Bitcoin doesn't belong to the institutions

[YellowSwap]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Just because so many people aren't into Bitcoin yet is why it's looking like the truth, we the people own Bitcoin, because let's say each and every humans in the world invest $100 into Bitcoin we will surpass the whole institutions investment in Bitcoin.




Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

[_act_]

Who is saying that? I have not heard about it before. Bitcoin is for everyone. If you have your money right now to buy bitcoin, you can buy it as it is always readily available for sale to buy.

About 4 to 5% of the people in the world that have bought bitcoin. As time goes on, more people will be interested as old generations are gradually reducing.

[Bitcoin-Forever]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Combine all the institutional investors together and they still never worth the global adoption rate each individual of is contributing towards bitcoin adoption, you should know that bitcoin is not centralized and that is why they cannot always be found being the highest category of holders when it's comes to bitcoin, whales are just fortunate to have a strong investing capacity but does not centralize the entire network in their direction to make decision on how or when the market you rise and fall.

[Junii]

Institutions can't win over the public in this case.

So you mean unity is strength and that is right but unfortunately it is not possible because every human being have different ideology about the investment . Bitcoin was made for freedom that not a single person or any other entity have control over it because it is decentralized and have a limited supply but as the elites and big institutional players are accumulating bitcoin as large holders can influence the price by buying or selling huge amounts.  So after some time if any one weather it is strategy or black rock or any other big whale have majority of the supply they will easily disturb the whole crypto market and we will see the real manipulation  .

[Lucius]

~snip~
Just because so many people aren't into Bitcoin yet is why it's looking like the truth, we the people own Bitcoin, because let's say each and every humans in the world invest $100 into Bitcoin we will surpass the whole institutions investment in Bitcoin.

Did you know that data for 2026 shows that 2.6 billion people still lack access to the internet? We are left with just under 6 billion people who have access to the internet, and of that number perhaps 1-2% own or have owned Bitcoin. Do you realize how astronomically far-fetched what you're writing about is?

Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

Realistically, whoever has the money wins because the market is open to anyone who wants to buy Bitcoin. At this point, most coins are still in the possession of private individuals, but how many people will be able to say no to selling when the price reaches a level that financially satisfies them?

[citywise2]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Actually one of the highlights of bitcoin is that it is designed to be boarder less and non centralized, but the buying power of the institutions  still gives them some comparative advantage to be able to jolt the price as we have seen from time to time, however the market is seen to sooner than later neutralise and contain any offset.

[Popkon6]

Investing in Bitcoin is a must for every person, because every person has a future. If you invest money in Bitcoin, then of course you can be the luckiest from it in the future and Bitcoin will play a significant role in changing your fate. There will come a time when every person will be enthusiastic enough to invest in Bitcoin, then there will be a huge demand for Bitcoin in the market. At that time, people will regret why they did not invest in Bitcoin in the past.
For example, those who were deprived of Bitcoin investment in the past are regretting it now, and those who are deprived of Bitcoin investment now will regret it later. In this situation, you should definitely invest in Bitcoin because if you invest in it in the long term, it will definitely be possible to succeed in Bitcoin investment.

[reagansimms]

The reason behind central banks around the world's anxiety is because of the six words that make up the sentence "Bitcoin doesn't belong to the institutions". It's clear that Bitcoin doesn't belong to an institution because it has no CEO, it can't be printed arbitrarily, it can't be confiscated if you keep it in a personal wallet, and the rules are in everyone's hands. It's okay for institutions to get into Bitcoin, but they are just players, not owners of the field.

Although institutions are able to purchase large amounts of Bitcoin, for example 10,000 Bitcoins at a time, they must follow the rules, 10 minutes for 1 block, halving every 4 years and cannot inflate the supply. Buying Bitcoin is not the same as buying shares, for example, BlackRock buys 30% of a company's shares, they can change the directors, but if they buy 30% of Bitcoin from the total available supply, they just become a "whale", the rules remain the same.

