Basepoker.com is a scam.

[deletedwindows]

b]What happened:: [/b] I played on Basepoker.com for a few days, most recently they are refusing to pay out my withdrawal of $350 (even tho they claim they have instant withdrawals up to 100k). They have blocked all communications and I have not been able to talk to them or get an explenation.

PS: I completed full KYC (even tho they mention they never KYC anyone and had 2000+ users and not a single one has been hit by AML, somehow I did)

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3641312

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5507413.new#new
Amount Scammed: $350
Payment Method: USDT Polygon
Proof of Payment: N/A
PM/Chat Logs:
https://ibb.co/Rpr17SQL
https://ibb.co/204DYYh1

my full bet history: https://pastebin.com/raw/8j5nWXMt

Additional Notes:

[acroman08]

Looks like they have been inactive for a while now. I don't expect them to log in here in the forum to address your case. I suggest posting this complaint on casino.guru, basepoker.com is listed there, and they might be able to contact someone from their team and mediate your issue with the casino.

[deletedwindows]

Looks like they have been inactive for a while now. I don't expect them to log in here in the forum to address your case. I suggest posting this complaint on casino.guru, basepoker.com is listed there, and they might be able to contact someone from their team and mediate your issue with the casino.

seems like hes operating under https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3748263 now

[acroman08]

seems like hes operating under https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3748263 now

You can try sending them a PM, or I'll try sending them a PM since they might still have their "Allow newbies to send you PMs" disabled.

I'd still suggest posting a complaint on casino.guru. The new account they are using hasn't been online for almost two months now, so I am not sure if they'll respond to your case.

[Rikafip]

PS: I completed full KYC (even tho they mention they never KYC anyone and had 2000+ users and not a single one has been hit by AML, somehow I did)

I have no idea where did they say that they will never ask for KYC, but something like that is not mentioned on their TOS. On the contrary, they do mention that they can ask you to go through it.

8.1 We may conduct identity, age, address, payment-method, wallet, source-of-funds, source-of-wealth, fraud-prevention, AML, sanctions, responsible-gaming, and security checks.

[Nathrixxx]

You should know that one of the reason why it is best to recommend using a reputable gambling casino is for you to be sure of their services and functionality, we are reputation and trust as well as how they process their withdrawal without delay or denial, first of all, I would have thought of you violating some of their rules may be by using VPN or multi accounting and so on, but since you made some clear evidence to what is happening, I think you will also be required escalation into your case by some reputable member who can deeply look into the situation.

[hosemary]

I have no idea where did they say that they will never ask for KYC, but something like that is not mentioned on their TOS. On the contrary, they do mention that they can ask you to go through it.

See their home page.




basepoker also said that users could use their service without KYC. However, they never claimed that this policy would remain in place forever.
See the following posts.

You can currently play poker without KYC at Basepoker.com.

But I'm quite happy that there is one poker site left that doesn't force KYC. Non-KYC poker experience is what I love to provide to our players.

We'll enforce KYC to certain countries on freerolls only to avoid multi-accounting abusers in the future.

We want to stay NO KYC poker site as long as we can.

[JeromeTash]

I think you should wait a bit more than 24 hours and see if their withdrawal will be processed. I believe you requested the withdrawal less than 24 hours ago, correct?
That being said, the support should be able to explain to you what is going on.
Also avoid using small, less popular casinos where, if issues arise, you don't get proper help by the support.

[Rikafip]

See the following posts.

So they were then just full of shit. Actively lying to their customers, while saying something entirely different in their TOS in order to cover their ass.

I wonder how none of their users went through TOS and asked them about that discrepancy.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

So they were then just full of shit. Actively lying to their customers, while saying something entirely different in their TOS in order to cover their ass.

I wonder how none of their users went through TOS and asked them about that discrepancy.

That's what many gamling sites do, especially here. I have read "no KYC required" so many time but when you look at the fine print in the TOS you pretty much ALWAYS find wording like "we can ask for KYC at any time". They love to throw those words around but if you are smart you always check the TOS first if what they say it's true.

Upon request of AML investigation, we're obligated to follow the rule. So far, over 19,000 signup users at Basepoker have never done KYC. Although we have KYC feature built inside Basepoker.com, our KYC system has to do with blocking freeroll abusers. We want to stay NO KYC poker site as long as we can.

