Genius move!Saylor plans to sell Bitcoins to fund operations on buying Bitcoins!

[Cryptomultiplier]

I don't think Michael Saylor needs Bitcoin at all for his financial scheme. It's too much trouble... 🙋He could simply raise money by issuing bonds and then issue shares of his company. By issuing shares, he could pay off the bond debt. He could spend the rest of the money on yachts and prostitutes. It would be a great business venture. 🙋

As for Bitcoin, in my opinion, the best solution would be to give it away for free to Bitcointalk forum members. I have nothing against Michael Saylor personally. However, I often criticize him, but if he makes such a decision, I will praise him in every tenth forum post. I commit to it! 💁

I just think every big pocket investor that is loud about their plans is just a scam marketing tactic genius, because they are all in for the profit and their interest rather than the claim of being die hard fans of the Bitcoin market seasons and to hold for future returns, is mere ruse to their own amusement.

This goes to show how leveraged treasury can't overtake the inherent mathematical reality of cash liabilities without an organic operational return while on the other hand, it is an evolution of a well manipulated economic system for the company who does as it pleases to fulfill their pockets and while the crowd of fans dance to their tune, they still have stacked loads of the coins sitting, while planning for a next move to support their interest position in the market.

[BlackHatCoiner]

It could work if the price of Bitcoin skyrockets, but given what happened in 2025 and so far in 2026, it looks like the era of big returns on Bitcoin is already over—which is why Saylor changed his initial assumption of a 30% CAGR.

What is considered a "skyrocketing?" Bitcoin might give less returns overtime, but it still gave a pretty decent return last time, for a $1 trillion asset. It went up by around 8x. If something milder repeats, say 5x, it's still going at around $250k.

And maybe the whole cycle theory is finally invalidated in the next years. Gold, which is orders of magnitude more liquid than bitcoin, had a nice run in the last 20 years, and in 2025 it spiked like a memecoin. I can imagine a similar hyper-bull run for Bitcoin at some future year.

[Mhizlove]

Although yesterday, the market reacted positively to this measure, but what the market does in a single day doesn’t mean anything. It’s probably just retail investors buying in, thinking this is a brilliant move.

The market did not reacted positively to it yesterday but neither did the market reacted to it negatively. If the company has started selling bitcoin, that can be felt in the market but the company has not yet started selling the bitcoin. The first time the company sold very small amount of bitcoin, it is possible that they used it for testing and to let people know that they can buy and sell bitcoin at anytime. Some people were thinking the company will only be buying bitcoin but which is not possible.

Because a company start selling Bitcoin that do not always mean that the marketust react immediately. You see daily trading volume is very high and bitcoin market don't grow well, so with little or gradual sales can hardly make any visible difference. The most important thing here is to watch if the company will continue selling as time goes on or if it's just a one of decision. Because only one transaction alone do not always tells the full story.

[Free Market Capitalist]

What is considered a "skyrocketing?" Bitcoin might give less returns overtime, but it still gave a pretty decent return last time, for a $1 trillion asset. It went up by around 8x. If something milder repeats, say 5x, it's still going at around $250k.

And maybe the whole cycle theory is finally invalidated in the next years. Gold, which is orders of magnitude more liquid than bitcoin, had a nice run in the last 20 years, and in 2025 it spiked like a memecoin. I can imagine a similar hyper-bull run for Bitcoin at some future year.

That’s the problem. First, Saylor’s model could succeed if the price of Bitcoin rises at least 5X, but it could also end up with the price falling 80% or 90% from its highs, retail STRC holders start panic selling, and as a result, the price goes to hell—for both STRC and MSTR. And if that happens, let’s see who’s brave enough to buy shares from Saylor again.

Since we’re using gold as a model, we have to remember that the price of gold didn’t hit a new high between 1980 and 2008 or so. Saylor’s model isn’t going to withstand that.

I believe the price of Bitcoin will continue to rise, but once it has matured to a certain extent, I can see the price going through a cycle or two without reaching new highs—and Saylor’s model won’t hold up to that.

[Fortify]

You have to admit, the former dotcom bubble scammer is a genius!
Charles Ponzi and Bernie Madoff are probably spinning in their graves in jealousy, seeing this 7D chess move!

https://www.strategy.com/press/strategy-announces-digital-credit-capital-framework_06-29-2026

Not only has he bought high to sell low, but right now he is planning on selling cheaper the assets he bought with loaned money for which he has to pay interest on!

At this point, I'm just curious, is there anyone left in the asslicking camp that still defends this as a genius strategy from the inventor of the perpetuum money printing machine that magically only prints liabilities?
Is there anyone left in the cult that would still find a way to defend this as a genius move or has reality finally hit hard enough?

It looks like we could be in a slow burn down scenario, there is a bit more noise these days about having to take action against quantum computing and if funds start taking notes of such a risk then it can be hard for them to justify it later on. Maybe the whole Bitcoin model will get changed but who knows if that is for the best and it would potentially be decided by the whales who have their own self interests. I don't think it was ever a very good idea to have one company centralizing so many bitcoins because it can cause an implosion and undermines the whole idea of being decentralized if so much financial risk is stored in a single place. Even if there aren't any bitcoin driven shocks, shocks from and against this company (like being hacked for example) could cause crippling effects.

[dezoel]

A company buys 800k+ bitcoins, and they are being dragged through the dirt because they sold 3500 of it . Makes no sense to me, there is no situation that we should be considering this as a good smart move. I get it, I mean you do not want to see anyone sell bitcoin and that is why you are doing what you are doing.

But at the moment we should not be considering this as that much of a dick move, we are overreacting for it. I think we should be considering how this could be just a normal move.

[WillyAp]

How are you sure it wasn't the coins that were bought above $100K that was bought.

hahahaha really? Why would he sell his high priced items when low priced Items are readily available?

[AakZaki]

A company buys 800k+ bitcoins, and they are being dragged through the dirt because they sold 3500 of it . Makes no sense to me, there is no situation that we should be considering this as a good smart move. I get it, I mean you do not want to see anyone sell bitcoin and that is why you are doing what you are doing.

Are you sure saying it's a smart move? even with the losses realized in the past month which reached $15,717,363.
I think you belong to this MSTR sect as the OP said. Lol

The so-called Smart Steps in Investment or Trade minimize losses, not allow losses to be up to tens of millions of USD. and even miss the ATH that has already occurred in two cycles.

This is precisely where the foolishness lies, instead of wanting to get as much profit as possible, it is the losses and floating losses that are experienced.
I can't stop thinking about what kind of investment is this? which should be When selling it at ATH they will earn money that may be incalculable.

[WillyAp]

This is precisely where the foolishness lies, instead of wanting to get as much profit as possible, it is the losses and floating losses that are experienced.
I can't stop thinking about what kind of investment is this? which should be When selling it at ATH they will earn money that may be incalculable.

getting as much as possible is the worst tactic applied in business.
Business trying to get most out their customers usually loose their customer base

M. Saylor first bought Bitcoin in August 2020, when his company, MicroStrategy, invested $250 million in the cryptocurrency. This marked the beginning of the company's significant investment strategy in Bitcoin

source https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/michael-saylor-a-history-of-his-relationship-with-btc

Price tag BTC 2020

The average closing price for Bitcoin (BTC) in 2020 was $11,116.38.

source https://www.statmuse.com/money/ask/bitcoin-price-chart-by-month-2020

sounds like a healthy business strategy from strategy