So, Bitcoin belongs to anyone willing to run a node and maintain the network, to the parking attendant who regularly performs DCA, to you and to me. This is the reason why many people are willing to do DCA in the long term because this is the first time in history that we can hold a truly neutral asset.

[hd49728]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

I am countering back your stance here.

Bitcoin is for everyone and if you want to use a word "belong", Bitcoin belongs to everyone, every institutions that can purchase bitcoin and hold bitcoin. In my opinion, which is opposite to yours, it's not right to prohibit anyone, any entity to access and own bitcoin.

It's a public blockchain that welcome everyone to use, and there is a free Bitcoin market for everyone to access for buying and selling Bitcoin.
Decentralized, freedom, and welcome everyone but people as individuals or institutions can get bitcoin by either buying it or mining it or accepting it as payments.

[Plutomanian]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Just because so many people aren't into Bitcoin yet is why it's looking like the truth, we the people own Bitcoin, because let's say each and every humans in the world invest $100 into Bitcoin we will surpass the whole institutions investment in Bitcoin.




Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

Do you think everybody would want to buy bitcoin if handed a $100 bill right away ?
I get your logic but the truth still remains that the institutions would still have the upper hand because they still have the larger purchasing power and there are people whom bitcoin still looks and seems complicated to and if handed a $100 bill, I doubt if they would have any single interest in wanting to buy or hold the coin.

So yes, bitcoin can be owned by anyone who can afford to buy it but the whales still have upper hands in the market.

[Alpha Marine]

I have never heard anybody make this statement in this context.
If you own something, then you should have control over it, but no single person or entity has control over Bitcoin. I also don't believe that normal folks like us own Bitcoin in this context. Bitcoin belongs to nobody in particular.
The only context where anybody owns Bitcoin is when they hold BTC in their address or spend it.

It's one thing to say institutions hold more influence on the market since they hold more Bitcoin; it's another thing to say they own Bitcoin. They wouldn't be wrong if people say institutions have more influence. That is simply the laws of economics at play.

[stompix]

Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

The only one who doesn't understand ^*&^ here is you!

Institutions are not some magical creatures, Microsoft doesn't go whoring with the money it makes, Nvidia doesn't pay alimony, and I haven't seen Google gambling in Las Vegas, they all represent their investors. What those institutions make or buy or hold are the assets of the people that held shares in it or own it.

Also, the $100 is dumb as fuck, 800 million people live on less than $2 a day, of course, they are magically going to fart $100 and buy Bitcoin with it, lol.

I love how socialists try to find their way in the most capitalistic of all things in the universe right now!

[bitbollo]

In general you had to see bitcoin as an alternative system to classic fiat system.
I dont see this an effective solution...using FIAT as unit of measure. Just because it's much easier they can print/borrow/ get more money than plebs.
Bitcoin has not been created to be an instruments to be rich. It makes you "rich" (or give certain advantage) because it's much more effective and fuctional than classic standard fiat.

[Spaceman1000$]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Just because so many people aren't into Bitcoin yet is why it's looking like the truth, we the people own Bitcoin, because let's say each and every humans in the world invest $100 into Bitcoin we will surpass the whole institutions investment in Bitcoin.




Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

The idea of everybody contributing $100 is not visible, give the institutions their flower for heavily investing in Bitcoin, Bitcoin is just like an open market everybody has the prerogative to invest, so if the institutions come with huge amount of money to invest in what they see as an opportunity, I don't think anybody should see that as an issue. I think that there is really no dichotomy or differences when comes to investment, there are individuals that prefer to invest their money in institutions because they trust those institutions not to fail, there are some individuals that take it upon themselves to invest and take the risks on their own, this does not make any rivalry between institutions and individuals, Bitcoin is an open market for everybody to invest.

