has warned that if Iran fails to sign the deal he will start the military actions all over again by bombing Iran. This doesn't appear to me as a person that wants genuine peace that will be lasting long, this is because  such agreements greatly reduce a nation's independence, increase foreign influence over such countries making the nation manipulative by foreign powers or even create a  long term obligations.
 I am of the opinion that for this peace deal to work effectively which will bring about lasting solutions then this deal should not be forced into the throat of Iran but should be done only on the basis of mutual self respect, which will be a lose and gain situation on the both sides. Infact a former minister of Libya under Gaddafi has send a strong warning to Iran to be very careful in the peace talks and to remember what happened to Libya.

https://www.rt.com/news/637952-iran-us-talks-ibrahim/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/06/21/us-iranian-meet-switzerland-hash-out-peace-plan/

[pooya87]

The word "peace" was repeated 13 times here and the thing is that these talks are not "peace talks" this is a MoU and Iran is just dictating its terms as the victor to the US regime as the loser of the conflict the American Axis began.

The goal is not peace either, the goal is buying time for both sides.
The US military has been devastated and it needs a lot of time to be able to rebuild only a very small part of that which cost trillions of dollars (the radars, the electronic warfare units, the tanker planes, air-force, navy and aircraft carriers, ...). US economy has taken a lot of damage as well due to the increased energy prices, the energy shortage and shortage of a lot of other key materials such as fertilizers, helium, aluminum,...
So US regime buying time by agreeing the terms Iranians have dictated to the US regime but are trying to not fulfill any of it.

Iran's military on the other hand is mostly intact and the very small damage it took was already repaired months ago and by unlocking newer capabilities (Iran has only used ~20% of its capabilities so far), Iran's firepower is going to be 10 times more devastating for the US regime in the next round (Operation True Promise 5). However, Iran's economy has suffered more, so Iran needed that time to repair the damage and import some of the ingredients through land based corridors as well as sea.
So Iran is buying time to do that while preparing for the next round.

The key thing is that Iran as the inventor of the Attrition Warfare is degrading the enemy slowly but surely. This is why the US regime is so eager to negotiate with the Iranians that they are practically begging for negotiations and calling it "peace talks".
Meanwhile the destruction of the Axis continues. Here are some examples from June 2026:

US military radar Bahrain ~10 days ago	|	Gas installation Qatar last night	|	An entire US Patriot battalion wiped out Kuwait earlier this month	|	A dozen NATO officers neutralized Kuwait ~20 days ago

By the way the only way to a true peace in West Asia and the rest of the world (stable global economy) is achieved only when the US regime and its proxies (ie. al-Qaeda, Israel, ISIS, etc.) are kicked out of West Asia. To put simply the United States must stop supporting terrorism or be forced to stop. This is what these negotiations are about.

[stompix]

Meanwhile the destruction of the Axis continues.

Meanwhile, in the real world, not some Basij women beaters propaganda:

Iran's firepower is going to be 10 times more devastating for the US regime in the next round (Operation True Promise 5).

So if this is Operation 5, the first ones were False Promises? 

[Olotu20]

Snip
[/table]
By the way the only way to a true peace in West Asia and the rest of the world (stable global economy) is achieved only when the US regime and its proxies (ie. al-Qaeda, Israel, ISIS, etc.) are kicked out of West Asia. To put simply the United States must stop supporting terrorism or be forced to stop. This is what these negotiations are about.

You are talking about America and it's proxies been kicked out of the middle east. But this same proxies is what America is fighting against, which they are even accusing Iran of sponsoring these terrorists organizations, in the middle east which has been even attacking Israel. Terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas militants has continued to attack Israel with the support of Iran this has been the position of the United States and their allies.

[pooya87]

You are talking about America and it's proxies been kicked out of the middle east. But this same proxies is what America is fighting against, which they are even accusing Iran of sponsoring these terrorists organizations, in the middle east which has been even attacking Israel. Terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas militants has continued to attack Israel with the support of Iran this has been the position of the United States and their allies.

The US regime first redefined the term "terrorist groups" then categorized any group that stood against their aggression under that fake definition. They even categorize Iran's military as a terrorist group after Iran crushed the the US-ISIS coalition in Syria during WW4.

