Study says, gambling disorder spikes in state where sports betting is legalized

[leea-1334]

That is not what the report says about sportsbetting,,, And no, legalising doesn't automatically spread it. Access does. But better regulated access than unregulated. I have seen what it can do, shouldn't come as any surprise to any of us. But there is I feel a grey line that says you can still be responsible as a business and not resort to predatory practices.

[lovesmayfamilis]

There are many law-abiding people. Moreover, some people won't be able or even willing to use something like a VPN to access casino sites if they're banned or blocked by the government, as this also carries a certain risk. But if everything is allowed, then people will play, and how they will be guided by their emotions will always depend on their worldview and views on the very direction of gambling. Someone will play for fun, and someone will hope to "earn money," as some really succeed. If we talk about gambling addiction, then it seems to me that everything is individual here. There are a lot of addicted people in countries where gambling is prohibited, and neither the government nor casino bans and blockages will be able to ban them from playing, as they always find ways to circumvent all prohibitions.

[Tungbulu]

When gambling is illegal in a country people naturally have a fear of doing that but when gambling is completely legalized a common person will gamble freely knowingly or unknowingly and as a result the amount of addiction can increase. However, I think that gambling addiction is completely dependent on the mentality or activities of the gambler, no one else is responsible for it. Before starting gambling, it is very important for us to gain the right knowledge, as a result of which we will be able to control greed, maintain self-control over ourselves and be saved from the destruction of gambling.

Yeah, its depends on the choice of one to be addicted to gambling or not, because almost every one who gambles knows what gambling is and how its operated, even if they don't have any idea, they can ask questions and make some research to with the answers they want and can make better choices through their research, and if they think other people will take responsibility of their actions won't be possible, as they will be responsible for their own choices. Even if the game is legalized, they should also make use of their brain and do the needful.

[bakasabo]

I am not sure if gambling addiction has connection with legal or illegal gambling. For me it seems that it does not matter much where to gamble for a person who is very emotional and lack self-control skill. It also does not matter which games to play and number of games played. Because everything depends from character of a gambler. Popularity and accessibility are one of the things that increases addiction rate.

[Cryptoprincess101]

So what does the research say, is sports betting more harmful than casino games like slots?

I don't think so, gambling (whether sports betting or casino games) is not harmful, it is those who play without discipline that makes it look as if it is harmful. This is a game of chance, tell me why people are taking it too serious to the extent of harming themselves and their well-being. Even in this forum, we have discussed it many times on the need for people to approach gambling as though they are just having normal fun they do when they spend money on vacations, outings and some fun activities because they use money they can afford to lose.
      When gamblers are spending so much time brainstorming on casino games and sporting events, why won't they face gambling disorder. When you walk into some physical gambling centers, some people who do not have a job will spend almost the whole day there losing money and at the end of the day they go to their houses with the thought of how they lost huge amount of money to gambling. Those experiences contribute to gambling disorder.

So what does that mean? Are they saying that if the government allows gambling, it will result in more addiction compared to not legalizing it at all?

I don't know what you mean by this question because the government already allows gambling even though it is not completely legalized but i don't think there will be any difference if the government finally legalize gambling because addicted gamblers will still experience gambling disorder.

[stadus]

I am not sure if gambling addiction has connection with legal or illegal gambling. For me it seems that it does not matter much where to gamble for a person who is very emotional and lack self-control skill. It also does not matter which games to play and number of games played. Because everything depends from character of a gambler. Popularity and accessibility are one of the things that increases addiction rate.

There is always a relation or connection with gambling operations, whether legal or illegal, otherwise the government would no longer regulate casinos.

When they regulate, they do not only require casinos to pay taxes, but also to comply with the rules, like not allowing minors to gamble. Why? Because minors are more prone to gambling addiction. That is the reason why gamblers should be at the right age, so they can decide more maturely.

So if gambling is not regulated, anyone can make advertisements, and that can attract many people to try gambling. Some advertisers even promote gambling like an investment, just to entice newbies.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Well in such states where sports betting is legalized, invariably, other gambling games will also be legalized and as we know, sports betting is not the only form of gambling where we see a large population of people doing it, so if casino games is also allowed, then there will definitely be spike in gambling disorder because after some people have tasted few wins in gambling, it will make them believe that they can keep winning forever and that's what results to them having the disorder. Also, the popularity of online gambling has also contributed to this spike.

[danherbias07]

No. I don't think so.

I believe sports betting can easily be handled. A sports fan has a rare chance to know more than 3 sports. I believe he can be good at 2, but never with three unless that is his job, like those analysts on ESPN.
Now, there's always a hiatus when it comes to American sports. Most of them have months of rest before the season starts again. If you are a person who is just following one sport, you will definitely have a rest.
Regarding the daily games, well, it will all depend on the sports bettor, too. In my case, I don't really go for matches that I don't like, and I don't want to watch, so I only bet on games that are entertaining for me.

[Cointxz]

So what does that mean? Are they saying that if the government allows gambling, it will result in more addiction compared to not legalizing it at all?

There’s a lot of factor to be considered and the angle I’m seeing is due to green signal to play legally, those bettor that betting discreetly in online casino which government doesn’t regulate is now betting on those regulated casino that’s why they are now being recorded when they show addiction unlike before when gambling is not legal.

Also, there’s a possibility that those doesn’t place bet because it’s illegal now placing bet and can’t control gambling addiction.

You might be correct on your assumption here.

[Mhizlove]

So what does the research say, is sports betting more harmful than casino games like slots?

They are all the same if discussing about losses, but some people deceive themselves to a thinking that sport betting is a skilled thing which can let them win money than to lose money. That is very far from what is happening because this is how some people got addicted.

Casinos or sports, addiction or thinking you can make money from any or both is not good.

