For sport Bettors, sportbook Rep & mediators

[Emjay24]

If a gambler tries this combination in one

And what these bettors advantage of doing what OP mentioned?

It's done in the simplest format that I can think of... Place the same bet in two different casinos, but with an opposing selection; Play for the home team, and then the away team all to win, no matter the outcome, you stand to gain a guaranteed fraction for a win.

What if it ends in a draw, then you'll not get any fraction, maybe you'll place yet in another casino for a tie and keep praying for the outcome with the highest odds to come through. This kind of betting isn't the best for me, tried it before and observed that over the long-term, you'll lose big money because there's no guarantee the selection with maximum odds comes through most of the times. Again placing such a game, you'll be naturally inclined to bet with big amounts so you can balance out the stakes and seek to get little profits, so it can prompt you to increase your bankroll unnecessarily and go well above your budget if you had any.

[iv4n]

Like, for example, I place bet on tennis N. B. Kjaer vs M. Dodig at casino A, go-to casino B and place the same a bet same option, different amount or same amount. Does that in any way violate any sports betting policy?

Honestly, I don't know how to answer that. As far as I know, arbitrage betting is not permitted on some casino sites, it would violate one of the rules in the 'Terms of Service'. You can look at how this issue is handled in some 'Reputation' cases. My question is, why did you choose to place bets on different sites? wouldn't it be possible to do so on the same site?

This example is not arbitrage betting. Arbitrage betting is when you bet on opposite outcomes at different bookmakers, so whatever the outcome is, you make a profit... but you need to find those, and that's not as easy as it seems.

My question is, why did you choose to place bets on different sites? wouldn't it be possible to do so on the same site?

Why not? Maybe he has balances in different casinos... so why move the money & pay transaction fees when you can simply place the same bet?

[Cointxz]

Is it a crime or against casino policy for me to place bets on the same game at the same option at different casinos?

Like, for example, I place bet on tennis N. B. Kjaer vs M. Dodig at casino A, go-to casino B and place the same a bet same option, different amount or same amount. Does that in any way violate any sports betting policy?

You can potentially violates betting limit on specific match especially if you place bet on casino that use the same odds provider.

However, if your bet amount is just low and at the same time not doing any arbitrage betting then I don’t see rules you are violating. Your money, your choice on how you spread your bet among different casino if the goal is to accumulate VIP xp.

Betting limit is your only concern for doing this.

[Betwrong]

This is not a violation at all and there is no way each casino will know whether place a bet on the same option on different casinos.
There are also some casinos that allow you to place bet on the same option on multiple times without any violation..~

I have a feeling that I use only these casinos, you've mentioned. If I bet $1 on an outcome and then think, I should've bet $2, I just place another bet on the same event with the same outcome. Basically, you can bet $10 on Liverpool's win or you can place ten bets, one dollar each, on Liverpool's win. I don't understand why some people think it should be prohibited.

[Ishicryptic]

If you're making the same bet on different casinos I don't think that any of the casinos would mind, they should be happy that you choose their casino as one of the sites that you used to place your bet so if you lose then it's a win for all of them because most times we lose our bets. If you're placing the same bet in different casinos it means that you're increasing your risks so everything is on you if you win you will take it all but if you lose you will lose in all the casinos. Personally I just place a perticular bet in one casino instead of spreading it, that strategy is not necessary for me.

[Lannakosa]

I don't have any better place to ask this question than here:

I was reading through some threads on the scam accusation section of the forum, and I came across sports betting policy violations of a casino, which brought me to the question running through my head.

Is it a crime or against casino policy for me to place bets on the same game at the same option at different casinos?

Like, for example, I place bet on tennis N. B. Kjaer vs M. Dodig at casino A, go-to casino B and place the same a bet same option, different amount or same amount. Does that in any way violate any sports betting policy?

I don't think it violates any laws, but I immediately had a counter-question: why would you place the exact same bet at several different casinos? You'd have to deposit money at each casino to do that. But I think that only makes sense if you're playing with very high stakes and the casino has a maximum bet limit. Casinos have very high maximum bets, so you shouldn't worry about being denied such a large bet. But I don't understand why you'd want to split the same bet across multiple casinos.

[AVE5]

Is it a crime or against casino policy for me to place bets on the same game at the same option at different casinos?

Like, for example, I place bet on tennis N. B. Kjaer vs M. Dodig at casino A, go-to casino B and place the same a bet same option, different amount or same amount. Does that in any way violate any sports betting policy?

If you're betting on different site how would the casino's know when you bets on the other casino's? Or could there be a link of the casino's affiliating?
However, I don't think this context would be a violation of the casino policy and I haven't come across any casino policy that requires us to only have one casino account.
Whatsoever casino that does that must be strict and such policies are usually hidden until the bettor hits a good sum of winning.
In such circumstances, is where the law enforcement and license issuing authorities should be involved because for a casino to penalize users on that concept is uncalledful.

[Royal Cap]

Like, for example, I place bet on tennis N. B. Kjaer vs M. Dodig at casino A, go-to casino B and place the same a bet same option, different amount or same amount. Does that in any way violate any sports betting policy?