Since you named some, lets see what are these groups. Hezbollah and Hamas:
Roughly 80 years ago, Zionists from various countries in the world came together to invade Palestine and start the occupation of this country. Like any invading force that wants to colonize a country, they needed to ethnically cleanse the "natives". That is when the genocide of Palestinians began and still continues today.
Obviously when an invading force starts slaughtering the people, some of those people start forming a Resistance to fight against the invaders. We've seen this in all invasions in the past, like during WW2 when Nazis invaded France. That is what HAMAS is, one of the many resistance groups or freedom fighters who are fighting the genocidal invaders aka Zionists.

After the Zionists established their colony inside Palestine and started the genocide of Palestinian people, they started thinking about expanding their colony. One of the directions they expanded toward was north toward Lebanon. Back in 1980's they invaded Lebanon and occupied half of it reaching the capital, they also started committing genocide there by mass murdering people. For example in one massacre in Sabra and Shatila they slaughtered over 6000 men, women and children.
Again, obviously when an invading force starts slaughtering people, some of those people pick up arms to fight the murderers, punish them and push them back. That is when the Lebanese Resistance began in around 1982. Slowly this resistance gained structure and got more organized and was finally named Hezbollah. A resistance group that first kicked out the invaders and has been protecting its home against foreign invaders aka Zionists ever since its establishment.

Obviously the invaders and the genocidal Zionists didn't like it when they faced resistance and failed to expand the territories they were occupying. Therefore they ordered the US regime to categorize those who stood against them as "terrorists" so that each time the Zionist regime carried out a terrorist attack against civilians in Gaza, Lebanon, etc. they could sell it to the uneducated public as "fighting terrorism".

Iran obviously supports the Resistance and anybody who fights the true terrorists.
You can see the sides during WW4 (~2000 to ~2019) very clearly: Iran and Hezbollah were on one side while US + Israel + al-Qaeda + ISIS were on the other side.
Even today that distinction is very clear. For example US regime received the head of al-Qaeda in the White House a while ago and openly too. Or the fact that recently The Pedophile POTUS announced that after Zionists sustained heavy casualties and failed to hold on to the occupied territories in Lebanon once again, they should pull back but hand over the terrorist attacks to the other US proxy namely al-Qaeda.

They are no longer shy about supporting terrorism either. For example United States Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard confessed to the congress that US regime supported, armed, trained al-Qaeda terrorists. Same with Joe Kent who made similar confessions, he was the director of US regime's National Terrorist Groups Management Center.

There are countless other confessions and solid evidence supporting this as well. Like declassified documents, leaked documents, the Timber Sycamore files, the statements by terrorist handlers like Robert Ford (U.S. regime's Ambassador to Syria) who was tasked to rebrand al-Qaeda and its new head al-Jolani,... and a lot more. The list is very long.

That is what I said before: the US regime and its terrorist proxies (ie. ISIS, Israel, al-Qaeda, etc.) must leave West Asia for real peace to be established in the world and global markets so that we can see global economic and energy stability.

[Doll2233]

The negotiation between USA and Iran has involved multiple rounds of discussions, compromises and they have to face international pressure from different sides of the world. The peace deal was basically designed to end the war and to stabilize the economy, just  saying that the deal was to weeken one country is not provin both sides have tried to protect their own interest in multiple discussion rounds while keeping their interest in mind they were trying to avoid any further conflict. This claim that the deal was one sided they need evidences as there is no official detail of the agreement available so we cannot conclude that what the real impact will be. We can hope that peace negotiation works so we can further stop this conflict and bring peace the world.

[Ryu_Ar1]

By the way the only way to a true peace in West Asia and the rest of the world (stable global economy) is achieved only when the US regime and its proxies (ie. al-Qaeda, Israel, ISIS, etc.) are kicked out of West Asia. To put simply the United States must stop supporting terrorism or be forced to stop. This is what these negotiations are about.

This is what allows wars and chaos in the middle east to stop because since the beginning of the war in the middle east has always involved Israel, the USA and several proxies that have been set up for this purpose.

But this will be a little difficult because from the beginning they have sought countries in the Middle East to be under them in terms of control and power so that even though they know this will make conditions turbulent over time, they will strive so that countries that oppose can at least be paralyzed and currently Iran is the most vocal that they are targeting.
There will be no peace deal despite the efforts of many but it is not just pride but ultimately equality and power that is sometimes at the root of the problem.