I never said that i wouldn't understand why you want to keep it there, but i am not sure how your reply defends the "NO KYC" sign, because it sounds like it should say "NO KYC UNTILL WE NEED TO LEGALLY ASK FOR IT". Which basically means no kyc for some people yet.

It's still misleading advertising. Many casinos still have non-kyc gamblers, but they don't advertise themselves with NO KYC sign. Or don't you see how misleading that is?

You can currently play poker without KYC at Basepoker.com. That's it. I don't know any poker site where I can play poker without KYC.
You may not be happy with our T&S and you're entitled to think we're misleading.
But I'm quite happy that there is one poker site left that doesn't force KYC. Non-KYC poker experience is what I love to provide to our players.

This sums it up prett well. Funny how they claim to be the only KYC free poker site while in 5-6 years I have not once being asked for KYC at SWC for exmple.

[deletedwindows]

I think you should wait a bit more than 24 hours and see if their withdrawal will be processed. I believe you requested the withdrawal less than 24 hours ago, correct?
That being said, the support should be able to explain to you what is going on.
Also avoid using small, less popular casinos where, if issues arise, you don't get proper help by the support.

Yeah, It's been around 18 hours, I wouldn't ring the alarm bells this early but the fact that they left me on read and blocked me on telegram is a really big red flag and is why I opened this accusation. They have been ignoring me for the entire time.

[Zwei]

OP, did you play with your own money, or were the funds you are trying to withdraw from a freeroll?
did they ask you for AML documents or did they only ask for KYC?

See the following posts.

So they were then just full of shit. Actively lying to their customers, while saying something entirely different in their TOS in order to cover their ass.

that's the reality in the space right now, the no KYC marketing talk would say something, then the terms would contradict it.

I wonder how none of their users went through TOS and asked them about that discrepancy.

someone actually did, and this was their answer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5507413.msg65785737#msg65785737

[deletedwindows]

OP, did you play with your own money, or were the funds you are trying to withdraw from a freeroll?
did they ask you for AML documents or did they only ask for KYC?

I never claimed any bonuses or freeroll (i opted out of every bonus they had, so i never received any) as I knew these cause issues, I deposited my own USDT and only played with that. I was asked for KYC for a previous withdrawal, completed it and received my withdrawal. However this last withdrawal they seem to not pay out.


They have previously processed withdrawals bigger than $350 however when looking at their hot wallet it really seems ever player on the site is a bot (there's 100+ users daily playing the $1000+ buyin tables, yet there is no blockchain data to back this up, for example on Solana they only have 200 USDT, same for most chains besides Polygon which holds around 44,000 USDT which is just my activity, no other withdrawals) and I am just the only real player as I am the only one who actually withdraws. I've checked their hot wallet on the BSC, ERC20, Polygon & Solana chain. Literally just 4 days of transaction that only belong to me, prior to me playing on the site there was very little activity with very small withdrawals. I was in profit on the site so my guess is that they were waiting for me to lose more money but after making a decent amount of profit just decided to not pay me out anymore.

Someone actually did, and this was their answer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5507413.msg65785737#msg65785737

I went through their thread before playing and I also read that one, funny enough they say:
"over 19,000 signup users at Basepoker have never done KYC"

I feel like this is one big lie, why would I be the first out of 19000+ sign ups to be forced to kyc?  

[Zwei]

They have previously processed withdrawals bigger than $350 however when looking at their hot wallet it really seems ever player on the site is a bot (there's 100+ users daily playing the $1000+ buyin tables, yet there is no blockchain data to back this up, for example on Solana they only have 200 USDT, same for most chains besides Polygon which holds around 44,000 USDT which is just my activity, no other withdrawals) and I am just the only real player as I am the only one who actually withdraws. I've checked their hot wallet on the BSC, ERC20, Polygon & Solana chain. Literally just 4 days of transaction that only belong to me, prior to me playing on the site there was very little activity with very small withdrawals. I was in profit on the site so my guess is that they were waiting for me to lose more money but after making a decent amount of profit just decided to not pay me out anymore.

i was going to suggest checking that, to see if maybe their hot wallet is empty, but that seems not to be the case.
can you post the hot wallet address here for us to check?

