Degen Casino Selective Scamming (514 USDT confiscated)

[Free Market Capitalist]

Agreeing to an ADR process does not mean a player loses the right to publicly discuss the outcome, especially when similar cases under the same automated flags resulted in completely different decisions. Transparency, I believe, is standard practice on this forum.

Right. I agree on that up to a point.

The arbitrator may have made a factual error in the decision (such as a calculation error, which can be easily verified), so in that case it is logical to further discuss about it, and of course, other aspects of the decision can be discussed in a forum like this one—especially in this section.

What I don't see the logic in is insisting over and over again that you're right once a ruling has gone against you. holydarkness has long been helping forum members with their disputes with casinos. In many cases, he has helped them recover the money they were claiming, which is why many of us believe he is impartial enough to serve as an arbitrator in these matters.

[Shishir99]

When a casino returns the deposit, of course I would say that they are not scammers.

Returning a player’s own deposit after voiding the winnings is not a gesture of goodwill. It is simply returning the player’s capital. The disputed amount was the 513.98 USDT profit.

It depends on whether the player is guilty of wrongdoing.
As a player, you may scream and say that you did not do anything wrong; you did not violate their rules. We never know if you are telling the truth or if you are telling part of the story that just makes you look like a victim. In case of a violation, it is considered a gesture of goodwill. But I won't argue with you here because there is no point in it. I am not from the casino, nor do I know what rules you violated. I just shared my own opinion about it, and you may not like it.