As far as I know betting on the same option on the same match at different casinos is generally not seen as a problem. Many people use multiple platforms to get better odds or for their own convenience.  So it can be called normal betting behavior. However , the situation changes if you bet using multiple accounts at the same casino. This is against their multi account policy at most casinos. Especially if you do this to get a bonus or other benefits, you risk having your account restricted or closed.

[ZeroVinsonN]

I don't have any better place to ask this question than here:

I was reading through some threads on the scam accusation section of the forum, and I came across sports betting policy violations of a casino, which brought me to the question running through my head.

Is it a crime or against casino policy for me to place bets on the same game at the same option at different casinos?

Like, for example, I place bet on tennis N. B. Kjaer vs M. Dodig at casino A, go-to casino B and place the same a bet same option, different amount or same amount. Does that in any way violate any sports betting policy?

There is not reason for that to be any kind of a violation, people have accounts across different platforms so they can decide to place any bet the want across any of them, do it across 10 different platforms and you still won't be breaking any rules you have the right to gamble wherever you want as long as that kind of gambling is legal.
Though I don't see the need to place the same bet across different casinos, why not just do it in one and maybe place a different bet on the other, I just don't see the point.

[Rashlyowl]

This example is not arbitrage betting. Arbitrage betting is when you bet on opposite outcomes at different bookmakers, so whatever the outcome is, you make a profit... but you need to find those, and that's not as easy as it seems.

That’s just as far as I know, since I’ve never done it myself. So, I could be wrong, just like you said bros @iv4n.

Why not? Maybe he has balances in different casinos... so why move the money & pay transaction fees when you can simply place the same bet?

Your reply made me laugh bros @iv4n. You're right, if we have a balance available on another site, moving it to the main site would take time & incur network fees, hahaha. What I mean is, when we don't have an available balance on any site, there is no reason to play on other sites.

[junder]

As far as I know betting on the same option on the same match at different casinos is generally not seen as a problem. Many people use multiple platforms to get better odds or for their own convenience.  So it can be called normal betting behavior. However , the situation changes if you bet using multiple accounts at the same casino. This is against their multi account policy at most casinos. Especially if you do this to get a bonus or other benefits, you risk having your account restricted or closed.

It should be like that, because I think for those who are used to doing sports betting, they will find their own way of betting that they themselves think is comfortable, either betting big at once on one game and on one casino or indeed betting adjusted but done with several betting places.

This is a legitimate and normal way of bertaurh in my opinion, but with the occurrence of this problem it should be clarified or sought further why this is a problem because basically it is not a violation either.

[yhiaali3]

AFAIK this is not considered a violation of casino policy because, as you know, each casino is an independent entity with its own terms of service, which vary from casino to casino. Therefore, betting in one casino with one option and betting in another casino with the same option is not considered a violation in my opinion.

As long as you don't use multiple accounts at the same casino, I think there's no problem. The violation occurs when you have more than one account at the same casino and then use each of them to bet on the same game.

[Julien_Olynpic]

Bookmakers are generally very sensitive to arbitrage betting, as it's theoretically a nearly surefire way for players to make some money. Generally, a player can place both legs of an arbitrage bet at different bookmakers, but not at the same one. However, in Russia, bookmakers seem to be coordinating and want to ban all types of arbitrage betting, even across different bookmakers. This isn't entirely fair, but it does exist.

[Jody.Drummer]

AFAIK this is not considered a violation of casino policy because, as you know, each casino is an independent entity with its own terms of service, which vary from casino to casino. Therefore, betting in one casino with one option and betting in another casino with the same option is not considered a violation in my opinion.

As long as you don't use multiple accounts at the same casino, I think there's no problem. The violation occurs when you have more than one account at the same casino and then use each of them to bet on the same game.

What you say is true, but this might be considered a violation because the casino itself has different requirements from other casinos, even though they basically have similar requirements or rules. What's confusing to me is how the casino knows if a player is placing the same bet at different casinos. If that's the case, it should cause problems even with different players. Wow, I'm really confused. The bottom line is, as you said, as long as we don't use multiple accounts at the same casino, there shouldn't be any issues.

[TedMosby]

Apart from arbitrage betting, there are many scenarios why bettors would do that. For example, they want to bet big, but the bookie has a maximum cap for each bet. So bettors need to find another bookie to place the same bet. Imagine the cap is $100 per bet, but due to your confidence, you want to bet double, so you put $100 on site A and another $100 on site B.

Another reason could be different promos or events, like cashback, free bets, etc. Just like what happened in Games and Rounds. Bettors may already have their preferred gambling site, but due to an event or promotion by a new gambling site, they also want to get the benefits from that.

Based on these example scenarios, I don't see any reason why betting on the same thing on different websites would violate the rules.

Even arbitrage betting itself, why is it considered a violation? I read about it, and I found that this kind of activity is legal by law. However, for some bookies (or maybe all), it's a violation because they want to add risk to how we play, and they don't want us to consistently make a profit in the long run. This reason doesn't make sense. It's contradictory to a bettor's goal

CMIIW.