Someone actually did, and this was their answer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5507413.msg65785737#msg65785737

I went through their thread before playing and I also read that one, funny enough they say:
"over 19,000 signup users at Basepoker have never done KYC"

I feel like this is one big lie, why would I be the first out of 19000+ sign ups to be forced to kyc? 

i'm inclined to believe that. they claimed to only ask for KYC in case of AML or freeroll abuse (which is why i asked you about it), so they probably lied about that as well.

[deletedwindows]

i was going to suggest checking that, to see if maybe their hot wallet is empty, but that seems not to be the case.
can you post the hot wallet address here for us to check?

https://polygonscan.com/address/0x68879d40eca90b9aecfb1b610c10f90b366d1d4ce
https://etherscan.io/address/0x68879d40eca90b9aEcFB1B610c10f90b366D1D4c
https://bscscan.com/address/0x68879d40eca90b9aEcFB1B610c10f90b366D1D4c
https://basescan.org/address/0x68879d40eca90b9aEcFB1B610c10f90b366D1D4c
https://explorer.solana.com/address/3Vz9iBXEDak7Q35w3nzzj1mPFMSnH6q18TS5vRzYYSwn

Only the polygon chain has a significant amount which doesn't seem to come from deposit but just from their personal money.

[basepoker]

Response to the accusation against Basepoker

The user’s version of events is incomplete and misleading.

Basepoker recently deployed new games, and shortly after launch, we identified a technical issue affecting some games around the daily seed release. Specifically, certain games did not auto-cashout correctly after the daily seed changed.

Our records show that this user repeatedly started games at approximately 23:58 UTC, shortly before the daily seed release at 00:00 UTC, and then completed those games around 30 minutes later with unusually large gains. These games normally take approximately 30–40 seconds to complete, so this repeated timing pattern was highly abnormal.

After profiting from this issue, the user withdrew his balance immediately. He then deposited again and attempted to repeat the same pattern the following day. By that time, we had already fixed the issue.

After realizing the behavior no longer worked, he contacted our support team and wrote:

> “Hello, for some reason I couldn't keep going on Game #1333. I was at 10x on $25 and I was forced to cashout. Is this new update?”

https://ibb.co/5xTkvVGL

This message is important because it shows that the user noticed the exact behavior that had changed after the fix.

Only after the issue was patched did the user attempt to withdraw the remaining balance, at which point the withdrawal was frozen pending review.

This is not a case where a player simply deposited funds and was denied a withdrawal without explanation. The account history shows a repeated pattern of exploiting a technical issue around the daily seed release.

The user’s overall account history is as follows:

Total deposits: $2,261.00 USD
Total withdrawals already paid: $3,463.51 USD
Current total profit: $1,202.51 USD

A significant portion of the deposits were re-deposits made from funds previously gained through the exploit.

Therefore, the claim that Basepoker “scammed” this user is false. He has already withdrawn more than he deposited and is currently in profit by over **$1,200**.

We understand that Bitcointalk users are cautious and often analyze on-chain data carefully. However, on-chain data alone does not show the full internal account activity, including game timing, seed release timing, exploit behavior, deposits, withdrawals, and support communication.

We take withdrawals, fairness, and platform integrity seriously. However, when a user repeatedly exploits a technical issue and then presents the situation as a scam after the issue is fixed, we have a responsibility to investigate and protect the platform and other players.

We are prepared to provide supporting records, including game IDs, timestamps, seed release timing, deposit/withdrawal history, and the user’s support message, to trusted forum moderators or reputable community members if required.

We hope this clarifies the situation.



