@Geobees,
You wanted a comparison and brought up market caps and volumes? Let's talk numbers and facts then.
You call my project out, but let’s look at your track record with BC2 and your previous tokens. Launching consecutive coins, abandoning them when the difficulty adjustment or network stalls, and then spinning up a brand new ticker to collect fresh funds from people's pockets is a pattern everyone in this space can see through. How much did you pull from people on BC2 before it froze and miners/buyers got left holding the bag?
Instead of spending over $2,000 on NonKYC listings and hyping up a new token to pump the price for quick cash, maybe you should have actually fixed and maintained the protocol you already built instead of treating serial coin-launching as a business model.
BTGS is community funded from day one. We don't farm thousands of dollars from unsuspecting users' pockets to chase continuous exchange listings with empty promises of 5-figure prices just to disappear later.
I wasn't even comparing projects when I left my initial comment I was just stating a neutral observation. But since you insisted on comparing: my project is standing strong at 6 months old, driven by its community, not by serial pre-planned cash grabs
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to entertain the audience about you.
For context: this individual was lurking across all three of our Discord servers (BC2, CapStash, KV5) attempting to recruit from our established communities. He was banned from all three. The "neutral observation" and subsequent vitriol make a lot more sense now.
Although isn't the right place to talk about BC2, I would like to straighten up a couple things...
1. -BC2 is the only successful Bitcoin relaunch in history so far. Longevity? Market Cap? Community members? Infrastructure? Ecosystem?
The numbers says so - because every other attempt ended in a death spiral...unless you know something I don't.
2. -How is BC2 "abandoned" -with a core team of 6 active developers next to me- while maintaining a larger and more decentralized node network than the original Bitcoin itself?
BC2 node network as of today:49,504 listening nodes |
226 full relay nodes |
2,371,105 active links
For context — Bitcoin has
~23,000–25,000 reachable nodes
after 17 years.
BC2 has 2x more. At 1 year old. Grown from 1 full-relay node at genesis to 226 as per today.
All of this during the peak of the worst bear market in recent memory — BTC down over 50% from its highs. This is pure organic growth at its best as far as I know!
The BC2 community isn't celebrating with press releases and announcements here and there...this is what "silent work" looks like when people actually care about the technology instead of the price.
So..."abandoned" is an interesting word choice.
The evolution from BC2 → CapStash → KV5 is documented, public, and principled.
As for BTGS we wish them luck, they need it.
End of transmission-----