[HustleZ]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Just because so many people aren't into Bitcoin yet is why it's looking like the truth, we the people own Bitcoin, because let's say each and every humans in the world invest $100 into Bitcoin we will surpass the whole institutions investment in Bitcoin.




Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

Bitcoin doesnt belong to anyone alone, it belongs to everyone. its true institutions have most of the supply in their hands but it doesnt make them owners of bitcoin other than their own. they do not control or own bitcoin as a whole which makes it for everyone. and speaking of everyone investing $100, then it is impossible due to several reasons and i wont discuss it here, i dont think there is a reason or need to beat the istitutions, everyone should invest how ever much they can.

[YOSHIE]

Institutions can't win over the public in this case, unless Bitcoin seize to exists, those who don't really understand now will one day see reason why they need to invest in Bitcoin.

They don't say that Bitcoin belongs to a government agency, they don't say that Bitcoin belongs to a company, in fact they are aware and know that Bitcoin is a decentralized asset, we understand this plus it has a limited supply.

Even though institutions are aware that they cannot win the hearts of the public and that Bitcoin does not belong to them, we can see that many large global institutions are competing to invest in Bitcoin, all of this is not done without reason, they believe and believe that Bitcoin has value and is an asset. the best of all time and worthy of being a digital asset of the future.

With the nature that Bitcoin has without anyone regulating Bitcoin and having the nature of being open to the public, all elements of society and being able to access the Bitcoin network anywhere, it actually makes global financial institutions choose investments, different from the general public, which manyhave doubts for Bitcoin.

[buwaytress]

So, Bitcoin belongs to anyone willing to run a node and maintain the network, to the parking attendant who regularly performs DCA, to you and to me.

Well, I might not go quite so far as to say the you and mes who really don't have much to say for the direction of Bitcoin...  I might idealise and say you and me could choose to run a node and vote for decisions as well, but just because we could doesn't mean we would ever. I've been happily following what seems to be the majority.

We hold the keys to our coin, and pretty much it stops there. That's... not such a bad thing in itself.

[ColdLava40]

People need to stop saying that because institutions are now buying Bitcoin heavily, they own bitcoin, or with this, Bitcoin distribution is now a problem on this part, I believe it's not true .

Just because so many people aren't into Bitcoin yet is why it's looking like the truth, we the people own Bitcoin, because let's say each and every humans in the world invest $100 into Bitcoin we will surpass the whole institutions investment in Bitcoin. .

There's no ownership of Bitcoin, it doesn't belong to any one. Bitcoin is not something a single entity can own nor control.

If people says it belongs to the institutions, they should ask their self, how many portion of Bitcoin have the institutions combined with the government been able to accumulate? It's not up to the percentage of Bitcoins that are held by Bitcoiner or investors.

It's even better not to listen to what many people say because some either want to create fud or just lack knowledge of what they are saying.

[tbct_mt2]

About 4 to 5% of the people in the world that have bought bitcoin. As time goes on, more people will be interested as old generations are gradually reducing.

The middle aged people and the elderly can feel hard to accept Bitcoin because they basically struggle to adapt to modern technologies, not only Bitcoin, as well as don't want to take too much risk. They are old and want to have something safe as they don't need to get richer a lot at their old ages, and they aim at a peaceful life at last years of their lifespans.

With the young people, they have more reasons to find opportunities to get richer, have more time to make mistakes, get losses and come back after that. That explains why young people are generations which accept Bitcoin and this changes with time.

I agree with you too, time will change demographics, and Bitcoin demographics will become better, young people now will become the elderly in the future but at this time, such elderly will be Bitcoiners.

https://coin.dance/stats#demographics

[rat03gopoh]

This perception is partly based on the assumption that Bitcoin is the sole source of capital, even though institutions can also obtain it through seizures, public offerings, and other means. They are only entitled to a portion of what they call operating costs and dividends; and as a consequence, they are responsible for the public trust and are subject to legal oversight.