Withdrawal $120 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x83ec286ba4c5ee4ea3d870ea979a4ea5f66690ccaf774bf540cc5619ed92ce7b
Withdrawal $200.55 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xad3bf44a70419a8c997a2b5b1a007eb24a31a161c495af85eaf9a749f4bc6b82
Withdrawal $501.22 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x9b0b88678e05bd86cd678b5ec730c16bafcf8d8cb00c5a7e71bc939198540440
Withdrawal $700.05 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xe0c3a44a7790c6fd0932cd3272a0ab87614ac07e7a759c17bc2fc92fb30277d4
Withdrawal $301.31 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x9b49903771ea739167b7a489c0b05f857450e5c423c23ccfe9d7acef0f10e004
Withdrawal $1100 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x7332e98a3adba910eb50e3bd032910d72e9ce5135c030a636b7c5bac364f96de
Withdrawal $180 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xa232818240d194babccdfb31316401d0a6a894f2a95d13b441b7f49694b4bc01
WIthdrawal $100 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xe6670c3d607c5575f0418939b7fbf885a80230a12f9a9d38be6f1671b42530c1
Withdrawal $200.92 => https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc2c148dca01c815a46116773e1cbe2e3fb3223f120e26e1ebb5218d7949d0070
Withdrawal $45.02 => https://explorer.solana.com/tx/9pB1xdv6aCLAJKy4nL82r1aXDc1tMQ7APbsJzFESKxuozPDtiyBVj4SdEiTCZ4S6uDvVdnmWTRqLnoYPMRR2zs6
Withdrawal SOL 0.250417  => https://explorer.solana.com/tx/zJMtdZY5zXkXkdPzTC1Zkd4ScBWkVubXcuyLrQkyo4LyUsDYzuWJ8ZaNLLKMTt3TUeXvKLCKV9WVFzvyEokPzXV

[deletedwindows]

Response to the accusation against Basepoker

The user’s version of events is incomplete and misleading.

Basepoker recently deployed new games, and shortly after launch, we identified a technical issue affecting some games around the daily seed release. Specifically, certain games did not auto-cashout correctly after the daily seed changed.

Our records show that this user repeatedly started games at approximately 23:58 UTC, shortly before the daily seed release at 00:00 UTC, and then completed those games around 30 minutes later with unusually large gains. These games normally take approximately 30–40 seconds to complete, so this repeated timing pattern was highly abnormal.

After profiting from this issue, the user withdrew his balance immediately. He then deposited again and attempted to repeat the same pattern the following day. By that time, we had already fixed the issue.

After realizing the behavior no longer worked, he contacted our support team and wrote:

> “Hello, for some reason I couldn't keep going on Game #1333. I was at 10x on $25 and I was forced to cashout. Is this new update?”

https://ibb.co/5xTkvVGL

This message is important because it shows that the user noticed the exact behavior that had changed after the fix.

Only after the issue was patched did the user attempt to withdraw the remaining balance, at which point the withdrawal was frozen pending review.

This is not a case where a player simply deposited funds and was denied a withdrawal without explanation. The account history shows a repeated pattern of exploiting a technical issue around the daily seed release.

The user’s overall account history is as follows:

Total deposits: $2,261.00 USD
Total withdrawals already paid: $3,463.51 USD
Current total profit: $1,202.51 USD

A significant portion of the deposits were re-deposits made from funds previously gained through the exploit.

Therefore, the claim that Basepoker “scammed” this user is false. He has already withdrawn more than he deposited and is currently in profit by over **$1,200**.

We understand that Bitcointalk users are cautious and often analyze on-chain data carefully. However, on-chain data alone does not show the full internal account activity, including game timing, seed release timing, exploit behavior, deposits, withdrawals, and support communication.

We take withdrawals, fairness, and platform integrity seriously. However, when a user repeatedly exploits a technical issue and then presents the situation as a scam after the issue is fixed, we have a responsibility to investigate and protect the platform and other players.

We are prepared to provide supporting records, including game IDs, timestamps, seed release timing, deposit/withdrawal history, and the user’s support message, to trusted forum moderators or reputable community members if required.

We hope this clarifies the situation.