[Darker45]

It probably is. And of all countries, it must be Iran itself that knows this. They've been saying over and over again that the US can't be trusted, that despite the deals that they're getting into, they're suspicious of the US and its intentions and sincerity.

The problem, however, is that the other way is war, violence, deaths. This now is apparently the lesser evil. Regardless of the feigned sincerity of Trump and the US, this would at least stop further destruction of lives and properties and allow the economy to rebound, both local and regional, even international.

[philipma1957]

You are talking about America and it's proxies been kicked out of the middle east. But this same proxies is what America is fighting against, which they are even accusing Iran of sponsoring these terrorists organizations, in the middle east which has been even attacking Israel. Terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas militants has continued to attack Israel with the support of Iran this has been the position of the United States and their allies.

The US regime first redefined the term "terrorist groups" then categorized any group that stood against their aggression under that fake definition. They even categorize Iran's military as a terrorist group after Iran crushed the the US-ISIS coalition in Syria during WW4.

Since you named some, lets see what are these groups. Hezbollah and Hamas:
Roughly 80 years ago, Zionists from various countries in the world came together to invade Palestine and start the occupation of this country. Like any invading force that wants to colonize a country, they needed to ethnically cleanse the "natives". That is when the genocide of Palestinians began and still continues today.
Obviously when an invading force starts slaughtering the people, some of those people start forming a Resistance to fight against the invaders. We've seen this in all invasions in the past, like during WW2 when Nazis invaded France. That is what HAMAS is, one of the many resistance groups or freedom fighters who are fighting the genocidal invaders aka Zionists.

After the Zionists established their colony inside Palestine and started the genocide of Palestinian people, they started thinking about expanding their colony. One of the directions they expanded toward was north toward Lebanon. Back in 1980's they invaded Lebanon and occupied half of it reaching the capital, they also started committing genocide there by mass murdering people. For example in one massacre in Sabra and Shatila they slaughtered over 6000 men, women and children.
Again, obviously when an invading force starts slaughtering people, some of those people pick up arms to fight the murderers, punish them and push them back. That is when the Lebanese Resistance began in around 1982. Slowly this resistance gained structure and got more organized and was finally named Hezbollah. A resistance group that first kicked out the invaders and has been protecting its home against foreign invaders aka Zionists ever since its establishment.

Obviously the invaders and the genocidal Zionists didn't like it when they faced resistance and failed to expand the territories they were occupying. Therefore they ordered the US regime to categorize those who stood against them as "terrorists" so that each time the Zionist regime carried out a terrorist attack against civilians in Gaza, Lebanon, etc. they could sell it to the uneducated public as "fighting terrorism".

Iran obviously supports the Resistance and anybody who fights the true terrorists.
You can see the sides during WW4 (~2000 to ~2019) very clearly: Iran and Hezbollah were on one side while US + Israel + al-Qaeda + ISIS were on the other side.
Even today that distinction is very clear. For example US regime received the head of al-Qaeda in the White House a while ago and openly too. Or the fact that recently The Pedophile POTUS announced that after Zionists sustained heavy casualties and failed to hold on to the occupied territories in Lebanon once again, they should pull back but hand over the terrorist attacks to the other US proxy namely al-Qaeda.

They are no longer shy about supporting terrorism either. For example United States Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard confessed to the congress that US regime supported, armed, trained al-Qaeda terrorists. Same with Joe Kent who made similar confessions, he was the director of US regime's National Terrorist Groups Management Center.

There are countless other confessions and solid evidence supporting this as well. Like declassified documents, leaked documents, the Timber Sycamore files, the statements by terrorist handlers like Robert Ford (U.S. regime's Ambassador to Syria) who was tasked to rebrand al-Qaeda and its new head al-Jolani,... and a lot more. The list is very long.

That is what I said before: the US regime and its terrorist proxies (ie. ISIS, Israel, al-Qaeda, etc.) must leave West Asia for real peace to be established in the world and global markets so that we can see global economic and energy stability.

Well Isis is on the side of the USA and is an enemy of Iran?

I guess I was misinformed thank you for the clarification.

[pooya87]

Well Isis is on the side of the USA and is an enemy of Iran?

I guess I was misinformed thank you for the clarification.

It is a bit more complicated than that but yes, that's pretty much it.

