hypocrisy...?

[libert19]

So I have observed this phenomena on the forum where signatures campaigners are often condemned (don't think it's right word tho) while bounty managers who also get the work same way as bounty participants do but are still seen in positive light.

I see this as hypocrisy. What do you think?

[Odohu]

So I have observed this phenomena on the forum where signatures campaigners are often condemned (don't think it's right word tho) while bounty managers who also get the work same way as bounty participants do but are still seen in positive light.

I see this as hypocricy. What do you think?

I have not seen those who openly condemn signature campaign on the forum, what I have seen are people condemning people for farming merits in a bid to getting enrolled in a signature and people spamming the forum to meet up signature campaign post quota. You will agree with me that these two scenarios reduces the quality of posts and engagement in the forum. Maybe you are mistaken these people who speak up against these negative forces for signature campaign critics.

[icopress]

Please stop creating threads in Meta for any reason.

You've done this nine times in just over a month.

[_act_]

What people against that I know of are spamming, plagiarism, posting of low value not useful posts, sending merits to your alts, joining the same campaign with alts after it is in the campaign rules that alts are not allowed and cheating in contests. Signature campaigns that are condemned might later be taken down if no changes are made and if proves are valid for accepting spammers and making the forum something else. Signature campaigns are not condemned generally.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I see this as hypocricy. What do you think?

I have a question for the OP. Where do you regularly get these questions from? Is it possible to slow down with various unnecessary topics that do not lead to any solution? Like this topic, all of your early topics lately remind me of that child who tests his parents' patience to the point of possible disobedience and, as a result, receives a good punishment. Many people have already called you a troll for your one-line themes; however, this in no way sobers you up. Can this be called some kind of seasonal exacerbation?

A question for both the OP and everyone: What if everyone behaves on the forum as if they have some kind of privileges and litters the meta with all sorts of junk? Why don't these topics just get deleted? Does the forum really need this?

Has anyone who worries about spam ever complained about such topics?

[GeorgeJohn]

So I have observed this phenomena on the forum where signatures campaigners are often condemned (don't think it's right word tho) while bounty managers who also get the work same way as bounty participants do but are still seen in positive light.

I see this as hypocricy. What do you think?

You have to give us instance or proof were other signatures campaigners or participants condenm others..I have been in the forum for six years but I have not experience something of such kind, before participants of different signatures campaign talks about other campaigns nagetively, they most be a ongoing accusations launched against them in accusations section..

Signatures campaigns in the forum have what we call a " ecological relationship of animals" and they fall in specific of mutualism " in which both the campaigns in the forum benefit..i want to let you all the campaigns have different mission or goals why they're in the forum...

[Free Market Capitalist]

I see this as hypocricy. What do you think?

What I think when I read your posts is that you're illiterate and lazy. With all the tools available today, doesn't it occur to you to check what you write? Especially whatever you put in the title. Then you wonder why people don't give you merits. They'll give you even less and less as you end up on more ignore lists.

I have a question for the OP. Where do you regularly get these questions from?

He takes them out of his ass.

[libert19]

Few people have actually responded to the topic, which is saddening. I'll take notes on criticism tho, and typo has been corrected — my whole life was a lie but then again, as long as one can understand what word is implied, it should be ok, no?

[Mia Chloe]

So I have observed this phenomena on the forum where signatures campaigners are often condemned (don't think it's right word tho) while bounty managers who also get the work same way as bounty participants do but are still seen in positive light.

Anybody condemning signature campaigns in general and is actually wearing one isn't even worth a discussion with if you ask me. Like others have said also, you have created a lot of drama starting and controversial threads in the last couple of months and it's actually getting buggy.

You should consider locking this topic already because all you'll probably see after this is either gonna be criticism of same reiterations of what's been said already.

[IjawMan]

I see this as hypocrisy. What do you think?

Sorry, but a phenomenon you observed without showing an example to where this condemnation may have been mentioned gives your observation no weight to consider it.

In my little time in the forum I have observed that what users condemns is not the campaigns but what it may represent and the quality of overall accepted participants and their behaviours.

[AakZaki]

No wonder you keep getting reprimanded for constantly complaining about things that aren't important and flooding the Meta section with threads that don't add value at all. If you want to post on this Meta, at least stick to memes. That's the only thing you seem to be able to produce like here.

I also have a meme for you

[GeorgeJohn]

Few people have actually responded to the topic, which is saddening. I'll take notes on criticism tho, and typo has been corrected — my whole life was a lie but then again, as long as one can understand what word is implied, it should be ok, no?

There's no criticism here, everyone is telling you the fact, but it's left for you to accept your mistake or you continue to make same mistake in meta section.. when you make good point everyone will queue with you..nobody hates each other here,  my peace of advice is that, try to make a research before you create a thread....

[NotATether]

I also have a meme for you
~snip

I hope this "meme" template doesn't go viral here. It looks visually awful.

[vapourminer]

I see this as hypocricy. What do you think?

I have a question for the OP. Where do you regularly get these questions from?

might be he just scans for old threads that have lots of replies/merits and recreates them.

[libert19]

I see this as hypocricy. What do you think?

I have a question for the OP. Where do you regularly get these questions from?

might be he just scans for old threads that have lots of replies/merits and recreates them.

No, I don't. I get thoughts and I create these threads. I still have plenty ideas in backlog, but Imma keep 'em there... it just feels dangerous to post 'em now.

[khatarnak]

might be he just scans for old threads that have lots of replies/merits and recreates them.

That is what Bitcointalk has become these days.
Same old topics, different packaging.

[Lucius]

Please stop creating threads in Meta for any reason.

You've done this nine times in just over a month.

Questions;:

A) Will his shitty manager reward him for his extra activity?

B) Will his shitty manager remove him from the campaign?

C) Does he realize that he is causing more bad than good to what he is promoting in his signature?

The above questions can serve as a starting point for some of the new phenomenal topics we will witness in the coming period

[libert19]

Oh how I wish I should have made this thread self-moderated, because all this off-topic stuff needs to go. But, oh well.

Oh how I wish I should have made this thread self-moderated, because all this off-topic stuff needs to go. But, oh well.

I know you have no idea, but it's not possible to create self-moderated topics in Meta.

Oh fine then.

[Lucius]

Oh how I wish I should have made this thread self-moderated, because all this off-topic stuff needs to go. But, oh well.

I know you have no idea, but it's not possible to create self-moderated topics in Meta.

[MarryWithBTC]

might be he just scans for old threads that have lots of replies/merits and recreates them.

No, I don't. I get thoughts and I create these threads. I still have plenty ideas in backlog, but Imma keep 'em there... it just feels dangerous to post 'em now.

If i were you, I'll keep my ideas to myself. People are pissed off already.

Your ideas are not so bad per say, if they were coming from junior members, but coming from a legend like you seems too basic.

Just take a break from creating posts, relax, everyone will be fine without new topics being created.