Withdrawal $120 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x83ec286ba4c5ee4ea3d870ea979a4ea5f66690ccaf774bf540cc5619ed92ce7b
Withdrawal $200.55 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xad3bf44a70419a8c997a2b5b1a007eb24a31a161c495af85eaf9a749f4bc6b82
Withdrawal $501.22 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x9b0b88678e05bd86cd678b5ec730c16bafcf8d8cb00c5a7e71bc939198540440
Withdrawal $700.05 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xe0c3a44a7790c6fd0932cd3272a0ab87614ac07e7a759c17bc2fc92fb30277d4
Withdrawal $301.31 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x9b49903771ea739167b7a489c0b05f857450e5c423c23ccfe9d7acef0f10e004
Withdrawal $1100 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x7332e98a3adba910eb50e3bd032910d72e9ce5135c030a636b7c5bac364f96de
Withdrawal $180 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xa232818240d194babccdfb31316401d0a6a894f2a95d13b441b7f49694b4bc01
WIthdrawal $100 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xe6670c3d607c5575f0418939b7fbf885a80230a12f9a9d38be6f1671b42530c1
Withdrawal $200.92 => https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc2c148dca01c815a46116773e1cbe2e3fb3223f120e26e1ebb5218d7949d0070
Withdrawal $45.02 => https://explorer.solana.com/tx/9pB1xdv6aCLAJKy4nL82r1aXDc1tMQ7APbsJzFESKxuozPDtiyBVj4SdEiTCZ4S6uDvVdnmWTRqLnoYPMRR2zs6
Withdrawal SOL 0.250417  => https://explorer.solana.com/tx/zJMtdZY5zXkXkdPzTC1Zkd4ScBWkVubXcuyLrQkyo4LyUsDYzuWJ8ZaNLLKMTt3TUeXvKLCKV9WVFzvyEokPzXV

Alright, I’ll post my bets with timestamps in a few hours. I gambled all throughout the day.
If you’d like to send some logs or evidence to back your claims, be my guest. I give full permission for you to share my complete bet log. I have nothing to hide. I was playing on your site, I admit I have 2 bets right before midnight but this was during an ongoing gambling session and was not something I intentionally did or knew I was doing. I never abused this. I didn’t even know this was possible. What was I supposed to do, stop betting once it hit 2 AM for me?

The reason why I asked why I was forced to cashout was because I always aimed for a high multiplier when I was at a 10x my game was stopped and I was forced to cashout. I would have kept going but I don’t see how this is relevant to the case? I have hit multiple big wins no where close to midnight, what’s your explanation for that?

My last withdrawal was 350 whilst I deposited 550. I felt betrayed that I couldn’t go past the 10x on my bet which led me to withdraw all my funds from the site. Again I don’t see why this is relevant to the case.

If you are unable to send the logs and timestamps, I will share them publicly here.

[deletedwindows]

I've gone back through my complete bet history carefully, and I want to
respond honestly instead of arguing.

I can see the pattern you're pointing to. 2 of my larger wins did land
within a few minutes of the daily resett. I'm not going
to deny what's in my own records, and I shouldn't have reacted the way I did
before I'd properly looked at it. I called it a scam out of frustration at
having my withdrawal frozen with no explanation I understood at the time, and
I get your concern better now.

What I can tell you truthfully is that I did not know a bug existed, and I was
not timing my bets to the seed change. I'm in a UTC+2 timezone, so the reset
falls at 2am my time, and I gamble late at night & my sessions run across
midnight UTC most nights as a result. My history shows me playing continuously
across a spread of games (Blackjack, Mines, Hi-Lo, Limbo, Keno, poker SNGs),
with wins and losses at every other hour too afternoons, evenings, early
hours. That isn't someone watching the clock for a reset; it's someone who
plays late and happened to be mid-session when it rotated.

The support message you quoted is part of that. I asked why I was forced to
cash out at 10x because I genuinely didn't understand why it happened I
always push for a higher multiplier. That was confusion, not confirmation that
an exploit still worked.

I'm not trying to keep money from a bug I didn't know existed. So here's what
I'd propose as a fair resolution:

- Have a neutral moderator or escrow on the forum review the full records
  your server logs and my history.
- I'll forgo any winnings a neutral reviewer attributes to the reset.
- In return, I ask that the rest of my account;  my deposits and winnings from
  normal play unrelated to the reset; be treated fairly, and I'll accept a
  neutral party's accounting of what that comes to.

I'll cooperate fully with verification or anything else you need. I'd rather
settle this fairly and quietly than keep it public, and I'm willing to walk
back the stronger things I said once we're working toward a resolution.

[Rikafip]

someone actually did, and this was their answer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5507413.msg65785737#msg65785737

Interesting wording and answer, because "So far, over 19,000 signup users at Basepoker have never done KYC" doesn't mean that no one had to go through KYC. Its just that 19k+ never had to do it. 

Also, I have no doubt that they will use that "freeroll abuse" thing any time they don't want to pay someoene, because they know that people can do very little to fight that and prove that they weren't breaking any rules whatsoever.

[yahoo62278]

Response to the accusation against Basepoker

The user’s version of events is incomplete and misleading.