Generally speaking the Takfiri ideology is rooted in Wahhabism and Salafism and it mainly considers Shia Muslims to be infidels or more specifically Kāfir and these Takfiri terrorists are taught from childhood that if they kill a certain number of Shia Muslims (IIRC a dozen or something like that!) they'll go to heaven and be rewarded by "god"!!!

Obviously Iran as a Shia-Muslim majority country is the first and main target of these Takfiri terrorists.

Now the other part (ISIS being on the side of USA) is a bit complex. When we talk about these Takfiri terrorists, we are not talking about a united group consisting of people with the same exact ideology following the same exact guy! For example the current version of al-Qaeda that is in control of Damascus consists of dozens of various groups, some of whom want the al-Jolani's head on a plate for having shaken hand with the Americans. Now this last sentence should have answered another question that you may have: Why has US been attacking ISIS, al-Qaeda and other Takfiri terrorists if these groups are US proxies or "on the side of USA"?
The answer is simple: they aren't attacking these terrorist groups, they are eliminating members of these groups who don't obey Washington's orders. The past decades are filled with examples but best ones are from the past week or two where US launched multiple strikes on certain Takfiri members of al-Jolani gang whom their own chief, al-Jolani leaked their location to the US because they weren't obeying Washington's orders well enough.

This last one is going to blow your mind...
What I just explained is the reason why the US regime eliminated its own employee called Osama Bin Laden. The same terrorist whom the West was praising once in their mouthpieces with terms such as "warrior", "businessman", "liberator", etc.:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/antisoviet-warrior-puts-his-army-on-the-road-to-peace-the-saudi-businessman-who-recruited-mujahedin-now-uses-them-for-largescale-building-projects-in-sudan-robert-fisk-met-him-in-almatig-1465715.html

You see, these Takfiri terrorists are a tool for the US regime even though by all definitions they are a branch of US army (ground forces). And just like any tool (or toilet paper) they all serve their purpose and will be discarded once they stop being useful.
So yes, the US and ISIS were on one side. Without these Takfiri terrorists, the US regime would have never been able to destroy Syria and take over their oils, they would have never been able to solidify their foothold in Iraq and steal their oil, they would have never been able to destroy Yemen, and generally the West Asia and so on.

[philipma1957]

Well this is why understanding this  shit is hard for Westerners .  I know the USA back and pushed Osama bin Laden forward for a decade . I know bin Laden turned on the USA and eventually may have been killed by  Obama.

I go back to the 1978 Iran overthrow of the Shah. As I knew a few dozen of his soldiers stationed on my base in San Diego USA.

I know the shah was brutal and many hated him, but from the info I get it looks like those that tossed him out

are brutal and people hate them.

I will tell you where we agree I do not like or support zionism. I would prefer that Palestine gets a fair deal.

But I am 69 and have seen war in your area since 1967 (I remember that one )

And it seems it never ends with lots of very tough leaders causing a lot of death but mainly a lot of weapon sales.

It is sad for people to die over land but people do.

Maybe one day we all will learn to stop.

[Faisal2202]

I am of the opinion that for this peace deal to work effectively which will bring about lasting solutions then this deal should not be forced into the throat of Iran but should be done only on the basis of mutual self respect, which will be a lose and gain situation on the both sides. Infact a former minister of Libya under Gaddafi has send a strong warning to Iran to be very careful in the peace talks and to remember what happened to Libya.

It seems like you have not heard what were the reasons of Iran and US not agreeing on the deals. What Iran was asking from US was too much, what US was asking was too much, but with multiple attempts they both lowered their guard and actually wanted to make a peace deal.

But then they both have ego and respect and power factors that become a problem and I also understand that when both countries really want to make a peace deal they have to adjust, but Israel is not letting US adjust. Whenever Netanyahu stays idle on these meetings, the opposition and the whole country forces the government Netanyahu to cause trouble so every single time they saw this deal closing, they attacked Lebanon and it is part of the deal to not attack it anymore, and every time US agrees and then Israel attacks Lebanon and the deal ends in failure.

This has happened so many times, recently a person from Israel, don't know the name, he is famous there like on some rank, said for every tear a mother in Israel has shed, will be revenged back by shedding tears of thousands of mothers in Lebanon. That post was removed later.

