Failed psychology playing casino originals

[Franklyn-wood]

So why not changing the side? Is it because of not trusting fair play, or is it because of being superstitious, or something else?

You can also agree with me that cases like this does not basically require you to switch phase before you can win the game.
It is still the same psychological uncertainty of outcome being experienced in the sport bets that is being encountered in the dice like that.
Perhaps you can decide to switch side at a time and you will be getting the opposite result and vice versa even in consecutive times.

I still see dice or the throwing of coins as a game of chance just like other casino games like the spins. Being so calculative on the game even cause mental stress with the heavy skips of the mind as the dice or coin rolls.

What gambling needs is technicality and diversity with the application of wisdom, many over act when gambling thinking luck will shine on them. There is no need overreacting about games played, if gambling is not favouring such person he or she needs to back off to avoid addiction to gambling that usually results to respiration, frustration and loss of funds made for other important needs or purpose.

[Hispo]

I would say that is a behavior which is rather related to the gamblers fallacy... I have been there and I have experienced it myself.
One starts playing a casino game (usually original games by some casino of our choice), we start winning and having a good luck streak, and then suddenly we believe there is some kind of dis balance building up in favor of the opposite side of our bets, so we decide to change in order to make our good luck streak to last longer and pocket more money...

Some people do that because they assume the casino "knows" when we have a good luck streak, so they can revert it and make us lose money by favoring the opposite side.
But it is actually all psychology and does not have anything to do with the actual mechanism which drives casino games.
Even if the game is probably fair, I have talked to gambler who still exhibit such behavior.

[tread93]

I guess many of us that occasionally play originals games know this. Lets say on dice you choose a side, at coin flip you choose one side or at limbo you choose a multiplier and then play. Mostly I, and I know many others do the same, stay on the one side and stick with it, often just adjusting the wager if a losing run comes to smaller bets (hopefully).
I for example often had the (I know it's wrong) mindset that when I switch the side my original side would come more, and actually in my history it always does all of the sudden.
I know all the babbling about “provably fair” and so on, yet that’s my personal experience.

So why not changing the side? Is it because of not trusting fair play, or is it because of being superstitious, or something else?

You know what, for the longest time about half way through I realize that I misread and what I did read was " I guess many of us that occasionally play ordinals games know this." And I thought to myself casino ordinals? What in the world is that. But then I re-read it and realized I read it wrong and its not ordinals games or casino ordinals its just original games LOL. Now I wonder if there are actually any type of casino related ordinals betting? lol. Probably not. But to comment on the post for real, usually in original dice games I do like to stay on the same side I guess you could call it being superstition or something but I call it being lucky.

[alegotardo]

I guess many of us that occasionally play originals games know this. Lets say on dice you choose a side, at coin flip you choose one side or at limbo you choose a multiplier and then play. Mostly I, and I know many others do the same, stay on the one side and stick with it, often just adjusting the wager if a losing run comes to smaller bets (hopefully).
I for example often had the (I know it's wrong) mindset that when I switch the side my original side would come more, and actually in my history it always does all of the sudden.
I know all the babbling about “provably fair” and so on, yet that’s my personal experience.

So why not changing the side? Is it because of not trusting fair play, or is it because of being superstitious, or something else?

My way to think in this is always the same: I have already lost of dozens times by choosing this side, so it can not be possible that the odds are so unfair to me and keep working against me. The next outcome need to be different.
Then come the second thought that keeps me to bet in the same side: what if I switch after so many bets and the outcome finally change? I would never forgive myself for not sticking with it a little longer.

In my case, these two thoughts are what make me stick with the same bet over and over again. I am the type of person who would rather stop play or lose my entire bankroll than switch sides and abandon what that I believe. That is also why, when it comes to sports betting, I place my bets in advance and never change them before or during the game. I stick with them until the very end... I never change them and I never cash out early, I always go to all or nothing!

[DubemIfedigbo001]

I do change sides occasionally as my instincts drives me but I don't auto bet. In fact I don't enjoy the auto bet feature because it's less engaging. More like the system having the fun on my behalf. I like doing the thinking, the selection and the staking by myself, the mental engagement and watching results unfold is a big thrill for me. Sticking to a side can bring wins but most times I think my being rigid brings about my loss, so I switch sides as the spirit leads.