I will say that confidence can easily turn into over confidence in gambling because even those that don't have experience can still lose because alot of things do happen when no one can predict. That's why self discipline and knowing When for break or to stop is much more important than believing that skill alone will guarantee profit. So for me I will say that gambling should just remain as an entertainment and not something to depend on when solving financial problems.

[Showlove01]

That is not what the report says about sportsbetting,,, And no, legalising doesn't automatically spread it. Access does. But better regulated access than unregulated. I have seen what it can do, shouldn't come as any surprise to any of us. But there is I feel a grey line that says you can still be responsible as a business and not resort to predatory practices.

You are right legalizing gambling is not a bad thing and it can not make people to approach gambling in a way that is not good because the consequences will be very bad. Funny enough everyone knows what gambling can do to someone if not approach wisely and properly. However, I will highly advise folks without emotional control to stay off from gambling because they can easily fall prey for it especially if they have a near mis because this majorly gives gamblers mind and hope that they are close to winning.

[pawanjain]

Whether it be sports betting or casino games, both has the capability to increase gambling addiction among the people.
If a state has legalized sports betting then it becomes obvious that sports betting will be increased in that region.
Hence it will spike the number of people with gambling disorders in that region.
If they would have legalized gambling in general then it would have showed better stats on whether the spike is for sports betting alone or casino games too.

[Johnlomape]

When gambling is illegal in a country people naturally have a fear of doing that but when gambling is completely legalized a common person will gamble freely knowingly or unknowingly and as a result the amount of addiction can increase. However, I think that gambling addiction is completely dependent on the mentality or activities of the gambler, no one else is responsible for it. Before starting gambling, it is very important for us to gain the right knowledge, as a result of which we will be able to control greed, maintain self-control over ourselves and be saved from the destruction of gambling.

Yeah, its depends on the choice of one to be addicted to gambling or not, because almost every one who gambles knows what gambling is and how its operated, even if they don't have any idea, they can ask questions and make some research to with the answers they want and can make better choices through their research, and if they think other people will take responsibility of their actions won't be possible, as they will be responsible for their own choices. Even if the game is legalized, they should also make use of their brain and do the needful.

Many of us that are gamblers don't see gambling addiction as a disorder that is already in the category of mental disorders.
Those means that gamblers that don't have the self control may have been in a critical situation that need rehabilitation.
The more we make research about gambling, the more we understand what are those things that could be attached to the way we gamble. Many are many people that need to take care of themselves because of the addiction they must have found themselves so they don't have to become worse in the gambling addiction.

[Hatchy]

So what does the research say, is sports betting more harmful than casino games like slots?

I get that sports betting people are more confident because they believe in their skills, so they tend to put bigger money on it. Compared to slots, some people only use it as a pastime and they do not really bet big.

So what does that mean? Are they saying that if the government allows gambling, it will result in more addiction compared to not legalizing it at all?

They might be right in a way though but I don't think it's directed only to sport bettors. Both casino gamblers gets addicted when they don't take responsibility over their gambling actions. What's worse when they are in a country with approved gambling, making it legal. They won't be shy, they would want to gamble regardless of what their current conditions are or what anyone begins to say about their gambling habits. The fact is that in most countries where gambling is made legal, the government are more interested in what or how much revenue gambling activities in the country would generate for them. Gamblers would Want to spend more time on casino be they are free to and that's why they become addicted..

[Pmalek]

Such results are expected. If you legalize a certain activity, it becomes widely available to the general public. There is no longer a law and a hindrance for you to try it out. Given that some people are more prone to addiction than others, it becomes easier for them to experience just the thing that might become the reason for their downfall. It doesn't matter if it's gambling, prostitution, or drugs. If it's starring you in the face, you are more likely to consume it and lose yourself in it than being forced to hide and act like a criminal to satisfy certain urges.

[Maslate]

That is not what the report says about sportsbetting,,, And no, legalising doesn't automatically spread it. Access does. But better regulated access than unregulated. I have seen what it can do, shouldn't come as any surprise to any of us. But there is I feel a grey line that says you can still be responsible as a business and not resort to predatory practices.

Being responsible on the business side has a basis. Whatever the rules say, the regulators set them, and that is what casinos have to follow for them to be considered responsible as well. So everyone involved, regulators, casinos, and gamblers, all have rules to follow. If we do not follow them, that is where the problem starts.

But addiction can still happen even if there are rules in place. What proper regulation does is only minimize the problem, not totally eradicate it.

[Pandu Geddon]

So what does that mean? Are they saying that if the government allows gambling, it will result in more addiction compared to not legalizing it at all?

There's a big chance gamblers can get addicted because gambling is legal. But what about government oversight? Are the gamblers who are said to be boosting the numbers old gamblers or new ones? 
Whether gambling is legalized or not, gamblers can still access it. The government also can't shirk responsibility in situations like this. They have to take preventive measures.

[Frankolala]

Just don't put your mindset on making profit from gambling and you will be free from addiction if only, you gamble responsible. I see both sportbet and casino games as the same thing and you have the high chance of getting addicted if you don't have self control over your gambling activities. Maybe, gamblers using the casino plays more responsible than sport bettors.

[Dunamisx]

I don't think legalizing gambling for people to enjoy being entertained with spike up gambling disorder or any abnormal behavior with gamblast, people have their own kind of way they play games and as well determine for themselves what they wanted to do, this is mostly not about the fault coming from gambling but those that are found with strange behaviors to gambling.

[noorman0]

If the government banned gambling, there would be fewer public records for statistics, then the addiction rate would probably be closer to 0. I'm not sure if they time-sampled the data selectively or properly included all medical records, given that this is when the world cup euphoria is in full swing. If there is a world sporting event, the level of gambling disorder is easier to increase than usual days.