I mean, these people are not human at all. Anyway, I hope a peace deal will be made, and we will hear some good news after all this

[programmer3666]

Honestly, I just want this war to end. War is never the answer to any geopolitical issue, it only brings destruction, suffering and more hatred. Both sides lose in the end, especially innocent civilians who have nothing to do with politics. But I do agree that this whole peace deal feels like a trap. Trump threatening to bomb Iran again if they don't sign!! That's not how you make peace, that's how you force someone into a corner. Real peace comes from mutual respect, not ultimatums. Both sides should give a little and gain a little, not just one side dictating terms to the other.

[CONVOAI]

I think it is not only important whether an agreement is reached but also how transparently the terms of the agreement are disclosed afterwards because the true value of any peace agreement is understood during its implementation. If both sides can strike a balance between their own security and interests then there is a greater chance of positive results in the long run. If the negotiations proceed on the basis of trust and mutual respect rather than external pressure then the risk of creating new tensions in the future will be greatly reduced. In the end a solution where neither side feels forced or deceived will be the most effective.

[Fortify]

With the current ceasefire that, has ushered in the peace talks that is currently going on between the united states of America and Iran. There are so much expectations that is hoped to come out of this deal that is expected, which will eventually leads to a lasting peace in the middle east. This is because Iran is a key influencer of what ever that happens in the middle east, but Some commentators has argue that, America's peace deals can sometimes act as a trap for weaker nations. And should be taken with caution because they may come with political, economic and even military conditions that primarily serve U.S. strategic interests and that of American allies. Even though the content of the peace deal has not been made open, for the peace talks to have lasted this long it means that the peace deal may be one sided.

This peace deal talks has been going on for a while infact, the peace talks has been extended with the aim of getting a good deal but Trump has warned that if Iran fails to sign the deal he will start the military actions all over again by bombing Iran. This doesn't appear to me as a person that wants genuine peace that will be lasting long, this is because  such agreements greatly reduce a nation's independence, increase foreign influence over such countries making the nation manipulative by foreign powers or even create a  long term obligations.
 I am of the opinion that for this peace deal to work effectively which will bring about lasting solutions then this deal should not be forced into the throat of Iran but should be done only on the basis of mutual self respect, which will be a lose and gain situation on the both sides. Infact a former minister of Libya under Gaddafi has send a strong warning to Iran to be very careful in the peace talks and to remember what happened to Libya.

Why would you be pro Iran? I get that the USA and Israel, as is the current state of their terrible leadership, have created this massive fuck up. However Iran is still a horribly oppressive government that does not allow it's people to be free and is currently holding the world economy hostage. I get that in some ways they are doing good - like stopping Israel stealing even more land from Lebanon and trying to maximize their hand in negotiations, but if they become such an obstacle through refusal to negotiate then they are likely to create a bigger war that will eventually force everyone else to go against them. They have a very fine line to walk and sometimes they are pushing it a bit too hard.

[DrBeer]

With the current ceasefire that, has ushered in the peace talks that is currently going on between the united states of America and Iran. There are so much expectations that is hoped to come out of this deal that is expected, which will eventually leads to a lasting peace in the middle east. This is because Iran is a key influencer of what ever that happens in the middle east, but Some commentators has argue that, America's peace deals can sometimes act as a trap for weaker nations. And should be taken with caution because they may come with political, economic and even military conditions that primarily serve U.S. strategic interests and that of American allies. Even though the content of the peace deal has not been made open, for the peace talks to have lasted this long it means that the peace deal may be one sided.

This peace deal talks has been going on for a while infact, the peace talks has been extended with the aim of getting a good deal but Trump has warned that if Iran fails to sign the deal he will start the military actions all over again by bombing Iran. This doesn't appear to me as a person that wants genuine peace that will be lasting long, this is because  such agreements greatly reduce a nation's independence, increase foreign influence over such countries making the nation manipulative by foreign powers or even create a  long term obligations.
 I am of the opinion that for this peace deal to work effectively which will bring about lasting solutions then this deal should not be forced into the throat of Iran but should be done only on the basis of mutual self respect, which will be a lose and gain situation on the both sides. Infact a former minister of Libya under Gaddafi has send a strong warning to Iran to be very careful in the peace talks and to remember what happened to Libya.

https://www.rt.com/news/637952-iran-us-talks-ibrahim/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/06/21/us-iranian-meet-switzerland-hash-out-peace-plan/

Mutual respect? Of course, it's very important and valuable. In a civilized world, where there are rules, where there are duties, where there are laws, where you have to keep your word, and adhere to humane approaches. But what about a terrorist regime that makes a promise and then breaks it, and does it regularly, and at the same time openly declares its goals of total destruction of entire countries and peoples?
 