Basepoker recently deployed new games, and shortly after launch, we identified a technical issue affecting some games around the daily seed release. Specifically, certain games did not auto-cashout correctly after the daily seed changed.

Our records show that this user repeatedly started games at approximately 23:58 UTC, shortly before the daily seed release at 00:00 UTC, and then completed those games around 30 minutes later with unusually large gains. These games normally take approximately 30–40 seconds to complete, so this repeated timing pattern was highly abnormal.

After profiting from this issue, the user withdrew his balance immediately. He then deposited again and attempted to repeat the same pattern the following day. By that time, we had already fixed the issue.

After realizing the behavior no longer worked, he contacted our support team and wrote:

> “Hello, for some reason I couldn't keep going on Game #1333. I was at 10x on $25 and I was forced to cashout. Is this new update?”

https://ibb.co/5xTkvVGL

This message is important because it shows that the user noticed the exact behavior that had changed after the fix.

Only after the issue was patched did the user attempt to withdraw the remaining balance, at which point the withdrawal was frozen pending review.

This is not a case where a player simply deposited funds and was denied a withdrawal without explanation. The account history shows a repeated pattern of exploiting a technical issue around the daily seed release.

The user’s overall account history is as follows:

Total deposits: $2,261.00 USD
Total withdrawals already paid: $3,463.51 USD
Current total profit: $1,202.51 USD

A significant portion of the deposits were re-deposits made from funds previously gained through the exploit.

Therefore, the claim that Basepoker “scammed” this user is false. He has already withdrawn more than he deposited and is currently in profit by over **$1,200**.

We understand that Bitcointalk users are cautious and often analyze on-chain data carefully. However, on-chain data alone does not show the full internal account activity, including game timing, seed release timing, exploit behavior, deposits, withdrawals, and support communication.

We take withdrawals, fairness, and platform integrity seriously. However, when a user repeatedly exploits a technical issue and then presents the situation as a scam after the issue is fixed, we have a responsibility to investigate and protect the platform and other players.

We are prepared to provide supporting records, including game IDs, timestamps, seed release timing, deposit/withdrawal history, and the user’s support message, to trusted forum moderators or reputable community members if required.

We hope this clarifies the situation.



Withdrawal $120 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x83ec286ba4c5ee4ea3d870ea979a4ea5f66690ccaf774bf540cc5619ed92ce7b
Withdrawal $200.55 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xad3bf44a70419a8c997a2b5b1a007eb24a31a161c495af85eaf9a749f4bc6b82
Withdrawal $501.22 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x9b0b88678e05bd86cd678b5ec730c16bafcf8d8cb00c5a7e71bc939198540440
Withdrawal $700.05 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xe0c3a44a7790c6fd0932cd3272a0ab87614ac07e7a759c17bc2fc92fb30277d4
Withdrawal $301.31 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x9b49903771ea739167b7a489c0b05f857450e5c423c23ccfe9d7acef0f10e004
Withdrawal $1100 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x7332e98a3adba910eb50e3bd032910d72e9ce5135c030a636b7c5bac364f96de
Withdrawal $180 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xa232818240d194babccdfb31316401d0a6a894f2a95d13b441b7f49694b4bc01
WIthdrawal $100 => https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xe6670c3d607c5575f0418939b7fbf885a80230a12f9a9d38be6f1671b42530c1
Withdrawal $200.92 => https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc2c148dca01c815a46116773e1cbe2e3fb3223f120e26e1ebb5218d7949d0070
Withdrawal $45.02 => https://explorer.solana.com/tx/9pB1xdv6aCLAJKy4nL82r1aXDc1tMQ7APbsJzFESKxuozPDtiyBVj4SdEiTCZ4S6uDvVdnmWTRqLnoYPMRR2zs6
Withdrawal SOL 0.250417  => https://explorer.solana.com/tx/zJMtdZY5zXkXkdPzTC1Zkd4ScBWkVubXcuyLrQkyo4LyUsDYzuWJ8ZaNLLKMTt3TUeXvKLCKV9WVFzvyEokPzXV

I appreciate that you guys took the time to make a detailed response to the accusation. I like to see both sides before making a decision even though my decision doesn't add to your conclusion nor change how you might proceed.

Just good to see a site fight for their reputation vs taking other stances.