Everyone in this thread has landed on basically the same answer, separate the money, DCA with what's actually spare, keep an emergency fund untouched. That advice is correct. But here's what I actually saw play out for years on a brokerage desk: most of the people who ended up selling at the worst possible moment never had an emergency fund in the first place, they bought with money that was already spoken for and called it "long term" because that's what they wanted to believe. Some did have the fund and still had to sell anyway, because life doesn't check your portfolio before it throws something at you, and that's not a planning failure, that's just life. DCA is still the right call either way. It's the only strategy that doesn't require you to guess right about timing, and it's the only one that survives contact with real emergencies, planned or not. The cash flow discipline everyone's talking about here is the whole game. Most people nod along with it and never actually build it, because building it is boring and buying the dip isn't.
I do agree with this.
Thank you for sharing this for brokerage POV. With some reasons, many people just following the trends to having a BTC without deeply understanding the risk and benefit on it. Maybe for them who just being FOMO, just decide to buy the BTC with uncalculated amount that become their own risk. Then who know DCA method from beginning if the investors didn’t learn about this cryptocurrency?
I do agree DCA is a good method for now to being consistently buying a BTC in any price with calculated percentage decide from beginning. In the end, you still having a BTC and that is a good move, also by implementing DCA you also won’t blame the fluctuation of the price as you are being consistent and will not harm you. You will know when to sell it and get a good profit as you expected on this.