I will give you a very unpleasant example, and you tell me - will you respectfully agree on something with the other side? I'll tell you right away - the example is very exaggerated, but it's for a deeper understanding.
Someone regularly beats up, robs your friends and neighbors. And then one day kills a few neighbors, rapes your sister and a couple of other neighbor women, wives of your friends, burns down their houses. You find out who it is, everybody knows who it is, and you're gonna punish him. And then the judge says to you, Olotu20 I'm going to convict you, will you drop your wild ideas of destroying and punishing these nice thugs, respect them, negotiate with their interests in mind ? Is that your answer?
 

The peace agreement is aimed at stopping the aggressive plans of the IRGC military junta, which has now usurped power, to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe so that the people of Iran, who have been held hostage by the terrorists in power, do not suffer.

[Oluwa-btc]

Well this is why understanding this  shit is hard for Westerners .  I know the USA back and pushed Osama bin Laden forward for a decade . I know bin Laden turned on the USA and eventually may have been killed by  Obama.

I go back to the 1978 Iran overthrow of the Shah. As I knew a few dozen of his soldiers stationed on my base in San Diego USA.

I know the shah was brutal and many hated him, but from the info I get it looks like those that tossed him out

are brutal and people hate them.

I will tell you where we agree I do not like or support zionism. I would prefer that Palestine gets a fair deal.

But I am 69 and have seen war in your area since 1967 (I remember that one )

And it seems it never ends with lots of very tough leaders causing a lot of death but mainly a lot of weapon sales.

It is sad for people to die over land but people do.

Maybe one day we all will learn to stop.

The west understands just one thing and it is strength.

This should be no suprise to people who knew how they supported the Shah and backed his nuclear program and ambitions until he was no longer controlled by them again. So they threw sanctions and programmed sponsored iraq against iran for the war they had, so they could tear down the nuclear programs. It is good thing that the Shah was brutal.

Palestinians shouldn't get a fair deal. The whole world should come together to see isreali regime restrained same time leave the lands of Palestine. It has always and will always belong to them. They're the victims and nobody will rewrite that.

Such cases is not just in the Palestine alone, the isreali regime are also sponsoring groups around the world to destabilize countries. Just as they're doing with a group here in Nigeria. Themselves and US government are the major threat to peace in the world.

[pooya87]

I know the shah was brutal and many hated him, but from the info I get it looks like those that tossed him out are brutal and people hate them.

I don't think any political system or rulers existed in human history anywhere in the world that was loved by everyone. But the term "brutal" is what those who were kicked out want to attach to the people who replaced them as part of US cold war against Iran and in the hope that the pre-1979 brutal dictatorship can be re-installed!

If you want to see what people truly think about the "replacement" just wait 2 more days till Saturday (July 4th) where the most significant event of this century will take place. Millions of people are going to bid farewell to their leader, Martyr Ayatollah Khamenei in Iran and a couple of other countries (last for a couple of days).
The sheer number should give you more realistic info on how majority of people feel about "them".

[AgriTrack]

Honestly, I just want this war to end. War is never the answer to any geopolitical issue, it only brings destruction, suffering and more hatred. Both sides lose in the end, especially innocent civilians who have nothing to do with politics. But I do agree that this whole peace deal feels like a trap. Trump threatening to bomb Iran again if they don't sign!! That's not how you make peace, that's how you force someone into a corner. Real peace comes from mutual respect, not ultimatums. Both sides should give a little and gain a little, not just one side dictating terms to the other.

Yes everyone wants peace now , war is just source of destruction for both side. On one side it claimed that he is fighting for the regime change while on other side after few months of war US want peace.  Even US failed to achieved its objectives. But now agreement have been done on peace but it is basically a trap not a sympathy for the Iranian. They by the agreement forces them to destroy their weapons or want to make it's visit possible to the sensitive areas, just want to get an idea about the military strength of Iran. That's Iran has refuse it's demand. US realizes that Iran never ever will agree on it's foolish demand, so US now move towards Israel and making another plan against Iran. Or they approved the agreement of get full control over the Labonon. Even after making peace agreement they hit Iran again, that's a great trap. Again he is making lame excuses for attacks that's everyone knows not true