It looks like you took a lot of inspiration in design from kycnot.me website, but it's silly to list fullKYC products like Coinbase or Bybit card
I do not think it can be termed inspiration
. It is an exact copy, with the header image and logo being changed. To get the Crypto.com card, a user needs to pass KYC. That is another product listed on a website that promotes non-KYC products.
I don't think this is true. Out of the 13 services you have listed so far, only 3 don't require KYC verification. This is totally against the point of your directory.
Clicking on the exchanges filter and the No KYC will still bring up all the 6 exchanges that you have so far listed and all require KYC verification.
Fair points, all three. Thanks for taking the time to actually look.
On the KYC-required listings — you're right, and I won't argue it. Those entries came from seeding the catalog at launch and they contradict what the site is for. The card products are being removed rather than kept as filler. Since these posts I've added actual no-KYC services: DEX.fo, Bmix, MixTum, BitList among them.
On the filter — the KYC levels are set correctly in the database (cards marked full KYC, exchangers partial, no-KYC ones marked as such), so if the "No KYC" filter returns services that require verification, that's a filtering bug rather than a false claim about the services. Looking into it now.
On the design — the layout follows conventions KYCNOT.me established for this kind of directory, and I'm not going to pretend the influence isn't there. Where it diverges is in what the site actually does:
- Live exchange rate monitor — rates pulled directly from exchangers' own XML feeds, refreshed every 15 seconds, ranked by rate with limits and reserves per offer, amount entry in either direction, city selection for cash directions. This is a rate aggregator built into the directory, not a listing feature.
- Cryptographic verification on listings — a service can publish a PGP key or a Bitcoin signing address, and a signed message can be verified in the browser on the listing page itself. Useful for confirming a mirror or an announcement actually comes from the operator rather than a phishing clone.
- Structured mixer data — fee bands, execution time bands and supported coins as a filterable section rather than prose descriptions.
- Account model — no email, no password. A generated key is shown once and that's the whole credential. Nothing to leak, nothing to correlate.
- Mirrors that are actually mirrors — Tor and I2P versions load zero third-party scripts. No analytics, no external fonts, no requests leaving the network you arrived through. The clearnet version is not equivalent in that respect and I don't claim it is.
Whether that adds up to enough differentiation is a reasonable thing to argue about. But "exact copy with the logo changed" is checkable in about thirty seconds, and it isn't that.
If you know services that belong here — there's a submission form on the site, and contacts at kycless.cc/contact. Suggestions sent that way get reviewed and added, and corrections to existing listings get acted on.
The catalog is thin, that's the honest state of it. It gets better as services are submitted and reviewed, and faster when people point at what's broken — which is what you've just done.
