Lack of intensive regulation

[YellowSwap]

It's been like how many years already? That same thing keeps happening over and over, the crazy part is in every bear market, it's too accurate to look normal.

It's like some group of people saying let's just steal money from our own pond and make it look like we got attacked.

I am talking about the hacks happening on DeFi projects, it's getting too accurate that every four years or let me say every bear market some hacks happens on DeFi.

And once recovery starts to take place every just disappears.
In 2026 over 250million in dollars is gone via DeFi hacks.

I can't help but think that this crypto space is the most suffering space begging for intense regulation than ever or you don't think the same ?

[_act_]

I am talking about the hacks happening on DeFi projects, it's getting too accurate that every four years or let me say every bear market some hacks happens on DeFi.

Defi and Bridges exploits are happening both during bull and bear market.

I can't help but think that this crypto space is the most suffering space begging for intense regulation than ever or you don't think the same?

What that DeFi and Bridges need is more than just crypto regulations. If bitcoin blockchain can not be hacked in a way that the hackers will successfully go away with bitcoin, you should know that the DeFi and Bridges developers are getting something wrong, but they might be the bad people just like you meant.

[IjawMan]

I can't help but think that this crypto space is the most suffering space begging for intense regulation than ever or you don't think the same ?

It needs the regulation to some limit and not the intense regulation you are suggesting cause there is a level of regulation so intense that is can scare away many project developers including the genuine ones therefore killing competition and, leaving it to a small group who by their big size may easily be manipulating the market more than what we experiencing.

May be if a lot of this projects can be revealing a proof of their reserves to pay victims in case of any unexpected incidents which is not the users fault then it can help reduce these hacks exploits.

[348Judah]

We can genuinely establish the facts on weather a hug is made as being proclaimed on it wasn't the exact situation concerned that the public will be told, you can only save ourselves from any further occurrence in such manner by avoiding all distort party services, we are giving our assets to them for them to manage and they can come up with any story, claiming our asset loss oh hack, and there's nothing you can do about it because they are centralized custodials, now you can see the relevance of going from non-custodial storage and taking charge of our asset by ourselves and avoiding investing on random projects.

[Dex_master25]

I can't help but think that this crypto space is the most suffering space begging for intense regulation than ever or you don't think the same ?

It needs the regulation to some limit and not the intense regulation you are suggesting cause there is a level of regulation so intense that is can scare away many project developers including the genuine ones therefore killing competition and, leaving it to a small group who by their big size may easily be manipulating the market more than what we experiencing.

May be if a lot of this projects can be revealing a proof of their reserves to pay victims in case of any unexpected incidents which is not the users fault then it can help reduce these hacks exploits.

Will the proof of reserve funds not also be a target to be hacked by these people?
However it would be weird trying to regulate DEFi which is supposed to be permissionless, open source smart contracts by forcing kyc requirements on it. Also I think only the front end can even be regulated if at all while the codes living on the Blockchain can't.
 I think for regulations to work it should be better targeted at the exchanges and stablecoins issuers who are the enablers of the hackers ability to cash out successfully their hacked proceeds, instead of the DEFi being regulated itself.

[Alpha Marine]

I think the lack of proper regulation may be a reason for this, but the regulation should not be "intensive". If the regulation is too much, it would choke the industry.
Hacks in Defi happen in any season, but in bear and bull markets. I can't tell if it's something fishy or if they are genuinely being hacked, but I know that if there are proper regulations, the hacks will be reduced.

Lack of regulation can make people not really pay attention and cross every T.
It's like how it is in the memecoins market. Anybody can just launch a token without properly considering everything. They don't care if people lose money, if the token has utility, or if it can survive such a volatile market. In the end, people lose money, and they get paid, and nothing happens.
But somehow, the authorities are not paying attention to those sectors.

[noorman0]

I don't believe hacks happen on a scheduled basis as bear market phases are largely influenced by the level of exploit cases. If you monitor defi hacking cases on defillama, at least they contain newsworthy cases with sizable losses every quarter throughout the year, regardless of market trends. The last major hack actually occurred during feb 2025, at the first bullish peak of this cycle.

[crwth]

]In a way, I think this could be lessened or somewhat given some insurance that could help alleviate the pain of losing money. I think there's an increase in complexity when it comes to attacks on Defi, but because of that, it could exponentially affect the exploit with the attack. Like an increase in attack.

From what I have read, it's always the cross-chain bridges that become vulnerable. Is it time to just really push one chain to prevent this kind of thing?

[ColdLava40]

I can't help but think that this crypto space is the most suffering space begging for intense regulation than ever or you don't think the same ?

Regulations only might not be the solution. These hacks are very common in Defi, but who is working to solve the problems?

The government regulations would not protect the network from getting hacked, it will only restrict investors from using it. People don't want to go through stress to access a network that's not supposed to be difficult. But some technical inspection might be enough to solve few of the problems.

I don't believe hacks happen on a scheduled basis as bear market phases are largely influenced by the level of exploit cases. If you monitor defi hacking cases on defillama, at least they contain newsworthy cases with sizable losses every quarter throughout the year, regardless of market trends. The last major hack actually occurred during feb 2025, at the first bullish peak of this cycle.

The hacks are simply random and not targeted on a particular season of the market.

[Dunamisx]

All these of gone beyond regulation because government cannot do everything for us, it goes beyond what they can do or are capable of, that is why if you look at the incidence of scam that are happening, not all of them were being apprehended by the government despite the regulations that are in place, and those affected have already lost their assets and can recover it any longer, everyone should know what they are going for and be able to understand the risk involved as well before they started.

[Fortify]

It's been like how many years already? That same thing keeps happening over and over, the crazy part is in every bear market, it's too accurate to look normal.

It's like some group of people saying let's just steal money from our own pond and make it look like we got attacked.

I am talking about the hacks happening on DeFi projects, it's getting too accurate that every four years or let me say every bear market some hacks happens on DeFi.

And once recovery starts to take place every just disappears.
In 2026 over 250million in dollars is gone via DeFi hacks.

I can't help but think that this crypto space is the most suffering space begging for intense regulation than ever or you don't think the same ?

It seems like you have a conspiracy mindset, which is doomed to leaving you feeling hopeless and constantly blaming someone else. There can be numerous different agendas (millions even) all competing for different aims and sometimes they all just happen to turn against you, but constantly feeling like a victim will eventually turn you into a victim. No, not every DeFi hack is somehow connected and conspiring against you, so get over that idea. Maybe crypto has just had it's short term peak and what's remaining is a more slow/steady gradual climb rather than volatility, which would actually be better for serious investors instead of day traders who are hoping for different coins to jump 1000% in a day.